G. & J. WEIR LTD. FEED PUMPS, CONDENSING PLANTS, EVAPORATORS, FEED WATER HEATERS, MARINE AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT.
| ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. II.K. & Shanghai Bank Bldg. Tel. 27780
JOHN CLARKE'S CASEBOOK
Welcome In Soho
party
Page '10
CHINA MAIL
Admissibility Of Evidence Argued
In Libel Action
Further legal arguments on the question of BOAT had come in the admissibility of certain evidence proposed to from West Afrign, and be called by the Defence in mitigation of damages off it had trooped a cheerful
Africans who were advanced by the Hon. Leo d'Almada, QC, travelled up {17 Lonton] leading Counsel for the Defence when the libel suit happy in The knowledge hearing against the Tiger Standard Ltd continued that here they had friends before Mr Justice Scholes and a male Jury in the who haud friends who
Supreme Court this morning.
had friends
who knew how to make a fortune here! without being put to much trouble,
An informal kind of welcome was arranged, to take place. the public bar of a Solio pušite hrase.
Drink Bowed.
half-
Or, rather, one or tw
pints of mild beer were passed No one had quite mundu te
I par,
Ji AVAN
vir fortune yet. spirli of the Occasion mattered, rather than the sub-
Win 110
stance of it.
What
there
more money left for even tulf-pints of mild, the welcome adjourned to the pavement outside.
I AM DRUNK
THE gathering took up must of the pavement, and aucturally was not long before a police-
officer came up.
Yesterday his Lordship held that there was a case to go to the Jury on the claim for libel but hold that there was no ense to go to the Jury on the action of the ense because his Lordship was not satisfied there was sufficient evidence of express malice at the time of publication,
Following upon the ruling, the case for the Defence opened but was interrupted by an objection by Mr John McNeill, QC, leading Counsel for the plaintif, on the question of the admissibility of certain evidence proposed to be called by the Defence.
Plamul in the action is Mr that was a circumstance which Dennis Victor, sole proprietor of his Lordship should consider 1, 144 Doss explaining the absence of the Lido Dance Vocux Rond
who is notice and further as a ground Central,
for
તા. the exercise of that special damages for claiming Joss of cardio at the rate of cretion granted
by that Rule 3036.02 a day as a result of an by which even though
not lee alleged libel contained in an had not been given the Court
give leave article published in the issue of might
datedvidence the Hongkong Standard August 13, 1951. (This claim has Counsel, now been withdrawn from the
A Chief Jury by his Lordship who has
spector. He asked the gathering held that there is no case of
for such
to be called, sald
DAMAGES ISSUE Passing on to the next point
WEDNESDAY,
Established 1845
OCTOBER 21, 1953.
SIDE GLANCES By Galbraith
Cor. 1943 by NIA Berries, M.
"Look. George! I've found the very thing to use up all that energy you've been storing since you quit bowling twice a week!"
DEATH OF
to break up so that people could the clan in action to go to the which concerned some c POPULAR
All
Defendants
Are
use the pavement. The Africans, Jury).
ranging, went their ways.
! Tiger excogit one.
Standard Ltd.. newspaper pro- The non-conformkUs name was Edgar.
He propped himself prietors and publishers, of 170 Wanchal Road, and The Sing against a wall that was handy,
Pno. printers, of the Tao
Jin und said to the Chief Inspector:
some "Sorry, boss, ['se drunk, & cua
me address. Appearing for plaintiff are Mr move from where I is.'
John MeNeill, QC, and Mr A. J. Clifford, both Instructed by Mr
Y. Alfred Hon. Defendents
represented the Iton. Leu d'Alainda, QC, Mr Charles E. Leseby, QC, and Mr D. A. 1. Wright, all on the instructions of Mr. B. N. Ce of Messrs Wilkinson and Griši.
TWO OBSERVATIONS
"You're not drunk," salti the Chief Inspector, who was un expert in such matters.
"I tell you I te drunk."
"I say you're not. Get along
a taxicab,"
now."
"You go cail Edgur replied.
INC
"ONLY JOKING"
THE Chief Inspector
void
hardly do this. He did the next best thing, called up police van. Next morning at Great Mariborough Street Edgar with obstructing was charged the footway,
He pleaded not guilty, and the the Chief inspector told of
eldent to Mr. Paul Bennett, VC, the magistrate, while Edgar, who wore a goatee board, a
by
Was
ure
Continuing bis
submissions
on the
which the Defence wished vall. Counsel said that
evidence went to the issue of S'HAI MAN
Charge Not Proven
SHEAFFERS
Skrip
King Case Resumes: Further Submissions By Defence Counsel
Resuming his argument of no case to answer on behalf of James Joseph King, Mr M. A. da Silva this morning submitted that the Prosecu- tion had failed because the money King is alleged to have fraudulently converted was the property of the firm of Holdens in Australia and not of Falconer's and because there was a possibility that it was kept in Hong- kong for Holdens for some purpose.
Falconer and Co. Ltd.
whilst
Th
Form
that
A 10-year-old woman, and damages were
Chu, who admitere a stolen damages always in issue, Le, li was not
wallet was found in her house. when a necessary
plainti in his picadings
The many friends of Mr but she hate krviesge olaimed
stolen properly ed damages to deny in Bill Mellor will hear with discharged by the Wa for the defendant his defence
that the plaintif regret of his death which Central this morning, when the had
suffered any damage occurred in Shanghai yes- Prosesion failed to prove s although in fact in the present terday, after a short illness. case Counsel Court would paragraph 6 of the defence they had in their pleadings denied that the plaintif hud suffered
alleged in clalin.
said that
And that
the
special damage or any damage
dotte
Ir
Dibel,
their statement
Supreme
hearing a before Yen-hol and In the
Court building. The Hon. Leo d'Almada, QC. and Mr A. J. Clifford are both for the Prosecution, instructed by Hastings and Company, Mr M. A. du Silva appears for the Defence.
were
wos
charged
In the
1
and
tho
1950 Buick
10
kong should he purchase car,
of
1x
"It might be that Holden wished to buy a Buick Sedan, to place it as a bet on the races, to bribe some official here or for some scandalous purpose but it is not for King to explain until the Prosecution has made out a prima facie case; the Prosecution must show there is only one possible inference, that the money is Falconer's property and they must discount and render impossible any other possibility," said Mr Silva.
Janes King, merchant, of 20 was Falconer's property, sald that in 1951 the price given Broga Circult, is accused of Mr Silva. The £400 was part King (who was no longer with having taken $8,305.04 (A£400) of the £1,100 contractual pelee Falconers but in his own firm) for the use of his wife, Marand
therefor was Holden's was even higher and the Pro- Karel, on November 17, 2050 property. "That is the dangersecution could not possibly say a Director of George Mr Cillford sees and hence his that. King was trying to cheat Interruptions of the vital parts himself. There was a progres- Mr of my submissions,"
sive rise
tho Holdens
£1,100 badges, said Mr Slice of
Mr Silvn then referred to tho which was accepted by King. The Prosecution was not in 5 correspondence between Holden position to contend that King and King and pointed out that was not authorised to agree to in two letters in October that price on Falconer's behalf. November, 1950, Holden had en-
"LEGAL ENTENTE"
quired of King about Mr Silve said "That £400 possible purchase of a Mr Silva reminded the Court
was beyond any possible doubt Sedan It was not an improbable
that that of the last hearing he had part of the £1,100 and there- inference
he wanted submitted that there
for Holden's property.
It is buy
a car, in these circum- several ingredients to be proven surprising that the legal entente stances he was entitled to leave and sumie of these had to be on the other side did not ste balance of his price of proven
on circumstantial that was the position in the 400 in Hongkong instead of evidence. The one Ingredient of first place before this Prosecu having to resuit money to Hong- whether the $6,000
tion was Instituted.""
tho Once the money was not Falconer's properly or hot was
Falconers
that ingredient
"Add to these probabilities tha a factor clearly to be proven on
WU'S only.
the charge
that gone. Holden fact circumstantial evidence
Australia at that remind you that before the Pro- could do what he wanted with time had exchange control and the £400, tear it up or throw
The secution can make out a primit into the harbour, said
po:sibility that there Mr difficulty sometimes in Australia facle case they must prove that
Silva. to be
in remitting monies abroad for converted the $8,000 alleged
""The £400 the of that cer
corporate. body, Falconer's, for not only within the meaning of Section American
luxury Cpl. 'Chau · Yuk, does that
appear in Section 32
is classified
charge," he told the Magistrate,
the the charge. That is a complete probable and not the impossible went-la No. 30 Wah Shan Road, the actuni wording
20d unenuverable end to this inference that King-retained the Ringer. Wong Ka-wal and Hui
the case. King cannot fraudulently £400 of Holden and for Holden show that In order to
convert Company
this sum if it became a limited liability Com-search in the house and found the Prosecution had to prove
15 in Hongkong for some purpose," Wai-yuen. They conducted o
$6,000 or A£400 was Ealconer's Holdens". pany in 1935.
Six wallets inside one of the
Hypothetically if Holden drew said Mr Silva, be- cubicles,
only £700 of his price and lett When he asked for that the contractual price the name of the person who was tween Holdens and Falconers £400 with King to buy him a Was secondhand Buick and It King badges) inside the cubicle the de- (for Jockey vingut admitted that she lived not £1,100 but only $700, sub-did not buy the car but donated
400 to his wife then In addition to being a Director there. When he further asked mitted Mr Silva. There was no the of the Companies under the
the defendant how she had come direct evidence from management of A. R. Burkill & into
Holdens Holden could charge King with passession of SO
that the contractual price was fraudulent conversion. But Fal- Sons, Ltd., he
the wallets, served on
the defendant replied not £1,100 (because
ono coners could not say no Boards of
companies that she had bought then some from Holdens had testified) and £400 was also their property Major General G. N. Tuck, Shanghai, including the Shang-time ago, but had forgotten there was 110 direct evidence and that King fraudulently con CB, OBE, Engineer-in-Chief, The hai Waterworks Co. Lid.. of where. Defendant was
That was complete | War Office, took the salute at then from Falconers that £1,100 was verted it.
Silva which he was Chairman until brought back to the Police not the contractual price. "On the nonsense, sald Mr.
the Ceremonial Parade-of-the- He continued: "Which is what Hongkong Squadron, Royal En- the Company was requisitioned Station where she was sub-
contrary, the Prosecution pru
when I said at the gineers, this by the Chinese Authoritles, sequently charged with receiving duced an invoice as part of their meant
morning, at the He was interned during the
stolen property.
case for £1,100, The Prosecution Pacific War at Lungwha with Insp M A. Ringer and does not challenge, in fact they his wife and two daughters who Wong Ka-wat gave corrobora- udmil, that this invoice is the now reside at Bristol, England,
tive evidence.
genuine involve from Holdens," and to whom his many friends
Mrs G. de Roo Identified that Mr Silva saldi. will wish to extend their sincerest the wallet belonged to her und
Mr Clifford: It is not true) sympathies in the great lose they said that it had been stolen at have sustained."
that we admit it is genuine. We the beginning January
Mr F. X. d'Almada submit-merely say it is an invoice pro
enablo vided by Holdens. to ted that there was no case to King
his to get away with He said that the Pro- that Me Li had stated that it would answer.
fraud. be seen from the return that from secution had failed to prove about the middle of August the that the defendant had
Mr Silva complained of this any
He served in
in the Tanks
10.
15
He contended
Ezt
known
goods-an.
M: F. X, d'Almada refproscated | the property or not only not the property of Falconer purpose of buying what lo the first World War, on the the defendant.
he came to the East and joined | testified that, on August 25 he of the larceny ordinance but is 32 and within the meaning of luxury goods you have the
In 1019,
Detective
conclusion of which.
Sons, with whom he remained Shek Kip Mei Village with Insp. the firm of A. R. Burkill ̧ &
until his death; becoming Director when the
on the question
He was for many years
the Defence
Ha
said
A
member of the Shanghai Light Horse and a member of all the leading clubs in Shanghai.
many
club
that the
car
Hearing is proceeding,
CEREMONIAL
PARADE
11.3
beginning and will say now that Army Field Maintenance Area, the dark as to how the Prosecu- I, as a Defence Counsel, am in-Shamshade, which comprised tion can say in law and in fact the Works Troop, Bomb Dis
The that there has been a fraudulent conversion by King of Falconer's was under
Troop, and MT Troop,
£400,"
FAILED TO SHOW
port
of
the command N. D. W. Ferguson, commanding the squadron. Also on parade was Pete, the
Even though it was not necca- from yesterday, Me d'Almada ry by the rules of pleadings raidh tuit he would like to make 1 join issue two observations
Birsf damage, point on which he said he had don
80,
suki Counsel. other told the
yesterday that In Court
words the De- fence said
anch he had shed.
they would ལ་་ས that would have been entitled to say The first point being the Deforce wished to call evi- without pleading assuming deree with regard to the cir- that this was a libel which they cumstances of publication and would not admit,
still plaintiff his first observation, said Couns suffered no damage by that drape-eld blue raincoal and a cel, was this: As regards one scarlet shirt, with drainpipent the grounds-for-leave-to-be Referring to the special damn trousers, distened sadly from the granted by the Court was that ages claimed in the statement of dock.
Mr McNeill had in fact attocked clan, Mr d'Almada said that he "When he Wis charged, at the bona fides of the defendants understood M. McNeill to say tris of course being bound up yesterday that he (Mr MaNeil) the station," the Chief Inspector | --1/)
with the fact that did not move rely on the special reported, "he said, i was only actually
originally this was on nction damage ond he would withdraw Juking with you."
"But you sez i was drunk, an both for libel and an action on it. I don' drink," Edgar sald, inter-the case he submitted that that
Mr McNeill
that circumstance which the rupting.
Count should take into considera- agreed with his Lordship that "He doesn't say that," the ten when it come to a question that went by the board with the magistrate said, "There was the of the exercise of his Lordship's withdrawal of the second limb unusual situation of you ussuri-| discretion,
upon Me d'Almuda's application. ing you were drunk and the A seroid point arose by It had gone with the action on officer saying you weren't." russon of an interjection by the case.
Mr McNeill added Mr McNeill in the course of that he was now merely claim-
takings of the Dance Hall showed a guilty knowledge that the interruption and asked Mr Clife would be able to EDGAR'S TITLE
drop, whereas before aftering gencrat damages on the libel. This arguments yesterday
certain number of $10 tickets, were wallet was stolen property, He ford to make his objections later, said Mr Silva, commenting sold and after the publication of said that in her statement in Juter.
that in "better late than never." He continueti WELL lissen," said Edgar tonean, said Counsel. His point
M: d'Almada was that this having be
funthor wished the article the number went down. the Chief Inspector, "did
know from Mr McNeill gun as a case with two causes whether Mr McNeill relled on
And that was put in
answer to the charge the de- spite of what Mr Clifford said B evidence of lusk of earings upon
had stated that the lie was going to show that the the £400 was part of Holden's yo' call me a taxien
which, fendant of nction, in the
Prosecution admitted it was Counsel atd. Me MeNeill was et wallets were not hers. circumstances
contractual price and falling the evidence led from Mr Li tilled to rely in there
etalin the
from Holdens. for need for
genuine invoice was no
direct evidence from Holden to give this notice and Dance Hall) tad atcrncy for
Shum-man (Manager of the Lido general damages in the libel, Defence to
Howeverthe defendant "When they put in the invoice as to what he intended to be he had argued from that that in the plaintiff on this aspect of the
The cross-examinution of Me Lt. testifed that on August 25 they did not allege it bears done with the money, they en- Two shots were fired at four discretion
and Counsel, was to the effect that three Police Officers
to forged signature of Holdens, tered into the realm his
about 10.25 inst Lordship case, i.c, the evidence of the re-
of con- Sampang at the reason why сул tickets were her should now give leave although turns (Exh. "') showing a loss
house and conducted a They put it in as an invoicejecture or circumstantial evid-night, by an recorded
unknown junk off as having been sold the Defence did not give notice of earnings.
the second half of August
and search there. They found the from Holdens which they did not ence, said Mr Silva.
Shek
Tal Wan, near Lamma onwards was because from about wallets Inside a cubicle which challenge and which they admit
Island. The Батрада WETO What time, the practice was adopted the defendant had let out to a to bear a genuine signature, I "Undisputedly the £400 was shing at the time. of re-issuing the same tickets önce or, more than once and that the person who was at present in point out to you that that in- not pold to the Mercantile males of those reil-nted tickets would | Canton. She said that she did volce is direct evidence that the Bank. Undisputedly
Mat Ha, the other at Tang the in- Young rties of guards, one at not know that the wallet was contractual price was £1,100. volce to that Bank was £700 Hon on the island, fred 12
Mr Silva salá. inside the cubicle.
and the bill drawn was £700. rounds of ammunition at the He
added
fact **In
Mr Undisputedly the £400 went junk, but it escaped without re- d'Almada opened his case on into Margaret King's account. turning fire, the basis that the contractusi| Where it went from there
ners The sampans were not damag- price was £1,100," and he re- we do not know. The Pro-ed and no one was hurt during ferred to the Prosecution open-secution has stopped there at the the incident, It is believed
"W
asked you?"
"No, I didn't."
when
the
his
He
the
to the other side.
In answer to the Judge, Mr that he agreed d'Almada said without qualification that had
ENTITLED IF PROVED
"Do you want to give evidence UF outh? the magistrale usked Edgar.
"Sure, sure," said Edgar. trundle to the witness-box.
"What
Is your job learned elerk asked.
"General labourer," he said.
way he said it, his bright this been an action for libel only tin was entitled to damages if The clothes, made it sound us if i
then the Defence would have lo he could prove were a title-halfway between a
hotice if they wished to give
damages, and brigadier labourer and a, neld-Introduce evidence.
evidence woulth be given marshal,
order to assist
the Jury in assessing damages,
Mr d'Almada said that he in-
NO TAXI
TWO-LEGGED ACTION Continuing. Mr d'Almada said that this was in fact a two-
Mr Justice Scholts and that if this was 1lbel then the plain-
13
that thine
not be shown in the returna..
Counsel said that Mr L's answers to the questions along those linea were in each cano "I don't know." In his re-examination Mr Lt dealt with such things, said Counsel, as the fact that Wong (khe marker), had been | chanissed about the end of April and then in the Spring of 1953 a number of waiters were dimnissed for bad behaviour. Mr Li then finally told
"I WAS just in the pub. to legged action and therefore ferred from his Lordship's re- the Court that the tickets were
"Did
the magistrate asked.
the Rules of the
"Now that was a challenge by the
returns made, returns which are
d'Almade.
came
Charged With Intimidation
*
а
The Prosecution had failed to mascot and guard dog of the thow how that £400 became squadron. The Band of the Falconers. Не hoped they Royal Norfolk Regiment was in show him altendance.
From the vantage point that Junk Fires On
TUED
Sampans
Ing saying that the same price mom
moment the money was paid that the motive of the attack
INTERLUDE
Radio Hongkong
J.K.T.
4.15, The
per badge was mentioned in the Into Margaret King's account, was robbery. meet these friends from ordinarily there would be no mark that plaintiff was entitled destroyed there and then after a
opening and in the invoice. It might have been sent back to Africa," he said.
The Prosecution "As It was 30 question of notice being neces- to rely on the evidence he had chook by the plaitutt.
admitted that Australia; it might have bought Jull in there, we came outside. (sary because the Defence would enlled with regard to the loss
Holden's price was £1,100 and a car, we do not know.
Holden
•1 dint say nothing about, nobe able to call this evidence of earnings in his claim for gen-Defence of the genuinenen of the Yuon King-six, 45, of 12 Lock Falconers.
Two Chinese,, Yuen Kan, alias that price was accepted by might have asked Mrs King to taxl; but when the taxi came li under the second limb.
put
that oll eral damage.
money on a red hol was a van"..
selled upon for the purpose of show Road, third floor, and Hung
tip at the races. Why should Counsel, said that his Lord- Mr McNeill sald that what-ing a loss of earnings and therefore Hoer-cheung altos Hung Wing, He sounded plqued.
he gave tendinging to general damages," said Mr 35, broker, of 177 Sat Yee Siro d'Almada when he is not here," don has failed?" said Mr Silva, ry: 1.02. Pohors from
anything be assumed against ship had ruled there was no over evidence
"You should not misquote Mr Jimmy King when the Prosecu 6. Time Signal and ProgramTD30 you say in the police
first flooc, were changed before
the station I was only jokinge to go to the Jury, on the to show generat. damages would
action of the
Theatre; case and all he be relied on by the plaintiff. A defendant was always entitled Mr Hin-shing Lo at Central this objected Mr Clifford,
He said that the first possible Leader: Seamus Marshall, Dennis Corta Trio, was trying to point out was Mr d'Almada sold that that was to show, if he could, that a plain- |norabng with criminal iriimida "ahut up" Mr Suva asked him | wonted his £400 Jotps for irm
After telling Mr Clifford
to intereson KAZKE
that now clear. He said that Mr Li Ni
Holden Probets (toll), Duggle Wright Twasn't no joke," Edgar that udan Onder. 13, 24 the course of his evidence produced it had in fact suffered no damage/elom.
10
(Piano). {Concert Hall);, 8.30, Time zaid with feeling.
merging there to be a libel Se photostatic copies of returns which said. If the Defence in the pacent have threatened one Woo Liang-wait for Mr d'Almada to
The defendants are alleged to whether he would prefer to in Hongkong for a certain pur- for Muse Twentieth Century "Well, I think it was one of Lordship ind a discretion to he had made to the Revenue, Do-
be pose. It was a probable in- innCTS): 7. Lucky Dip Vacaty - Berenader cond. by Monia Liter ente were to prove the retums did these jokes that got out of allow evidence of the kind dealt pariment for the purposes of dance not show the true position because sang, elas Ng Kat-fu with injury, present to answer for himself ferner and in law
hall tax.
presented by Margherita hand," Mr. Bennett Bald. "Pay with under
4 was the quest that Rule to
In fact by virtue of this cause of en dive dates between October and asked the Court to ad-duty of the Prosecution to Grow Time Sixgal World News and (Studio); 7.50, Weather Report; 40s,"
called "If in his Lordship's Mr McNeill said that if the De conduct of re-ling sickets which 14 and October 20.
that it was a did not appear in the returną, then
impossible in United Nationw Chief Det, Insp. F. Roberia, Edgar went off, and several of opinion there were grounds for fence could not attack the correcif
Report Opposing the
(London course. Counsel argued,
adjournment, fence before they could sux-Relay): 8:15, Letter from America-by news of Ue accounts without attack». his fellow-countrymen slipped the exercise of that discretioning the character of the plaintin, the Jury that the evidence et Loss
were entitled to submit to prosecuting, asked the Court Mr Cliffort said "I promise to cool. Once it was admitted or Alial Cooke (Recorded London
to remand from the public gallery, looking in favour of the defendants, Hoon they must give notice because
the defendants keep quiet however Mr Silva shown that the £400 was Holden's Relar): 9.30. Orchestra of the Week sympathetic. The new arrivals Counsel said he had advanced gation. It was only a question of they were, leading evidence in muti-
of earrings pran not worth the for three days, as they had twists his evidence," time it took to give, that it must expressed a wish to seek legal
apart from uticther there was Garden:., Piano
Royal Opera House Orch., Covent Recital by Jenny from Africa, perhaps, learned as a reasonable ground for Epilce; it was not a question of the
be rejected.
advice.
The Magistrate decided that exciznge control in Australia or Wong Ku Ying (Studio). Sonata in the hazards you face making a that the argument that as this plaintiff concealing any evidence, ha
it would be a waste of time to coh, it was cot improbable or ab Minor Op. 8 by Hirsius; 3.30 said.
Wednesday fortune the hard way-without began and went on until yes-
Theatre. "The Old· ruling from your Lordship that we of $1,000 each,!*
adjourn and Me Silva continued sued that Holdem wanted to re-
Curiosity Shop" by Charles Dickene working too hard,
terday as a two-legged action,
taly the £400: in-Hongkong. -Me d'Almada said that from" what ¦ can call evidence to prove that
with his submissions,
· Adapted": "for". Radio Mabel Con- Mr McNeill had just sold it looked thess books carmot bo rolled od dn
Onco 4 was admitted that
Mr d'Almada might argue (Part 1(NECTA): 10.30. One Night atanduros Produced by Cleland Fin 'as if he was going to object to um; evidence of loss of earnings be- Printed and published by WILLIAM ALICK GRINHAM for evidence the Defence proposed a cause of certain things which began
was the £1,100
contractual that it was improbable because stand-Cleorge Biravo and his Orch. and on behalf of South China Morning Post Limited at 1-3 lead on this point.
to be done about the middle of
price it was impossible to try of the difference in the 1940 (with Yoon! 10.50, Weather Report: 10 submit that the £400 not price quoted and the 1080 price 11.15, Goodaght Music, God BAYR
El, Radio Newsroo) (London Ite Hearing là continuing
paid into the Mercantile Bank, but he (Mr Bilva) would show The Core: 11.30, Clos. Dawn
bo
N
tija
"All we are out to get,nove is, a Yuon and Hung, are on bail
Wyndham Street, City of Victoria, in the Colony of Hongkong, given by Mr 2. Mr d'Almada sald
Rafesting again to the evidence | August," Me d'Almada declared.
"What's Her Line?' Solutibo MILLINER.
Journ