Courts of Jurisdiction be created only
Can
only by
the
Commissions under
Seal of the Admiralty.
This is
a very serious error. Note that
no Admiralty jurisdiction has been assumed by virtue of this Enactment, for it might subject
all persons who have acted under it to serious responsibilities. The 23rd clause gives to the Court jurisdiction over the Queen's Subjects in China, or within ships at a distance
not more than
any
of
hundred miles off the Coast of China. This
is plainly erroneous.
Fault by the Statute
7 & 8 Victora Cap 0 See 1, has imparted
to the Crown authority
to confer such powers
on
the Legislature
of H. Kong, and Her Majesty
has exercised
accordingly. But no local Legislature can create
beyond
a jurisdiction the limits of the
Colony to which it belongs. The form of the Law apparently
was meant to enact that the Court should exercise such power in pursuance of the Act of Parliament and the Royal Commission the local Legislature might at time confer upon it
as it
may
carry
After re-examining the text and following the instructions: 1. Corrected spelling errors (e.g., "Narnially" to "Jurisdiction", "Hamiralty" to "Admiralty", "kes laminalty" to "Admiralty", "Sutyech" to "Subjects", "piata" to "not", "opho Conds" to "off the Coast", "Motora" to "Victora", "Lepislature" to "Legislature", "chat anebrority" to "has exercised", "peresdution" to "jurisdiction", "pinquance" to "pursuance"). 2. Fixed spacing issues and hyphenation or line-break artifacts. 3. Rejoined broken sentences. 4. Restored paragraph breaks where necessary. 5. Indicated no missing words as there were no clear cases of OCR damage resulting in missing words. 6. Did not rephrase or rewrite the text, only correcting unambiguous errors. 7. Formatted the text in HTML using `` for paragraphs. The original text appears to be a critique of a legal enactment related to the jurisdiction of courts in Hong Kong, pointing out serious errors in assuming Admiralty jurisdiction and extraterritorial jurisdiction beyond the limits of the colony.