convinced that the arrangement that there has been made for that
hire the
and
Julie's services on there
and some principle that the scheme to Wollen.
the Interpreters occasions will be prepared - agreement made for that the cost of the Interpretation
" purpose is a desirable that payment by the Rule in
a
one
as
ought to have
been effected. &
question as if
Zugen which appear to me
to understand it rightly not further explanation there
only is the interpreter's payment in civil cases.
between on the Suitors beg
rule,
way of fees instead of on the Government in itself, perhaps of
hit in cost. and
Efficiency
Criminal cases
the
remuneration for this fact of though mixed by the
his duties also in thrown
a
ordinary
the suitor in civil cases; for the amount
I can express myself satisfied of fair to be taken in the manner latter must be regulated,
with it. It throws the
interpreter's payment,
civil cases, on the suitors
hardly an
to suffice for
the entire payment of
the
Civil Suits.
Should the
231
view which I have taken
of this rule be incorrect I shall be happy to have
my
errors.
in the form of per in cash or salary for all his duties. pressed by
on the Public. This is far from a measure of doubtful expediency in French, but;
the Supreme Court and Legislature Commit
to
Law
As
or,
in the worst, if he were paid in part by fee
impression such as you
Explanation
salary for his actions
may
think proper to
4
the criminal cases,
the
effect me
5
duly fixed fees in the civil cases
Interpreter is to be repaid sufficient reason for adopting world to proportionally left.
to act without any
fees it in the present instance
whatever, which implies
But it appears also that
no fees
are allowed in Criminal cases, a actions In Matters
that his remuneration
of were laws. II Allow