Paga
THE CHINA MAIL, SAT URDAY, MARCH 20, 1948,
FAILED TO SATISFY COURT Playwright Loses His Copyright Claim -
Judgment Based On Mr. Follows On The
Privy Council Case
So
3
The failure of the plaintif, Fung Chil-fun, to satisfy the Court that the Infringe- consisting of five words, ment of title, "Ho Chu See Nung Ka," was on extensive a scale and of so important character as to be a proper subject of protec tion against being copied, resulted in Mr. Jus- tice E. I Williams (Chief Justice), delivering judgment yesterday in favour of the defen- dants, The World Theatre, as regards the plaintiff's claim in respect of this work.
.
Budget
(Continued from Page 3).
Building Schemes
Reminders
rudayala
of "East Asia," "Led," annual general meeting. Dee: Yoeus * Road, Central, 2.10 p.m. Flag Day in aid of Aberdeen. Indus-
trial School.
Bay Scouts Association Supper Dance,
European Y.M.C.A., 6.30 p.m.. Kowloon Cricket Club dance, 9, p.m.
Coming Events
MONDAY,
1.K. Universlty annual sports, Caro-
line. Hill, 1.30 p.m. H.K. Council of Women generat meeting, Y.W.C.A., Duddelf› 66, $.15 p..
Police
Failed To Turn Up
CLAIM FOR PREMISES Hearing Opens At
Supreme Court Didn't
Hearing of an action for the recovery of 53 Con-
naught Road West and the 2nd and 3rd floors: of 3 Des Voeux Road · West, was commenced before Mr. Justice T. J. Gould (Pulsne Judge), yesterday.
10
Beginner
Get Far
Twenty-three-year-old 'Kwan
Chi-lik had hardly started on
his career as a pickpocket when the was involved Inga (street; fight which led to his appear-
months
Defendant, who súmilted that he was learning › to be a pickpocket, was charged with being an accessory after the ect, wounding and posse.usion of an instrument At for an unlawful purpose.
Jing of the road, and it is neeca
The plaintiff, Wong Wal-chu, ropresentations by solicitors for ance" at Central MAK_SIFRCY" sary to undertake, this work, at
was represented by the Hon. Mr. the landlord, Mesars, -Johnson | yesterday and sentenced by Mr. the present functure owing to the
Leo d'Almada e Castro, K,C., in- Stokes. & Master, who, were told F. X. d'Almada to 10 fact that the renewal of the I now come to the Head "Publlo tram rails on this section enn no-
atructed by Mr. Sydpoy Ng Quinn by. Wong Mah-cho that the on- hard labour and recommended of Messra." Brutton & Company, ¡cupants were the rightful tepants, | for banishment. Works Extraordinary" which prolonger be delayed; it is in thu
Mr. Marcus A. da Silva appear- In abandoned his claim. vides for a programme estimat interests of all partica that
[ód for the defendantë, · Lan An the
All this was reported to plain- ed to cost $0,428,500. As 1 ex- relaying of the salla and the
|and Tang" Sum.
tiff and his son in Canton by plained earlier in my speech, this work on road should be care
the
Opening for the defence, after Wong fan-cho and they raised Head has not been much in evi-ried out at the same time. The
it had been ruled that the onus-no oblection the tenants. dence since the re-occupation as second scheme at May Road in
was on him to begin, Mr. Silva Plaintiff in fact gave carte. blanche practically all capital expenditure, volves the reconstruction of a por having been in the nature of re-tion of the road which was com
sald that the premises were rent-autherlly to Wong Man-cho re od by defendants from Wong garding the matter of getting the
authorised "Discharged." Mr. d'Almada Man-cho,
of premings'reldased from the Cur DSI Mackenzie told the Court against loan funds. Aese. It is necessary
sæent Juhurat on the authority of ant issue. That is Franels Day &
after complainants plain
and on todian
went t Hunter v. 20th Century Fox Cor- In
that at 0.30 am. on March 7 recent Privy Cunell case.
Man-cho had worked, for Formosa. which dounges were clined for poration Ltd.) (1040) A, C, 112. stage has now been reached, low-this In order to provide access to ordered
the complainant boarded' Trám up to give ing a new block of a. The add failed to turn ever, when, instead of repairing appellonis
In April 1947, when the Cus 14 years, in a firm at 81, Des
No. 82 proceeding which will result | lavidence.
towards. Infringement of the copyright in
In and replacing buildings and in-tional traffic
SL 1 litle The Man Who owners of the copyright
who stallations which existed before will make it necessary for some Mok Chol, 40, of No. 113, Voeux Road West, managed by todian was about to release Causeway Bay with friend. Jokes the Bank at Monte Carlo." song entitled
plaintiff and his son, Wong Ming-premises, Wong Man-chu cabląć. The plaintiff, who claimed to be brote the Bank at Monte Carla' the war, it last tretine Fioccheary of the more dangerous corners to Second Street, ground floor, and lak, who we known to be a na plaintiff and his son in Formons
for in-to embark on entirely new schemes be widened to some extent.
Japanura. thas author of two dramatic works and claimed damages
Mr. Justice Willans based his assistance in deciding the ques & the tation, could be properly pletely blotted out by the Japan- |
in that Case,
"The
nun
were
to restore
when
PUR
The Kin Long Kang Kin" and fringement of their copyright by which were not in operation in Deep Water Bay Road extension So Lan, 50; of No. 20 Arberdeen ¿turalize when Wong Ming-tak | Gratitude, was expressed by plain
hearing the some title at *Theatre, The plaintiff therefore elained damages, Ituited to $1,000 or, alterimtively, an account trolls.
Kang Kin" will take place on April 9, og 2.30 p.m.
Mr. P. J. Grißiths of Mesars. Walkiem & Gost is appearing for the plaintiff, what defendants are Pjesmited by Mr. F. 14. Loseby.
in the course of his judgment,
Mr. Justice Willams sald:
"Particulars of the infringement romptatged of were that the de fendants had exhibited on a mim- ber of eenshots in their theatre a bencing the sane title as that of the work 1n Chu See Norg Kn There was no cunt- plaint of infringement of anything the contuned in the body of work.
p. 122-123 x very relevant:
There may have
of the theme of
the most
it is f
of the Jim is Gitterent from inai start is
more
attached,
use by the rus-durinkoad 2 relates to a
seem ground in copyright law to justify the appellants' to prevent the
obvious pondents of these few words, which are too unsubstan tial to constituie an Infringement, especially when used in so ferent a connection.'
dif-
Not Original "In the letter of 8 February Betting out the points of defence, ch fordans did not deny that the
*Applying the reasoning in paint was author of the work but dented he was owner of ปี that case to the present case; 1
The
sault on March 18 was
re-schema will bring in valuable re- ST. JOHN'S
AMBULANCE
In
floor.
in
Was
Plaintif then wont Into volun-
*
and received. IZREDNO
+
with
DUL
His friend saw defendant put-
14
they returned to Hong Konging a hand under a pocket and an argument ensued, resulting performance the pre-war period. Some of is to provide access to some land | Street, third floor, charged with
• Chu See Nung Ka" alleged the respondenta by that 122 deferadusite infringed his of a motion picture entitled The there I have already mentioned which is being utilized for a now hawking in wrong pitches last went to Canton, the firm, which tiff and his son to Wong Man in fight. Defendant wis
nt and I have not time this after building scheme.
Thursday, were dismissed when was then at 11, Queen's Road, cho and the tenants for their help allege to have slashed at the copyright in the title of these two Man who broke the Bank
in Apart from the noon to deal
detall with the
arrested closed down.. In 1942, Wong In looking after the premises. complainant with a razor, blade. Sub-Heads 17 and 18 relate to the constables who Monte Carlo". works by performing or authoriz
title of the
The conductor promptly put all should like, two song Lull
two reclamation schemes. Since them were not in Court to give Ming-tak returned to Hong Kong full programmo.
Forgery Alleged rubble ing or pr.curing this performance, fact that the
out of the 'tram: 'But flis flight in public, of citsematograph time and of the motion pleture were nevertheless, to give Honourable the reoccupation much
actual Members a brief
neas at 11. Queen's Street, Tat outline the same, no part of the their
of some from destroyed buildings has been evidence when both pleaded not and, with his father, started busl
guilty. this Important words or mute of the song were of the
Soon after, however. plaintif continued on the street, when Charged with alding and The firm later moved to 3,5 and his son tried to get the ten plainant's friend. Item dumped in those arena and this
defendant 'slashed - at.. con- film. It was held which I have not touched
West antr out of the used in the that the use in the motion picture when and hard which fortaps it in danger of being washed into abotting a larceny on March 9 and 1, en Voeux Road
premieos. and unless work
Both were sent to hospital. property
purchased | Through Wone Man-cho, 'they of the words of the lure we are not sufficiently, explained by on the construction of retaining at Hilller Street, Des Voeux The unsubstantiin matter to of the the title of the Sub-head.
arted now. When com- Road, Central, Yu Kul, coolie, through Wong Man-cho and re-offered the tenants increasing Defendant escaped. is started, wall The judgment of yesterday re-
infringement
plaintiff's
information re- name, sums of "tea money." In July, However, lated only to 11, Chu Sep Nung stitute an
Provision is included for new pleted, the reclamation at Hung of No. 82, Spring Garden Lane, gistered copyright.
was also discharged when the Wong Man-cho was present when after getting the title deeds fruro coived by the Bay View Station markets at Tai Po and Cheung Hom Bay will yield 93 acres of K: hearing of that part of the appellant's Interary
Meser Johovou Stoke & Mas led to the arrest of defendant claim relating to "Chal Kin Long This paauge of the judgment of Sha Wan which are urgently re- reclaimed land which would be complainant, Leung Lun, 35. the sale was completed.
ler, plaintiff went to Wong Man for building sites valu- overseas-Chinese, residing at
in an unnumbered but in "Ming, quired, and for the partial re
Title Deeds
cho and asked on chop to exo-Yuen Street, where the razor Tau ed at some twenty million dollars been a cer-constructions of the a
cute a mortgago. This was given to appear when he pleaded not On the liberation of the Colony, to him. In July or Aug, plain blade was found. tain amount, though not a high Chung Slaughter House which while the levelling of hiflades to the Luk Hof Tung Hotel, failed
guilty.
No. 7 Police Station sent guards tiff and his son fell
"I ask Your Worship to tako- degree, of origmality in thinking has been the subject of complaint provide more filling will make a
by the
Anfurther large area available for health authorition. and ice, with quarters the song.
a serious view of this cASO The alleged thief, however, and impounded the goods on the Wong, Manho. Wong Ming-tak is industrial and housing develop- even in choosing the title, though to be built for the Health
was sentenced to tive months 1st, 2nd and 3rd floors of the called or tenants and gave them owing to the prevalency, of this
on which WAY obvious. To
dintment,
hard labour and recommended premises. Plaintiff fort the title ploces of paper
razor blade pickpocketing on "break the Bark" is a backneyed spector of the Aberdeen
Waterfront Scheme for banishment. on a guilty deeds of the property, as well as written an address, 60, Wing Lok trama," DSI Mackenzie, spid exprossion, und Monte Carlo is, who at present is forced to re
Tie asked them to pa title deeds relating to Canton pro- Street: plea
Among the articles and or was, the most obvious place at side in the city and thus waste
|rent to' much valuable time
The second scheme at Con- Fireman No. 28 of the Cen-rty in possession of Wong Maniho Imadlord direct. When
a pawnticket, which de- ount the cho, together with
certain account |
410 tonants went to this addrea WAG which that achievement or acci-
A naught Road Central will provide
fendant asked to be returbed dant might take place. The theme and returning from in reaching
and
endeavoured to pay rent; they of the song, and their Lordship constag being made on the a reclamation from which can be tral Station charged with aa-books and aix chops. Wong
dis- he was told to look after the were asked to wait on the ple: and to be redeemed before he transit sheds plera with
serves his sentence. construction of much needed sub-built five
offices though It w511 only be for the use of river and coastal missed when the complainant property as plaintiff anticipated that no rent book, was available
being Interned. Plaintiff directed Eventually they
they received *notice Mr. d'Almada requested that claim pathla to
to complete one of those cargo vessels. These will replace failed to appear.
hose "piers.
Мип-спо Hong the, coming year.
to let the pre to, quit.” In: Dec. 1947, plaintif the inspector make arrange- I-Cythero damaged and obsolete
mises so that ere would be alleged that the shop on the re-ments to have somebody do it Subj
someone to look after them after te
ceipts was: A forgory, though the
shton behalf of defendante e tug- clamation scheme at Aberdeen venue and more piers be con-
can
the guards had gone.
algnature was admitted to br L boats trueled later if required. It i alongside which flahing could berth while the actual realso proposed to
genuine Plaintiff nevertheless to construct dock
|tary, internment. Wong Man-cho failed to
the Policu. gould be used for rond 100 ft. wide, and 3,800 ft. dalmed arca
visited him thera
Wong, Man-cho with the salting and drying of fish, long, on the reclaimed area, which
Orders by Asst. Comm. A. el Arrull, furth inatractions to collect
if he gave evidence. further 3 provides the
for int will help materially in relieving Acting Commissioner Ei, J.. A. B. Order
outstanding debts. Wong
Tang Bum was then called to to testify for the defence, also requested
flor Town. Wholesale the schemes Kunnedy: will holes are at $32,000,00 and the possibility-
purchano foodstuffs to be sent to which hearing was Hong Kong Bib Nam Dr. Bh Nain
adjourned Calle Sat, 10th, 1.30 pr. Shauktwan plaintiff in internment. A sum until Apr. 28, at 10a.m.2. The evidener gen by the ity in choosing the title of try adequate when the number of of financing this by means of a plaint was that he was a writer play, it certainly is not of a vy vessels landing dish increases. An Wan from Colonial Development pokocham Neboer Bat. 2016 of $4,000 was collected. Wong released from in- of Cantonese songs and plays, and high degree. I should think that
for and Welfare funds is under dis- Central Dis, Northcote Training Ming-tak was
Schoo) Baž. 20th. 7.30 pm.
ternment and sent to Canton, like Lad written about 20 Cantonesa for some years before the plain-application has been made
grants from Colonial Develop ciusion with the Secretary of AMBULANCE DUTIES HONGKONGA
other Formosans Pays, In 1941 be write the play tiff wrote his play, the question STA
Max. 16th to Mar. 26th. Wanchal “A”. ara- | Divizion. Mar, 37th to Apr. 2nd. Bhan- The goods on the premises were in question. The plot concerned Where is my home?' must have met and Welfare funds for the Stato. In the meantime, a girl who, bemise of her m
ilwan Division. Apr. Erd. to Apr. 9tb. removed about
Christmas 1945, occurred to and been expressed financing of those schemes, but in being provided for the .000
Chung Blok Division. ~ In addition to the expenditure INSPECTIONS:
Wong Man-cho then let the 1st, cods, had bee diven frem ner by many a Chinese woman who no decision has yet been reach tory work on each home.
end and 3rd floors to various Lee. A translation of the the returned to where her home and ed.
to Kal Tak Compensation provided for, of course, continuing Dirikns at Brigade Headquarters dants. In Sept. 1945, he receiv
for in the
The Act Commt, will inspect the follow tenants, including the two defen Appropriation were only Where is my hiding (or family formerly fastly)
Sentence of a year's hard home destroyed by expression is a find the
The provision of $5,000,000 for ing our expenditure from Joan 40 p.: on the followior dates. ifterary ane, not colloquial, and i bombing or fire at the hands of Kal Tak compensation relates to runds, and the bulk of the ex Tues. Erd, May. Bib Nam Division. ed a
a requisition In respect of the
of the fabour and recommendation for one which a tenure and not a the Japanese and her tamily
the payment of compensation in
penditure on rehabilitation
ground floor from the Accom- banishment was passed by Mr NOTICE. All Blv. Bupts, are asked to modation Officer. This led to the A Blair-Kerr at Kowloon male would use, After comple missing.
compulsorily (345) sompact of land
to be mot from this
take note that every effort will be bude promizes being occupied by IP yesterday on Ng Shiu-cheung tion plaintiff, all sold the work
sagree. ---Theatre it-party-for-perform "As_1_have_already said I do taken over by the Japanese for continue
Up to the 31st March to fall it their Divisions before the San-ho, an employee of the Cus They paid no compen-sour runways.
res (17) who pleaded guilty to the
At the original hearing of original Bead kept no copy. of the film it may have beenation for the land though some amounted to $30x80,757, and
that of b
by the 81st "The only witness for the de- entirely different from
pect of the lat, 2nd and 3rd floors for the month of Feb. wRE TO: According to Det. Sub-Inspec- were which
March, 1948, this figuro may have
coived and Wonx Man-cho lasued tor J, R: Sykes, Ah Kam and when the case was called
not present in Court fence was a Chinese teacher. His the play. The plaintiff has failed was paid in respect of buildings is estimated that,
Were demolished. evidence was that the words 'Ho to satisfy me that the title, con- which
beon increased to $73,000,000, these five ruways are still in use and the
receipt, uslag chop of plain his wife left their hut in Fuk Chu See Mung Ke were cermin sisting as it does of
tiff's-firm-and-his-own-personal Tun Street at 8 am, on March ex parte judgment in the sum He words, is on so extensive a scale question of payment of compensa-though the final total depends on language
chop,
of 8700 and costs was awarded 12. for work. When they rein favour of the plaintif. An particular and if so important a character tion for the land is under dis- whether stores due for delivery uny
by the 31st March are further de the Secretary work in which they occurred as to be proper subject of pro-cussion with
Inyed.
year's budget is only balanced by
turned at 6 pm they found the order for possession of the roof Notice To Quit 1 Stale. eiher us the title thereal or lection against being copied.
Loan expenditure during 1948- the fortuitous circumstance that
lock broken and a quantity of was ano made in favour of the ctlierwise but he
Sub Heads 14. 15 and 18 all claimed that therefore hold that as regards
In March 1048, letters were sent clothing missing... they were so common that the this part of plaintiff's claim, relate to road widening or ex-40 is catimated at $45,915,556. I considerable arrears of Earnings
plaintiff, in my and Proẞts Tax will be collected The first at have already, earlier
The plaintiff claimed "', {liat,, expression might occur in any there must be judgment for de tension schomes.
fendants with costs."
Causeway Bay involves the rats-peech, explained that loan funds in 1948-19 instead of during the to occupiers by Mooers. Zimmern Inquiries made among
have been, carmarked for the recurrent year. These arrears really & Co., claiming tenancy from the neighbouring huts led to the the ground and third floor of construction of King's College represent part
The Custodian of Property and giv arrest of, defendant who, ques 140 Des Voeux Road West and certain other educational in-plus for 1947-48, and naturally 1 ing notice to quit. In June, the tlened by the Police, admitted were let to the defendants, who stitutions. Work on Government should have preferred to utilise tenants wore told by poople from quarters will continue to be fin- the money to build up our zc, the Custodian of Property that the theft. He also told the were snit fish dealers. At sothe if they did not move, their furnt ollee that the property, valued time unknown to the plaintiff, anced from this source, and this | serves.".
ture would be thrown out into at $50, had been sold to an un- defendants erected a platforin work, which will help to relieve the general housing shortage,
the street. Later, as a result of known man in the street. being pressed forward as rapidly
Copyright in the title, elajming consider that, though there maying facilities attrahe congestion. The total cost No. 0/40 ́delad March 2015. 1948.
веро
The
the
prepara-
will
PARADES UN
Yel. 28th Man, 8. G.-A. A. Division.
Broke Into A Hut
Re-Hearing Of Damages Claim
Re-hearing of an action for „damages. by Wan Dal-shiu (plaintiff) against The Nat Hing Firm (defendanta) took place before Mr. Justice. E. H Williams (Chief Justice);-at- the Supreme Court yesterday..
AMA S. C. Comberof Messrs. Hastings & Co., ap roared for the plaintiff, while Mr. Peter H. Sin of Messrs F defendants were représented by
Sin & Co
arce by then, giving them the not know what was the theme the extension"-of-the-serodroma 07ture from loan funds annost Inspectlan. Their co-operation istodian of Property Rent in charge of housebreaking the case on Nov. 14, defendants.
in fl wrillan could nut BRUNC
newspaper;
Expression Of Thought
"At the close of the evidence, anjiciturs for both sides adversed me on the inw. Soliciter for the plainút submitted that the words were un expression of thought, originating from the author: though individually they were of comment use. when put together they conveyed an idea and were therefore the subject of copyright (7 Ballsham p.621 para. 873). Even the title of a play, provided it was original and Illerary "work, could be the subject of copyright (Weldon w. Dicks (1878) 10 Ch. D. 217). Solicitor for the De- fendants submitted that the few
Profiteers Fined By Court
needed to inform the Equipment Omber
immediately
outstanding
na possible. The construction of able
of the requirements will
Roth ADWARD
A. Carpe Ofer
of
Not Enough
It was, unfortunately, not pos
to limit expenditure to new Police Stations to replace sion as it was necessary to pro-
$140,000,000 on the present, occa those destroyed during the war, which are now housed in requist vide for certain items, such as Fines ranging from $25 to $250 were imposed on toned buildings, will als be an Kal Tak compensation payments which quite definitely will not Our expenditure siculd 15 shop and stall holders when they appear-urgent item in the Loun pro- gramme. This include,;a' divi:
therefore fall automatically to ed at Central Magistracy yesterday before sional headquarters at Kowloon Mr. Thomas Tam on charges of selling at City and stations at Bay View, some extent next year, but this Energalle Hung Hom and Shau Ki Won will not be enough above the controlled price. T
Five new stations are also being action will be
Mr. J. H. G. Pitman prosecuted.
Training School
recur.
necessary. to
We shall not be out of the
of
the
Rattan Workers On Arms Charge
on the sloping roof for drying s
This was done without fish. the knowledge, of the plaintiff. who had never rented the root to the defendants. The exi tence of the platform: A brought to Hght wherfien”) varandah collapse occurred a st year.
Defendants content
· the platform was
Mr. W. A. Blair-Kerr at Kowloon yesterday of the premises/Th for the hearing of the case in which Tang Yiu- knew the type of
which they were wing (28) and Li Chung-woo allas Laut Sre was the general
Ho Sit Hor of Leung Kwok drug constructed in the New Territor streamline expenditure in all de The afternoons of March 24 and 25 were fixed by when they took over words forming the tile could not Tang Fuck-larn of the Fook store, 32 Bonham Strand was ies to replace demolished build. Partments, bo sald o be an original literary Cheong, 34 Kam Wah Street was fined $150 for selling a tin of ings, and work is about to be wood financially until we have werk. As to whether the title of fined $100 for scilling a tin of black currant pastiles at $1.05 commenced
on a new Police built up a really substantial re- a work was the proper subjectCarnailon
at ($1.25) evaporated milk
serve, and this can only be done of copyright, he referred to a B cents (80 cents).
by, cutting expenditure. or in - sang... allas Lau Chuen-heung (74), rattan - surrounding, fish: Laansa passage in Coppinger an, the Law
Wan Fu, of the Ying Kee store
New Airfield.
creasing revenue by means
workers of 295 Yu Chân Street, first floor, are such structures. of Copyright 7th Edition, p,61 to Cheung Cheong of Yet Hang. was fined $100 for selling in tin
further taxation." the effect that "Weldon v. Dicka 34 Connaught Road, was fined of powdered milk at 33 ($2.50)
A sum of $4,000,000 has been
Adequate reserves are especial. being charged with armed robbery, possession Tearing was had later been overruled. He also to for selling two apples and Mr. Pitman informed the court provided to enable work to be ly necessary in view of the many referred to Broemal v. Mayer 20. two oranges at 60 cents and 40 that defendant was appearing for started on the new airfield as
of arms and ammunition, and receiving stolen Marx 24 at 11.80 partent imung connected with TLR. 148.
cents each (30) cents and 25 cents the second --time" on a similar son as a final decision is reached war-time expenditum, which still
property.
FOR Before I proceed to discuss the cach),
charge.
in regard to the sila, " This, rum, romain to be settled. During Second defendant will face the | It will be recalled that when Inw, I would like. to make'a few,
of course, only represents a fractie, gear, which is just closing additional charges of attempting Li way stopped by PC 1883 in Med
Committal observations, No copy of plain." Wong Kwat of Ying Fat Leong Hong Yam of the Kes Heung ten of the probable, dual cost of we have been able to chlains to shoot: PC 1889: Yu: Wan-Hung, the lane on Feb. 22, and asked til's work has produced in Court 25 Connaught Road was fined Bakery 84 Queen's Road Centdal the new airteld, and the question picture of these Isuse, and pro and possession of arms and am, to open up the newspaper. Trang- I do not know the langur of the 3250 for selling powdered - and was fined $160 for selling a tin of the financing well the full power for bettlement have muditien, at a scavenging land parcel he was carrying he was "Klul achari play: It may have only been a malted milk at $760 and $2.50 of powdered milk at 32,40 (82.80) scheme is sull under discussion er nybanded to the Secretary off Surrey Lane, Kowloon Teng alleged to have drawn'a revolver sérvant of short one-act play or it may have gach ($6.50 and $2,30 respective, Kwok, Lun of the Lai Shan with His Majesty's Government | at Blaise Theed are, still under on Febr 22, been a very fengthy one Plain={1}=
Cale, 34 Wellmgton Street was If more than $4,000,000 fre aurcusion in London and 1 an Lal Hing sing (39), tiff is now spukling; damages for, Soo Pul of Eurala Medicine fined $120 for selling a bottle of quired during the coming year not, therefore, in a position to rattan-worker of the same add
The constable drew his own the Infringement of copyright-in co, 60 Des Voeux Road Central hot milk at 60 cents: (85 cents) for the tollis work on the new discuss them this afternoon, rear, who was originally charged a work of which he does not, now sa remanded for two wool. Ho Shook Kien of the Alley Berodrome, a furthe sum of the Until a decision is reached on with Fang on the count of poss revolver and gred at the man posstes any copy. No complaint
made of any infringement of M. M. A. day Süva: la appearing and Co. 5. Morrison Hill Road some amount, which has been these proposaints we hall Spot Casion of 40 round of ammuni inaleting hinting at wound
was fined $25 mr selling tool earmarked for the purpose would know how the Colcay will emerge tion at 396 Yu Chau Street, was copyright of the play but only of for the defendant,
the "dimculties | yesterday::discharged. Ek Sharicially from brush for $150 (1.30),y be made available; defil the title. It is to be remembered Lee Mel Lam of the Sun Ming
the war and the": BEEN MADENESTA MENS The Loan programme also pro- that the title must be of much Lee 31 Shing Woo Road, was Cheung Ying of the Woo Benvidon for the work on the reba
ength as constitute a literary fined $150 for selling cake of Hannay Road was lined $35 for hilliation of the water composition of the author before Old English Lavender:: soap for selling two oranges at 30, omnia he continued and for i the title is the subject matter of 90 cents (70/cants)!
Lea Bul Wah of Nan Taf sking, willigandi: 186.
(copyright ?(7) Hellsham: pláš).
"There is no evidence, as to the Shumm Ken Mán: Kwok Shop 0 Jubiles Strust wast
nature of the plat depicted in the Shop, B4 Wellington Stree
(Calm shown vint the - defendants, 71*
also from the parcel and fired twice converting
Ing a publi false; Information arid misprison) (of this kommt
been committed
bon fondant
the abbomén,