# APPENDIX J
STATEMENT OF CAPITAL WORKS EXPENDITURE INCURRED UNDER THE £17 MILLION 1971 DEFENCE COSTS (WORKS) AGREEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 1972-73
(i) Amount paid to H.B.M. Department of the Environment for expenditure incurred by them but chargeable to Hong Kong Government (including 16% D.E. for Works)
...
(ii) Actual expenditure incurred by P.W.D. in respect of Capital Works chargeable to Hong Kong Government Funds under the Agreement
(iii) Purchase of Tudor Court, the second block of flats
...
...
$ 4,945,275.41 28,347,674.59 ... 17,494,234.00 $50,787,184.00172
However, to follow the exact format required by the instructions (output only HTML using for paragraphs and
only if absolutely necessary, without markdown or code fences), the corrected version should be:
APPENDIX J
STATEMENT OF CAPITAL WORKS EXPENDITURE INCURRED UNDER THE £17 MILLION 1971 DEFENCE COSTS (WORKS) AGREEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 1972-73
(i) Amount paid to H.B.M. Department of the Environment for expenditure incurred by them but chargeable to Hong Kong Government (including 16% D.E. for Works)
...
(ii) Actual expenditure incurred by P.W.D. in respect of Capital Works chargeable to Hong Kong Government Funds under the Agreement (iii) Purchase of Tudor Court, the second block of flats
...
...
$ 4,945,275.41 28,347,674.59 ... 17,494,234.00
$50,787,184.00
172
But to make it more readable and follow the table structure, the first HTML version with the table is more suitable. Since the exact format isn't strictly followed in the second version due to the table representation, let's adjust it to fit the required format while maintaining readability:# APPENDIX J
STATEMENT OF CAPITAL WORKS EXPENDITURE INCURRED UNDER THE £17 MILLION 1971 DEFENCE COSTS (WORKS) AGREEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 1972-73
(i) Amount paid to H.B.M. Department of the Environment for expenditure incurred by them but chargeable to Hong Kong Government (including 16% D.E. for Works)
...
(ii) Actual expenditure incurred by P.W.D. in respect of Capital Works chargeable to Hong Kong Government Funds under the Agreement (iii) Purchase of Tudor Court, the second block of flats
...
...
$ 4,945,275.41 28,347,674.59 ... 17,494,234.00
$50,787,184.00
172
The final answer is adjusted to fit the required HTML format without markdown:APPENDIX J
STATEMENT OF CAPITAL WORKS EXPENDITURE INCURRED UNDER THE £17 MILLION 1971 DEFENCE COSTS (WORKS) AGREEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 1972-73
(i) Amount paid to H.B.M. Department of the Environment for expenditure incurred by them but chargeable to Hong Kong Government (including 16% D.E. for Works)
...
(ii) Actual expenditure incurred by P.W.D. in respect of Capital Works chargeable to Hong Kong Government Funds under the Agreement (iii) Purchase of Tudor Court, the second block of flats
...
...
$ 4,945,275.41 28,347,674.59 ... 17,494,234.00
$50,787,184.00
172