SUPREM
COERT.
Thursday, 10th Angast. --E-APPRÍLATE JURISDICTION,
DEMORY SITE Ty moors (Enter-Jes)
SAND. MR. A. U. Wine (Potass Judon).
A QUESTION OF OWNERSHIP. ·
EK LAM TUNU AND THE NAM LONG
Toir Loxlship red judgments in tuis inatier web d. lisered.
H
this
TOT
THE LONG HING
#
55
PHOTO COMPETITION FOR AMATEURS
$220.00 IN PRIZES.
THE HONGKONG" SALY PRESS, FRIDAY, AUGUST 1178, 1905.)
atague Court below. The obrious conclusion, of course, tint a care has been "d cided on insufficient strenuously urged in the earlier
or ab at wouhl that this theory was elabonited at a evideo ad hat the evidence proposed to be of the caso. It appears that on
assured that 24th March, 1905, an application was made jaar date; however, we are zudiced would be sufficient to a Bo Court to di cover time tratti, that would in Chimbora on behalf of the appellante sue was not the case, and that being so. I cau for a commission to or mine witnesses in fron only way that it je beyond tay рекега ups fol ground for adming the w -evi vend“!
With all respect in the learned and other pinces. TL's apple.tion was refused to furnish an explanation
The only other judge it soong to me impossible to give by the then cting Chastice. No reasons extr ordinary omission.
evidence us to the letters is that
There three words their apparent meaning.
for a rolne were given, but a prensal of the They are dametrical y ppow to the prin papere in connection with the opuli ation points wit at three writers of the first four. tiple of "rers-other chit. If the fact that to su exploration. At boy rate, the application which is rather against the theory that the the ardone propel to be adue-d would must have fren opposed on bet it of the phin letters were concceted on board, although, as te salicient red for adm toong it on the tiff (respondent), No stops were i ken to set are sail that theory is contrailted by a
As I have already stated that in heuring, terwould be no point in the axide this refusal mixt the rare caug on for trinter one,
admileted. remarks-of-tie Mates of the Reds in Sanders before the learned Chief Justice my 18th Jara, opinion further evidence should unt
Pemains to on-ider whether, an the bris Hour the Chief Justico mid;~ This
anders that the paight.k veb-21 shaped 1), and following axe, so th the appellants was a motion to go the judgment of the bitter is one holow: 280 for laying had more than two monks in whics to appel material before me, the judgment appelo from const helow on the trial this notin, toit dewn as rude rerel, to be departed from that gain at the refus à and of which they look so much in the weight of evidenos advantage. Furing the terug in the ort th it ought not to be allowed to stand, and unter judgment for the defendants. A motion fresh evide shall not be introduced tecansa was nie to admit farther evidenc
nolig is me dangerous in allow it below the appellants made no nove in this that the ants fret application should her dir e iou, even thongs the leaned Chief unitel 1 have already stated the principles gn and that a summons for a commisin to Bert july in ariot 7. Hampden had bre
dane in Saigon and be where had been an app at a stead acin for enzieynd Justice sugested that both part es should whirl I think should guide the Court of Appeal in coming to decision, and following those Chambers that the evides osud nooited, the dog ing lad down by Larut to letters of reques. This suggestion was
stot ared to on b half of the resp adent, and principles to the best of my ability. I'm no prited as obtainable in the sommous or the Justine Lin log have waranted the
the burned Jud did not consider that he had reason why this decision should be dis urbed. I evidence specified in this motive of motion: andra option or the fact that a receipt but in fact tim te julgect of the reert below showed been grey douce on the rebar. ig. war toisene such letters érproprio sute. At the Horongly agree with the learned Chief Jus Terug of the appoutuber of ewew cits time that there was considerable difficulty in bo this evidene to, he essential to just do ision W. as was said judgment tout cuse
There would have bien équille a picable),
en the point in balalf of the appellants, and at matter, but I can only say that several donb's being mind at by this Court.
first the order to further evidence-as efkined that on first read ng the papers hav· dis- alifiost
piter on it was a kid appeared ex further consitenation. are 258 a quitton or ifta ponce, and the age of ninion that the appeal should be dismissed a Cogin Mind, exparle Mashiteru s
on the
Brehendes 1-tasa. Îi xuách Ĺhe right. Eit ad rezondig min 15183
of fact of Appeal to hear far horvidence has bellisses and explained I will how Me bezowy 14 of Ponty to two or three
area the greatest
pant do to pa ter the third menin became they were i
of tapest important decisions. In re Chenal the fist time with ir egy
if my
10 Yiais Nont line is arrongly relied fab
I hate exagit ese and other fri
Fion the 30
Eye em to Plaats in w
tho
neztu it the fun
what further ceflone they high teleggy that they had two of o
ulje mi je to get. But further ild themelves if
IN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION,
York Su P, T. Pusort (Cup
3VICE)
H. MURRAY WAR, U. WAKEMAN,
E
ENTRIES FREE
VALL OR WRITE FOR PARTICULARS.
* NG
Com
· 17 · QUEEN's Road, Central, HONGKONG. LOATING MINES IS CHINA SEAS.
In the House of Communes of July 10th, Lord Muskerry called att, ntion to the grave risks to life and pro erty presented by the great anu ber of bating mine in the Chia Sas outsite terri drial wars, and to sexmalties: ara faused by such mines; and asked whether the Merchant Serice Gits repre en ing dla captais and officers of Beiti-ships din thổ China Sosa, had appealed to the Adminky | Evropal in the destruction of then m na and whether the Admiralty colla dipinte those of is gajesty's Ships n the Chin Station which are available to mode tok, this work of remesing, as far as possible, the ions gor to British shirs which now existed in that quarter of the globe.
hearin of the minich the plaintiff brennan lind been a surprien so far: el. si l Trona the defealant, the trusted in bank- ak the wind Fonery: they a tel with the or he Wai Yig ting sam of $100, even perustances, if the car of returning the sigam launch ext of appeal whrern, freeed they would be
Comjetstar, was enthouet no fa St Bay judgment of Kay dad.
ME IF N. Forrows, instructed by Mr. P. W
| ringa repicemed the pinintiff, and Mr. II. E. Pollock, th instrur ed by Mr C. F. Dixon (oftr. Lastings, office appeared for the
fortaut.
The Maguis of Lalitherow. In sower to
TRADE
30
MARK.
CLARETS.
1 oz.
Bettles.
i aɔz.
Bottles
4 deg.
bottles
$5.78 58.75
8.95
6.2 1.25
87A-
--+976-
-9.75
7,75 10.75
-7.00
8.00
VIN ORDINAIRE $475 COTES.... MIDOG
the noble lord I have to state that to question ST EMILION of the risk to and prop ity to oigh . MARGAUX.... wines in the Chinesa intsid turritorial ST. JULIEN...
To 50 A notice to NT. ISTEPUE
Cos ST. MICHOL starI
in the above crised am strongly of opiniza | Azolaying"f,f":23 essrs. Brüt: en. Hett and Gold. the attentid Puttu mengying
it hat the Brave to u dien ir su evidence is the inception of conspiracy. 1 Tofore a judge "wi, jurỷ, in the ground that! tool wrth this d ́enient nu it stand irrespec. game. Atalant Sis, vinta. Quid i
HI
a
A Ferrous-The document was drawo up On Jaunary 27. stamped on the 30th, anit esented aftere, ds,
The Clint Justic No! M, Murray says and stamped before signature. His words that the second unte was signed on January
immediately before sign ture." are "I got it stamped immo ately afterne,
Mr. Polk questioned him further with regard to the Bill of a
tendered and daring the progress of the case the attention of the Court is called to the Tet tint the dates are wrong, and the ply pussile solution is that it was stamped after dating. Tine unfermesto stamp clerk has
been deceived.
Mr. Porters Deceived: No. ba har maile muistado.
The Chief Justice-No, he has not made mistake: your clint said it was stumped before
execution.
Plaintif was non-suited, and the promisery not was impounded. The nou-shit was without prejudice to the deferunt's rights under the injunction dated May 11, 1905, with respect to dommages.
f nal
-OFFICIAL LIBEL ON HONGKONG.
11,06 800 940 39.00
13:50 14.50 12.50 180 16.50 CIL LEOVILLE... BO 1-440* 17.00 CH. 1AROSE
B.20 166
-17.00
CALIFORNIA
+
AMERICAN
$1.75
+5.75
$8.75
0.75 14,75
⚫ SPANISH.
VALDIPENAS... 8477
H. PRICE & CO.
2,75
1, QUEEN'S ROAD CENTRAL
THE
ROBINSON PIANO CO.,
LIMITED,
A
PIANOFORTE
ITS / LEGED INSALURITY.” If the environment on board a well appointed warshipin Hongkong labour ha notsalubrion", there can be few really healthy places in tho world. In the House of Commons 'n July 26," on the report of the ents of U2,765,000 for thei dockyards, Mr. Whitley moved the reduc ioni of the vote by £100 by way of protest against į farther expenditure on Weitainei, which he described as a bathing establishment. Thourb Weihaiwei had been given-up as aanval hasa or a place of arms, yet lyst year, as well as this, the Honsa e as led to sanction the expendi
Mr. Protyman said it was a mistake 16 suppose that Weihaiwai was nothing more than
f large sums upon it.
bathing establishment. (Herr, hour 1 It was the summer station for the ft in the China necessity for ach a summer station Seas The
from the insalubrity of Hongkong, the MANUFACTURERS Arose shio stat on, in the Hammer. At Wellniwi all. ths neo ssary training and exereia s could be
TUNERS. gene through, and in order to enable the feet to be at anchor behind the island some droging and other operation had to be carried ect. It was not a naval basis in time of war, Int the POLISHERS AND
• and gunga 7 pr-clico. training
REPAIRERS. plecs was merely wil in summer for torpedo Mr. Luras said that he had not proposed to deal with the question of Wai atwel, hat as the hou, meraber opposite had thaght proper to mi-e it, and to raise it in a manner which thing in ght happ n, he would follow the hon. suggested that o'clock was an hour when gentleman's land Ho hoped that the Admiralty. woud n't spend money ssarily nt Weihaiwei.
( Ch. D. 4% fresh ovitone was allowed as to the Lots in the Compu, dan IM bernangis il appared the the art below had hard to and rstand why th
cal elecced up a ouer as to throw chnical dunnted wou d'not bave artist in a ne dificultus in the way of the a ministration of the question whether we make ju fic quest a thou is, was thisex deucecx- the person whose extence hallenged cluded in these below by reason of teclubal Having all cases in the; ourt of Appe to objuana? Without doubt, No. The evidence je upon, 1 must elino rept ta fra was hade by an e der of the Judge in doctrins said ob deri arom, that she
home here was 10 ap en frou tot This motion diy red of, I tone tile fete, Item he pinion I decision; Bundication túng set was rude. 1 sa ne x usou to
thurt caring to traf which won d have rond af erten ing the rise. It is a red. der to raka tur der for this ovalence to from the forms of my dean at tht I s la taki it. It is idla nentend hat the ragga+ prie
riene d cousí truble difíenity in anivong st
but in view of their faghes the yg & not clutitled
mriars indicating trip Zine, has tremad Howie dent the close of the Cial and I, therefore, wathe me questa har
to any indulgence, that fras his part
prommented, unstructions be that L. torf Requa-t, sh nici isso by en what faith argouts coad to advanced on
to His Majipu on the sution to destroy sent, restituted an application on the art of her sid to make the matter clare to my of the appeal goes, it fails. That leaves us on to deal with the first application thi-, new
any wines they may moet ek on the fi: h defor dauts:
renvale ind. I do not find anything to make me
When the case was remanent yesterday the. The effurance of eating minus from to smotinced fo is then 'es officia
n altr the decision arrived at, nor ny of the that the admission of farli er (vidence has her
bús en ta en in hand dethical objection similar te the rubordinate opinions on d forent parts of red, any mean what it sires vin, that the if using call-Thrs a derament which territorial
parpers to have been excónt, on January 26,
by the pairs Governinents. Į al with in Chrunell. In Fanders ve so which went to cugoso he wi ole. I murt decision should be reversed and judgmentonted Sandes (19) Ch. D. 7) dm Court of Appeal however dont will then w suggestion at for the defendat, ori mama tolak
and it bara stamp da ed Janny 30). I wish
A Admienity to
to reperiat analgenee The reasLes given for the saint in my julement that Mr. Ferret judaient was against the might at five the evidence, fir-t-I thought of tron evin daplain laging in those waters, ZINFANDEL
admitted the story
to the fatter No. dobre. Many cans were qu ted to us as to the rising 1 to be stamped and impose the representing the danger to terizati a. transat in list cafe were, that the appella t
hight base adued bevy.d-n is the Court with he nee panying 90; 1 said further, powers of the Court of Appeal in sneh questions, lig, ander sriel of the Stamp Ordin-thi- your e, and asked that His Majesty's ships how ited 1 do no intend going through them at ane but I sen that fils of Exege and Fro might take steps to clear away the min sy but that I did not ind that ho might have shaped his eas however,
Jough. because it seems to me that so many missory Notes all not be stamped after the ordos given on the subject were ho thues but the fetuo: M.E.sid sit on teen could have aecided. Mr. Ferrara said thu
jizes have xpressed the ente principles in sir
Theratury there would appear to
esult of this appeal, but of a provi-us cont- wal, nothing is more dangerous than to allow I misundersto d'in, and the hs admission
hary is many different ways that it would ways be ho un offer undar setion is the duty inunication from ho Japanean sorament His new was quit different," fresh or I erit n to be and after a
easy for counsel either for appet ant or respen the Con 1 tu ret in oil of the roror no and inviting the re-operation of His Majesty's sh p dier-red a Court. The thi
No. 5. only is envelope
gerating; case has bou
not to manife a Begum at, like, 'his Unless on the Ingh seas. 't pout on which evileme is wentvil but to this he adds a somewhat inge.dous dent to call sentences in their own fav nr.
hough the Counsel for the plaintiff can show why it. having has been discovered, to allez feh hyphesis Tha the le tor had in fet bin, Ils, however, to me, that elave-to-b-introduced at tiet stugedeavored, together with tu 20. at this the opina of the Jonge in the art but not done I can reserve the doon
ม. would offer a song to plation to pejargey bad en dis ribat d and, tha tho boleg sitting without a fury-udyo b The point involved in ih prent case is not plaintiff bad in same way or other become for the watakaes), is boud to have great covered by the decisions 1emsivos, but it is possessed of the envelope, and b.d bas d the, weight with the members of the Court of well cover by the principle on which they other furst-ri-s on it. Aenggs stad tas this Appeal, yet ths: his plon is not by a
shind og on them, and if they think it 30 på ̈nf.
Whether, envelope did unt form part of the origin five proe-tai when the or our which it is sught eftere, and had to restion to the 320 alleged merely on the ground that they might not hure to jutrohes se uded for the Court by the plaintiff to have formed part f the $2,600 arrived at the a me opinion themselves) that below after an attempt to got it by e mission, and therefore, challenged my opinion that the evidence did not warrant such a decision; or the ander for a commission having been refnd, there ought to be funga at for the paint.fin other words, that it was unreasonable, then this Court of Appeal ought to admit the now for at 1 ast $20. here is really a ly one point, they will reverse or alter it in such a way as evitence. I think it shoud be admitted if the which at it empparis this theory that La secas most in neerdance with the den of
The Chief Justion --I cannot adm't any commission was wrongly rafased ? pochap even Tung's name does not appear on the envelope in ice. Und then cimustone za review ofthe
widence and of the judgment com se evidence to vary that star vinent. A domment though thera hari ben no appe. Its ins to me out neither does it on envelope No. 4. thub the Coites might seasonal y treat the really srious part of the case made on this has fist statement which the cusut for this
the improbability motion to add further erudice as taifa put is the sorepancy in the evidence of uppstaat dult with was
At the Police Court he of the letters having been concocted on the sigual irven the Judge in Chombors. But this Raong Kan Chung.
steamer in consequence of the bad weather," caso does not fit in with his proposition. I heard of opened the envelope and that thes were indiented in my judgment two points on which two ravelopes inside. At the trial he said that and couns pointed out that according to the evidence at the Jeginning of the voyage the reliable videns Pould have been outained from when he opened the envelope there was a
somed to me to cant in the letter inside which he put back in the envelope weather was tins, and the letters might have Saigon, which
born written on board. Hewer, r, eransel kernel of the question of truth or fasily. If It is much to be regretted that the oficirks st
2 theory that au application had been made for Lett as of the Police Court do not seem to have been ton aft-retard set up and relied on 2 Request to obtain idence on these points and careful to see what became of the enclosure, the letters were maniastared by a solicitor's elerk in Hongkong, so that point may be passod it had been refase, then thi Const w nid have whatever it was, as a record ought to have
over. With segard to the evidence as to the
Mr. Murray was put in the box and re actal on the principle I have just indicated been precise upon the point, The envelope Bat this was not the application, nor did she came to the Registrar of this Court opened,oter beinwra ped in a red handkerchief, the applica ion which was made in any way resemble with no enclosure. although this is a serious learned Chief Justice came to the conclusion examined. After further argament the Chief that there was no red handkerchief and, of Justice said I do not believe the statement of It was to examinato Salon or ofsosh re matter in not think that there is anything in
course, the appellant does not object to that pluinfif with regard to the dates, and i in Annam or French Lido Chins certain s reified it to support the theory that the envelope was
and to obtain the addi fonalna eldne, nd was not, in fact, opened" in Buding. Now as to the firo irtters. It may oblieve the dates as signed are the correct dates, With or W corroborative evidence of no sa-ti mine the pre anco of the M gistrate. All artios mentioned here that the convention of the and, therefore, I cannot receive it in evidence, tean other Chinese shop or firms. This pre-were present and it is ut to be supposed that appellats is that the first four letters we kring not in accordance with the Stamp sent motion, therefore, is not in any sunny sleight of hand could hars ben practised gries conected in Hongkong, that the fifth Ordinance. appeal from the Judge in Chymbers: it is an without somehdy noticing it. But again, this document (an empty envelope) was remin Independent oction. But it is said that on on pinta to fraud and perjury, and we cannot coine the contents having been prev.ously removed) point the motion is identical with the origins! decision, which is only consistent with such and was produced te sa port this frauhlost application, that is, with regard to the ovi once heinous offences, on no better evidence thus elim. The first lett a purported to contain at the Tsang,hing firm a Saigon. That is what s oto e a somewhat fan astic theoy SLA sent by sao Kang bong, residing at so: and if the defendant lad at any time as to what astna ly took place. Th re is no Cholan, avain, to his mother. The evidence limited the application for emmission half-way house. Either the plaintiff's story is in support of this et ry is that of Lam Tung
Mr. Le regretted that certain hon: merabera | HIGH-CLASS. INSTRUMENTS, to take the evidence of this a'obe, tru; or as I said in my former judgment, he (the respondent who of course, states that he
vision of a sanatoriom for the China-Floob as I do not Sung, the alleged senior, was oralued in the think it necessary to al or a ginie w rd
And of course corriorated the Court below, doubtful whether the be rued judge would have
The plai fit second angineer of the ss.jke. Ho had visited the China S'ation in summer, and to climate at that souson was His Hoont, Mr. A. G. W se summed up as story. Hiscross-examination was chi zote Route, claim it from the defendant, master of refied it. If he had refused each an épplica
Ino joke. It was of the utmost importance indeed Semotima: in he wassupposed to have lived fifteen years. It mast Court would have granted this applic tion. facts are shortly as follows:
chosen where the ships coald go and the men Ba the doferdas stuck thronglut to August, 19-4, a burglary was commit do the be admitted that under cross-eivative his breach of contract, this elond of whineseon," and that being promises the defendants, who are Chinese knowledge did not appear to be very great, but
expenditur on Weibeiwei was only for the I say, I aid before, I am
nt merchants carrying un business near Faigon, it was clear that he knew something about the and Master) uppeared for the pliatiff, and Meroald carry out their shore exercises. The purp as of fitting the place as a sanatórium: it The plaintiff enter inte a contract with the surprised that his sammens was dismissed, nad a large sum of money amongst other place, and his evidence, thngh perhaps M. F. Tapiens represented the defendant.
way moderate in amount sull it was monéy well- the plaintiff was a cook sbaker, was ant materially damaged As and I think it would be going direly thinga) was stolen.
spent, the next letter eait to contain $5.0, here is no defendant at Senth Shields, England, on on a French steamer watch left Saigon on The spirit of this dec sious to contrary
svideoce to corroborate the story of Lam Tung, Gotaber 7, 1901, whe why he was engaged to ser re him vow to come forward with a roduc d August 9th, and arrived in Hongkong on the evilch must, therefore, st nit by itselt. With seosad engineer for na ordinary vayage: appliation. The case is even str nger that 26th Augu-1, 1904. As a passenger on bare wi Marriot v. Hampden, to which reference was the same steamer was a man Lamel had reference to the third letter said to contain $30 with n the Buits of the contract. The defee-
AgrOdment, made in a rovent bankruptcy case. The defra. Kreng, who auording to the evidenc, had there is the evidence of Laim Tung supported by daut did not employ the plaintiff to serve or
that of Lam Tasi, who stated that he had sent the board theste mehip accorting to dant has not found the receipted bill which to been acquniated with be plain if for some
The newspapers print the gloomiest loading bad het; he has found out the step which he Jesrs. On the arrival of the steamer in Beng money Uriagh Lam Tang As to the fourth on the arrival of the vessel at Singapore (Nov.
lettor said to contain 280 sant by our Tara On, 1941 defordiant falsely represented to the artie es The Taivel says that Russia is as shonsand times more in erested in the prospects ought to have taken. If the remedy is gone in kong the sad Chau Kwong as rrested on
addition to Lum Tang's statement a witness plaintiff that the next port of call would be the one case, it is certainly geus in the other the application of the Fro ch. au borities
defendant's persoubing concerned in the above mentioned burg. Lam I was called in the Court below, who Hongkong. Instead of
order
Revolution now staras as in the face, Elling with despair those who yesterday Lokod forward resovering money which he has
stated that he had received gittances before. proceed to Vladivostiek with a cargo of
The plaintiff was given so to a brightor dawn." The Russkiya Vreďumposti compulsion & law, cannot be different ie prin followed and, in due course, Chan Kwong was ciple from that which govern the admission of handed over to the French shorities, and However, he stated that Tuin partion ar 3
Bys: We are becoming accustomed to hear The reason for afterwards convicted and punished. On the
trok. When the Royalist w under weigh
of a starofsinge being declared at varions prints fresh evidence og appeal.
ar st of Chan Kwong in Hongkong over fifteen years standing, and accounts for the
sailog to give as a reason for aneh a serious stop. stronger, because there was ano her application. which the defendant might have made at any were found upon him (5,600 of wh eh for the such intention bao nse it was ferred 2 intered into a verbal contract with the plaiutiit,
The previous correspondered. The tenned lief whereby, on consora ion of going to Vladi Tua Nasha Zhen ways: The Governmout tims b foro the conciu-ion of the trial but which set of the present litigation,
defendiots dea agred the restitution of the Justice in the judgment appealed fram vosleek, plaintift would receive the double would have as believe that the appearance of a waves on the bhas, ad he. therefore, claimed [ few agitators suced to upset the discipling and he did not make. The e-nclusion to which I
the improbability of this
loyalty of the navy, but 1. evident thai th comer from these case is that where the ad moneys as leing part of the proce-ds of and commented on judge las indicat d that the absanes of cer-
the barglary, but the plaintiff claimed them as story sud, no doubt, if it stood by itself, $1,000 as des
Mr. Get read the claim and said that the catastrophe is due to o her and d epor causes. received them. together
with-it could not be relied on. but taken in tain evidence has had a mat rial effect upon bis having decision, and has given judgment accordingly, covering letters, in the caprelty of bailee conjunction with the other sideure in the port of Vladivostock was within the limits of It is vident that passive ignorance is as un Saigon, core it is entitled to a certain amount of the articles, The Rogalist proceeded to reliable support of order, and that were tread in the Court of Appeal should not allow that from various
abad mesus of goverùm, nt. Syn. Otechesiva!. Tarions stunt on. We now came to orbi it 5 which, Baer and took a cargo of coal on hord, sub- evidency to be taken on the rhe ring. Tis its vieiuity, for distribution to print is directly covered by the dictum of Jessel persons in China, and stated that in con- in the eta e it arrived at the Cont below, consequently arriving with the coal at Singapore. rees four separate but corr late phenoba in
the events & Bassa lahat a sisted of an envelope containing only a place at To plan if pas under the impression that the
mement.booliganism, and mutiny. Thu M. P. cited above. The defendant's crunsel sequence of rough weather be banded them to says it is wry hard to have such valible he friend Chan Kwong to safe cost dy. This, pink paper. The envelope was endorsed to the cal was for Singapore but when he saw ther vidence ezcladod. But this orbers from the therefore, was the issue that was tried before effect that there were 820 inside. This is the wore not going to discharge at that port and zaniedbatreys an omining process of fact that the affidavit made in support of the Larned Chief Justice, whose decision in most interesting exhibit of all, and is supported also saw a Russian liontenant in conversation disintegration in the organism which tradi- tionally is most loyal and most devoted to the the summons for a commission disulaged favour of the plaintif has been appealed from by tha evidence of Lam Tong and Kwong Kom with thy-captain “ba got suspicions were maintenance of order. The Notor Fremg
ashed the chif engine where they was alleged by the defendants. At the he-rius of the Tean. The appellan's admit that this exhibit bound for, but the chief replied that he to sepal
which it facts
bewails Russia's woes, and awaits the judgment is genuine, and state that ils entente the witnesses in Saigon would give appeal the counsel for the delendabts (whom I have already intima ed that I think this is
He divided Lis wrong. Soo what it led to. The toarned counsel hill call in the future the appellants) took & were abstracted after its arrival in Hongkong "dil-not-know. As the vessel'was leaving Sin of Heaven upou tlie aathora
and state that this has beos their theory gaper plaintiff went to the captain and asked somewhat peculiar course. seemed throughout his argument to assume that lack into two pirls In the one it is a long Nin, Krong Kn Tut the whether the vesend was going to Hongkong er the strugth of his application lay in the fact asked that the judgment appeled against Magistracy stated that the loffer on being that this particular and specified evidence bad any he reversed and that judgment may opeu dintained two envelopes, in the Court to Vladivostoel. After dome conversatio
of receiving doable wages and a ben xuled; and touch desperate straits was be entered for the appoil-nts, and in the below he said that when he opened it at the plaintiff se reed to go to ledivestock zu son- ho reduced, that at the gloso of his argument, heat or be waked for special leave to adducegistres inquit sineda l-it r which his read sideration of
Now, although there is a di-crepancy. in his bowte ferred to these facts as evid nee 1-cady given farther evidence on the appeal interese vitezice na to the contents of the envelop The Puisue Indge--What to dants admit Such a satement as that unde in the solicitor's meaos upon the appellants being success afidavit could not even be dignified with the ful on the first part. All of which I finally the agistracy, yet there is the uncontranisted going through all this. The defendants admit
for the
understood to moun a new trial before a judge evidence of this man that there was an enthie liability. and that web-dy else might way somethir guderafood closare or- opolows it chibit, and I can
lo orion. With regard to the best parts a certain was not merely referring to the piece This was obly equallal by the attempt to introduce in the Court below, and here, the preliminary objection as to form was taken of pink paper. Now, the theory of the appet written statements of people in Saigon who which was overruled. It was, however, to the lanis is that the contents of that env lope had were not called as mitos es 1 must now second part that the peculiarly above re orreden previously removed. That being so, it difficult to imagine why the witness consider the case of the Copiapo Company (10 to particularly appertains. It seems to me te is
Pot cross-examined
this state- a bonus.
the Time-L. P. 180). Lord Justice Lindly lays down this principle: that if the Court thinks
IN SUMMARY JURISDICTIOS.
unnet
specified witnesses, it seems to me more than judem ni, on further con In that duly received the 1-itor for delivery. KonT BEFORE MR. A. G. Wron (PUNT JUDGE shoud care treated the question of the pi
or of this firm and of one or two wher was an accomp.ica in the
W, SEABROOK 2, W. A. SCOTT.
tion, then again it is conceivable that this follows:-This is a interplesd 3′ Issue, and the to proving his ignorance of the locality in whichthe said rese-1, the ant of $1,000 on an alleged to the flet that some healthy pt ce should be
-Nit
:10
Mr. H. J. Gedge (of Messrs. Johnson, Stokis
but
THE CRISIS-IN RUSSIA.
In this respect the rula which provenderlary. The use-i oʻtradition proceedings | claimed Lam On as a younger brother and kong the Iloyalist, anding to Hong of a revolution than in the prospects" peadn
was intended to pay off credit re of my fba declising to proceed to Vladivo
up Iging tut priuciple in this case is the 2000 in French bank notes) and some pilver fact that the letter contains no mention of and loavi g Bingapo e Harbour the defendant in the Empire with ut iho Government's vouch-
e
}
porsens
OT
be a belated attempt to get in further evidence,"
(40
which attempt ought to have been mor, mont either in the Magistracy or in
ao Te Captain replied? We are going
Mr. Stepbens-We say we are willing to pay the money at the proper time when be vessel arrives at her. final port of destination. We is a bonus to will got one. aduit cortain liability double wages. If there Mr. Gedge-I think I can prove there is The farther heuring was adjouruci.
+
WEATHER REPORT
The Hongkong Observatory yesterday issued the following report:-
Ou the 10th at 13 10a.m. The barometer bas falleo elightly over the Philippines, and is little chau:ad on the China Coust.
Pressure is bighest over the 8. part of the China Sen, and over the Pacific in the sigh bourhood of the Loechoes, and lowest over E. Jap
Moderate S.E. winds may be expected in the Formosa Channel, and moderate S.W. winds over the N. part of the Chins, ea-
Forecast-Moderato F. windy; showery.
BEG TO CALL ATTENTION TO
THEIR EXTENSIVE STOCK
OF
“BOTH OF
1
THEIR
"OWN MAKE
AND THE
LEADING BRITISH,
CONTINENTAL
AND
AMERICAN HOUSES.
AT
PRICES WHICH DEFY
COMPETITION.
MUSIC AND MUSICAL INSTRUMENTE OF EVERY DESCRIPTION.
CASH OR HIRE PURCHASE
SYSTEM.
Hongkong, 20th July, 1905,
11861
DR. NEWFLL WILSON, DENTIST.
Latest American Methods Reasonable Fees.
No charge for examinations. Ooo-bours 9 A.M. to & P.M.
No. 2, PEDDER STREET(next to the General Post Office-and opposite to the side entrance to the Hongkong Hotel).
1870- Hongkong, 5th 1905.