to the I reply that such a inclusion is in
direst variance with the terms
the Government documents.
J
}
delivered to me in evidence
of my
title, and is only arrived
at, by a- eeting aside, as of
any comment. of
no- value, and without- their recorded terms.
To these
feel
documento Lagain confidently refer, and pal justfick
engiring. If it is now to be assumed that Sshould have been better acquainted with the terms
in
the
616
to purpose of worsting the table road. _ It must be achumoledord Hat, If any irregularity is
the Holghong
in it, and in
is nour to be assumed,
Covernment has had more than ito full share
RA
far as
I am
misleading me, and that.
only declare the ground forfeited
concerned they can nous
4
a
the thank
then the covernment itself which make it - why during
possession, the three months the ground remained in my the Government did every thing in ito power to mislead
undisputed - me and to assure the my
induring
title was
me to mnour the expenditure upon it, which bey
world nows seek to appropriate
indemnity..
without any offer of
On the 1st Betober 1842 the keting
lovesher by his official letter found that lapt entitled to sell" "the ground, and ordered the lead officer
An a
direct repudiation
It is no
a question
relendiation of
doubte
"there their own acts.
easy for
the local Government, in judging
between ittell and me a
a private individual, without
even an allusion to these their own documents which shave
repeebly brought before them; _ and within little more them, while the operations then a month of the latest
t
and the
suggetet and inthericed by it were in raked proges, building approaching completior. to declare the ground pepetir-
to
so
forfeiter.
appropriate the wakes it adored to themides. wathant an alleged latent erregularity, which wraining; for an alleged latent.
notice or ur
And
Meth was
to transfer it to me,
which he
a
Certifacte
accordingly did on the transfer
if
Betober
in the
rent
4th delivering to me
usual termis
to:
1
subject to future regulations regarding but above all. I may enquire, "why", is late
when according sought to be laid down, the ground would have been
as the 26th November,
to the rule now..
the beting Governor _ ( at which time
neturally forfeited,
the Land
Jfficer
wrote to me
Aficially
by order
my
Buildings
My
-
were in rapid progress) _ again achnowledging
requiring
title to the ground, and sepest terary, at my non capince! contain
me to undertake in certain non cxlincs! wition operations for
it ceitted at all is plainly there our fault and not mine? demand for indemnity that "it is evident and to reply to my
7
"W. Websites must be a differer"; "hat I confidently why
Mr
that Lord bey will see.
justee
the same measure
metel out in this transactions
as
as if
off right t if had occurred
Any
this
between private individuals. _ Had I ben able by additional act of prudence to have warded off hardship. Suruld withingly reign all olan for compensatio.
the
question ; quite out of
but it is
claim that I could have sappioced
defect-
the ground liable & forfature for a latest depot. which the Government had in three seperate oficial documents, during