The Chinese Plaintiff, that pertow
und beer advised to commence
Board of Ti
proceedings
in die Supreme Court,
and to avail himself of
the
Law in favour
provision of
of poor suitors, by peltirning
be allowed to one in forma pauperis
In came seedia
petition
pushie Hulme as
before thief
A
matter of course.
The Law Adviser report, that the
Polition ought
mitted; mishand
to have been ad-
which the
Judge allowed thie Befendent
to then cause.
against it, and
H
94
rejected it. But, although this
may have been mistrust, according
to English practic, got, according
both to prachen and reason, the
defendant must have been admitted
at one
Huge
or another to chers,
of he could, that the Plaintiff
no pauper, and thus to protict
west
himself from the certagnanced of
Consegnences
The Affilications, namely,
te de:
: privation of
his costs in cate
The
of decrefs. In afflication to
success.
den in
Forma pauperis is to the
disachin of
The
Court algae and