.1
L.
Court.
4. The omission
was also discus
teens, because the day fixed might, for ought the Governor could know, have interfered with some of the
judge's judicial duties, public or private
5. The notere itself.
up in such terms,
was dracond
as to make it
at least doubtful whether it did
not purport to come from the Supreive
Const. Aranding
to
meve Grannnationl
consturation, such would be the proper reading of the notice; the only "Count " acpressly mentioned in the noter, by the of a Count, being the Supreme Court,
hame.
Yet the bleef Justice must have indentos the real meaning, and ought not, I think, to have affected, to misunderstand it.
The Secretary's letter to home of the 19% of Apiel seems to me to have been a improper letter. It describers
rude
Ro
and
an
"perfectly emintelligible "," the objections
t
•
343
to the form of the notice, though there objections
evere
as it deems to me,
both
clear, and (in absolute strictness, well
to the Judge founded. It conveys
intance.
of the
consequences of his now
attendance, although he had never
the least reason to chiffese.
*
never given
that he
meant to absent himself. The rebuke
for his assuring the title of Land dif Juster is conveyed
in d
harsh and
offension tone, this Excellency will not aller
Such also is the tone of the
ہوا کرتے
rebuke for writing, through his clerk, to the Colonial hautary. In this last rabutte the Indge
reminded that, not long
کیا ہے
before, the Colonial Scentury. Administrator of
the Government, had
to
takes precedences of himself; remark calculated, if not designed,
I can see / quite
gove pain, & /s for
beside the purpose.
رها
7. The controversy respecting the miles
7