港史文本搜尋系統 Hong Kong in Texts search portal

2026-06-19 11:55:24 · Auto OCR Correction

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

People 5.8% 3.0% 18,2% 87 1% 6.5% 6.5% 5.6% Country 2.6% 100.0% 20% Government 0.4% 1000% 0.4% Others 3.9% 37.9% 27.3% 39.1% 54.3% 6.5% 8.3% Sum Col% 84 6% 15% 120% 2.0% Legend: cf. Table 9 & 10. A similar picture emerges in the cross-tabulations between the level of face attributes and face situations (Table 12). At the level of country alone. The proportion of sentences that are enhancing to China is 23.4% compared to 34.1% at the individual level. If the three collective levels other than the sports representatives are taken together, the sum of their proportion in this column amount to 43.4%, much larger than those at the individual level. This stands in contrast to the figures in the third column. Those at the individual level alone account for 48.3% while the total from the three collective levels together doe not even reach 15%. TABLE 12. Cross-Tabulation Of The Level Of Face Attributes By Theme I Count Face Situations (Theme) Col% Row% Enhancing China Threatening Enhancing Threatening Total China Others Others Row % Athletes 43.3% 808% 48.3% 167% 35.9%

Baseline (Original)

50 People 27 0 2 2 31 5.8% 3.0% 18,2% 87 1% 6.5% 6.5% 5.6% Country 12 0 0 0 12 2.6% 100.0% 20% Government 2 0 0 0 2 0.4% 1000% 0.4% Others 18 0 25 3 46 3.9% 37.9% 27.3% 39.1% 54.3% 6.5% 8.3% Sum 466 8 66 551 Col% 84 6% 15% 120% 2.0% Legend: cf. Table 9 & 10. A similar picture emerges in the cross-tabulations between the level of face attributes and face situations (Table 12). At the level of country alone. The proportion of sentences that are enhancing to China is 23.4% compared to 34.1% at the individual level. If the three collective levels other than the sports representatives are taken together, the sum of their proportion in this column amount to 43.4%, much larger than those at the individual level. This stands in contrast to the figures in the third column. Those at the individual level alone account for 48.3% while the total from the three collective levels together doe not even reach 15%. TABLE 12. Cross-Tabulation Of The Level Of Face Attributes By Theme I Count Face Situations (Theme) Col% Row% Enhancing China Threatening Enhancing Threatening Total China Others Others Row % Athletes 70 0 14 0 84 43.3% 808% 48.3% 167% 35.9%

2026-05-13 07:18:58 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

View comparison

AI Proofread

50 People 27 0 2 2 31 5.8% 3.0% 18.2% 87.1% 6.5% 6.5% 5.6% Country 12 0 0 0 12 2.6% 100.0% 20% Government 2 0 0 0 2 0.4% 100.0% 0.4% Others 18 0 25 3 46 3.9% 37.9% 27.3% 39.1% 54.3% 6.5% 8.3% Sum 466 8 66 551 Col% 84.6% 1.5% 12.0% 2.0% Legend: cf. Table 9 & 10. A similar picture emerges in the cross-tabulations between the level of face attributes and face situations (Table 12). At the level of country alone. The proportion of sentences that are enhancing to China is 23.4% compared to 34.1% at the individual level. If the three collective levels other than the sports representatives are taken together, the sum of their proportion in this column amount to 43.4%, much larger than those at the individual level. This stands in contrast to the figures in the third column. Those at the individual level alone account for 48.3% while the total from the three collective levels together does not even reach 15%. TABLE 12. Cross-Tabulation Of The Level Of Face Attributes By Theme I Count Face Situations (Theme) Col% Row% Enhancing China Threatening China Enhancing Others Threatening Others Total Row % Athletes 70 0 14 0 84 43.3% 80.8% 48.3% 16.7% 35.9%

Baseline (Original)

50 People 27 0 2 2 31 5.8% 3.0% 18,2% 87 1% 6.5% 6.5% 5.6% Country 12 0 0 0 12 2.6% 100.0% 20% Government 2 0 0 0 2 0.4% 1000% 0.4% Others 18 0 25 3 46 3.9% 37.9% 27.3% 39.1% 54.3% 6.5% 8.3% Sum 466 8 66 551 Col% 84 6% 15% 120% 2.0% Legend: cf. Table 9 & 10. A similar picture emerges in the cross-tabulations between the level of face attributes and face situations (Table 12). At the level of country alone. The proportion of sentences that are enhancing to China is 23.4% compared to 34.1% at the individual level. If the three collective levels other than the sports representatives are taken together, the sum of their proportion in this column amount to 43.4%, much larger than those at the individual level. This stands in contrast to the figures in the third column. Those at the individual level alone account for 48.3% while the total from the three collective levels together doe not even reach 15%. TABLE 12. Cross-Tabulation Of The Level Of Face Attributes By Theme I Count Face Situations (Theme) Col% Row% Enhancing China Threatening Enhancing Threatening Total China Others Others Row % Athletes 70 0 14 0 84 43.3% 808% 48.3% 167% 35.9%

2026-05-13 07:18:58 · Baseline

View content

50

People

27

0

2

31

5.8%

3.0%

18,2%

87 1%

6.5%

5.6%

Country

12

0

12

2.6%

100.0%

20%

Government

2

0

2

0.4%

1000%

0.4%

Others

18

0

25

3

46

3.9%

37.9%

27.3%

39.1%

54.3%

6.5%

8.3%

Sum

466

8

66

551

Col%

84 6%

15%

120%

2.0%

Legend: cf. Table 9 & 10.

A similar picture emerges in the cross-tabulations between the level of face attributes and face situations (Table 12). At the level of country alone. The proportion of sentences that are enhancing to China is 23.4% compared to 34.1% at the individual level. If the three collective levels other than the sports representatives are taken together, the sum of their proportion in this column amount to 43.4%, much larger than those at the individual level. This stands in contrast to the figures in the third column. Those at the individual level alone account for 48.3% while the total from the three collective levels together doe not even reach 15%.

TABLE 12. Cross-Tabulation Of The Level Of Face

Attributes By Theme

I

Count

Face Situations (Theme)

Col%

Row%

Enhancing

China

Threatening Enhancing Threatening Total

China

Others

Others Row %

Athletes

70

0

14

0

84

43.3%

808%

48.3% 167%

35.9%

RAS-1993 — Page 71

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note