It is neither exclusively Portuguese-Chinese, but both, and can be garrisoned by one or the other; neither is the supposition that it has never been occupied by our Troops, correct, for not only circumstances than say require it; but less year ago a Portuguese force actually stationed there for some months, and the very gate which exists at present was made by the Portuguese Government without any opposition on the part of the Chinese Authorities - nor indeed, could they offer any by right. Under these circumstances, the temporary occupation of the Gate cannot be regarded, the Council have already observed, in the light of an usurpation or violation of territory, which justify the act commenced against aggression as would us on the 24th Instant by the Chinese force at the fort of Pacassins, who were the first to fire upon the Portuguese Troops. - So order that the Portuguese might retain their position without being harassed by the Chinese, it was necessary to dislodge the Chinese force from the fort, and the adjacent positions occupied by them, and this was effected the same evening with the most fortunate results on our part, our force at the conclusion of the expedition returning to the Barrier, where it is at present stationed.
The Council are of opinion that the explanations above given completely elucidate the essential points of the question, and that your Excellency will thereby clearly perceive the position in which this Government and the Chinese are placed with respect to it.
It now remains to thank your Excellency for the promptness with which the wishes ...