100
from the consequences ophis act, repeating whed the strong evidence
of uneral tea faring luglishmen will be found enclosed.
The annexed papers will show
that M. Hulme had no better ground for this proceeding ther the hearing
lvidance
of
der hackin's own stewerd,
and her Larkin's personal declaration
that the Chinese Plainting had recovered his tapel, but not his Cargo, which was all metted
Jans
6.611.
Jour Lordship with the amare
that I had obtained for this same be tacking the sum of you
oo Dollars
from the Chinese Jovernment on the
here
lost
allegation of his having
by the temporary
A that amount be the
detention of his treamer at Canton.
The petition of the Chinese Plaintiff
and the english leidence in his case
are annexed & this.
Under the circumstances of ay
repeated pledges theying on the
hubject