+
of that notice, it purper. ted to be the Act of the Supreme Court? But
the meaning
enough; and
was obvious
I regret
that M Huline should in
such a Carrespondence,
have thought it judicions
to write rather
Q Y
a
Grammarian, and as
a crite
on traccuracies
of style, than
ast A
publi
Offen, dessering to expediti
Her Majesty's
Service. But-
of this wast
an error
This side, it was
349
to address to the Judge
A
letter, in which his
remark was contemptuously
(and unjustly / denounced,
AS
" por featly unintelligible,
and in which the
threatened with the penal
Consequences of his
Avon
-attendance at the Court-
never
although he had intrinated that he meant to absent himself,
had given
given you any
readon
to
asorche
duck av intention to
much
mae
Dereines
mistake on
on your
own
t
Que
hind.
Yo
Lv Ere
clearly
right in maintaining
that.