of
91
Board of Tra
Court
of Appeal.
I am not sure whether the
Tourigin Office ought not, in strictuels, to have
submitted this Ordinance to Lord Gray before they
dent it to the Law Officers,
as it affects the
positions of a Colonial judge, though in respect of a jurisdiction between British subjects and foreigners. However, as they approve of it, nothing need be said : though, otherwise, I ch?, perhaps, have questioned the utility of ar
of Aschnal, in such cases,
cases, considering
a Court.
that the
finde is, hardly, likely to be a Lawyer of much
disbuchons .
tom.
For 23. The whole enc
concluded. The fendage is condemned,
q
the Chinaman compourates, & bea
purisdiction within to exercised
exercent o the fange in similar was taken
Jam
to passare, caustioned array. as way these has been by hand
Salmantin & the
kat
for offices
live he
perpenly. But cunnet unser in the remach stark Palmeen
of hard
}
Mail Mar
dission yhen fase exford
the Chinamon fare compensation.
Cabe buil
the page dise
his application to the
of
leifen the facts sten
C
buDay
to sepers
Panfe.
lue
given the condens esten Juge don
bat wnnant the opinion expensed.
he Fu: office is quite
f
austing connected with the Juge <
bis quants, wote tue frd.
Loc
Auguing wote du. Meisace that
7 likely
bs. Balor, it is important that in
has suffered
justice
A
in whiche
Le
that it shared be fully explained to
fol P. kint from
Scaresty
of injustine
agerne
the present Untiment
the imputation
hine. I therefor
Whe
ufen
with to minimale.
I conem in this Sprint " _ Ishd also conceive that instead of untheraging die 1. Davis to pay the amount of loss it, i have been perfectly posible to
direct him to
the Chines
Λ
Cance
Alaintiff to be informed that any reasonable & moderate prosents his claim u be paid by the
low with mcused in
Ith Godt such an assurance
I have removed any
any diffi =
culty in Stains the series of a member of the lynl profeft" in brings the case besnother coust. - B. 29/