4.
then
existed, for all money really forrowed constituted a debt.-
Neither that, nor Mr Young' claim, would ever have been
noticed, except in consequence
this was
of Mr Shelley's uncalled for fortestation of intere pectom "frm debt, "followes "immediately by the oftration of Spring's claim, when he feared
his debtor
was
ad
quitting
the
Along. Mr Shelley's Inclosure proved the fact that Springs, his former Clot, did really
on
that obtrude his claim me at the time. General
"Aguilar
I'
was with me
when he brought it, and endeavoured to persuade us
Shelley that day to pay
miel.
pay it at
The
The
APR 23
1847
198
lety Enclosure goed
not "refute" the proof before forwarder to Your Loirship, of another claim advanced
the part of Mr Young....
I should not have
Now
noticed what Mr Shelley states as to my having denied his ability to pay his bett to his former Clerks, excepts to observe, that if I either felt
or
a
expressed met
fear of the poor man losing his all, I possess written proof of its not having been altogether unfounded,
in
noter from the
very person who, at Mr Shelley's
Las advance urgent request,
the money for Spring's payment, arsing "we don't like such transactions, but