8.

23d of July had subsequently required mirification - Did you ever

the statement to

&

Bumpelf?

modify

A. I do not recollect that I did;

because I was never distsi

distinctly

acquainted with the real particulare

until they appeared Q. At the time

my

in

the evidence.

" you spoke to me on

Retium from Chusan, with a

to the recurrence of the 2300 Reference to the seem

fe

of fuely, did not you of the judge as opposed to those

view the habité

sobriety .

of

4. I did - But I spoke of things not directly within my.

(beyond the

Knowledge,

occurrences to which I

have already deposed) and that opinion

has been totally altered

Aestimony

I by

the

that, has been received

in the course

of thire investigations.

Irue Extract.

Littmare (ette)

block of formeils.

in

9

193

:

Share This Page