having
omit the remark Mat there
been thus refrated, although but at the same time. I cannot Iachwoohdy that your Anpatch ti megtalfe of the 22? May lack in left thing and an equivront, than Forgate of gwer Baf. to Lnd
6-
Valmerston
of
mag last
thin 28t hers. For
collating this his Papaliter together I have, inde), traded in control emailing them with each
the
obten. De van Persie of tin 284
Nov.
Ar
Jm
describe Mr. Hulme as
Political dunhard, and stati
that gone have geurselfe oflin witressed and defphored that fact. You designate him as "Filonus» and
conlast this vahe
with the value
of
of
his services.
This Services
"
which a Tober judge w. uender.
de her Bache: of the 22? mag zou
speak of gour
own
conclusions with
regard to Mr. Hulme, as though
In charge of balitual dunkenness
the
had been advanced by gon
as
is a difference which I um
ut a loss to understand between The language of
+ which you
στ
term "the
pimiciful orcomenil though this vigiant accused".
a conclusion or inference which
Gon
And drawn from the
62
tishning
of others, and not as a matter- fast which you had geselsen flin witnessed. Instead of securing to this charge of holitical drunkennesß you have now alluded to what's ducated at "the Complintate" (whations that may be ) and
rome accus
B
ma which look place
on the one occasion the of Keyings
Last visit to doughing (omation thab-securrence may have dean)
You abfear to admit that the alleged
habit has been abandoned since
the whinen of hd. Hulmet
Family
of
from England; and gen ohrak oh
حمن
as a
"habit which occurred
when his Family were absent. "
Whellen I am to wederländ
Jen
still adhering to your original declarations that tie Ch: Justice
was an
Thank
halilmal dunkard - that