complaining of the team
on which Lands in the
Colong have beenderpored of, and protesting agains The imposition of any Reprfaed
Fax as unconstitutional audillegal.
With respect to the Leun,
on which dunds have
there appears
been disposed of there a
nothing
she not
new in the
menent representation_and the safest has been
As
already
exhausted
both
in Lin St Pottinger; Day?
18444 and
of March Mag docs Stanley's answer of
19 Nov. 1844,
own
dence with
anding your correspondence the trescantile Body, it would be superfluousin me agains to gover
renew the discutzon
The real obfiction
of
L
35
d. Scontent
sugaety, therefore, with expressing my
reasoning 2nd Stanley as well. ks.
on
in the generatio this sugeat-adopted for If Pottinger, dordstantly.
H
and jouself. Aregand Wo the imposition of Rates Lunderstood the theccantile,
Bady
many
mean that as
such Rates are in this
Coustry levied. & Minister Bodies and not & the Imperial degislature, its
is acconstitutional and
N
the Terchants in probaty illegal that they should be to daxation without levied in St thong of the
Colonial degislature.
Refrescitation.
But whiten Mais habr
not the fort austration of seedsamling
their language, in ther
proposition itself which Theyhan advanced d
byen
that is
concur. The circumstance
of the Town of Victour. and of the Colony of Khony.