TUNG KWU ISLAND
81
influence is provided by the recent discovery (in 1968) of a Shang-style stone ko (dagger-axe) on Sha Chau in association with the same soft pottery. The affinity between the decoration on the pottery of Sha Chau and Tung Kwu and Shang pottery is therefore rather stronger than Mr. Schofield's last sentence in the present article suggests. Perhaps his statement made thirty years ago in his classic report on the Shek Pik site remains true: "From the earliest period to which the Hong Kong culture can be dated a trace of Chinese influence is present."
++
Pre-war writings on Hong Kong Archaeology include:
(1) J. G. Andersson — “Topography of the Hongkong Sites" in Bulletin No. 11, Topographical and Archaeological Studies in the Far East, of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, Stockholm, 1939.
(2) S. F. Balfour Section II, "Archaeological Evidence" at pp. 336-341 of his article "Hong Kong Before The British” between pp. 330-352 and 440-464 of T'ien Hsia Monthly, Shanghai, 1941.
(3) Fr. D. J. Finn — various articles in The Hong Kong Naturalist between 1933-36. These are now reprinted in (ed. T. F. Ryan, S.J.) Archaeological Finds On Lamma Island (Akhio) Near Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Ricci publications, Ricci Hall, University of Hong Kong, 1958.
(4) C. M. Heanley and J. L. Shellshear "A Contribution To The Prehistory Of Hongkong And The New Territories”, Praehistoria Asia Orientalis, I, Premier Congrès des Pré-historiens d'Extrême-Orient, Hanoi, 1932.
(5) W. Schofield — "Implements Of Palaeolithic Type In Hong Kong" at pp. 272-275, The Hong Kong Naturalist, December, 1935.
(6) W. Schofield — "The Proto-Historic Site Of The Hong Kong Culture At Shek Pik, Lantau, Hong Kong" at pp. 235-305 of Proceedings of the Third Congress of Pre-historians of the Far East, Singapore, Government Printing House, 1940.
A photograph of Mr. Schofield taken at Tung Kwu by Professor Shellshear on 9 December, 1931 is at Plate 9. Ed.