54
She becal wurls have intron place on the 18th Deliber, but it was portfirmed A certif . Lo heen (con - a material intress. What Roheen Feen wich ham said where told but doheen been : we are was the farby
riginally accused, by Farrant, of comption, and comprador and, of course, ander his rifluence: Why was he not falh. was hajor Caine's forth If co couse the bral would not be rcoming Crine. Hr. Bonhams, who has not proceeded with for "want of wordence". For the whole wiidence against Janant was the undeffuted, minchrobable, story of a Chinese, Rosan, What Farrant had come to kind and Directly solicited him to bear false-witness against major Sirically made himself thoroughly acquainted with the Janant does not deng Pafos, sage and God. Sie sehr Paris said the same the thing before. He does deny it, in the most dishnet manner possible, in his Letter on the sccasion of his suspention, 5th Augt 1947. The rest of the this Charge: T Evidence in the depositions (repeated bechod. Bonhand in his last flexpatch) adds, in reality, nothing whatever to Un case.
portferned. If came on The Trial wat acerdigh again at the Decembre was absent agai Sessions. Loheen Feen has absconded from the Colony (10 The recognizances, Ever service. Th of The Crown, were being no suffierent Ended. sagt Janant) in the molin 14 accordingly discharged there no sufficient wiidence". And so the matter
The tone reason Ir. Farrant ashed why. was not assigned to him. The stringe which was assigned lone, that the Kial was selinquished because the Athenex Zenual who had admind An the case. (Colonial Secretary's Letter Ze aren f January 1848) silage le bord. alleged in Md. Bonham's Berbatch of 19th June (4 and the same false Grey 1664 Hongkong) no doubt for misinfomation on du. Conham's part, who had not not long arrived
I cannot avoid coming to the conclusion, that no Final war really intended. She Farrants Inspensions. object was abwined by det. Fenault' desfentione
After re-examining the text and following the instructions:54
She becal wurls have intron place on the 18th Deliber, but it was port firmed A certif. Lo heen (con - a material intress. What Roheen Feen wich ham said where told but doheen been : we are was the farby
riginally accused, by Farrant, of corruption, and comprador and, of course, under his influence: Why was he not falh. was Major Caine's forth If co couse the bral would not be rcoming Crine. Mr. Bonhams, who has not proceeded with for "want of evidence". For the whole evidence against Janant was the undeffuted, improbable, story of a Chinese, Rosan, What Farrant had come to kind and Directly solicited him to bear false-witness against Major Sirically made himself thoroughly acquainted with the Janant does not deny Pafos, sage and God. Sie sehr Paris said the same thing before. He does deny it, in the most dishonest manner possible, in his Letter on the occasion of his suspension, 5th Augt 1847. The rest of the this Charge: T Evidence in the depositions (repeated bechod. Bonhand in his last dispatch) adds, in reality, nothing whatever to Un case.
port firmed. If came on The Trial wat acerdigh again at the Decembre was absent agai Sessions. Loheen Feen has absconded from the Colony (10 The recognizances, Ever service. Th of The Crown, were being no sufficient Ended. sagt Janant) in the molin 14 accordingly discharged there no sufficient evidence". And so the matter
The tone reason Mr. Farrant ashed why. was not assigned to him. The stringe which was assigned lone, that the Kial was selinquished because the Athenex Zenual who had admind An the case. (Colonial Secretary's Letter January 1848) silage le bord. alleged in Md. Bonham's dispatch of 19th June (4 and the same false Grey 1664 Hongkong) no doubt for misinformation on Mr. Bonham's part, who had not not long arrived
I cannot avoid coming to the conclusion, that no Final war really intended. She Farrants Suspensions. object was abwined by det. Fenault' desfentione
Here is the corrected version in HTML format:54
She becal wurls have intron place on the 18th Deliber, but it was port firmed A certif. Lo heen (con - a material intress. What Roheen Feen wich ham said where told but doheen been : we are was the farby
riginally accused, by Farrant, of corruption, and comprador and, of course, under his influence: Why was he not falh. was Major Caine's forth If co couse the bral would not be rcoming Crine. Mr. Bonhams, who has not proceeded with for "want of evidence". For the whole evidence against Janant was the undeffuted, improbable, story of a Chinese, Rosan, What Farrant had come to kind and Directly solicited him to bear false-witness against Major Sirically made himself thoroughly acquainted with the Janant does not deny Pafos, sage and God. Sie sehr Paris said the same thing before. He does deny it, in the most dishonest manner possible, in his Letter on the occasion of his suspension, 5th Augt 1847. The rest of the this Charge: T Evidence in the depositions (repeated bechod. Bonhand in his last dispatch) adds, in reality, nothing whatever to Un case.
port firmed. If came on The Trial wat acerdigh again at the Decembre was absent agai Sessions. Loheen Feen has absconded from the Colony (10 The recognizances, Ever service. Th of The Crown, were being no sufficient Ended. sagt Janant) in the molin 14 accordingly discharged there no sufficient evidence". And so the matter
The tone reason Mr. Farrant ashed why. was not assigned to him. The stringe which was assigned lone, that the Kial was selinquished because the Athenex Zenual who had admind An the case. (Colonial Secretary's Letter January 1848) silage le bord. alleged in Md. Bonham's dispatch of 19th June (4 and the same false Grey 1664 Hongkong) no doubt for misinformation on Mr. Bonham's part, who had not not long arrived
I cannot avoid coming to the conclusion, that no Final war really intended. She Farrants Suspensions. object was abwined by det. Fenault' desfentione