OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
ミ猭Ы穦某筁祘タΑ魁
Thursday, 28 March 1996
せるら琍戳
The Council met at half-past Two o'clock
とだ穦某秨﹍
MEMBERS PRESENT
畊某
THE PRESIDENT
THE HONOURABLE ANDREW WONG WANG-FAT, O.B.E., J.P.
畊独Щ祇某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE ALLEN LEE PENG-FEI, C.B.E., J.P.
腜某C.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE MRS SELINA CHOW LIANG SHUK-YEE, O.B.E., J.P.
㏄辩睶┥某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE MARTIN LEE CHU-MING, Q.C., J.P.
琖皇某Q.C., J.P.
DR THE HONOURABLE DAVID LI KWOK-PO, O.B.E., LL.D. (CANTAB), J.P.
瓣腳某O.B.E., LL.D. (CANTAB), J.P.
THE HONOURABLE NGAI SHIU-KIT, O.B.E., J.P.
ぶ城某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE SZETO WAH
畕地某
THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, O.B.E., J.P.
糂祇某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE RONALD JOSEPH ARCULLI, O.B.E., J.P.
甃ㄎ瞶某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE MRS MIRIAM LAU KIN-YEE, O.B.E., J.P.
糂胺祸某O.B.E., J.P.
DR THE HONOURABLE EDWARD LEONG CHE-HUNG, O.B.E., J.P.
辩醇翬某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE ALBERT CHAN WAI-YIP
朝岸穨某
THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG MAN-KWONG
眎ゅ某
THE HONOURABLE CHIM PUI-CHUNG
糕蚌┚某
THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE
毒浪膀某
THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL HO MUN-KA
︙庇古某
DR THE HONOURABLE HUANG CHEN-YA, M.B.E.
独綺笽某M.B.E.
THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING
糂紌某
THE HONOURABLE LEE WING-TAT
ッ笷某
THE HONOURABLE ERIC LI KA-CHEUNG, J.P.
產不某J.P.
THE HONOURABLE FRED LI WAH-MING
地某
THE HONOURABLE HENRY TANG YING-YEN, J.P.
璣某J.P.
THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN
襖略ビ某
DR THE HONOURABLE SAMUEL WONG PING-WAI, M.B.E., F.Eng., J.P.
独篿某M.B.E., F.Eng., J.P.
DR THE HONOURABLE PHILIP WONG YU-HONG
独﹜グ某
DR THE HONOURABLE YEUNG SUM
法此某
THE HONOURABLE HOWARD YOUNG, J.P.
法У地某J.P.
THE HONOURABLE ZACHARY WONG WAI-YIN
独岸藉某
THE HONOURABLE CHRISTINE LOH KUNG-WAI
嘲糠某
THE HONOURABLE JAMES TIEN PEI-CHUN, O.B.E., J.P.
バ玊某O.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN
某
THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM
朝挪狶某
THE HONOURABLE CHAN WING-CHAN
朝篴篱某
THE HONOURABLE CHAN YUEN-HAN
朝胞糭某
THE HONOURABLE ANDREW CHENG KAR-FOO
綠產碔某
THE HONOURABLE PAUL CHENG MING-FUN
綠癡某
THE HONOURABLE CHENG YIU-TONG
綠模磁某
DR THE HONOURABLE ANTHONY CHEUNG BING-LEUNG
眎▆某
THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG HON-CHUNG
眎簙┚某
THE HONOURABLE CHOY KAN-PUI, J.P.
讲蚌某J.P.
THE HONOURABLE DAVID CHU YU-LIN
Χギ棚某
THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN
︙玊く某
THE HONOURABLE IP KWOK-HIM
腑瓣辆某
THE HONOURABLE LAU CHIN-SHEK
糂ホ某
THE HONOURABLE AMBROSE LAU HON-CHUEN, J.P.
糂簙煌某J.P.
DR THE HONOURABLE LAW CHEUNG-KWOK
霉不瓣某
THE HONOURABLE LAW CHI-KWONG
霉璓某
THE HONOURABLE LEE KAI-MING
币某
THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG
辩模┚某
THE HONOURABLE BRUCE LIU SING-LEE
郭Θ某
THE HONOURABLE LO SUK-CHING
霉睲某
THE HONOURABLE MOK YING-FAN
馋莱某
THE HONOURABLE MARGARET NG
艷祸某
THE HONOURABLE NGAN KAM-CHUEN
肅繟某
THE HONOURABLE SIN CHUNG-KAI
虫ヲ昂某
THE HONOURABLE TSANG KIN-SHING
纯胺Θ某
DR THE HONOURABLE JOHN TSE WING-LING
谅ッ闹某
THE HONOURABLE MRS ELIZABETH WONG CHIEN CHI-LIEN, C.B.E., I.S.O., J.P.
独窥ㄤ军某C.B.E., I.S.O., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE LAWRENCE YUM SIN-LING
ヴ到圭某
MEMBERS ABSENT
畊某
THE HONOURABLE EDWARD HO SING-TIN, O.B.E., J.P.
︙┯ぱ某O.B.E., J.P.
PUBLIC OFFICERS ATTENDING
畊そ叭
THE HONOURABLE MRS ANSON CHAN, C.B.E., J.P.
CHIEF SECRETARY
︽現Ы某ガ現朝よネC.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE DONALD TSANG YAM-KUEN, O.B.E., J.P.
FINANCIAL SECRETARY
︽現Ы某癩現纯疆舦ネO.B.E., J.P.
THE HONOURABLE JEREMY FELL MATHEWS, C.M.G., J.P.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
︽現Ы某現皑碔到ネC.M.G., J.P.
MR MICHAEL SUEN MING-YEUNG, C.B.E., J.P.
SECRETARY FOR HOME AFFAIRS
現叭甝喘ネC.B.E., J.P.
MR CHAU TAK-HAY, C.B.E., J.P.
SECRETARY FOR RECREATION AND CULTURE
ゅ眃約冀㏄紈撼ネC.B.E., J.P.
MR HAIDER HATIM TYEBJEE BARMA, I.S.O., J.P.
SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORT
笲块纉ゅネI.S.O., J.P.
MR NICHOLAS NG WING-FUI, J.P.
SECRETARY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS
舅ㄆ叭篴ネJ.P.
MR DOMINIC WONG SHING-WAH, O.B.E., J.P.
SECRETARY FOR HOUSING
┬独琍地ネO.B.E., J.P.
MRS KATHERINE FOK LO SHIU-CHING, O.B.E., J.P.
SECRETARY FOR HEALTH AND WELFARE
徖ネ褐繬霉璼O.B.E., J.P.
MR JOSEPH WONG WING-PING, J.P.
SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION AND MANPOWER
毙▅参膚ッキネJ.P.
MR PETER LAI HING-LING, J.P.
SECRETARY FOR SECURITY
玂兢紋圭ネJ.P.
MR BOWEN LEUNG PO-WING, J.P.
SECRETARY FOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND LANDS
砏购吏挂現辩腳篴ネJ.P.
MR KWONG KI-CHI, J.P.
SECRETARY FOR THE TREASURY
畐叭馣ㄤвネJ.P.
MR LEO KWAN WING-WAH, J.P.
SECRETARY FOR ECONOMIC SERVICES
竒蕾闽ッ地ネJ.P.
CLERKS IN ATTENDANCE
畊
MR RICKY FUNG CHOI-CHEUNG, SECRETARY GENERAL
毒更不ネ
MR LAW KAM-SANG, DEPUTY SECRETARY GENERAL
捌霉繟ネネ
MISS PAULINE NG MAN-WAH, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL
瞶ゅ地
MR RAY CHAN YUM-MOU, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL
瞶朝窜璟ネ
APPROPRIATION BILL 1996
Resumption of debate on Second Reading which was moved on 6 March 1996
PRESIDENT: Council will now resume and continue with the debate on the Appropriation Bill 1996. Does any Member wish to speak? Mr SZETO Wah.
畕地某璓勉畊ネ纯竒Τ蔼"璶逗布ぃ璶匡布"逗布籔匡布┏琌或妓闽玒㎡┏琌ぃ甧и临琌瓸睛ㄌ秈癶闽玒㎡ミ猭Ы籔匡布Τ闽癩現箇衡籔逗布Τ闽臮きㄓミ猭Ы籔癩現箇衡跑て┘が笆闽玒碞ǎ匡布籔逗布闽玒狠硂琌Τ痲币み醇
ひ包匡拒だ厨祙琌翠カチ眏疨璶―き玡ミ猭Ы沮и癘拘埃瞷ヴ畊独Щ祇ネ硂琌ㄤ某璓醚琌現┎┶荡硂璶―㎝醚и纯ボк某癸︓癩現箇衡㎝︓癩現箇衡硈ㄢщは癸布碭竒現┎沧︓箂癩現秨﹍龟琁ひ包だ厨祙硂琌き玡琿菌
ミ猭Ыま匡チ匡某禬筁计秖跑玃秈借跑琌現┎⊿Τタ跌硂借跑﹚︓癩現箇衡ご礛蹦琂┕篈癸チ種φぃ籇竚窖ぃ瞶ê癩現箇衡ミ猭Ы眔玡计は癸布讽癩現琌沉蔼贾ネê琌材癩現箇衡眔竒喷毙癡琌瞏ㄨτΤ痲ê癩現箇衡硄筁ミэ跑現┎筁篈約獂钡牟セЫ某渡钮チ種﹚癩現箇衡┮癸︓癩現箇衡и蝶基琌"琌Τ┮秈˙琌癸チ種耕タ莱"硂琌秨﹍現┎タ跌ミ猭Ы借跑て﹚癩現箇衡ぃぃタ跌チ種
きミ猭Ы某场パ匡羭玻ネ硂琌秖跑τ借跑Τ秈˙祇甶瞷и-
タ癚阶せ︓癩現箇衡碞琌硂妓菌璉春矗ㄓ安硂癩現箇衡Τ或ぇ矪иぃ粄琌瞷ヴ癩現琌地┪琌醇τ琌匡布琌匡布秖硂琌匡布籔逗布瓸睛ㄌ秈癶闽玒臟靡
癩現箇衡盢穦妓㎡硂盢穦琌穝Ч钵妓菌璉春矗ㄓ
丁ㄓい瓣﹛竒炽炽ぃヰは滦眏秸匡セЫ┮Τ匡布15る獽场紀パぃ甧は癸Ч⊿Τ匡布羬ミ猭穦τぇ
程い瓣﹛硓臩癩現箇衡璶パい璣蛮よ﹚临Τる关㏑ミ猭Ы砛硄筁ぃ甧璹玥羬ミ猭穦穦糵某︽﹚琌"癬膌╛"
琂Ч⊿Τ匡布ぃ甧は癸ぃ甧璹︙ㄤ臦笵硂临Τ或翴翴"瓣ㄢ蔼︑獀"㎡
Τ纯篕"舩窥"纞"ó反"籔硂妓﹚癩現箇衡螟玂ぃ穦"滥窥""奔繷"
皑弧筁﹙毙琌チ弘緙琎ぱ玱Τ弧穦褐琌贺弘緙ぃ笵硂衡ぃ衡琌祇甶皑竡硂妓祇甶皑竡Θ﹚癩現箇衡盡產╄竒祇贺"з逗‵喱"非称扳ぃ琌з瑀琌"з逗"種獽ぃノ逗
Τ某瞷ヴ璶﹛矗玡"筁郎"﹚癩現箇衡癩現讽礛妮璶﹛矗玡"筁""郎"┮孔い璣蛮よ﹚癦ぃ琌跑Θ縒產盡竒犁
ヘ玡膚〆穦坝〆荡场だ"翠獀翠"跑"坝獀翠"よΤ玌粂孔"纒ネ纒获ネ获ρ公ネㄠ穦ゴ瑌"パ膚〆穦玻ネ崩匡〆穦パ崩匡〆穦玻ネ羬ミ猭穦碞パЧ⊿Τ匡布羬ミ猭穦糵某璹︽硄筁︓癩現箇衡盢穦琌"滥窥""奔繷""з逗‵喱""坝獀翠"癩現箇衡
る琁現厨臛阶и纯︳璸翠盢穦瞷贺贺癶瞷ㄓ癩現箇衡盢穦琌程瞷癶
êΩ臛阶いи弧"安и-
镑秸笆┮Τ秸笆は癸癶縩伐刮挡ち刮挡は癸癶秖и-
临ぃ璓荡辨"
は癶竒ㄓи-
璶ミ程約獂眏は癶羛皚絬癩現箇衡碞琌硂は癶羛皚絬璶驹
и临まノ筁Χ︑睲钢"眔锭礚︙斗报保独"и辨糵某硄筁︓癩現箇衡セЫ某ぃ恨ヴ戳临Τぶら常璶セ▆翠痲ぃ璶а癘纯や瘤礛盢穦砆矗玡紀匡布匡チチ筹︕チщ缠腨布
は癶竒秨﹍琵и-
籔翠カチ灸矮
畊ネи略朝勉
MR RONALD ARCULLI: Mr President, the media is always interested in what marks Legislative Council Members give the Financial Secretary's Budget. I have resisted this over the years, but because of my appreciation of this year's Budget, I will depart a little by dealing with most of the main points of the Budget. Perhaps with this, the media can ascertain the level of support given to this year's Budget. Like the Financial Secretary, Mr President, I shall deliver my observations in three parts. First, from my head, from my heart, and then from my arms and my legs, but I shall do so in reverse order.
First, from my legs, or in other words, what we in the Liberal Party stand for. Mr President, the Liberal Party's motto is this: "竒蕾旧闽猔チネ".
We believe in it. We are proud of it and we wanted it for the good of Hong Kong. Does this however coincide with the objective of this year's Budget? Let us see.
The Financial Secretary repeats the Administration's policy of low, stable and predictable taxation. We agree. He re-asserts modern infrastructure, better homes, health care, schools and social welfare. We agree. He believes in small government. We agree. He emphasizes that we must live within our means. We agree. As regards his "seven heavenly virtues", we agree with six the only exception is the level of fiscal reserves which we believe is more than adequate. His rigorous user-pay principle on government fees and charges I shall have more to say about this later. His proposals regarding a science park, a second industrial technology centre, a fourth industrial estate, promotion of our service industries including concessions on interest income and trading profits of debt income and limited waiver of stamp duty. We agree. A mortgage corporation. We agree. His reduction in stamp duty for property transactions. We agree. His refurbishment allowance for hotels. We agree. Mr President, I shall now move on to my arms. Against what do we raise our arms in protest? I will give a few examples. We disagree with his pitiful increase for the elderly. We disagree with his unreasonable refusal to reduce profits and salaries tax. We disagree with his pursuing a change in depreciation allowance. We disagree with his proposal for annual revaluations of property for rates. We disagree with his refusal to grant a housing or mortgage allowance. We disagree with his increase in hydrocarbon oils duty. And, last but not the least, it will be a long time we forgive him for his refusal to change or lower the duty on alcohol. Obviously, he could rectify this quite easily. Mr President, I suspect, and if I may be so bold to suggest, that this has your support in spirit if not in fact.
Mr President, I better move on to the second part of my observations, and that is, those from my heart, and here I speak for my constituents and my hobby, horses.
For my constituents, we all know, they, are members of REDA, HKCA and EMCA, but I should also say something for their customers, those 850 000 odd property owners. I welcome the modest stamp duty relief given to those whose vote of confidence in Hong Kong is the purchase of their home. I say modest because they have lost 24% of their investment due to unnecessary measures taken by the Administration to lower property prices. Next, his revision of the current rules to permit elderly residing in China to receive Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA) standard rates and long term supplements has my cautious welcome. Cautious because I hope they will receive everything they would be entitled to had they been living in Hong Kong. Cautious because I hope there will be an absolute minimum of bureaucratic hurdles for those who wish to live in China to claim their allowances. Mr President, the Liberal Party has been pushing this for some years, but apparently the Financial Secretary only succumbed to my wife's constant lobbying, and for this, I thank her. Last but not the least, Mr President, betting duty. It seems extraordinary that the Financial Secretary would put his hands into the charitable pockets of the Jockey Club to increase the betting duty by 0.5%. If he had said I need the extra $400 million because I have to increase the CSSA for the elderly by $350 per month, I might have understood. But as we all know this is not the case. The $400 million, as honourable colleagues know, would have been spent on the community.
Mr President, I shall now move to my head. Any head has eyes, ears, nose, mouth and brain. Today, I will let my nose and the little brain that I have in my head be the masters of my mouth. Well, what do they smell and think? First they smell and think that our Financial Secretary has a number of ideas which if implemented will get more but unnecessary money into public coffers. What could these be?
First, the forecast deficit of $2.5 billion for 1995-96. There should be no deficit but forecasting a deficit allows him to budget for a $1.6 billion surplus for 1996-97.
Second, the conservative management of our fiscal reserves yielding $5.8 billion or about 4% yield, thus allowing the Exchange Fund to profit from cheap funds from our fiscal reserves. The Financial Secretary and the Secretary for the Treasury have repeatedly said that we cannot, and I repeat, we cannot, take any risk with our fiscal reserves. It seems strange that we can do so with the Exchange Fund where the annual return averages about 12% or nearly 200% more than the return on our fiscal reserves. To make the point, Mr President, if our return yields an extra 1%, that is about a billion and half dollars, which I am sure that Financial Secretary and his colleagues and Members of this Chamber can put to good use, I ask my honourable colleagues this question: Is there any difference between our fiscal reserves and the Exchange Fund if and when there is a loss? I believe not. What then is the answer? Perhaps the answer lies in this. We cannot ask the Exchange Fund to give us the profits to spend whilst increasing fiscal reserves would enable us to call for either reduction in taxes and/or increase in spending! Are not they clever?
The third item, Mr President, government fees and charges. As you all know, we have been doing battle with the Administration over increases in fees and charges. All of us believe in the user-pay principle. All of us believe that because of the economic downturn, high unemployment and high inflation that the Administration ought to freeze for one year any increase in government fees and charges. As a result of our initial solidarity, which sadly does not exist today, we were able to examine in great detail the Administration's approach to the increases. We got detailed costings, questioned efficiency and discovered some mistakes. As a result, today we are much wiser. But alas, that solidarity did not last and the Administration is about to divide and conquer. We in the Liberal Party still believe that our initiative was and is still right but we need colleagues' support to sustain this initiative. Today may well demonstrate whether this is to be when we vote on the Administration's proposal to increase car parking charges at Kai Tak Airport. But I now throw another challenge to the Administration. Firstly, if you believe in maintaining increases in Government fees and charges, bring every increase without exception to this Council and I would include water charges. Secondly, examine how many fees and charges there are that can be altered from annual renewals or once-in-a life-time payment or perhaps no payment at all. There must be fees that you are collecting where the collection charge is more expensive than the fees you collect. Thirdly, on those where you seek full cost recovery, give us details and reasons for any shortfall plus any proposals as to what is a reasonable period within which you should attain full cost recovery. In this context, I would like to emphasize that the overriding factor has to be flexibility. In other words, if the economy is good you may charge a little more, but charge a little less if the economy is not so good. I ask the Administration to do this because of the massive surpluses that have been forecasted between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2000 which amounts to some over $20 billion for each of those financial years. Mr President, the Liberal Party understands that part of the forecasted surplus comes from an assumed annual increase in government fees and charges. Fourthly, we believe that there is no justification this year for not limiting such increases for any of the three items where services are charged in full to a rate not more than inflation. We hope the Administration will respond positively to these four points so that Members of this Council could re-consider their opposition to such increases.
Before I conclude, Mr President, on behalf of the Liberal Party, I cannot emphasize more how vitally important it is for Hong Kong and for our people to have a seamless, and I emphasize, a seamless transition on two matters: our Budget and our Civil Service. I therefore take this opportunity of asking China and Britain to bury their differences for the sake of the people of Hong Kong. Thank you, Mr President.
DR SAMUEL WONG: Mr President, a surge of fresh air swept through this Chamber as the Financial Secretary, Mr Donald TSANG, presented his Budget speech on 6 March 1996. Mr Donald TSANG is a communicator. He explained the complexities of the Hong Kong economy superbly, especially in his Addendum published under the title: "The Services Sector Support and Promotion". He even provided a glossary of financial terms. I would certainly recommend my members of the constituency to study the two documents for sheer excellence in presentation.
For example, his concept of the role of Government was a model of humility and accuracy. In the Addendum, 14 of the 17 Action Agenda positively stated that progress was in the hands of the private sectors, most containing the words "it is for the private sector to take the lead." Since this sector generates 73% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) you might conclude he put Government firmly in its place. Its partnership with the business sector, he said, was based on its established policy of minimal intervention and maximum support for business (what used to be called positive non-intervention).
And yet, in apparent contradiction, he demonstrated leadership. A leader is someone who inspires people to follow. The Budget speech was the most inspiring I have heard from a Government officer. As he put it himself, "it is our duty to offer our community a clear description of what can be achieved and what we need to do to make our vision a reality." This was not just a fine phrase. He went ahead and did it. Furthermore, he did it in a context of an almost no-win situation. How could he please the community, legislators, the media and China all at once? Yet he came incredibly close.
He was honest too. In describing the rapid and overwhelming development of the services sector over the past two decades, he admitted freely that Government had only just started coming to terms with it. Indeed, it became clear that one of the main reasons for the present unemployment was the failure to recognize the urgent need for retraining arising from the shift from manufacturing to service industries. Yet, the Addendum to his speech left me marvelling how much the Government had caught up with in just a few months.
Obviously, the more Government leaves to the private sector the better. We are all aware that the decision to build a new airport was left till well after Kai Tak was doomed to overload. On Government's own admission they have been unable to table the Broadcasting Bill because they could not keep up with the technology. The decision to corporatise Radio Television Hong Kong was left too late to avoid a Chinese veto. Hong Kong roads have the highest vehicle density in the world, which is another way of saying we have not built enough roads. There is a shortfall of 76 000 overnight parking spaces and 37 000 daytime spaces for goods vehicles alone. Many more examples like these show Government's previous failure to show leadership. At last, in our Financial Secretary, I believe we have a civil servant who understands it.
He understands, too, how to put things into perspective. Of the 73% of the GDP generated by the services sector, engineering plays a significant part in less than 10% of it. That puts us in our place, but perhaps it may lead us to see the potential for making more use of our consultancy capabilities. On the credit side for engineering, infrastructure and environment, at 18.5% of total public expenditure, together form the largest item (and that is not counting building from the private sector).
On matters of detail, I applaud his policy to encourage scrapping of old cars. I just hope he has somewhere to put them. I also notice that 100 more native English teachers are to be funded. Native of where? Are we to have any consistency of dialect throughout the schools? Is Hong Kong to be predominantly American or British? Our spelling is mostly British but I am not so sure about our accent.
In his speech, the Financial Secretary has underlined Government's intention to identify ways to further facilitate the success of our economy. As the Governor's main adviser on technical education and industrial training, the Vocational Training Council, which I chair, has the responsibility to ensure Hong Kong has a comprehensive system of vocational education and training to meet its current and future needs. To this end, the Vocational Training Council has taken a number of measures. These include:
(a) The submission to Government, almost two years ago, of recommendations that would improve the attractiveness of the "New Technology Training Scheme" to employers. These include a proposal to increase the level of grant to employers sending their technologists and managers to acquire new skills that would benefit both their own business and Hong Kong at large. I am glad to learn from the Financial Secretary that Government is now considering our submission (Paragraph 106 of the Budget);
(b) Work is already in hand to add a training hotel to complement the existing training facilities of the Hotel Industry Training Centre so as to facilitate the continuing growth of our hospitality industry. This new addition will enable the Vocational Training Council to offer real-life experience to trainees and students in all areas of hotel operation (Paragraph 116.3 of the Budget);
(c) The continuing review and re-structuring of courses at the technical institutes and industry training centres with a view to re-diverting resources to areas where training needs are growing, for example, the engineering services, commerce and other services sectors. An example of the measures taken to reflect the changing economic situation is the closure of a manufacturing engineering teaching department in one of the technical institutes in 1995-96 and the concomitant establishment of a computing studies department. The transference of practical training from the technical institutes to the training centres will release space needed in the former for additional courses for the commercial and services sectors;
(d) Emphasis will continue to be put on increasing and enhancing training in information technology and in the application of computers in the control of machinery and equipment with the aim of bringing about an increasingly "computer-literate" workforce;
(c) Steps have been taken to upgrade the English language ability of students to meet the proficiency demanded at the workplace. Technical institutes now have more teachers of English and additional language laboratories. Teaching materials on sector-specific vocational English are also being developed for use in both the technical institutes and technical colleges. The Vocational Training Council is fully aware of the importance of the language skills of the workforce for Hong Kong to maintain its position as an international centre for trade and finance (Paragraphs 107 and 108 of the Budget); and
(f) The Management Development Centre of the Vocational Training Council continues to develop management training programmes which aim at helping small and medium size enterprises enhance their productivity and upgrade their management systems (Paragraph 116.5 of the Budget).
Finally, the Government has just commissioned a firm of consultants to review the vocational education and training in Hong Kong in the past decade and to chart the way forward into the next century. We must prepare our young workforce to face the challenge of, not only 1997, but the year 2001 and beyond.
With these words, Mr President, I support the motion.
糕蚌┚某璓勉畊ネ癩現矗材癩現箇衡莉眔蒥チ㎝肚碈局臔иョい瓣镑暗翠崔チ瓣┮暗ㄆτ稰篴瘤礛иぃだ贺壁拨澈硂陪ボ"翠獀翠"獺み琌獶盽
癩現镑莉眔渤蝶璶Τ材镑だ吭高種ǎ疭琌ミ猭Ыêㄇ竒盽獶某現┎現郸現囊種ǎ材ㄆ镑だ秆絋龟拜肈и-
璶候癘琌ㄆ癘眔Τ︗玡ヴ癩現びび纯弧ヴ︙Θ毖常ぃ琌癩現︑镑暗讽秆睦琌崩砫ヴиさぱ矗ボ玱琌璶癩現ぃ璶а癘硂箇衡琌ㄆ絪籹ㄓ材碞琌骸獺み艶矪瞶痙ㄓ拜肈硂贺弘碞琌セōΘ碞讽礛и-
ぃ璶а癘現┎Τウ︑縒疭ぇ矪翠現┎场Μ常琌ㄓ︑"ノ︑"玥硂竒Τ秆∕场だ癩現拜肈ノ膀挤蹿瘤礛挤蹿玱ぃノ痙倒癩現箇衡и辨現┎ぃ璶竒盽硂虑癩現逼Τ翠現┎獽琌芥矪翠蔼基現郸狦ご窥杠琌癩現程ㄎ玂毁
и癸癩現箇衡Τㄇ種ǎи谋眔祙膀﹍沧筁疷и筁ㄢ竒盽矗硂拜肈璶琌パ场だ紅產┪щ戈盢-
щ戈耎︓い瓣翠現┎癸莱盞ち闽猔痙種︙眖硂ㄇщ戈讽い笷璓祙Μ酚臮㎝ゼㄓ璸购
癩現箇衡び現獀紇臫珹現囊紇臫и粄癩現莱赣Τ︑绊﹚ミ初ぃ莱び膀糷礚ゎ挂璶―磜▂镑ッ环骸ì硂ㄇ礚ゎ挂璶―盾и谋眔箇衡冈荷や场だΜよ玱琌"辨ぱゴ"讽礛珹и┮矗芥Μ干ぃì
癸坝祇甶τēи﹍沧粄現┎筁计耕祏跌疭琌瞷ガ材戳穨恏单蔼мよи粄現┎莱赣挤ㄇ蹿兜ら猔種┹甶穝мㄏ穝м祇甶镑莱ノゼㄓい瓣蒥初笷璓竒蕾㎝坝穨祇甶硂琌獶盽璶
畊ネ瞷筁寸戳﹟緇460ぱゼㄓи-
璶渡闽猔计よㄆ薄讽礛チネ琌璶и-
璶秆ゼㄓ穦Τ現獀竒蕾㎝磕よㄆ薄現獀よи-
ミ猭Ыㄆ竒盽癸ゼㄓ﹙瓣い瓣矗妓ぃу蝶㎝獶某︓い端の碿種ю阑硂Τ或ノ㎡狦竒蕾㎝ら癩現箇衡诀穦秈︽び現獀┦┽阑и玂痙現獀拨澈ゲ斗Т┪癸杠讽礛Τㄇ⊿Τ诀穦癸杠-
莱赣浪癚︑岿矪狦び癸кま癬﹙瓣ぃ骸癸︑絋龟琌ぃи粄埃獶Τセㄆ︽笆к某┪ㄤ㏑┦︽玥莱赣が碙薄鶪矗︑芠翴眖τ笷璓腀辨㎝醚硂琌ゼㄓ現獀玡硚
材竒蕾よ翠祇甶琌跑窾て疭琌せ忌笆パ┦м㎝磕祇甶ㄏ翠よ笷璓キ颗祇甶筁翠Μ痲辅璣瓣だぇ瞷玱禬璣瓣だぇ瞷硂或畉禯琌翠疭ぇ矪и獺盢ㄓ翠竒蕾穦籔い瓣秨現郸荡癸だぃ秨狦い瓣镑ㄎ祇甶竒蕾翠Τ或拜肈ㄤ龟常ぃΘ拜肈璶い瓣現┎瓣チネㄇ–碞穦Τ3 000窾︓5 000窾笴ㄓ翠琌翠竒蕾獶盽や琖3 000窾︓5 000窾ぃ筁い瓣5%传杠弧狦瓣チ璶ㄓ翠キА璶–20眔Ω诀穦秨現郸翠竒蕾莉眔祇甶㎝猋猋篴琌礚胔好
緇ㄓ獽琌磕拜肈ら癩現莱赣ㄇ弘闽猔磕ㄆ叭祇甶厨彻㎝肚碈桂Ω厨笵翠琌磕いみи磕狝叭Τ癸弧会稰胔好и-
琌Τ戈弧眔硂或岸ゼㄓ癩現箇衡莱赣盿笆硂よ祇甶ら磕狝叭現郸穦癸よ祇甶Τ环紇臫翠蹿㎝Τ闽よ讽ㄣ┦キА璸玡璗狦翠磕⊿Τセō箇衡㎝璸购ア北и踞み翠磕蒥初穦Θ摸崔チ┮孔摸崔チ碞琌翠龟悔薄鶪琌15る獽穦挡崔チ参獀狦и-
磕蒥初砆瓣墩北笲碞ッ环临ぃ睲眖布蒥初戳笲ǎ瓣秈м㎝-
種├薄籹硑墩ノ翠布蒥初-
ノ戳砯盿笆瞷砯蒥初ぃ筁琌-
挡基膚絏硂薄鶪癸翠磕伐ぇ繧и獶ē羜钮癩現莱赣ゼㄓ癩現箇衡い挤戈方╯硂よ拜肈翠秈︽蚌癡磕ノい瓣ゼㄓ磕狝叭秨現郸诀穦ㄏ翠镑眖い眔痲秈˙綿㏕翠磕いみ︗
畊ネ矗磕狝叭碞ぃ眔ぃ矗ㄢ翴材癩現癩現箇衡い矗の布祙粄莱赣籔ユ┮竒坝某矗硂兜璹и赣荡癸ぃ種硂猭и-
ゲ斗秆翠瞷蛮よご斗煤0.15%祙传杠弧禦芥い穦Τ0.3%祙ヘ玡祙よ酚現┎矗ㄑ戈芖布ユ程翠逼材程蔼玥琌皑ㄓ﹁ㄈ琌场禣ノ1.15%翠布竒瘤礛逼材ㄤ龟弧琌程0.25%い竒盽穦Τ50%Ι琌0.125%畊ネ布竒硂妓現┎临рウ穦搭祙иぃ觅硂翴布竒︙穦﹚0.25%程璶琌购-
ぃ琌胋耞и-
ゲ斗瞷购ΜよΑ琌忌現郸ㄏ-
Μ硂计肂セ常琌莲籯иㄓ穦硂癩現㎝癩竒ㄆ叭伐搭布祙続莱吏挂盢祙搭0.05%現┎癩現Μ穕ア10货┪8货じ斗跌ユ肂τ﹚﹉づ阶︙环τē硂琌抖莱奸瑈τ琂礛翠︑粄磕いみ妓膙碞ぃ璶辅鶪硂计ヘ穕ア淮獽眖ㄤよ寥ㄓ
畊ネи讽礛穦酵酵盿烩磕ㄆ叭靡ㄩの戳砯ㄆ叭菏诡〆穦"靡菏穦"ユ┮瞷タ膚称琍戳紋笲㏄翠布蒥初Τ105菌硂琿戳丁ずちΘ碞㎝Θ常妮筁纯翠靡ㄩΤ闽τぃ琌せΘミ靡菏穦Θ罿ぃ琌ヴ戳︓さ骸辩﹚üネ骋矗辩﹚üネи碞璶借好翠現┎現郸琌甧砛沟ㄏぃ琌そ叭ぃノ帽獽ヴパㄤヴ戳┑и辨癩竒ㄆ叭氮臛い穦琵翠だ秆琌Τ硂薄鶪の︙秆∕
靡菏穦琌菏恨诀篶и-
ゲ斗秆翠磕いみ莱パ癩竒ㄆ叭参烩よパ羛ユ┮磅︽布戳砯ユ┮磅︽戳砯τ蝗禩初玥磅︽-
程パ靡菏穦菏恨Τ闽笲琌タ盽ウ璽砫琌牡诡τぃ琌"辊堵も"巨羇翠磕ㄆ叭笲㎝ちΤ闽и璶―癩竒ㄆ叭┪癩現琍戳莱絋龟┯粄蝗禩初猭诀篶蝗禩穨ら琌璶吏瞷ウ︗瘤礛⊿ΤタΑ莉┯粄τ-
︑笲獶盽タ盽狦镑玡蹦暗猭拨澈穦癸穦Τ
畊ネи粄癩現筁祏祏丁ずよ常暗眔獶盽ì镑и辨穦暗眔
и略朝勉
綠模磁某璓勉畊ネ﹚せ︓癩現箇衡絋琌ま闽猔硂箇衡览筁祘い癩現埃克ō︑秆某種ǎ翠刮砰現囊ョ現┎矗璶―糤硂糤ê┮孔"礩枫骸ヘヘぃ穠倒"Τネ媚┍ずκ耫妓妓Τ
癩現妓癸現刮┮矗璶―㎡и-
癩現礛跑Θネ媚┍"磝耫"獶盽羙癸現刮璶―Τ"磝耫"癸κ耫Α妓ネ媚龟︽┷"抖も┼ㄓ"郸菠オ珺ㄇ珺ㄇ︑Τㄇ媚碞Θ"警"ネ媚┋⊿Τр"碍絙π"讽"碍皐"產笵硂ㄢ贺"碍"讽繷ネ媚┦Чぃ岿獽痷"警"
挡狦るせら克︑籹"睲▁楞孩玂獵琄糤"緄肅よ硂郸菠讽よ粽臕把臕粄硂警緄肅よ琌現┎钡и硂現刮種ǎΤи把籔ョΤи骋獶苂ぃ粽蛤筁Τ┮ぃ筁琌玶ち睛絴瞷硂Ω玱钩"筳猳碍"妓⊿Τ""琌"痥絴"羆ぇ絴眔"秨み"┮瞷ゎ硂警緄肅よ竒Θ临Τ璶琍戳à初ぃ筁硂警緄肅よ辳媚мォだ蔼ウ璶―琌60窲辳Θ窲τ璶篊
セ┚現┎み"诨""辳爱辳濱媚"玥獽穦莲卤
畊ネи秨初フ翴禨竡常⊿Τ琌ノゑ畴せ︓癩現箇衡称穦闽猔
酵箇衡ず甧畊ネи-
璶睲贰秆翴現┎祙Μ埃璶莱タ盽そ秨や临斗笷贺篵膘ノㄏ穦戈方眔瞶だ皌┰砲碔畉禯琌セ翠祙"坝淮チ"硂贺"坝淮チ"祙龟Τ浪癚ゲ璶
さΩ羱祙祙肂瘤礛眔矗蔼羛穦粄硂碩ぃì镑セ粄络璹祙肂莱赣р翠竒蕾龟借糤㎝硄砯勘等ㄢ贺璸衡ず骋顶糷癸翠羉篴Τ癪膍-
莱赣だㄉ眔竒蕾祇甶Θ狦羛穦某羱祙祙肂莱矗蔼︓96,000じ
埃膀セ羱祙祙肂羛穦矗"Ω竚穨︑︘ㄑ蹿"祙纔磃搭淮Жみ顶糷潦竚﹡┮璽踞癸Ω竚穨︑︘產畑ㄓ弧-
程ぶ璶Μㄑ加临璶ㄑ20︓30ㄑ"ě籊瀉溯"虫︗耴╯琸常琌現┎蔼基現郸┮硑Θ現┎Τ砫ヴ腊-
搭ㄑ加璽踞
堡癩現⊿Τ钡и-
種ǎ癸祙祔秸俱祙琌竚穨戳Ω筁煤ユ癸竚穨らㄑ蹿璽踞翴腊常⊿Τ
羛穦辨現┎砰教硂у現┎蔼基現郸ぇ璚カチ盢-
ㄑ加蹿兜祙搭淮-
ネ璽踞ㄏ-
镑﹡贾穨菠菠秸俱祙ゑκ碭窾ㄑ加痷琌を
ㄓ翠竒蕾挡篶锣ア穨计胟ど箇衡癸硂竤ア穨瓁礚腊羛穦ΩΩ璶―現┎砞ミア穨穿現┎礚跌и-
璶―ョ簔跌ア穨ち惠璶ㄏ-
Θ竒蕾挡篶锣碾珇
翠┎瘤礛龟︽沟蚌癡璸购⊿Τ縩伐惫琁躬纘沟竨ノ蚌癡厩
糤蚌癡竨诀穦羛穦某箇衡莱沟ノ蚌癡厩沟矗ㄑ祙兜纔磃沟–叫︗蚌癡厩莉单ㄤ羱Θ祙肂祙戳虑矗蔼蚌癡厩竨诀穦
セ翠眔祙瞯熬︙ㄏ坝寥伦玴柬ぇ┯踞癬鮔穦砫ヴ翠┎莱赣盢セ翠熬眔祙瞯秸蔼笷璓戈方だ皌ヘ
癩現粄セ翠眔祙瞯熬箇衡い硂妓弧"籔ㄈび跋ㄤ瓣產ゑ耕挡狦膥尿やи猭碞琌セ翠眔祙瞯竒獶盽"堡琌瘤礛フ翠眔祙瞯熬临琌ぃ盢眔祙瞯秸蔼
ㄆ龟ㄏ盢眔祙瞯祔秸蔼翠ㄈび跋ご礛Τ耕纔禫膙刚ㄈ瑆纒ㄤ纒玭龙穝℡芖-
眔祙瞯常24%︓27%ぇ丁τ翠眔祙瞯Τ16.5%產セ翠眔祙瞯龟熬盢眔祙瞯淮稬秸蔼ョぃ穦э跑翠"祙瞯"セ借鶪щ戈σ納埃祙瞯ぇ璶琌俱砰щ戈吏挂ㄤい珹穦铆﹚猭Ч到骋借︓м砃ㄑ莱单
程и-
璶眏秸Μぃ莱砆祙呼熬眔祙瞯ョ莱ぉ秸蔼环ㄓ弧翠┎ゲ斗稸浪癚セ翠祙眏瞷︽祙仓秈笷璓戈方そキだ皌玥
畊ネセ略朝勉
㏄辩睶┥某璓勉畊ネさ癩現箇衡琌翠ミ猭Ы153菌パ地癩現矗ユ箇衡螟┣纯疆舦ネョ︑稰︑花さ箇衡肈琌"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"繩丁и猤猤︑尺癩現琌︑パ囊"灧┏"и-
腹"竒蕾旧闽猔チネ"р玪セㄓ稱璶―そ秨蔼秸ρ龟┯粄琌ささら璶蔼﹛篈ぃ醇┮и-
琵ㄆ薄ぃēτ畴絵
箇衡倒и程禜碞琌玦侥瘆肚参螮玛硂ぃ虫ゎΑэр現┎场秨や箇衡Ω亩Θいゅ簍勉いノ約狥杠弄羆挡场だぃ笵穦ぃ穦ノ璣ゅ弄まēノ約狥杠弄砰场だノ炊硄杠弄玡陇某
畊ネ纯碭︙и癘眔担杠珿ㄆい┰揽ㄢ縊縊獽倒┰腀辨и揽癩現綾硂或玂︳璸癩現程ぶ穦и笷Θ腀辨絵
и材腀辨琌翠現┎祙Μ膀娄铆胺ㄏ癩現Щ瓜璸礚佩礚繧眔辅龟
癩現さ秈˙某碩矗蔼祙肂ㄏ祙眔叉瞒祙呼иЧ種薄鶪砛ゴ莱ぶユㄇ祙琵-
Τ诀穦э到ネぃ筁и胔好╯澈莱赣琌琵ぃノユ祙р祙叭踞パ稶ㄓ稶ぶ璽踞临琌莱赣琵ユ祙计璓蝴ぃ跑τユ祙常–ぶユㄇ
ㄤ龟︑パ囊ビΩи-
璶―硄等秸蔼膀セ祙肂τ硓筁耎溜祙膀ㄓ覸絯祙璽踞ㄒせ︓и-
某р祙顶だ–45,000じи獺硂琌程叭龟ョキ颗铆﹚祙膀㎝覸絯祙璽踞暗猭
癩現ㄨㄨ常绊現┎Τ铆胺τ砮过瞶癩ぇ笵Τ玂Μ㎝や瞶パ尿秸俱Μ禣㎝丁钡祙祙膀澈礛э盽篈弧罽獽ミ罽ぃ碽ぃ秆
иぃ粄現┎莱赣繦種Μ祙膀疭琌畊瞶玂る临弧さ簿チ计穦耕ど5%︓10%簿チ常琌耕Τ竒蕾祙︓琌煤ユ夹非祙瞯祙現┎よΜ祙膀よ祙呼い璽踞程讽いΤ耕簿チ薄鶪琌ぃ琌現┎だ磝搐ぇず㎡и踞み現┎╯澈癸祙膀硂拜肈Τ⊿Τ琂﹚ミ初临琌パぃ癩現︑︽∕﹚
┮и材腀辨琌癩現窾ぃ璶碔蕾砲┪临碔チ╣獶ゴ"秨"临碔膀糷ゴ┪磃の祙虑丁钡祙㎝現┎Μ禣よ跑セ糉
и材腀辨碞琌癩現酚臮蒥チぇ緇ョ镑酚臮у祇の箂扳穨ネ璸疭琌讽い常琌ネ種
и笵現┎竒Τ璸购Θミい穨〆穦ョ穦砞ミ狝叭穨や穿戈璸购璸购い坝腹矗蔼ネ玻硂ち常弧現┎璚みぃ筁и腀辨琌現┎暗硂ㄇきǎ环ぇ緇ョ璶皐癸泊玡薄鶪τ矗ㄑ癸郸
и纯竒璶―現┎搭坝穨祅癘禣秸畉昏︓ぃ璶硂竒蕾糤絯τ現┎""らいぃ耞矗蔼現┎Μ禣堡琌箇衡琌禜紉Α矗蔼坝穨祅癘禣僚キ硂┮孔纔磃さぱネキ蔼害翠痲坝め计秖Ττ癸ㄤ荡计筁ㄢㄓ–璶ユ2,250じ祅癘禣い坝めΤ︙腊㎡
参璸矪玡ら祇る羬计箂扳穨羆箂扳基ゑ戳禴8%羆箂扳秖禴13%ㄏ琌蒥チらノ︾綾摸㎝珇废皊摸箂扳基㎝计秖常程ぶ3%痌腳耿㎝═ó綪扳禴碩琌パΘ︓Θぃ单κ砯そ㎝禬蒥初ョぃǎ眔春嘲尿Τκ砯そ闽超穨い龟螟粄癩現癸さ竒蕾確礵贾芠︳璸
る翠Τ69 000丁у祇箂扳㎝都穨そ琌坝め讽い计常琌箂扳穨箂扳蒥笵畉薄鶪-
ネ璸獽Θ拜肈и獺癩現ㄤ龟ぃ穦ㄨ種ぃ瞶穦硂竤坝禥ㄆΓ⊿Τ诀穦钩и妓刁蒥蛤坝め渡酵┪坝め常⊿Τ快猭舱麓癬ㄓ莱Τ舦痲
癩現弧現┎⊿Τ砫ヴ縀竒蕾籔ㄤ弧現┎⊿Τ砫ヴぃ弧現┎⊿Τ禣獺み镣墩ぇ現┎ぃ耞禣琌辅かホㄏ竒犁跑眔κょ
現┎ゲ斗タ跌拜肈┯踞現┎莱璽砫ヴ硓筁贺贺︽惫琁ㄓ覸絯Θセ溃羆服琁現厨い矗璶虏ても尿㎝絣﹛贡硂ㄇㄤ龟常Τ竒犁Θセぃ筁現┎荡癸ぃ超硑ó﹚璶㎝穨Τ坝Τ秖穨種ǎ祇揣程Θ
碞某糤废祙ㄤ龟ぃ搭ぶ蒥チ废はτ穦縀ぃ猭だǐ╬废紇臫┮の現┎祙Μ穦搭ぶ瞷ぃ眔甶ボ废ョぃ眔祅废約钡丁钡常癸窾扳芥Ч祙废郎鏓暗Θゴ阑ぷㄤ琌-
琌顶糷砰め紇臫
︓き蒥–ら扳879窾やЧ祙废穨ず︳璸硂羆秖Θㄤ緇Θ琌ǐ╬废現┎–ら瘤礛絩莉22窾や╬废ョ琌弧–絩莉や╬废碞Τ17や瑈蒥闽瞷︳璸せ穦絩莉3货や╬废狦簗呼ゑㄒぃ跑瞷Τ祙瞯現┎獽穕ア32货じ莱Μ祙蹿硑碞25货じ犁穨肂╬废蒥初硂薄鶪矗蔼废祙ぃ筁琌ぃ猭ぇ畕秨甶丁╬废耎蒥初硂笵瞶и-
羙癩現ぃぃ烩菠
材腀辨碞琌現┎荷е挤蹿Θミ筿紇祇甶Ы翠筿紇︽穨胺眃祇甶
и-
戳Θ纒此㏄柬祇单ゴ秈筿紇蒥初τ稰だ藕镀硂Θ碞璉ㄤ龟盿拜肈︙禫ㄓ禫圭腀环璾放地单╃尼常ぃ翠╃栏ㄤ龟碞琌現┎ゼ环ヘぃ崩笆筿紇ㄆ穨祇甶璓セ筿紇︽穨ら镣⊿辅瑈
Θ纒放地瓣╃"礷跋"緿瑆㎝玐霉吹╃"虏虫ヴ叭"︓Τㄤ旧簍常ри-
籹盿㎝嘲╃尼或翠筿紇籹よぃアまぃ籔ㄤよ膙現┎场癸翠玻猍跌琌ㄆ龟Τ闽场礚参膚ぃ篈癸и-
翠筿紇琌贺瞣螟┣ㄏ荐稲翠Θ纒癸и弧ぃ穦翠╃筿紇τぃ琌穨ずぶ计Τ砛ㄤ旧簍ョΤ稰
硂紇臫琌瞏环翠玻计秖パ秨﹍硈芠渤初计碩菲辅ぶ腀種翠щ戈╃ぶ╃︑礛硂︽穨眖穨璶ア穨┪锣筿紇穨参璸穨ず沟2窾現┎︳璸Τ6 000沟筿紇穨狦硂︳璸タ絋筿紇穨癸⊿辅诀龟琌ぃ発磷ㄆ龟
瞷и弧ぃ筿紇穨龟悔癸翠竒蕾癪膍ョ弧ぃΤぶセ筿紇簿硂タタ琌翠⊿Τ筿紇Ы┪ヴ︙舱麓ㄓ参膚穨祇甶㎝羆挡墩穨ず︳璸翠玻籹ΘセキА–恼琌1,000窾じ翠籹154恼筿紇璸衡щ戈碞笷15货じ芥梆舦禣阀Τ7货じ翠セ布┬7.7货じョ琌阀7货じ魁紇盿舦禣の筿跌冀舦Μ痲筿紇穨瘤孔ぃ確讽玦ご琌伐胑穨ウ甌贾基㎝肚碈床冀ョ翠綿㏕﹚︗
緿瑆20玡∕﹚祇甶筿紇穨さらΘ碞Τヘ窣讽現┎筿紇そ硑籹筿紇戳籹ぇノパ翠⊿Τ幢щ戈籹ぃぶ翠玻竒锣┕緿瑆暗戳籹翠瞷ご礛琌ㄈ瑆筿紇籹跋ぇ緿瑆現┎ヘ夹琌рㄈび跋籹いみ锣簿緿瑆
筁┕翠現┎崩約禩㎝禜常筿紇穨㎝筿紇琍︓さぱ琌腊硂璶栋美砃籔穨ō︽穨ぃ莱琵ウ︑ネ︑防
畊ネиセㄓ稱材腀辨矗璶腀辨ぃ筁иぃ琌砱眔礚菇ぃ稱癩現泊路睹挡狦硈腀辨常礚猭и笷Θㄤ肂骸ǎ框腀辨珹ぃ璶︳畉昏矗蔼癸砲璚ρ侯穿膀セ肂糹︽浪癚厨┯空龟借糤牡叭单贺贺и穦硓筁ㄤ硚畖癩現㎝現┎Τ闽场璽砫は琈
畊ネセ略朝勉
纯胺Θ某璓勉畊ネ︗地癩現纯疆舦ネ祇ヴㄓパ地籹癩現箇衡癩現甧︑稰"︑花"の"篴┋""┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"肈陪筁寸戳のチ渤闽みの紐納拜肈
港礛いよ驰"ó反"絴"翠┎膀現獀σ納舩褐窥泞蹈カチ"ㄨ癩現礚好キ颗よ痲よ暗蛾硂ぃア骸現獀︹眒癩現箇衡
癸膀糷カチτē硂箇衡琌"Τ眔诨蒒眔緋"┪"ぇ礚斌ぇ堡"ㄓ甧孔"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"莱э"┛菠膀糷簔跌チネ"
︑パカ初籔"绘"晾ē
畊ネ渤┮㏄翠琌︑パカ初旧竒蕾硂贺"続ネ∣畓痙眏"硓筁カ初ㄑ―︑笆秸竊砆臕竒蕾尿糤璶や琖礚磷︑パカ初ョ籹硑砲碔畉禯瞷禜Θ膙筁祘いア毖
Τǎの砛﹁よ秈瓣產珹ㄈ瑆纒常硓筁現┎続箇穦ぃ┋ㄏ-
镑筁螟闽ㄉΤΤ碙腨ネ借膥τ穝щ膙い莉︓そキ膙兵ン┮穦褐秨やぃ虫ゎ琌矗ㄑ┮孔"呼"τ琌虑祇揣癩碔だ皌
畊ネ砛Τ粄硂琌笻は現┎"秖"玥τら穦砆笻は膀セ猭
街琌禣と繺
畊ネΤ粄癩現箇衡舩褐窥穦禣と繺磃種饼龟悔矗蔼ρ褐螟笵穦ρ種饼螟笵穦せ烦蔼闹骋窵ネ﹟璶膥尿ぃ勉骋璚螟笵竒蕾挡篶锣τア穨矗ㄑア穨穿┪玂繧穦-
ぃтτ跋跋碭じτ穦"猍跌"Гㄉ穦褐螟笵虫克產畑の端摧矗蔼穿穦搭篊竒蕾糤硉癸硂竤ρ畓﹖摧穦娩絫竤のぃ┋и-
癦臮竒蕾糤竚-
矪挂ぃ臮硂贺"︑╬"の跌窥︓腳種醚セ籔瞷穦發―キ单そ竡の闽胔穦ぃ皌甅
いよ癸箇衡箇琇礛璝处
畊ネ癩現弄箇衡簍勉疭眏秸絪籹︓箇衡穦吭高い瓣現┎ぃ畐叭馣ㄤв獽籔い璣羛羛蹈舱いよ朝︴瑋笷Θ醚蛮よ種璶Μや現郸斗パ筁寸戳箇衡盡產舱硄筁ユぉ⊿現┎﹚ㄣ砰灿竊
硂贺玡ぃ焊は焊甧琵いよ竩礚б吉础も箇翠癩現箇衡礚好胔好玡翠蔼︑獀翠獀翠弘︙螟笵翠┎粄いよゑ翠秆穦惠璶の龟悔薄鶪螟笵いよの┮孔盡產翠∕﹚セ翠癩現箇衡よのヘ夹螟笵翠┎ぃ┤いよ"ó反"阶盢瞷さ︽ぇΤ癩現よ皐崩ㄓ螟笵碸﹚眃┮烩旧現┎盰检璶いよ繷揽綾寸
弧翠璣現┎琌璣动筐记篗癶娩絫泵ゃ盢翠痲の㏑笲ユ癠ぉいよ 癸翠礚┮––舦纞翠ゼㄓ烩砈
纯疆舦ネō籔и冠
畊ネΤ蝶阶苂纯疆舦ネ箇衡ㄣ承種癩現疭砞ㄢ琿础ΡΤ兜琌ㄑ緄﹏ゝ祙肂兜琌弄蚌癡揭祘祙肂и稱硂琌纯ネ砮い瓣瞶芠├硂琌狦纯ネ淮ō砲絘產畑τダぃ眔酚臮и稱ささらи-
ρ產侯穿肂莱ぉ矗蔼狦纯焙禥ぇ璚τㄑ糷禥加谋眔ǒ璚瞷獽莱赣э跑蔼基現郸盢畉昏淮淮搭狦痷獽琌翠ぇ褐龟悔狦璶盢筁┕快猭э跑獽ゲ斗盢膀セ猭材κ箂兵埃玥さ疭跋現┎穦筁┕κ崔チ暗猭"秖Μやキ颗磷í籔セネ玻羆糤瞯続莱"現郸﹉づ阶硂ㄇ現郸惫琁琌続﹜膀セ猭ずㄤ︽┦の艶┦の穦惠璶┦玥胔好
и粄璶龟瞷蔼陇环苀ㄣ闽胔薄穦ヘ夹癩現箇衡硂ㄇ╟ぃ瘆粇腳ㄥ砏兵ゲ斗璶璶﹜皌穦惠璶約秨ē隔甧ぃ竒蕾祇甶郸菠の癩碔だ皌
畊ネさぱ癚阶琌癩現箇衡иΤㄢ拜肈斗Ω綠矗琌骋現郸琌戮穨現郸戮穨よ現┎临琌猽ノ戮穨瞶阶ゼ阀珹翠κ窾骋笆虫琌硑穨–種瞯275.03き淮稬︓236.2筁–キАΤ87癸硂ㄇ穨種端计現┎挤窾ぃì 3,000窾戈方硂妓酚臮翠300窾骋笆㎡も↖絚よきΤ87﹙種ㄢ﹙璓㏑種現┎琌璶ミㄒ沧ゎも↖絚㎡诀初祘よ璓㏑種パ12﹙ど︓き23﹙硂琌惠璶э到㎡都穨種瞯パ67.1%ど︓68.2%
癸硂ㄇ穨種и-
妓干毕㎡獶穨種よи-
妓絋玂"ゴ"痁痁㎡и辨癩現挤戈方糤も翠"ゴ"稱
碞穨よ竒筁硈﹃骋ㄆンτア穨瞯ョ蔼笷3.6%現┎沧暗ㄇひΘミ"诀初┷竨いみ"程钩"ぱ礚寄"钡獽"Τみ礚"и硑弧-
瞷ネ吏挂琌"繺紐繺马娩闽"或纯┕┷竨いみǎΤ2 000莉竨ノぃì200Θ︙临Τ沮诀初恨瞶Ы矗ユ戈硂2 000ǎ︙ぃ莉魁ノ㎡闹拜肈粂ē拜肈篈拜肈戈菌拜肈贺贺拜肈常琌"猍跌"拜肈常琌翠現┎⊿Τ義秖箇诀初秈拜肈狦痷璶―翠┯坝竨叫翠翠基窥┯坝獽ぃ腀種叫τ旧璓诀初ぃ丹硂獽跑Θ現獀σ納碾翠舦痲ゴ瘆セ"逗窲"и辨骋矪㎝毙▅参膚稸σ納瓃拜肈糤戈方荡玠骋拜肈の蝴臔翠300窾"ゴ"戮穨胺眃
畊ネセ略朝勉癸︗地癩現ョ琌﹎纯и稰︑花
MR DAVID CHU: Mr President, the Financial Secretary's first Budget is sound, balanced and innovative, particularly its summary in Cantonese. He projects a vision of Hong Kong and its unique place in the region and China. I support his ideals and broad strategy.
By now, many of my colleagues have discussed the Budget in detail. Some have spoken with an eloquence I cannot match. I will instead limit my scope to talking about the future.
We are moving towards a destination called "one country, two systems" where no one has ever been. An explorer myself, I relish the challenge. An athlete improves with each new challenge. So does a community. I hope my ideas complement those of the Financial Secretary.
The first point. We have to maintain an executive-led administration An administration that knows exactly where it is heading for and is not distracted along the way. An administration that does not let short term public pressure detract it from promoting the long term interests of the community, the whole community. Not any segment in it. Not any group.
The second point. We must devote ourselves to economic growth because there lies the solutions to our problems. Unemployment, underemployment, housing, inflation. You name it and chances are it can be overcome if we can return to a growth rate more typically East Asian 7%, 8%, 9% rather than to have one which is almost European. We have to focus on expanding the economic pie rather than dividing it. To accomplish this, we have to reaffirm our faith in individual enterprise and initiative and reject reliance on government handouts, except as the absolute last resort.
I believe it is imperative for us to avoid the pitfalls of other developed societies which have lost their drive, impetus, work ethic, purpose and nerve. Rather than constantly copying others, virtues and vices included, we would do ourselves a favour by fostering our unique democratic system, a system whose consensus has to be, once more, for economic growth.
The third point. We have to maximize the synergy between ourselves and China. The Financial Secretary talks about seeking out new opportunities. We have to do more than that by establishing across the board co-operation and co-ordination in trade, industry, investment and infrastructure development. China is simply our most decisive competitive edge.
The fourth point. Education is our salvation as a community. We value our youth and that is why we have expanded university enrolment from 4% of the student population a decade ago to 18% today. We now have the quantity. What is lacking is the direction. Our graduates need meaningful job opportunities and challenges. I believe it is our duty to provide a framework for their career progression and improvement on the quality of their life.
At the primary and the secondary school levels, our pupils must be weaned from rote learning and be more imaginative. Instead of just copying what others have created, our youth should one day do the inventing in an age of digital technology and electronic information.
There is no shame in identifying the intellectually gifted youth early and in having some top schools like the Bronx High School of Science in New York to get them ready for top universities. There is much honour in providing our other children with the most advanced skills through top notch technical institutes. On the one side, we can have an Ivy League environment, on the other, a Germanic approach to craftsmanship and to mechanics. Having the two would be a formidable combination. The crude egalitarianism, now in vogue, is wrong for the community and for the individual.
The fifth point. Stability for a developed society depends a lot on having a large and contented middle class. This is not what we have today in Hong Kong with its great disparity in wealth. We need to devise an explicitly comprehensive and continuous long-term strategy to expand the middle class. We should amend policies in education, taxation, health care, housing provident funds, infrastructure with that objective in mind.
The sixth point. Our universal health care coverage is our pride and joy. But we are heading towards the abyss of socialist medicine such as that in some Western societies. We have heard about faults and abuses in their systems. We would be foolish to repeat their errors just as they are trying to correct their mistakes. I advocate more private initiative, more private investment in health care, and some day, comprehensive medical insurance provided by the private sector.
The seventh point. I detect glimmers in the budget of an attempt to social engineer and to promote family values. The Financial Secretary's allowance to encourage families to fend for their elderly is commendable. We need to do more. Family values are big items in the American presidential election this year. British Prime Minister John Major is behind a campaign called "back to basics". But over there all these desperate awakening to morality may be too late. Our cultural heritage remains strong and should be re-enforced now.
Any problem solved at the family level costs the community virtually nothing. Such a problem that must be dealt with by society through counselling and social welfare, the courts, reform school, even jail costs a fortune. Today some Western Governments are being bankrupted for this simple reason.
The eighth point. Our income tax base shrinks rapidly. Some 54% of our working population paid salary taxes three years ago. Now, only 40% do today. Credit, or debit perhaps, goes to government constantly raising the basic allowance and giving tax concessions. The trend is understandable because the Government is being pressed into helping the working and lower middle classes. They have the majority of the votes. Their champions are many in this Council. The Government cannot broaden the tax net because that would be highly unpopular. The solution, yet again, is economic growth. Growth drives up income. Higher income would bring more people back into the tax net.
The ninth point. The Financial Secretary pledges to make the Government more business-friendly. This can be achieved, as he suggests, by easing bureaucracy and increasing efficiency. This can also be achieved by government interfering less and, where possible, leaving businesses to regulate themselves. In recent years, goaded by some legislators of activist and unionist persuasion, the Government has not been friendly to business. An array of new rights regulations, some of dubious necessity, have been stifling. A few such as payouts to appease labour and stringent anti-discrimination decrees are expensive. We would do better for everybody in the long run through legislation for growth rather than more regulation.
The tenth and final point. Our environment is critical to all of us, both in terms of quality of life as well as our competitive edge. Our high standards of living dictate that we move up the market and compete at the top level. A safe, clean, first class environment is, therefore, absolutely essential to our future success.
A good Budget is one that brings out the best in all of us. The Financial Secretary understands this. Our success as a community is but a composite of individual successes. Our greatest asset is not the harbour which is diminishing, not even our proximity to the China market, but what is in our minds, in our hearts, in our character. We cannot lose sight of this. The Budget before us recognizes this in parts. I endorse the Budget and trust that future ones, under the present Financial Secretary's stewardship, can be just as relevant and even more inspirational.
Thank you, Mr President.
郭Θ某璓勉畊ネ耕Ν玡癩現"蔼碪"弧硂癩現箇衡翠現囊種ǎタ┮孔"栋Θ"┯癩現瞶癩厩镑玃秈┹甶竒蕾㎝э到チネ琌畊ネ琎ぱΤ某у蝶瞷翠現┎ㄤ龟穌褐竡翠躬"ぃ骋τ莉"穝芠├琌贺"弘緙"
и钮硂ㄇē阶稰綺佩硂︗某у蝶狦Θミ杠狦癩現弧猭琌ㄆ龟и獺琌ㄆ龟ê﹚陪ボ翠㎝現囊珹セЫ场だ現囊常Τ把籔躬"ぃ骋τ莉"穝芠├Τ把籔砪芥"弘緙"硂兜у蝶龟琌"饼ぇ竜︙眞礚勉"ョ琌程碔稱钩㎝程ぃ惠璶沮北ノ狵λゴ翠差秨泊
膀糷刮砰珹チ癩現箇衡祇ぃ耞祇у蝶粄現┎褐秨や糤ぃì筁掇и-
﹚琌"弘緙"砪芥坝翠ぇ丁礛骸"弘緙"坝╊產㎝и非称緇簍勉い玃叫現┎糤褐やи踞み穦Θ扳"弘緙"だ
畊ネиチ碞箇衡いΤ闽褐毙▅の骋よ祇種ǎΤ闽褐场ださ琄竊碒瑈脓翠计ρㄆンタ忌臩翠ぃぶρ琌ネ﹖璚け﹖ミ礚穿边春锈睤挂鶪い-
ネ砲絘ぇい竒蕾痢畓胺眃薄鶪ら亥癐癶ユ伴ろ克ねの綟や穿ㄆン祇ネぇи-
戳辨現┎穦箇衡ずㄇ候莱眏酚臮ρ狝叭ア辨琌и-
ゼǎ現┎Τ莱︽笆τ琌は莱筐秝Τ眞"ρ猫痝"
現┎癩現箇衡い┯空穦糤ρ皘盝︗ρいみら丁臔瞶いみ產叭瞶钉单艼泊ㄓ現┎琌は莱庇倍癸ρ挂鶪祇荐みㄤ龟現┎琌瞷┕"﹖碒"┯空狝叭ぃì薄鶪ㄌ礛腨沮穦褐祇甶き璸购戈せ︓皘盝︗ごろ3 000ρいみろ46丁ρ狝叭いみろ丁ら丁臔瞶いみろ丁產叭瞶ろㄢ钉τ硂ㄇ计竒盢さ糤狝叭璸衡ずㄑぃ莱―薄鶪惠璶狝叭ρ產斑Τ膥尿扶扶单ρ皘ㄒ近ρ瞷Τ13 000穝糤1 500肂骸ì阀Θ惠―
ぃ虫琌ρ皘盝︗腨ぃìρユ惠璶τ砞ρいみョ琌腨ぃì現┎纯┯空穦糤砞43丁ρいみи-
踞み硂┯空琌戳瞷碞Τ丁ρいみ︹ぃ続翴┪祘┑粇τ┑戳秨快и-
龟ぃ腀種翠ρ產盢-
逞ぃら礚ゎ挂单チ玃叫現┎浪癚瞷匡祘の祘秈е秨快ρいみ硉
畊ネ現┎ρ狝叭よ矗"跋酚臮"琌琵ρ︑剪眡跋ずㄉ边跋酚臮硂現郸Θ∕跋や穿狝叭琌ì镑τρ甶钉琌ㄤい璶吏甶钉癸縒﹡砰畓痜︽笆ぃ獽ρ產琌讽璶の惠狝叭ρ產ぶ穦笆т碝硂ㄇ狝叭ㄏ琌Τ拜肈ョぃよ―笆钡牟秆-
惠璶矗ㄑ狝叭琌獶盽璶瞷翠Τㄢ钉ρ甶钉狝叭芖の芖ㄢ跋瞷8 000縒﹡ρㄓ弧硂计ヘ虏琌狹ó羱
琌現┎⊿Τ璸购耎甶甶钉狝叭現┎秆睦琌Τㄤ狝叭ㄒ竡璸购產叭瞶钉ρ洛励甶钉单и谋眔現┎┮瞶沮ぃì镑產叭瞶竡单常⊿Τ筁盡穨癡絤-
⊿Τì镑盡穨キ蝶︳ρ惠璶ぃぶρ琌︘吏挂碿╬加泞の侣そ璶硂ㄇ竡戳贝砐蛤秈-
ぃ︽
ㄤ龟钉ρ甶钉竒禣阀琌70窾じ璝翠18跋–跋砞ミ钉–┮惠禣ノ琌1,260窾じチ粄現┎莱赣ョ眔や硂计и-
ぃフ現┎︙掇
埃ρ跋や穿狝叭ゼΤэ到ρ┮眔侯穿ョ氨孩ぃ玡現┎程そガ侯穿浪癚厨摸侯穿肂常Τэ到斑縒琌虫ōρ夹非肂玥礚龟借э到硄等秸俱τ
現┎羘嘿縒﹡ρ秨やゑ翠程Μ5%︘め蔼16%-
侯穿肂ì蝴膀セネ珿ㄤ侯穿礚斗矗蔼チ癸現┎硂弧猭稰钵盽极現┎琌ノ︘め秨や秸琩ㄓ"筁爵"盢ρ產╟╟í砲礚碙腨ネい程Μ5%︘め-
Μ翠︘め羆Μぃì1%︘め秨や秸琩いи-
祇瞷綺佩ㄆ龟碞琌獶侯穿縒﹡ρ–るΤ1,235じㄑ秨やキА–ら40じネ薄鶪螟稱钩
蝗︽祇甶厨1995い翠Аネ玻羆琌21,560じ琌瞴材碔肝穦い澈礛Τ–る莉1,200じㄑ秨や縒﹡ρи-
莱赣稰槽現┎澈礛ノ硂уρí砲ネキゑ耕膀计ри-
璶―矗蔼ρ侯穿夹非肂㊣羘氨硂竤ネí砲侯穿ρネ礚猭眔瞶э到
現┎┪砛穦臛婚現┎穦–侯穿ρ產矗ㄑ320じユ瑉禟の200じ穝"琌"硂ㄇ瑉禟ρ–る糤43じΜユ瑉禟琌龟厨龟綪ρ產璶︑鼻竬乖やΤ闽禣ノ硂暗猭穦搭-
ビ叫種饼
チ某現┎龟借糤侯穿ρ膀セ肂篒讽и稱ビチミ初碞琌璶―現┎盢侯穿夹非肂矗蔼︓翠戈い︗计だぇ2,700じ璝盢6窾縒﹡ρ侯穿矗蔼︓2,700じ惠璶阀5货6じ癸現┎┮縩3,200货じ纗称ㄓ弧硂计ヘぃ筁琌をи辨現┎ㄣ砰︽笆э到ρ褐
钡и稱碞毙▅场だ祇ēさ毙▅よ竒盽┦秨や琌345货じ糤碩Τ4.3%耕ㄓセネ玻羆糤5%临璶ぶ現┎癸毙▅┮щ戈方竒琌硈尿ㄢゼ發竒蕾糤硉龟ア辨
埃戈方щ糤碩ぶぇ毙▅戈方だ皌ョ毙紐納琵и-
ㄆ龟
穝癩現箇衡い膀娄毙▅毙▅竒盽秨やせΘτ蔼单毙▅玥Θ┕膀娄毙▅秨やゑㄒ琌Θ
さい厩毙▅竒禣糤ョだΤ2.6%の3.5%糤碩厩毙▅5.9%糤
﹛ミ厩キА虫︗Θセ琌20,000じい厩玥琌33,000じ厩キА虫︗琌202,000じ琌厩
计陪ボ翠毙▅戈方だ皌琌眏狵畓稦繷竲淮逼膀娄毙▅ゼ莉眔ì镑跌硂贺ぃキ颗祇甶程钡紇臫琌兜э到厩毙▅惫琁戈方ぃìτ砆╈┑
厩毙畊厩︗て
癩現箇衡い現┎ガ盢穦糤300厩厩︗毙畊厩厩︗毙畍ゑㄒパ2%ど︓3.3%絯篊硉借好現┎箂箂玡盢Θ厩毙畊эパ厩︗毙畍踞ヴ
厩ら
現┎癩現箇衡い┯空穦糤15丁ら厩癸翠750丁厩15丁琌盢ら厩ゑㄒ矗蔼2%ㄤ龟厩らぃ虫ゎΤ厩ネ祇甶ョち瞷翠穦惠璶瞷ぃぶダА璶厩らΤ磷琵厩ネ虫縒痙產い礚酚臮の菏恨и辨現┎璹絋丁τ糤挤戈方縩伐崩︽厩ら
い厩疊笆痁
癩現箇衡いゼΤ碞疊笆痁矗ヴ︙э到惫琁ぃぶ厩ネご璶锣绑狥゜﹁禲秸传揭チ癸ボア辨
厩玡毙▅戈
穦癩現沧┯空穦箇痙8,000窾じ戈ギ竂堕-
Τ竨叫の毙畍э到毙厩借現┎箇戳穦Τ400丁ギ竂堕把赣璸购龟借Τ240丁ギ竂堕辨τ玱˙琌ビ叫兵ンび璙ㄨτ┮眔戈びぶ硂薄鶪癸毙畍羱筍螟Τ龟借э到-
ョア护钡癡絤戈璸购セэ到ギ竂堕借ヘョ螟笷さ現┎戈ギ竂堕璸购挤蹿琌今˙蛤┮┯空妓琌8,000窾じゼΤ陪帝糤
常琌戈方ぃìτ╈┑膀娄毙▅э到惫琁膀娄ぃ铆祇甶獽穦紇臫チ辨現┎浪癚毙▅竒禣だ皌糤挤戈方э到膀娄毙▅祇甶
程и穦碞セア穨拜肈ビチ璶―
癩現箇衡い現┎瘤礛竒蕾祇甶糷矗ㄇよ猭縀セ翠竒蕾玱⊿Τ矗ヴ︙ㄣ砰惫琁秆∕セ翠ア穨拜肈ア穨瞯蔼瞷禜尿盢癸竒蕾挂ア穨玱や穿璓戳ゼт秈τ癸ネ稫碼礚ョ┯讽溃
チ辨現┎σ納砞ミ"ア穨筁寸戳竒蕾穿"癸êㄇ獶︑腀τア穨程ぶるア穨矗ㄑ
チ癸現┎Г局きκ货じ緇薄鶪ごゼ钡某ボア辨
セ略朝勉
朝篴篱某璓勉畊ネセ癩現箇衡疭︹碞琌矗╰郸菠や穿の崩約翠狝叭︽穨癩現纯疆舦ネ霉14翴や穿狝叭穨矗莱н郸菠侯芠硂ㄇ某炊筂坝角喘ㄤ叭龟Τ承種硂ㄇ種ǎㄓ︑磕蝗︽禩の硄癟单︽穨癸ㄇ侣Α骋盞栋都皊┍箂扳κ砯单狝叭┦︽穨ㄓ弧玱ゼΤ躬籖㎝Τн現郸矗ョぃǎ眔Τ闽讽ЫㄣΤ港種や穿
繦セ翠竒蕾锣狝叭穨タ硋亥耎セネ玻羆ゑㄒぃ耞ど產骸狝叭┦︽穨ネ種春ㄆ龟獶–狝叭︽穨常稱钩い砍碞и瓃┮矗のㄇ骋盞栋侣Α狝叭穨碞タ羬贺妓竒犁螟產常笵ㄢㄓκ砯そ皊加竩超ぃ荡φ碞都穨τēき沧︓さΤ计κ丁皊加竩超秆沟
陪硂ㄇ侣Α狝叭┦︽穨タ瞷竒蕾ぃ春τ蒥チ炊筂潦禦籔潦禦種饼綰搭璓ネ種肂禴┍鏓超沮穨ず玃ㄏ-
挡穨璶ぇ琌禥-
ネ種竒だ篏睭玱碩糤ㄏ"ブ禣"忌糤┍鏓碞礚ー薄鶪挡犁穨
狦翠┎絋龟Τ港種秆∕硂ㄇ︽穨竒犁螟н-
祇甶碞ゲ斗粄睲拜肈┮癸痝媚虫綼瞷┮矗ㄇ⊿Τ龟悔ノ某琌翠┎羘嘿"や穿崩約"安笆腊ぃ惠腊︽穨
癸皊┍穨τē糤砞陆穝ч侣祙肂龟悔ノぃΤ羆筁礚τ糴縩ゑ瞯玱р畐糷计璸衡ず跑Θ"眔搭"ゼㄓら現┎盢穦碩糤皊┍礟禣穨ず羘更笵セ辨現┎穝浪癚皊┍穨縩ゑ瞯の癸皊┍穨現郸
︓箂扳κ砯穨よ翠┎┮矗琌玥┦某矗蔼ネ玻ま蔼мэ到狝叭借单ㄆ龟иЧ借好硂ㄇ郸菠琌穦︽穨眔龟借や穿崩約㎝祇甶タи┮弧蔼炊筂蒥チ禣種饼琌-
程竒犁螟獶虫眖э到狝叭まм碞眔秆∕拜肈
ぃ筁и獺程稰ぃ骸莱琌竒犁都穨俱箇衡癸や穿︽穨唉ぃ矗瞷禣蒥初拷兵讽ㄤ侥碞琌都︽穨计κ璸皊加竩凡穨琌礚臛ㄆ龟琌都穨眏疨璶―搭Μ逼γ禣搭淮璽踞現┎玱ㄌ礛φぃ籇┶荡莱の搭Μ都︽穨紇臫20窾眖穨ネ璸籔笴穨闽τ-
–ぱ计κ窾璸蒥チ矗ㄑ狝叭钡籔チネΤ伐闽玒ヘ玡竒犁笿贺贺螟現┎讽Ы玱ㄌ礛蹦"簔ぃ闽みぃ瞶穦"篈硂よи穨現┎ボ荡癸ア辨
畊ネセア辨ぇ緇ョ璶苂癩現堡ぃ畒辨钮眔ㄤい翴碞琌箇衡い挤蹿5,000窾じΘミ"笴穨祇甶膀"秈˙祇甶笴穨セ粄硂琌兜惫琁眔苂瘤礛5,000窾じぃ琌计ヘ璶現┎Τ港種暗硂兜獺翠笴穨穦Τ秈˙祇甶笴穨祇甶ゲ﹚盿皊┍の都穨皊┍の都穨砞琁の惠―﹚ゲ穦糤癸糤碞穨计Τ﹚腊癸瓃都皊┍箂扳κ砯单狝叭┦︽穨現┎ゼ痷タ暗龟借н㎝祇甶
セ璶翴狦現┎蝴瞷現郸翠ㄉΤ瓣悔"ぇ常"の"潦ぱ绑"臕盢穦硋亥ア︹Θ窾笴みヘいゴчΙセ辨現┎粄醚崩約㎝砍都皊┍のκ砯箂扳穨琌や穿の崩約翠笴穨程ㄎよ猭
и稱酵酵蚌癡拜肈現┎さΩ癩現箇衡い猔戈3货じ倒蚌癡膀砞ミю弄粄皘蚌癡揭祘厩禣祙纔磃硂弧琌タい国惫琁癸さら翠竒蕾挡篶粿锣ア穨瞯蔼"莜"羮螟薄鶪蚌癡Θぃ阶屡烩フ烩︓η烩м砃笵"―ネ"ゲ璶腊-
磝搐Τ垦ネ锣穨穝醚㎝穝м砃堡癸粿竒蕾锣㎝↖穦惠璶3货じ猔戈ぃ筁琌"狹ó羱"单蚌癡Ы筁竒禣τ程盽羔痜琌瞷蚌癡璸购ぃ痷タΤ腊锣穨㎝碞穨硂翴產常筁ぃぶу蝶璶蚌癡璸购眔ΤΘ罿ゲ斗Τ現┎㎝沟縩伐跌のが皌ぃ︓瞷碞穨岿皌薄鶪瞷硑Θ戈方禣国狠硂翴辨現┎闽猔のэ秈
畊ネセ略朝勉
MR PAUL CHENG: Mr President, I am sure the Financial Secretary is familiar with the saying: "You cannot please all of the people, all of the time". This is especially true where politics are involved.
The annual Government Budget, however, is something we should not over politicise. It is not very meaningful or productive to debate at length the nitty-gritty of specific numbers. We either support the Appropriation Bill or we vote it down.
I, for one, would like to commend our Financial Secretary for presenting a balanced, caring Budget, aimed at building confidence during this challenging period in Hong Kong's history. He deserves our support.
The Financial Secretary has gone well beyond the usual simple financial exercise and provided a visionary outlook for Hong Kong. He has shown an ability to step back and look at the bigger picture and longer-term priorities, while still keeping a watchful eye on the short-term pressures.
It is an impossible task for the Financial Secretary to please everyone, to satisfy everyone's demands, to do everything the community wants or needs all in one single year. But that will not stop some Members of this Council from nit-picking in the guise of ensuring "representative and accountable government". I, however, prefer to focus on a few important areas which the Financial Secretary should address as we move ahead.
Business-friendly government
The Financial Secretary's commitment to creating a government which is "truly business-friendly" should be welcomed not just by the business sector itself, but also by the broader population. Hong Kong has thrived and Hong Kong people have prospered on a simple philosophy that what is good for business is good for Hong Kong.
Creating an environment which is accommodating to business and where the investors, the risk-takers, together with a hard-working population, are well rewarded for their enterprise and effort has been the main reason for Hong Kong's success. This is how we have been able to achieve an average per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of US$24,000 one of the highest in the region and the world. And it will be all the more important in the increasingly competitive years that lie ahead.
The Budget has made a start with a promise to cut red tape, improve efficiency, streamline government services, and, where needed, provide additional services to assist business. There were even a few tax concessions thrown in for good measure aimed at reducing the cost of capital, as well as the operating costs of small businesses. Welcome as these initiatives are, at the end of the day, they do not add up to a great deal. More meat will be needed in the sandwich if the promise is to be truly delivered.
The business community looks forward to working in partnership with the Government to identify the more substantial measures that will be required to ensure that Hong Kong consistently enjoys the ranking of the "most business-friendly city in Asia".
However, the Financial Secretary's admission that it has taken policy-makers time to catch up with the economic reality of Hong Kong's shift towards a service-based economy because it was "so swift" may not bode well, especially when, in the same breath, he tells us this shift has been taking place over the past 15 years! Let us hope the more business-friendly government we have been promised has a more business-oriented definition of swiftness.
A balanced economy
The strong, albeit belated, focus on the services sector is a reflection of the fact that this sector now accounts for 83% of Hong Kong's GDP. The Government's commitment to support the market momentum created by the private sector is reassuring, and essential if we are to continue to lead the region as a service provider.
The proposed $50 million "Services Support Fund" is neither here nor there. It merely seems to add to an already muddled situation. What concerns me more is the continued fragmentation of our efforts in promoting Hong Kong's goods and services and attracting inward investment. I still maintain that we need to pull everything together under an Economic Development Board (EDB) a strong, central co-ordinating body that would be more focused and more cost effective.
Why not go all the way and turn the Trade Development Council (TDC) into an EDB, rather than merely extending the TDC's mandate to include the promotion of trade in services, and continuing to leave the inward investment promotional responsibility with the Industry Department? Having separate overseas offices for the TDC and the Hong Kong Government is confusing for potential investors, and the duplication is wasting taxpayers' money.
There are those who would write-off Hong Kong as a manufacturing centre, so it was gratifying to see that the Financial Secretary's vision of the future includes a role for Hong Kong as a premier regional centre for high-technology, high value-added manufacturing. This is absolutely vital if Hong Kong is to develop the more balanced economy we need to underpin our future growth, and the Government is rightfully expanding its support for this sector through:
- Establishing a science park;
- Developing a second industrial technology centre and a fourth industrial estate; and
- Commissioning a detailed study on longer-term industrial development.
However, such programmes are likely to have little direct effect on the economy for several years. In the short-term, the Administration must be more aggressive in looking again at targeting key multinational companies with a tailored package of financial incentives to encourage investment in Hong Kong's manufacturing sector. We need actions and we need results.
While the services sector will clearly continue to be dominant in Hong Kong, we have to guard against over-dependence. A vibrant, revitalised manufacturing sector will provide us with at least some counter-balance and prevent us from becoming a "one-sector wonder". Wonders may never cease, but they can certainly decrease. Growing our manufacturing sector will also have the benefit of creating new jobs, jobs in which many of our displaced workers may feel more at home.
After all, workers from the manufacturing sector made up 38% of the over 5 000 registrants to the job-matching scheme in 1995. On the face of it, retraining and upgrading the skills of manufacturing workers for new manufacturing jobs would seem more logical and would perhaps meet with more success than pushing them into service jobs. The latter rather smacks of forcing a square peg into a round hole.
Tackling unemployment
The pain associated with the restructuring of Hong Kong's economy will undoubtedly continue as Hong Kong further develops as a services and high-technology, high value-added manufacturing centre. A better-resourced Employee Retraining Board in combination with more effective job-matching schemes are crucial in helping get people back to work.
But the Government needs to keep these programmes under close and constant review to ensure that they are indeed effective and relevant. In other words, to ensure that the services being offered meet the needs of those seeking assistance.
At the same time, given the urgency of the situation, one has to question whether enough is being done and enough resources are being directed into these initiatives. Tackling unemployment has to be one of our top, top priorities.
Language
Continuing to enhance the skills of our workforce is essential to our future competitiveness. And high up on the list of required skills is languages.
The Financial Secretary has warned that Hong Kong will not be able to maintain its position as an international centre for trade and finance if we allow our language skills to slip. This is no idle threat. Yet slipped they have, especially with English which is so important to our international trade and financial services. Educationalists have called for urgent remedies, and a strong recruitment drive for native English speaking teachers.
Therefore, I was once again surprised at the seemingly low level of resources being allocated to this area.
Revenue protection
Concerns have been expressed in many quarters about the shrinking salaries tax base a base which will shrink even further with the Budget proposals. While the beneficiaries of the new tax concessions and allowances will be delighted, and while the Financial Secretary's generosity might help lift some of the economic gloom that has hung over much of the population, concerns about the revenue base must not be taken lightly.
The situation is all the more worrying in light of the estimated 15% decline in land premium income one of the Government's other primary sources of revenue in the 1996-97 financial year. The Government's coffers (and those of the future Special Administrative Region Government) have been bolstered by the high land premium income in the past few years. However, with the relative scarcity of "prime sites" remaining in the government portfolio, the trend will be towards declining revenues from land premiums.
To address this, the Government should initiate as a matter of urgency a detailed review of medium-and long-term land supply, with an emphasis on urban renewal, re-zoning and modification of land use.
I am also concerned about the delays in the Capital Works programme and the impact such deferred expenditure will have on reserves especially should there be an economic downturn at the time the committed expenditure finally becomes due.
The Financial Secretary spoke of the need to keep our reserves for a rainy day. And by that he indicated he meant more of storm than a shower. For the same reasons, we have to protect our revenue base.
Living within our means
Furthermore, while we must increase our support for the elderly and the needy, we must also ensure that we continue to live within our means. Hong Kong's success has been based on the principle that those who can work do work, and work hard. Long may it continue. We therefore have to strike a balance between helping those in genuine need, and welfarism for welfarism's sake.
The Financial Secretary has gone to great pains to make it look like his Budget is in keeping with the "living within our means" philosophy. But with the concerns over the revenue base and the deferred expenditure on Capital Works, are we? And what of those "rainy days"?
Threats to growth
The Financial Secretary's projection of 5% economic growth is encouraging, although there are many who believe he is being optimistic. If growth fails to meet the 5% forecast and the Government's downward revision of 4.6% growth for 1995 is not an encouraging sign the projected surplus could easily become a deficit, especially given some of the ominous clouds on the horizon:
- The possible downturn in the United States economy
- The on-going efforts to curb inflation in China
- The threat to China's Most Favoured Nation (MFN) trading status.
All these would have a negative impact on our overall economic performance. And, if China were to lose its MFN status, then Hong Kong would definitely be in for some stormy weather.
Conclusion
In conclusion, prudence, caution, conservatism should be the Budgetary watchwords, particularly in this challenging period of transition. Yet, as the Financial Secretary rightly pointed out, we cannot afford to wait and see what happens. The conservatism has to be combined with innovation and action.
Only by becoming more innovative by seizing the lead and keeping it can we truly enhance our competitive advantage. And, only then can we achieve the Financial Secretary's vision of Hong Kong's future as a premier centre for international trade, manufacturing and services in the region.
The Budget has given us a start. A foundation on which to build. So let us stop the nit-picking, the political rhetoric and the arguments about who will and who will not have a say in preparing the next Budget, and begin working with the Government to build the future, the promise for Hong Kong outlined in this Budget.
Let us give the Financial Secretary our vote of confidence, just as he has given Hong Kong his vote of confidence.
Mr President, I support the motion.
MISS MARGARET NG: Mr President, I am told by those whom it is my duty to consult to praise the Financial Secretary for his Budget, and I hereby do so.
It has been long in the folklore of this territory that the fundamental philosophy of this government is non-interventionist, with the Government's role being confined to the provision of a sound infrastructure to facilitate free enterprise, and of a "safety-net" of help for those who are unable to help themselves.
These three elements are, of course, capable of development and interpretation. They had been interpreted and re-interpreted and developed by each Financial Secretary through their Budgets down the years. But the issues have not changed very much. They have always been whether a financial policy was or was not unduly interventionist, whether the priorities are correctly ordered with respect to infrastructure, and whether not enough or too much is being spent on welfare. Few have really seriously challenged the broad approach. No one, for example, has championed a welfare state, or advocated a planned economy.
One would expect that the same would be reflected in the first Budget of the present Financial Secretary. "Conservative" is not a four-lettered word in this community where the Budget is concerned.
But I am not at all sure that this expectation is met in the Budget now placed before this Council. I may have got it wrong, but it appears to me that a departure has been suggested. I refer to the idea that this Government should make serving the business community a top concern and play an active role. The Financial Secretary says, on page 8 of the Addendum: "Civil servants should not see their role merely as regulators but more as supporters and partners for business." In Paragraph 97 of the Budget speech, he says, "We should set ourselves the task of making the Government, as far as possible, user-friendly for business." He repeats this in the next paragraph: "The goal will be to create an environment which is positively business-friendly." And again, at Paragraph 99, "I believe the whole of the Government has a duty to provide a business-friendly environment." Towards this end, he says, he will be asking all policy branches to review their current policies and practices.
No doubt we shall hear more of the outcome of this exercise, but several areas have already been indicated: balancing regulation against freedom, introducing new services, further privatization, lowering government fees and charges (this may astonish those who have been voting with the Government to increase them), reducing the cost of capital, and so on.
A more pro-active role is envisaged with a single-minded purpose. Not only is the whole administration going to re-orientate itself towards serving the interests of business; the professional and the service-sector will be "encouraged" to become competitive. In the Addendum, the details of the purpose of the Services Support Fund are set out. Among the "Policy Directions" is one which refers to implementing the proposals in the Report on Legal Services of the Attorney General: proposals which include what the legal profession considers seriously challenging its independence. Self-regulation is curtailed by legislative intervention in the name of encouraging competition. If this is the keynote, then not only the Administration, but the professional and service sector, must be, or forced to be, orientated towards business.
Mr President, I do not quarrel with business. Indeed my livelihood and the livelihood of those I represent depend very much on business. Furthermore, I agree with the Financial Secretary when, talking about Hong Kong's future, he started with the economic prospects. "After all," he said, "it is our economic success which makes everything else possible." Hong Kong's future means Hong Kong's future under Chinese sovereignty. But for our economic success, we would never have been in a position to negotiate with China to keep Hong Kong's system and way of life after 1997. But for our economic success creating tremendous economic interest in us for the United Kingdom and other countries of the world, we would never have attracted so much international support for maintaining the rule of law in Hong Kong after 1997. To survive, we have to continue as a huge economic success. To survive, we must make ourselves not just very useful, but downright irresistible in our usefulness, and that usefulness refers to being useful to people who come here to do business.
So I do not quarrel with the Financial Secretary for his enthusiasm or anxiety I do not know which. What I do feel deeply about is that we must not, in the concern to be useful to business, forget that this government exists for the people of Hong Kong, it exists for their needs and must be guided by their aspirations. It is not for the Government to take sides, to support what it chooses. The Government should be even-handed in its dealings with all sectors of the community, distributing its resources instead of backing one form of economic activities or another in the hope that it will bring benefit to all. It should, insofar as possible, support a pluralist society in which people have real choice.
It saddens me to compare the eagerness to serve the bright future of business with the passive acceptance of the fact that the level of unemployment is "unlikely" to improve quickly. The only remedy the Financial Secretary suggests is expanding the retraining programme a programme whose success has been insignificant so far. I am disappointed that no concrete relief will be given to the unemployed.
Insufficient emphasis, in my view, has been placed on education, the most important way of "empowering" people, enabling them to make a better deal for themselves. Money spent on education is money really spent on the people and a real investment in the community's future at the same time. Our service sector, which the Financial Secretary so highly praises, is not the result of the Government's determination to support business, but a product of an increasingly higher level of education in general.
Yet apart from the training of language skills, nothing much is said about education. The real growth of expenditure on education is a very moderate 4.3%.
Likewise, the administration of justice should be an important element in the philosophy of government: to provide an impartial and user-friendly system of courts where disputes can be rationally and expeditiously resolved, and the rights of the parties properly determined. This means adequate provisions for the judiciary and for legal aid.
In this context, I welcome the strengthening of the staff establishment of the Legal Aid Department. Justice delayed is justice denied. To ensure that those in need of legal aid have their application dealt with speedily, and those who are granted legal aid receive a high level of professional representation, there must be a realistic number of staff at the appropriate level and adequate allocation of funds.
I do not view with unmixed comfort at the expansion of the Legal Department. I agree that the Legal Department needs to be properly staffed in order to provide advice, to draft and keep legislation under revision, to consider and devise policies for the better administration of justice, and to carry out other duties which can only be undertaken within the Government. High quality government lawyers with firm professional principles are essential to the maintenance of our legal system now and into the future. However, there are important public interest reasons, including costs, for using more lawyers in private practice in a flexible way for government litigation and criminal prosecution, rather than expanding staff establishment in order to keep most of it in the hands of a government department.
I note that cautious amounts have been allowed for expenses in connection with the setting up of the Court of Final Appeal: to buy books for the library, to carry out building works and to pay for some administrative staff. I hope this does not mean this is all the progress we may expect, and that the crucial matter of recruiting the best judges will not be embarked upon in this financial year, but only that it does not cost us any money to do so.
Finally, I want to add my voice to those who have been making passionate appeals for a more humane and caring society. I do not disagree that large percentage of increases have been allowed to social welfare in this Budget, but then we are increasing on a very low baseline. Only as generous as possible an approach to the question of welfare could counterbalance the ruthlessly competitive society that Hong Kong's special circumstances have made necessary. Looking at the modest grant of $320 a year for the elderly for social and recreational activities, and then at the $50 million Services Support Fund for the service sector to improve its services, one cannot help wondering if we have got our proportions right. I would support the call for raising the level of Comprehensive Social Security Assistance for the elderly by another $300.
Mr President, I have praised the Financial Secretary, and also said a number of other things. I support the motion. Thank you.
眎▆某璓勉畊ネи稱量珿ㄆ
箂︓箂璣瓣Τぃぶ崔チ崔チ琌だ砲絘⊿窥秈︽膀程﹙瓣―穿璣瓣現┎程砞ミ掸崔チ祇甶膀ㄑ崔チビ叫挤蹿竒蕾祇甶ぇノ
翠妓翠現┎璣瓣現┎厨嘿翠竒蕾祇甶Τ禫Θ碞筁礚斗羭杜癩現︑倒︑ì爹硂琌翠そ瞶癩纔▆肚参
獺せさぱ翠現┎ョ妓弧硂妓花薄Ё粂翠ぇ┮Τ"ㄈ瑆螺"Θ碞荡獶案礛硂琌翠顶糷カチщ戈盡穨約骋拟も挡狦癩現簍勉材94︓100琿い璶┹甶竒蕾э到チネ璶硑瞷て犁坝吏挂よ璓ㄒ玂臔醚玻舦崩︽よ獽犁坝現┎玃秈現┎场瞯单硂妓郸菠羆ㄓ弧琌眔舧陪ボ現┎崩笆翠竒蕾祇甶よ沧﹚祘┯踞甶ボ﹚环ǎ
癩現矗浪癚瞷現┎祘のよΑ眏瞯и-
舧現┎硂よи-
璶猔種現┎场眏瞯獶虫琘ㄇ场┪兜ヘэ╬犁て┪"犁笲膀て"獽秆∕拜肈ヘ玡現┎砞ミ璝犁笲膀Τㄇ场ョσ納"犁笲膀て"琌ㄇ犁笲膀场セō竒ㄉΤ祘胋耞┦ㄒ爹矪そ爹矪︓秎現竝单︙眏-
膙笆莱坝穨穦㎝カチじて惠―硂翴現┎璶э璶ま痷タ膙笷ヘ讽礛и-
ぃ莱癵獺そ犁场﹚穦瞯┪╬犁诀篶﹚穦Τ蔼瞯蝴Τ╬坝祇甶カ初吏挂現┎莱璓犁硑蔼そ犁场讽い闽龄碞琌璶Τ膙碞琌璶琵そ禣Τ匡拒Τ禣碙腨そ犁场硂妓暗琌璶疉のそ叭ゅてэ硑
現┎┹甶竒蕾犁硑Τ坝穨祇甶吏挂ぇ璶禬禫"坝"熬跌炊霉カチ禗―キ颗坝穨祇甶祏戳㎝戳惠―キ颗祏戳痲發硋㎝戳痲蝴臔穦Τ瞶祇甶吏挂蝴"尿祇甶"Ы
畊ネ絣硑"尿祇甶"吏挂ぃ虫斗ㄌ苦┮孔カ初秖カ初秖讽礛崩笆翠筁竒蕾祇甶Θ碞獶琌祇甶斑秖カ初獶┾禜狥﹁カ初秖ゲ斗皌猭獀弘の絣硑そキ膙そキ禩兵ン祇揣ノи-
舧癩現や穿の崩約狝叭穨ゅンい郸菠材き翴ボ穦碞崩笆そキ膙よ┯空穦糹︽ㄈび竒舱麓璟ēず秨カ初搭ぶ胋耞暗猭и-
窗玃現┎璶惗痷タㄇ縒カ初ま秈膙矗ㄑ痷タそキ膙兵ン㎝吏挂チ囊纯礷眎Θミそキユ〆穦㎝秈︽は胋耞ミ猭瞷琌癩現ㄣ砰︽笆辅龟┯空
瞷籹硑穨簿翠タ邻璶竒蕾锣顶琿癩現矗の"┹甶竒蕾"Τㄤ疭種竡"┹"Τ秨┹笆阑種τ"甶"莱钡珼驹㎝祇揣肩種竒蕾锣硑Θ挡篶┦ア穨拜肈瘤礛程ア穨瞯Τ絯格禜锣穨逼┪琌妓秈︽蚌癡穦锣惠璶墩旧現┎硂よゲ斗璶皌カ初癬盿繷ノ盿烩翠穦秈锣竒蕾砰╰硂穝竒蕾砰╰ゲ斗矗ㄑ穝碞穨诀穦矗ㄑ蔼糤诀穦翠骋笆カ初挡篶毙▅キмキ㎝戈キ单よ跑て莱翠ずカ初挡篶跑て
畊ネさΩ現┎崩約狝叭穨砏购よ┯空埃琌借砞ㄒ筿癟翠㎝诀初ぇョ┯粄蚌癡琌翠ミìㄈ瑆璶膀ホ現┎蚌癡よ矗碭よ某
揭祘祇甶某穦揭祘э
籔狝叭穨Τ闽揭祘ず甧
癸戮穨厩甶秨浪癚
眏厩ネ粂ゅの
き骋穝м蚌癡
硂妓ㄓ硂ㄇ蚌癡よや穿琌竒蕾锣τō璹硑и-
ぃ莱︳揭祘浪癚㎝戮厩浪癚狡馒┦㎝螟狦揭祘浪癚琌碞厩ず甧干干獽種竡ぃ妓ぃ穝﹚戮厩à︹τ琌盢揭祘ㄇэ▆ョ琌穔ぃ膐矪翠俱砰厩揭祘挡篶ゲ斗ㄓセ┦э硑栋い蚌緄厩ネσ琵-
镑磝搐穝戈癟穝м蚌緄-
莱跑て放珿穝戮厩ぃ莱Θ瑈厩毙▅娩絫╰参и-
惠璶俱ゅて厩毙▅㎝戮穨厩毙▅俱毙▅砰╰い闽玒ㄏ-
Θㄢがや穿妓ど盡毙▅タ盽毙▅家Αи-
舧現┎沧腀種タ跌セ厩ネ粂ゅ挤蹿兜や穿厩ネ磝搐粂ゅ琌硂κ窾挤蹿毙参穦材せ腹厨ㄤ某現┎琌だ顶琿龟琁虑ビ叫粂ゅ膀瞶パぃ癩現"┏"硂翴琌ア辨
よ┹甶戈方Τ碭翴眔闽猔
1.現┎Τ⊿Τì镑畍戈蚌癡ㄓ莱竒蕾硉锣跑τ惠э揭祘ョ琌弧и-
蚌癡畍戈Τち穝竒蕾顶琿惠璶瞷戮毙畍妓秈︽蚌癡㎡現┎崩笆粂ゅ癡絤よ埃т穿тㄇ璣粂ダ粂毙畍ㄓヴ毙ぇ癸ㄤ毙畍穦矗ㄑ続讽粂ゅ畍戈蚌癡硂ㄇ常琌璶秆∕拜肈
2.揭祘祇甶のэよ毙▅竝タ崩笆"ヘ夹セ"揭祘崩笆の糤毙厩借糤毙厩借現┎穦σ納璹甅Τ躬纘┦ㄓ贱纘êㄇΤ禫瞷蔼厩㎝毙畍矗蔼毙厩借㎡眏秸膙跌禣惠―犁坝吏挂и-
Τ猔種毙厩吏挂いま秈妓秈發―禫弘ま秈続莱縀纘诀㎡
3.膀娄毙▅よ畍戈蚌癡ㄒ厩毙畊厩︗てギ竂堕盡穨蚌癡よ現┎筐筐ゼ辅龟ㄆ龟毙▅竒禣糤絯さぱ︙"┹"㎝"甶"㎡膀娄毙▅璶ㄇ皌翠顶琿竒蕾祇甶揭祘盡毙▅よ︙皌甅и-
戳辨︽盢祇毙戈穦厨穦甶ボ睲捶隔矗ㄑ盿烩翠厩毙▅秈屡瓜
翠ゼㄓ
畊ネ"ミìㄈ瑆泊"莱琌翠邻竒蕾祇甶羆乎烩ㄈ瑆ㄤい"竒蕾螺"翠︙祇揣ㄈ瑆跋疭竒蕾︗琌и-
盢ㄓ璶癸璶揭肈
癩現簍勉い眏秸翠い瓣竒蕾祇甶癪膍и-
ぃ穦借好翠硂よ癬ノㄆ龟繦翠竒蕾禫ㄓ禫籔い瓣竒蕾候候Ιい瓣絋Θ翠竒蕾祇甶程跑计贾芠ぇ緇и-
Τㄇ踞み碞琌翠タ祇甶Θ瓣悔常カ磕いみ瓣悔戈栋翴ㄤ龟ョ琌盢翠加基基ネ禣单单硋˙崩蔼崩蔼︓环瞒┮璽踞ㄇ礚猭璽踞硂蔼禣ネキ跑Θ翠穝砲絘糷埃獶-
綞嘲碞瞷ㄇρ產癶ヰぇ嘲﹡︘妓и-
踞み-
跌翠寥窥翠Θ嘲戈セ戈㎝瓣悔癩刮羇绢發硋祏戳痲㎝祏戳柬┪竩種щ诀初и-
踞み-
ぃ穦瞶穦翠Τネ㏑穦Τ尿祇甶惠璶
狦翠竒蕾祇甶跑Θ硂妓礚好翠穦膥尿璉璽瓣悔カ羘陪划翠琌"碔Τ"ぱ绑τぃ琌┮Τ翠"ōミ㏑"よ
狦璶翠Θ瞷て家絛カΘい瓣竒蕾いみ翠ぃ虫ゎ莱竒蕾ㄆ叭癩現祇甶よ"瓣悔て"ぃ莱虫琌▆坝穨祇甶玡春ヘτ琌犁硑竒蕾穦ゅて籔現獀よ常А颗祇甶Ы絣硑炊霉渤常﹡贾穨吏挂耚叉"坝竡"盻︔硂妓翠ぃ穦Θㄇ竒蕾厩┮踞み"耙箉て"カτ琌產常镑ōミ㏑痙翠祇甶崩笆穦эい瓣常穦
畊ネセ略朝勉
爹 ǎStephen CONSTANTINE, The Making of British Colonial Development Policy, Frank Cass, 1984, P. 294
币某璓勉畊ネ癩現ヴㄓ材現┎癩現箇衡璶穦顶糷璶―荷秖い瓣現┎粄絪籹硂箇衡∕獶ㄆ癩現箇衡夹肈琌"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"翠カチ磞酶碩腞瓜礶琌瞷龟鶪琌痷穦
癩現ボセ翠さセネ玻羆穦Τ5%龟借糤锣禩糤玥笷12%箇代㏕﹚戈玻щ戈よΤ6%オ龟借糤碩竒蕾瞷衡ぃ玌堡芖甽比癬冻旧璓セ翠カ竒菌Ω╝临Τ坝砐翠ボさ瓣┑尿い瓣禩程磃瓣笿ゑ┕螟琌い璣闽玒㎝瓣匡羭羆参紇臫薄鶪ゼ窾Ы墩癴锣瓣ぃ┑尿い瓣禩程磃瓣笿盢腨ゴ阑セ翠竒蕾翠赤ア8窾碞穨戮︗セネ玻羆盢禴1.5%刚拜吏挂紇臫夹临Τ龟瞷盾翠┎夹篯糵稸瞶癩玥瞷玱矗耕贾芠竒蕾箇代叫拜翠┎癸Τ︙р搐の癸郸
癩現某р羱祙膀セ祙肂パ79,000じ糤︓90,000じ盉祙肂パ158,000じ糤︓180,000じㄢ兜祙肂矗蔼14%ごぃì翠骋刮羛穦某98,000じ祙肂產睲贰笵羱祙祙肂戳矪熬キゼ發戈い︗计糤ㄏ戈い︗计砆祙呼絛瞅癩現┮某祙肂ㄤ秖琌纕临菌侣眀ㄏ癩現某90,000じ璸衡る7,500じ虫ōョ砆祙呼產ぃ螟稱钩7,500じΙ埃逗ユ硄禣临Τぶ逞緇矗蔼祙肂琌癸计羱翴酚臮Τ-
ア穨潮紇糤翴縩絓ň娜セ窥芠Τ現┎搭ぶ硂よ穦褐秨や辨癩現σ納
闽畉昏癩現ボ︳斗癸莱揭畉昏碩糤穦σ納琌Τ惠璶龟琁続讽畉昏糴搭璸购セ略叫癩現︽挡Ω潦竚︑︘穨畉昏搭淮硂уカチ璽踞矗蔼カチ︑竚﹡┮潦禦激
畊ネ翠ア穨鶪碿て腨紇臫竒蕾˙Θ穦闽猔礘翴ぇ酚き竒蕾阀鶪参璸计き材﹗セ翠竒﹗竊┦秸俱ア穨瞯の碞穨ぃì瞯だ琌3.5%㎝2.3%ア穨计107 800碞穨ぃì计72 900眔猔種琌きず翠ア穨戳い︗计77ぱ癸70ぱ糤10%癸惠璶緄產絢ア穨ㄓ弧痷琌ら琌埂簙ぃ緅簙哀癩現弧"瘤礛瓣悔夹非颗秖セ翠ア穨瞯琌矪キи-
ぃτ癸碞穨薄鶪奔淮み"現┎︙ぃ癸ゑ稼瓣產穦褐玱虫癸ゑア穨瞯硂琌粇旧カチ現┎螟笵镑簔跌盽瞷ア穨︑炳ア穨︽单穦拜肈盾瘤礛粄醚"璶叭琌腊ア穨︽"碞穨匡皌璸购狦Θ瞯笷71%盢沟蚌癡膀猔戈3货じ挡狦琌癩現┮弧"蚌癡秆∕场だ拜肈"瘤礛現┎程穝参璸计陪ボきる︓せるア穨羬计︓3.1%琌瑈搭ぶのセ翠骋﹠碞羱現┎нセ籹硑穨糤碞穨诀穦よ┮暗ぶ辨現┎盢干筁е龟琁兜璸购ア穨︽癸ア穨τネ炒挂倒ぉ竒蕾や穿
箇衡盢穦褐秨や糤14.7%よ蝶阶角禨ぃセ粄セ翠穦褐絋Τ糤ゲ璶羱顶糷ρ虫克產畑端摧单ち惠璶耕Ч到侯穦玂毁穿璸购翠┎抖莱カチ场だ璶―眖るら癬虫ō–る烩肂糤︓1,615じ籔產︘糤︓1,440じ端摧祘笷50%Θ–る烩肂糤︓1,760じ璹瞷︽砏﹚砛い瓣﹡︘ρ膥尿烩侯穿璸购夹非穿の戳干单骸ì硂ㄇ穿膀セ璶―戳辨現┎荷е辅龟穦玂毁快ㄆ矪糤20%も璸购疭琌┹甶ρ狝叭甶钉Τ惠璶矗ㄑǔ硉Τ狝叭沮翠┎参璸计きいセ翠65烦ρ笷590 100羆9.5%箇代箂箂65烦ρ盢糤︓70窾ρてら镣腨龟莱╯砞ミㄑ蹿Α穦玂繧璸购秆∕ゼㄓρて穦拜肈瞷顶琿莱σ納糤蔼闹瑉禟肂鮔ρ產筁┕癪膍
侯┮瓃ぃ螟眔硂妓挡阶琂礛翠┎獺"秖"玥ê或罽祙膀薄鶪ぃ笆ノ纗称癩現秸笆戈方Τォ包螟ぶμぇ癩現莱ぇチノぇチ続讽笆ノ场だ癩現纗称戳笷ㄤ砍竒蕾э到チネЩ岸ヘ夹︙ゲ辨癩砍鼓㎡
畊ネセ略朝勉や兵ㄒ
PRESIDENT: Honourable Members, Mr LAW Chi-kwong has requested my permission for him to sing two bars during the course of his speech. Standing Orders are silent as to whether or not a Member may sing his or her speech, or part of the speech. On that basis, Mr LAW has argued that it would not be out of order for a Member to sing.
I have considered the matter. Whilst there are some merits in the argument, I hesitate to rule to the extent of total relaxation. A number of reasons come to my mind immediately.
Firstly, there has been no precedent in this Council. There have, however, been ample precedents in this Council of Members reciting their own poems or quoting the poetry of others.
Secondly, the act of a Member speaking is for addressing the Council, questioning the Government and debating bills, motions and amendments. On such occasions, Members persuade each other and persuade the Government by laying bare their reasons and showing off their debating skills, not their angelic voices in songs. In any case, if songs were to be allowed, it would detract from the main purpose of the debate, as all songs are pre-written, not readily understood if heard for the first time, and spontaneous responses to songs would be very difficult if not impossible.
However, I would exceptionally accept the singing of a short sentence as an illustration of the speech. Members who wish to do so should bear the following in mind: (1) Only a short sentence would be permitted, not a substantial part of a song and certainly not an entire song; (2) the line sung must contain words, not hum's and ha's, and the words must be relevant to the subject matter under debate; (3) no accompanying music would be permitted.
I am confident that Honourable Members will not tolerate this august debating chamber being turned into a canto pop hall, or for that matter, a cathedral or monastery, however much I personally like to sing Gregorian chants.
霉璓某璓勉畊ネи-
よу蝶さΩ癩現箇衡挤蹿э到穦褐ぃì镑ゼ發穦惠―ョぃ祏戳ず秆∕狝叭腨祏拜肈よパ現┎璶タ筁┕癸穦褐┛跌τ惠碩糤秨やτまㄓぃぶу蝶の踞紐穦褐秨や糤穦ア北產穦佩砓琎ぱセЫいΤㄆ緙ゑ畴穦褐ぃ筁и獶材Ω钮硂ゑ畴﹉づ阶硂ゑ畴璉は璣薄狐┪琌潮垦阶ㄓ┮Τ翠璣現┎琁現琌讽и穦褐ミ猭Ыぃ眔ぃは拜︑╯澈и-
よ暗眔ぃ镑璓场だ穦ゼ秆翠穦瞷腨ぃìよ
穝""ㄆンまㄓ穦㎝セЫㄆ癸縒﹡ρ惠璶闽猔の縩伐玃叫現┎タ跌拜肈癩現箇衡絪籹惠珿そガ箇衡い碞Τ闽拜肈莱よぃㄆ龟筁るい現┎硂よぃぶ莱珹箇衡ノ5,000窾じ烩侯穿縒﹡ρ杆筿杠の煤ユる禣ノ1,700窾じρ狝叭いみ祇甶甶狝叭眔嘿苂琌現┎絋腀種ǔ硉莱璶у蝶玱琌現┎︙羆璶单"厄加"腀種蹦︽笆иぃ窽稱癬瓣チ簈Blowing in the Windず簈迭"How many deaths will it take till he knows that too many people have died?"硂種琌弧"╯澈璶ぶ笵び㎡"瘤礛簈勉種琌は驹ぃ筁硂タタ続琵и-
は瞷翠穦癸蒥チ褐は莱螟笵и-
痷璶磀粿祇ネ砰穦и-
褐ぃìぇ矪盾
產临癘眔计玡Τуρ產ノ捆ㄠó更癳-
Θ腨畓醇ミ猭Ы叫腀繦まㄓ穦闽猔玃Θ硈﹃現郸э到程ョΤ竤弘痜眃確腀種ㄓミ猭Ыビ禗场は琈-
癸狝叭ぃì種ǎи獶盽ㄘ狝-
玦玙穦夹帽ぇ璚硂ご琌骸猍跌穦ōτ钡笷︑―硂贺薄鶪и谋眔ベ瘤礛и跌笴︽ボ產盽獽逗璶硂ㄇ穦夹帽ぇ璚┻繷臩龟Τㄇみぃгиョぃ窽胔好琌﹚璶盢и-
穦荷璚甶臩描繷玡眔穦薄㎡
玡计ぱ烦ギㄠ產いΘ垦ネτ璶縒︑籔舙ネ﹏ゝ痙產挡狦祇ネ糧加種и-
既ぃ癚阶莱ミ猭窽ゎ產縒痙產い拜肈и稱癚阶ㄤ璉┮は琈穦拜肈產穦稱瘤礛克Μぃ铆﹚暗洱洱皊加Μ稬璶ビ叫ギㄠ狝叭禣ノ戈ごぃ才戈さぱ皊加┪е繺┍る羱Τじ盢ㄢ戈獶θギㄠいみ–る斗緇じ禣ノパ戈ギㄠいみぃì璶ㄏノㄤ⊿Τ戈ギㄠ狝叭ㄓ酚臮ㄢギ–る獽璶6,000じや璶硂︗洱洱斌τ痙產い酚臮ギㄠ克Μ玱ぃ寂產ネ禣и痷琌ぃ惧眔莱赣ノ"ネネ"临琌ノ""ㄓ甧硂﹙種┮は琈穦拜肈の硂羉篴τ砲碔腶翠穦┮玻ネ穦瞷禜и辨產ぃ璶а癘硂磀粿祇ネ诀ㄆ龟肩ヱぃぶ砲娩絫產畑ぇい"琌"ョ璶弧螟笵璶禴碭ギㄠ酬癬êㄇ粄穦褐琌緙薄み盾
и琎糶硂簍勉︓瞷弄硂簍勉硂ㄨみ薄常↖и福い疊瞷春禜癸ひ包Г產い饼礚瞈泊ぺぺ-
Τ祇甶毁锚瞶獀励畍┪戮穨獀励畍狝叭τ–鶪禫单薄鶪穦禫ㄓ禫畉-
盢穦ア禫ㄓ禫礚確ō砰
┪砛计玡禴环耕さぱ临璶琌⊿Τ痙種琌さぱ翠羉篴и-
︑郒琌蔼ゅ穦狦Ч綼蒥初笲瞊∣畓τ骸ìネ發―и-
痷み瞶眔盾
и癑み㊣苸êㄇ︑粄琌Θ︑粄綼眔Θ狦狟ね叫ǐ-
快そǐ-
蔼贾场砰诡翠计窾砲絘┪琌砲絘娩絫蒥チネ挂и紋┋ダ倒ぉи胺ō砰紋┋-
倒ぉиぃ岿兵ン琵иさぱミ猭Ыい祇ē琵иΤ惠璶τ眔ぃ酚臮荷礷
さΩ癩現箇衡穦褐秨やよㄆ龟Τ芠糤琌ごΤぃìぇ矪Τ惠э到渤┮㏄さ侯穿い虫ōρ夹非穿⊿Τ或э到產⊿Τ痙種端摧夹非穿疭琌100%端摧ョ眔ぃэ到ぇ琌パ現┎︘めや秸琩いтぃì镑獶侯穿端摧妓セτぃゑ耕┮璓и辨癩現碞硂よ瞶莱и∕﹚るら莱︙щ布и辨翠ぃぶГい瓣﹛オφ娩狟ねぃ璶芠芠莱ち龟翠穦ぃ┋竤ら癚阶翠癩現箇衡碭だ薄み砞碔闽胔翠穦翴翴
セ略朝勉
霉睲某璓勉畊ネ翠竒筁κ崔チ参獀羬Τ︗地癩現矗癩現箇衡孔筐ㄓ琄ぱ礛τ拨澈"筐筁礚"硂琌眔舧癩現羱祙祙肂い矗兜ㄑ緄﹏ゝ糴搭ボσ納地穦翴み
翠е盢璶"瓣ㄢ"笲虑诀穦セ略酵酵и-
惠璶或穦и-
辨翠ミゅ戈セ竡硂ぃ阶┪穨Аセō兵ンだ祇揣-
ぃ穦ぃ瞶ы溃τΤそキのА单祇甶诀穦現┎蝴臔そキ膙薄鶪だ碙カ初笲籔現┎辣干カ初ぃì現┎硄筁猭ㄒ現郸の祙罽搭砲碔腶現┎ぃ虫璶酚臮穦ゑ耕ぃ┋-
Τ诀穦だㄉ穦Θ狦莱承硑吏挂玃ㄏ–カチΤミ︑ネ
畊ネи盢穦碞癩現箇衡疉の碭よ矗ㄇ猭
箇衡琌秖
癩現眏秸硂琌秖菠Τ緇箇衡セ癸Τ┮玂痙そ秨や糤碩7.6%环蔼セネ玻羆5%糤瞯疭琌讽戈胑"豪堕"璸购珹穝诀初み祘膥丹膀セ祘砞碩搭ぶそ秨やごΤ硂或糤碩ぃぃ闽猔ㄆ龟ㄒ臟臟诀恨Ы单猭﹚诀篶秨やの犁笲膀秨や单琌現┎北秨や莱ご妮現┎秨やㄤ糤碩莱ㄖ籔セネ玻羆糤碩本恥
癩現矗そじ箂箂箂珹疭跋膀ず羆纗称盢禬筁3,650货じ︳璸⊿Τ璸の兵穝臟隔材兵诀初禲笵翠祇甶单胑膀秨や虫琌﹁臟隔硑禣︳璸獽笷750货じㄆ龟箇衡い硈∕﹚砍厩堕单兜ヘ⊿Τ箇痙蹿兜硂ボヘ玡翠璣現┎秨眎眎戳布パ盢ㄓ疭跋現┎や
16货じ緇琌计笴栏セ程﹗计货じΜ痲盢挤ㄓτр兜膀Μ崩蔼331货じよさ膀祘┑粇搭ぶ秨や计货じ癩現⊿Τず干ㄓ盢ㄓΤ眖疭跋現┎秨やいや
н坝穨
瞷ヴ癩現沧癸н坝穨耕ㄣ砰莱硂琌眔苂洁︓ぶ現┎腀種癸セ翠穨锣拜肈の┯粄и-
穨祇甶辅ㄈ瑆ㄤ纒礛τ現┎矗どセ翠籹硑穨借玃秈セ翠狝叭穨Θ祇甶蝴翠Θ瑈磕いみ︗单"翬瓜璸"常篶稱顶琿龟だ挤蹿き窾じΘミ狝叭穨や穿の笴祇甶膀孔"楞楞窰"翴后龟悔
セ玃叫現┎猔種нい穨繦セ翠竒蕾祇甶セ翠癩刮ぃ耞Ё癬ㄓи-
ぃ辨ǎ硂摸癩刮Θ胋耞┦栋刮с炳い穨ネ丁の祇甶诀穦ㄣΤ艶秈承穨弘い穨琌セ翠竒蕾祇甶ぃ┪笆現┎莱磕戈祇甶矗どм砃の恨瞶キ单よ倒ぉ戈癸穨锣珼驹
矗蔼セ翠骋笆借
筀ы硄等玂翠玻珇膙現┎蹦骋の跑块堵カ骋現郸ま璓セ翠龟借戈ア穨瞯ど繦ぇτㄓ褐秨や惠―糤穦璽踞蝴ρ馏糤基琌祙窥拨澈蹦筀ы戈も琿琌伐快猭縩伐暗猭琌抖莱穨锣矗蔼穨玻矗蔼ネ玻毙▅蚌癡蚌癡矗蔼碞穨骋笆借戈琌Τ┮翠ネэ到ぃ琌ㄌ苦褐琌咎︑だㄉΘ狦
毙▅よ現┎筁碭癸膀娄毙▅い厩よ挤蹿龟借糤尿熬瞷ョ莱赣琌э跑硂贺熬薄鶪
耎溜祙膀蝴現┎祙Μ铆﹚┦
蝴眔祙瞯16.5%キの碩矗蔼羱祙肂硂㏕礛笷"舧尺"Ы祙膀ぃ耞Μ龟闽猔セ粄程碭祙顶娩悔祙瞯ゑ碩羱祙祙肂环璸現┎莱σ納夹非祙瞯のま秈仓秈祙瞯現┎莱だ到ノ祙罽搭砲碔腶現郸も琿
畉昏よセは癸–︳硂贺暗猭琂糤︽現禣ノτセ翠Τㄤよ猧碩会–︳ΩㄤキА耕続硂暗猭
き 糤臥耎そ
矗蔼祙肂搭祙㏕礛Τ旅碔チタノ礛τ快猭琌カチΜㄣ潦禦ヘ玡程紇臫カチΜ潦禦琌蔼加基籔Τ快猭琌糤挤耎そ疭琌そ硂妓,琂э到糷﹡︘吏挂ㄏ┬惠―闽玒╬加加基の叭カ初ㄏい糷カチ磃
糤臥恶琌耕竒蕾よ猭礛τセは癸恶蝴ㄈ翠ㄓ莉眔蝴ㄈ翠硂瞏翠琌翠程腳禥戈方ぇ琌翠甝禥癩玻翠璣現┎縩伐蝴翠恶だは琈锭現┎み篈港礛恶蝴翠琌程ㄣ竒蕾痲┮莉眔基蔼硂贺暗猭框鹤エㄤい珹Μ笵ま璓種瘆胊瑅ネ篈╰参γ琕吏挂瘆胊翠春︹の锚カ砏购А颗祇甶粿ユ硄拜肈单癸翠俱砰穦竒蕾祇甶盿ㄓЙ锚
せ ρ褐よ
鲸恨穦のミ猭Ыずぃ某А璶―現┎糤ρ褐だ框狙現┎玱跌璝礚窣ρ侯穿よ龟悔⊿Τ糤ョ⊿Τ挤蹿耎甶ρ甶钉現┎р┹甶ρ甶钉砫ヴ崩產叭瞶钉┪竡单よ琌ぃì莱龟悔惠璶現┎糤の戈ρ皘の臔瞶ρ皘よ秈絯篊环环辅龟悔惠璶ま璓ヘ玡近肂窾璸衡パセ翠の戈Аゑ瓣ず蔼セ翠砍ρ皘┪臔瞶ρ皘竒蕾痲ゑ耕現┎σ納籔いよ坝翠綟よㄒ瞏┪痌à瑆单щ戈砍ρ皘┪臔瞶ρ皘┪躬纘の戈ㄇв腀狝叭诀篶瓣ず砍の恨瞶单ρ皘硂妓ノΤ戈方祇揣痲单ρ產荷Ν莉眔ōぇ┮
ㄠ担褐よ
ヘ玡ㄠ担侯穿肂璹非玥ゼ骸ì-
惠璶碿┦碻吏挡狦┕┕硑Θ侯穿產畑砲絘┑尿穦莱琵侯穿ㄠ担籔產畑ㄠ担АㄉΤ妓戈方吏挂Θ-
Τ诀穦▆毙▅耞荡絘ヘ玡络﹚侯穿夹非琌翠程砲絘5%產畑膀娄硂ボ侯穿ㄠ担ぃㄉΤ產畑ㄠ担单祇甶戈方络﹚ㄠ担侯穿莱﹚夹非莱э到侯穿厩担干策揭┪潦禦茂单瑉禟ビ叫籔祇の矗ㄑ-
耕ㄎ放策吏挂癸虫克產畑ョ莱╯ㄤ惠璶э到矗ㄑ-
Λㄠ狝叭硂ㄇ虫克镑Τ诀穦щ確︑ミ
洛励狝叭
硂碭現┎纯╯セ翠ま秈洛励玂繧セ某現┎莱縩伐σ納龟琁硂妓莉眔穝糤戈方やセ翠洛励狝叭礚阶借の秖よА眔矗どτ現┎Τ耕丁続秖秸挤щ洛励狝叭よ戈方ㄏΤ惠璶镑眔狝叭
穝簿チ狝叭よ
現┎莱秸挤続讽戈方莱穝簿チ┮盿ㄓ穦狝叭惠―溃ぃ虫莱Τ笲ノ硂ㄇ戈方ヘ玡毙▅竝癸穝簿チ厩担矗ㄑ穿砆笆ㄒるΤ窾続闹碞厩穝チㄓ翠Τぃだぇ莉逼弄現┎戈厩ㄤ緇玥弄厩禣禥╬┪靳厩毙竝┮矗ㄑ続莱揭祘︑る崩ㄓ︓るゎ厨弄厩担Τ2 600籔ヘ夹6 000环瘤礛現┎糤挤戈方琌Τ笲ノ龟妮好拜莱赣糤挤蹿穝簿チ矗ㄑΤ狝叭
畊ネセ略朝勉
襖略ビ某璓勉畊ネи钮︗ㄆ祇ē-
⊿Τ疭矗の玂よやиぃ笵琌莱赣尺玂だ皌眔Т讽產常谋眔骸種沮и芠诡玂さ挤蹿κ货じい竒盽秨やΤ禬筁100κ货オ琌挤倒牡钉┮и獺牡诡瞷㎝瞯盢钡紇臫俱玂狦硈尿ㄢи璶―現┎そガΤ闽牡诡恨瞶浪癚厨沧癩現箇衡ぇㄢるミ猭ЫΜ41厨セЫΘミ疭舱秈︽糵某碞ㄤいㄇ耕璶兜ヘボ辨Τ戈方や龟琁珹箇痙干蠢も俱牡钉ヴ︙丁А甧砛1 498癡┪ヰ安ㄤ龟さ現┎ぃ筁挤129干蠢もи谋眔硂计ヘ琌环环ぃì镑鲸恨玂籔牡钉临Τ琘ㄇ灿竊阶陪琌129琌ぃì莱瘤礛產ゼゲ種璶Ч干蠢1 498程ぶご穦種硂琌獶盽ぃì计ヘ
厨ョΤ矗のǖ牡计┪滦籠絛瞅单ㄆ兜る讽и-
糵某牡钉恨瞶碞痙種玡ǖ牡计腨ぃìи獺硂ㄢ糤秸牡叭ㄓ秈︽玡絬ǖ呸ぇ秈˙ゅ戮ての诀瘪砞称蠢も薄鶪琌穦Τэ到瞷ゎи-
ご单現┎暗ㄇ秸琩ㄓ絋﹚╯澈瞷и-
跋ǖ牡计㎝滦籠絛瞅琌ゑ玡э到硂琌璶
材翴牡钉や竒笷100κ货и-
龟璶粄痷╯и-
窾牡诡㎝窾场钉瞷絋﹚琌Τ惠璶盢-
瞯祇揣眔硈尿ㄢㄓи常窗玃現┎ぷㄤ琌牡叭矪辨-
猔種–牡跋瞷ㄇ牡跋牡诡计ヘ蝴ぃ跑琌揣﹛秸ǐミㄨ獽酚侣ノ妓计ヘ牡诡祇揣计瞯硂ぃ琌и芠诡Τㄢ牡跋渤跋防竜〆㎝跋某单常Τ稰ボ獶盽猋洁и獺揣﹛璝縩伐秸笆牡跋800κ牡诡狦琌穦祇揣眔現┎砞ミㄇ夹ㄇǖ琩夹非㎝パ︓揣╰参ㄓ蝶牡跋瞯㎡癸ㄇぃ秈┪眔筁筁揣﹛﹚璶溜程ぶ璶腨糉牡粅辨盢Τも祇揣眔程
材現┎沧フ瞷顶琿и-
翴莱は堵㎝Τ舱麓竜さ現┎糤挤κ暗硂よиだ舧の猋洁竒筁碭羮璚糵某ぇи-
沧眔キ颗﹚Τ舱麓の腨竜兵ㄒ结ぉ牡よ肂舦и辨牡よぷㄤ琌さ糤κ牡跋羆Ы秈︽は堵薄鶪镑Τ龟借瞷倒カチ硂琌-
戳辨硂计ㄓ弧Τ舱麓竜秸琩龟悔盎瘆カチ嘿箌и辨硂肚参㎝瞷镑瞏牡跋㎝灿だ跋は堵钉ヮ続讽癸堵穦だ繷礹阑硂琌讽璶︓玂场よи竒矗璹ㄓ現┎⊿Τ钮某種ǎ秆睦玂场玡現獀场╯澈ユぶ倒ぉ瞷玂场㎡硂拜肈竒尿计τ︓籔現┎阶玂场厨ê42厨ㄤいぃ祇ョ竒Τる︓и辨現┎琍戳超虏厨穦い镑睲贰禗某玂场┦借
иョフㄆ薄瞣疉庇稰戈τи-
ョぃ穦そ秨硂ㄇ戈琌礚阶翠┪ㄤよ讽現┎璶―挤蹿常ぃ镑琌矗"ず场玂"瞶パ碞Ч骸ì某璶―┪镑カチ某瞶菏诡㎝莉眔挤蹿ㄌ沮ㄏㄇチ穦︽現场琌チ匡玻ネ常惠璶ミ猭诀闽ユミ猭诀闽ユよΑΤ贺Τㄇ琌硓筁〆穦τ〆穦Τ贺羆τēぇАΤ疭逼㎝よΑΤㄇ跋狦Τ碭現囊-
穦逼ㄇ戈瞏某︓帽玂盞ㄇ疭よ秈︽虏厨瓣"Strong Room"碞琌и獺ぃ镑痙堵瑌ㄏカチ踞みぃ笵╯澈琘ㄇ癸カチ琌Τ┪ぃ莱赣┪ぃ莱赣も琌┪ぶ╯澈穦琌玡現獀场┑尿カチ琌獶盽闽猔︓ぶ碞钩и矗種ǎ妓计竝竝莱琘祘糵辨畐叭㎝癩現σ納硂糵ぃ莱Ы玂场临莱珹ㄇ疭"funding"ㄒだ兜103"reward and special service"硂ㄓゑ玂场や庇稰诀盞︓硈ㄇ虏虫计沮だ摸ョぃ祇
︓よㄒㄇ笆薄厨穓栋敖钮单и桂Ω高拜ノぶ丁и獺璝倒ぉ羆计琌ぃ穦紇臫诀盞琌現┎瞷ゎご琌ぃ氮滦よ繦竜デ龟糤и-
惠璶ㄇ秈砞称иぷㄤ琌辨現┎癩碔秸琩よ挤ㄇも瘤礛硂琌璶暗и-
ョ惠璶ㄇ╒ㄇ秈瓣產竒喷癩碔秸琩ョウ-
端硓福惮и辨がユ瑈ㄇ硂ぃ琌翠縒到ㄤō拜肈
禫玭差チよи辨現┎镑眏㎝еΤ缓浪癚Τ闽胓毙竝も絪╯澈琌筁候иョ舧現┎砞ミ窽瑀膀琌–戈诀篶蹿兜ぃ筁琌窾и獺и-
惠璶ゑ硂ㄒ獵ぶз瑀徊旧も皘狝叭单и常辨ㄓ箇衡Τ龟借糤︓毕臔狝叭よи┯粄ㄇ岿粇硂碭絋耕ぶ痙種硂よぃ某琌耕ぶ痙種┮現┎硂よ┛菠毕臔狝叭よ程阶琌╯澈莱挤ㄇ戈方瞷夹非暗眔玂ㄓ粄瞷硈︽ó夹非だ牧ゼ笷и-
⊿Τ瞶パэ硂瞷夹非и︑癸硂ぃ骸種и-
惠璶琌洛厩à㎝ㄇ芠夹非ㄓ莱﹚丁瞷蹦ノ︽ó夹非龟悔и-
礚猭菏诡眔┮钡狝叭薄鶪┮и獺蹦ノ╄笷丁夹非穦睲贰鲸恨и-
锣ノ硂夹非ぇ参璸よ穦ぃ瞷礚阶︙硂夹非非絋㎝タ絋蝶︳狝叭薄鶪
и璶弧琌硂碭ň糤砞戮︗疭沮计沮иΤぃ穦岿胔好毕臔狝叭琌ň矪絪璓硑Θ糤砞戮︗Τ"灿禬"ぇ尔ň糤砞戮︗礚阶哎┪ゲ惠璶糤砞常琌毕臔狝叭硂碭ゑㄒ环环ぃìよぃ璶璸ň灿だτ琌玂ㄒ牡叭竝ň竝闽┪チ挂ㄆ叭竝单и祇谋硂碭び牡叭矪よи辨ゼㄓㄢ玂┪癩現镑龟借糤毕臔狝叭やカチ硂よ璶―矗蔼τ硂ョ琌闽㏑拜肈
程и稱弧Τ闽カ跋拜肈и-
さぱ癚阶癩現箇衡癚阶窥癚阶祙Μи-
ノ窥琌璶э到カチネㄤ龟窥璝ノカ跋琌続讽и钮阶秸弧狦и-
璶瑉禟ㄇ玻坝加┪挤竚┪耕基竚琌現┎瑉禟ㄇチ丁坝穨笆и谋眔硂玥琌眔坝篹龟悔狦琌ノ窥ㄒ挤ㄇㄓ暗竚ノ┪挤ㄇ戈方ぉ┬〆穦ㄏウ酚臮ぱ┪カ跋紇臫カチ龟悔êㄇ窥琌钡┪丁钡ノカチōи獺カ跋ぃ钩玡ê妓礚セ︓礚セネ硂琌Ч︽ぃ硄и辨現┎ゼㄓ计る秈︽カ跋俱砰現郸浪癚癩現硂よ矗ㄑㄇ腊ぃ璶"ォ包螟礚μ"琌稱︙э到猭ㄒэ到ㄇ狵竊拜肈セ礚猭秆∕ちカ跋拜肈瞷カ跋加キА闹20琌糽稨ノ传杠弧狦ゼㄓи-
ぃΤ緕Щ芠щㄇ戈方玃Θカ跋腊カチэ到ネ杠и-
盢癸拜肈τカ跋ぃ琌礚龟悔芠τē祙Μ络禣︓加基蔼芥加眔祙单ㄤ龟丁钡琌畐┬砋┮辨現┎硂よ计ヘ璸璸挤ㄇ戈方カ跋иョ辨現┎癸稨恨瞶よぷㄤ琌猭刮や穿よ倒ぉ現叭竝ㄇ戈方
セ略朝勉
朝挪狶某璓勉畊ネチ羛ㄤㄆ竒碞癩現箇衡Τ闽э到チネ场だ矗и-
種ǎиセチ羛竒蕾ㄆ叭祇ē穦钡栋い癚阶箇衡Τ闽┹甶竒蕾拜肈
э到チネ斗膀▆竒蕾吏挂
и荡癸種箇衡"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"肈璶э到蒥チネ借ゲ斗璶膀▆竒蕾吏挂竒蕾よ癩現箇戳せ︓セネ玻羆Τ5%糤,箇衡ゅい玱⊿Τ矗ヴ︙Τ弧狝瞶沮琌虏虫矗稼のい瓣单ㄓ常Τ贾芠竒蕾箇代硂ㄇΤ盿笆τ箇戳翠ゼㄓ竒蕾祇甶盢耕筁ㄎ
讽礛チ羛辨翠竒蕾ǐé┏硋˙確礵ㄆ龟眖筁ㄢ竒喷セネ玻羆龟悔糤┕┕耕癩現箇代τ坝玕﹙┥程ョ箇戳ス瓣ぃ┑尿い瓣程磃瓣笿翠竒蕾糤盢穦2%︓3%弧セ翠竒蕾甧紇臫癸癩現矗5%竒蕾糤и粄莱赣╆糵稸贾芠篈
癩現箇衡い矗璶セ翠承硑よ獽犁坝吏挂琌だタ絋篈τ碩矗蔼羱祙祙肂よ琵Μ叉瞒祙呼ョ糤產畑禣Τ俱砰禣蒥初確礵
浪癚セ翠祙
ぃ筁籔Τ翴琌и-
稰紐納碞琌祙膀秈˙Μ斗璶ユ祙禫ㄓ禫ぶ現┎Μ栋い场だ蔼Μのそ眔祙ヘ玡羱祙の眔祙Μ碞現┎祙Μ50%ǎス瞷竒蕾ぃ春獽甧玻ネ祙Μ碩猧笆翠┎竒盽┦秨や尿碩糤︙絋玂Τ铆﹚癩現Μ琌癩現惠璶闽猔
ぃ筁癩現さ癩現箇衡いノ溃罽膀秨や笷璓耎竒盽┦秨や快猭琌眔坝篹┮チ羛辨翠┎Θミ祙叭浪癚〆穦浪癚セ翠祙蝴癩現铆﹚の絋玂祙そキ┦
や穿狝叭穨ΘΤ芠诡
礚粄翠竒蕾挡篶パ筁膀セ穨锣︓狝叭穨癩現祇Τ闽や穿の崩約狝叭︽穨ゅン﹚┹甶竒蕾よ琌耕筁縩伐堡ゅン瘤礛癸や穿狝叭︽穨矗兜穝某弧琌礩枫骸ヘ狦и-
灿ㄤいㄣ砰┯空ǎ翠┎挤蹿羆肂Τ货窾じ辨硂ぃì货じやㄓ盿笆㎝や穿俱狝叭︽穨陪礛琌磃τ龟ぃ︓
τнい穨よ癩現瘤礛矗兜祙兜糴搭惫琁ㄤ龟ゼ镑ㄣ砰秆∕い穨ヘ玡┮癸螟и-
辨祔Θミい穨〆穦ち龟╯︙セ翠い穨秨┹穝蒥初莱ノ穝м矗蔼玻珇糤の矗ㄑ獺禪や穿单拜肈
簔跌н籹硑穨
チ羛眏秸狝叭穨セ翠竒蕾ゑ瘤礛璶癸籹硑穨のㄇ蔼糤膀娄穨翠┎ぃ莱"縩伐ぃ箇"瞶パヴパ硂ㄇ︽穨ぃ耞典罽τぃ穿も斑箇衡矗厩堕の材穨恏㎝材穨мいみ单ョ琌狡玡┯空τЧ⊿Τ冈灿砏购チ羛癸硂よ稰だア辨
и-
粄現┎莱赣蔼陇环苀躬纘㎝ま烩セ穨ǐ︑иэ硑矗蔼ネ玻м砃㎝恨瞶キ璝绊礚τ獀砏兵ヴパセ膀娄穨瑈アи-
羘痚㊣ㄆ肚穌或厩堕㎝мいみ碞竒び筐セ穨ぃи-
眖м厩眖贺硚畖蚌▅ㄓмぃ祇揣┮セ穨瘤礛и-
種蒥初竒蕾笆程パ坝︑︽磝搽琌讽и-
癸㏄瞅瓣產и-
坝┷もи-
ご礛礚笆癑┋笲ぇ穦膥尿膊臮и-
㎡
さぱ翠籹硑穨ネ玻羆ぶ20%碞タ琌筁и-
ぃ跌穨絫珿竒蕾祇甶ぃキ颗癸骋笆盞栋よㄓ弧琌獶盽ぃ胺眃瞷禜и-
辨翠┎﹚环現郸籹硑穨矗ㄑΤ竒犁吏挂穨矗ㄑ戮蚌癡戈单矗蔼籹硑穨м砃キの糤ㄏ翠籹硑穨ご礛瓣悔蒥初畊︗
и耕Ν竒セЫ碞环穨現郸矗某臛阶τ眔ぃぶセЫㄆやチ羛辨翠┎粄痷σ納セЫ某某荷е﹚癸籹硑穨兜璸购㎝現郸
–蝶︳畉昏骋チ端癩
よиョ辨酵酵畉昏拜肈チ羛粄畉昏琌ゑ耕璶㎝铆﹚祙蹿ヘ玡–蝶︳莱揭畉昏暗猭膀セ︽癩現某э–蝶︳Ωи-
粄硂妓暗猭琌"骋チ端癩"よ畉昏穨︳基竝盿ㄓ獶盽羉溃瞷も絪セぃ–蝶︳Ω璝琌–彩菠蝶︳杠玥甧玻ネぃそキ瞷禜ョま癬ぃゲ璶τよ蒥チョ穦畉昏肂竒盽跑τ稰ぃ獽
癩現箇璸э跑畉昏蝶︳戳穦糤Μи-
稰谋胔好琌狦蝶︳琌酚膀娄杠玥蝶︳ョτ穦瞷秸瞷禜讽礛ヘ玡薄鶪ㄓ弧秸诀穦ぃ环τē硂琌Τㄆи-
某現┎﹚瞶畉昏紉Μ膀计籔叉恥礛–蝶︳Ω
羆珹τēチ羛粄癩現さ箇衡膀セ琌镑宽酚"秖"玥琌糵稸㎝叭龟癸癩現碞ゼㄓ碭緇箇代и-
玥Τ┮玂痙箇衡さ挤膀纗称膀膀祘のユ硄秨や瞷9%璽糤叭祘┑粇旧璓秖膀セ祘纗称膀挤蹿ゼΤ荷ノ繦兜膀兜ヘ珹﹁场ǐ碮臟隔の臟や絬单盢ゼㄓ计硉皑癩現緇盢ぃヘ玡贾芠τゼㄓ癩現よ琂ぃ玠搭褐秨やよ璶や胑膀秨やの莱癩現矗瞷"芳猙獴"吏挂﹚穝箇衡盢穦癸螟㎝現獀溃〓癩現箇衡盢礚磷ゲ斗いよ把籔﹚и-
辨蛮よ斌現獀種醚篈阶ち眖翠痲祇拟もΘの抖筁寸承硑Τ兵ン
畊ネセ略朝勉
THE PRESIDENT'S DEPUTY, DR LEONG CHE-HUNG, took the Chair.
某璓勉瞶畊ネ癩現纯疆舦癩現箇衡"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"肈ぃ筁ゼ笷痷タ┹甶竒蕾のэ到チネヘ┹甶竒蕾よ現┎ご侣⊿猭矗甅Ч俱の玡陇┦竒蕾祇甶郸菠τ琌ぃ絛氓ず倒ぉ坝摸纔磃癚種э到チネよ簔跌讽玡穦砲て拜肈Τ琂Τず癸褐翴э到沮ゼ顶糷だㄉ穦羉篴Θ狦ㄤ龟箇衡ぃ痷タ辅龟┹甶竒蕾э到チネヘ夹璶翠┎︽玂瞶癩厩ョ癩現箇衡┮矗"紈"ㄤい程璶讽礛琌秖ド秖癩現箇衡э笆よぶぇぶ縀竒蕾э到チネよセ⊿Τì镑戈方过┏崩笆琌"绘Τ溯"薄鶪糤穦褐獽ぃ碩糤э到毙▅洛励糤毙▅獽ぃ糤玂耴挡琸現┎硂︓琌竧ぃ獻デヘ玡そ秨やセ翠セネ玻羆18%硂环环瓣︙и-
ぃ盢そ秨やネ玻羆ゑㄒ秸蔼礛蔼膀娄竒蕾糤瞯北夹璝糤3%獽单350货じ笲ノê或и-
Τ戈方щ穦竒蕾の褐砞
翠┎"現┎ぃ箇"竒蕾玥竒筁мら穝る钵い現┎ぃ箇セ碞ぃ矗蔼翠垢τ筁岿粇縩伐ぃ箇現郸竒ㄏ翠Θ24程蔼キ跋い砲碔畉禯程腨跋カチネ借э到發ぃ竒蕾糤翠穦莱赣宠斌硂筁現郸и-
惠璶穝竒蕾現郸盿烩翠ǐ蔼竒蕾纔借ネ借蔼褐穦ㄏ穦–常镑﹡贾穨筁Τ碙腨Τネ
讽и矗翠莱ǐ蔼褐獺Τ穦終癬繷纯碭︙"褐"ㄢΘいよ伴い"魂偶"迭琎ぱ独﹜グ某秨ネ盢褐单緙籔朝︴瑋ネ缒糤旧璓"ó反"阶Τ钵Ρぇぃ筁ゑ耕癬ㄓ緙阶碞ㄨ痢硅薄琌┮Τㄉ褐碞砆"笵ね"竒癸褐舽硂癸┮Τ钡褐穿琌碿玍癲独某秈˙哪睦褐糤ㄏぃ骋τ莉穝芠├钩緙床冀琌ぃ骋τ莉丁钡躬穦渤猍跌だて翠穦и㊣苸穦渤揽獹泊氟琌┮ぃ骋τ莉13窾烩侯穿い12窾琌ρ端摧虫克產畑单-
常ぃ琌Τ穦ぃ-
矗ㄑ褐穿螟笵璶盢-
笵反防緇1窾妮ア穨Μ-
烩侯穿ョ獶甧埃ゲ斗Μ竝砏﹚戈玻肂琌砏﹚ゲ斗硓筁骋矪т碝烩ゲ﹚琌獶︑腀ア穨螟笵穦ぃ莱腊硂摸тぃカチ筁ア穨螟闽-
硂ㄇカチぃ琌ぃ稱ぃ稱徂τ琌⊿Τ碞穨诀穦┮辨產"-
皑"讽礛и-
眔┯粄﹚Τぶ计垒ノ褐穿и-
荡ぃ莱τ"λ縯ゴ差"盢┮ΤゴΘ"ぃ骋τ莉"
ㄤ龟穦褐ぃ虫ゎぃ琌躬纘ぃ骋τ莉τ琌"骋眔"弘砰瞷ョ琌┦て穦瞷穦褐ヘ琌璶┮Τ骋笆フ讽ネρ痜竒蕾ぃ春赤ア垦ネ诀穦眔ネ借兵ンτ┮惠蹿兜ㄓ︑キら┮ユ祙蹿褐┦借琌"骋"膍穦ㄏΤ惠璶镑"Τ┮眔"┮褐荡ぃ琌琁彼τ琌ヴ︙そチ舦琌穦癸そチ"骋"┮鮔
翠Г局1, 500货じ纗称キАセネ玻羆逼材伐碔肝穦璉玱琌碩碩磀篏瓜礶и-
ρ⊿Τ癶ヰ玂毁и-
Τ5窾縒﹡ρ﹖Г產い酚臮и-
ΤΘ產畑60窾Μ琌––る1,400じи-
蚌癡厩拨穨┮眔戈い︗计5,500じ龟借戈きるゑ4%ゴネ借⊿Τ︸繦竒蕾糤τ眔э到はτ竒蕾锣τуу炒Μ砲絘炒ɡ砲碔畉禯ら痲耎砲絘拜肈ら镣腨さぱи-
碙禥τō膚〆某-
の"︑び"朝︴瑋ネ-
临璶竩蝶阑癩箇舩窥穌褐程踞紐琌產み▄-
盢穦琌ゼㄓ讽舦独﹜グ某琌い璣羛蹈舱箇衡盡產舱いよΘ瘤弧祇ēぃ硂ōだ﹚種ǎ琌盢穦紇臫〓箇衡硂ㄏ翠穦褐胺眃祇甶籜潮紇螟笵耴癸砲翠ㄓ弧琌褐癶琌秈˙砲てㄓら翠糷カチ碞璶盢壳繷扒眔候
程ぃ┋﹚盢穦琌絘い程絘竤翠せ窾ρ產俱箇衡и程ぃ骸琌翠┎Чぃ矗蔼虫ōρ侯穿τ寂璴Α砞ミ龟厨龟綪–320じの200じ琌現┎瞶パ琌-
ネや籔程絘20%ρゑ耕畉ぃぃノ秸蔼拜肈莱琌侯穿肂–る1,900じ–ぱせじ莱膀セネ秨やㄏ-
眔筁Τ碙腨ネ璶拜拜肈琌︙程絘20%ρネ琌Б￢膀セネ惠璶ゼ笷и-
莱︙腊硂竤ぃ侯穿ρ叉瞒砲ぃノ砲娩絫い泵ゃ現┎龟莱暗瞏秸琩秆-
砲パτぃ琌ノ-
溃侯穿肂
さぱρ褐拜肈は琈現┎筁┕ぃ箇現郸ア毖ぃ箇種醚烩旧翠┎筐筐ぃ砞ミヴ︙Α癶ヰ玂毁の堡琌翠┎锣浹ぃ砞ミρ癶ヰㄏ硂ρ眔癶ヰ玂毁辨Чほ防τ現┎玥璶璉璽癬↖钓璉璽玱ノ荷快猭筀ы硂よ秨やさΩ癩現箇衡ぃ虫矗蔼虫ōρ侯穿の淮稬矗蔼蔼闹瑉禟獽琌程ㄒ靡翠┎龟莱毙癡褐砏购猔н砲郸菠ミΤ穦玂毁τぃ琌拜肈陪垦―寂璴Α癸郸硂絋玂翠对灸だㄉ竒蕾羉篴Θ狦
н砲郸菠ㄤ龟ぃ琌穦玂毁璶琌腊穦–Θ甶┮璶甶┮程璶璶ㄢ吏竊翠ゲ斗矗蔼膙и-
ゲ﹚璶ㄣΤ玡陇┦τ璶暗硂翴俱穦癸ゼㄓカ初惠―非絋蝶︳礛祇穖管カ初硂琌稬硁羆掉夹籠局╆ゼㄓΞ堡癩現硂箇衡ゼ局╆ゼㄓ盿烩翠ǐ蔼м蔼糤穦よ陪眔礢好ぃ∕琌秆∕祏既狝叭穨祇甶拜肈ゼつ购翠ゼㄓ膙郸菠瞷渤ゼㄓ厩常︳秖盢琌戈癟翠┎玱癸戈癟м祇甶ぃぉì镑躬纘硂墩盢甡и-
穦膙и玃叫現┎や戈癟厩祇甶ㄏи-
硂柜穝мよ穖舮Θㄈ瑆跋管眔烩旧︗眖τ綿㏕翠竒蕾よ祇甶
材絋玂甶吏竊琌蚌癡い翠硂よ砏购睹ゼΤ蚌癡郸菠毙▅よ熬蔼单毙▅玱┛菠膀娄毙▅ㄏ俱砰毙▅キゼ矗蔼蚌癡よ筁は块骋羘いのア穨瞯蔼崩蚌癡璸购τさ3货じΩ筁挤蹿ㄏぇ┑尿蚌癡璸购琌叭―程е硉нア穨碞穨τ絬い絬郸购のヘ夹硂癸矗どいм砃キ⊿Τ痷タ腊讽材猧锣ㄓ羬琌ууア穨瓁蚌癡璸购琌皐癸瞷30烦﹡チê或30烦現┎Τ或蚌癡郸菠┪穝簿チよ︙硂ㄇ常琌フ翠┎程竨叫沟拜╯戮癡Ыの蚌癡Ы祇甶硂琌Ω策и-
瞷惠璶琌現┎絃浪癚戈方郸菠パギㄠ毙▅︓Θ毙▅吏Ι吏腊翠カチ發珼驹玥ア穨拜肈穦ぱゑぱ腨и-
惠璶琌顶辫Α蚌癡诀穦弄Ч蚌癡揭祘τ碞穨膥尿秈顶辫蚌癡硂妓ぃ耞秈莱ら穝る钵穦τ讽哎蔼ぇョ乃м砃︗竚倒⊿Τ秈俱穦狦常ぃ耞矗どм砃キê或и-
Θ籔ㄤ瓣產膙τ現┎砫ヴ碞琌矗ㄑ硂ㄇ秈诀穦の躬纘ゴぃ耞秈現┎碞玡暗眔荡癸ぃì躬纘よさ秈祙肂玥莱癘
и程叫癩現矗蔼ρ侯穿肂︓$2, 700キ琎ぱ糂紌某苂洁Ж硔い絪糶硂箇衡иョ笵さオ暗螟и睲贰笵碞篏薄稱紀猌┮叫猌临琁甶爱簿猭盢ρ侯穿肂糤獺硂﹚穦莉眔セЫ某翠ρやτиョщ觅Θ布
略朝勉谅谅瞶畊ネ
璣某璓勉瞶畊ネ纯疆舦ネ琌材︗翠ネ地癩現и獺ョ盢穦琌舦筁寸玡程︗癩現タ硂ヴ癩現ョ疭螟暗
癘眔沉蔼贾里ヴず程癩現箇衡纯砆у蝶"猧︽ó"獶盽玂τさ纯舅磝浹箇ΝΤ羘弧翠璶"ó反"粅╯澈ó璶秨眔е㎡璶纗称ìы┪琌褐︽㎡硂絋琌兵蔼螟キ颗笵隔τ纯舅硂よ礚好琌ǐ会铆胺材˙
硂癩現箇衡辅龟砞ミ厩堕某∕﹚祇甶材丁穨мいみ㎝材穨恏硂ㄇ璸购А琌翠穨ㄓ伐躬祇甶隔Τ矗どм砃糷Ωн穨祇甶躬纘籹硑坝щ莱ノ╯皌蚌癡璸购綿㏕翠竖瓣悔竒蕾︗のア穨瞯蔼碞穨玡春穞睭单拜肈碝眔隔
崩笆狝叭穨よ現┎ョ霉硈﹃э到狝叭穨穝惫琁硂よ琌荡癸タ絋璶笵翠狝叭穨セ翠ネ玻羆禬筁80%и讽礛礚種┛跌籹硑穨︗ぃ筁癸竒蕾锣眏祇甶狝叭穨琌竒蕾秈祘ゲ礛顶琿いぃì琌硂翬瓜璸琌"瞶稱絛瞅溜篶瓜戈方ぶ"璸购虫咎き窾じ挤蹿獺ヴ咎︙м螟笷Θ硂妓瞶稱Щ腀
┮璶崩笆狝叭穨и粄璶眖よ秨﹍も
矗ㄑ▆щ戈吏挂
▆猭の菏恨诀の
虏虫祙の祙瞯
矗ㄑ▆щ戈吏挂琌現┎砫ヴ礛τ現┎硂よ陪礛ゼ荷羭ㄒ弧秈禩穨現┎瞶阶㎝腹眔甅甅叭龟某玥阀ろ碞钩禩硄︓さご礛琌拜肈芛芛ㄒ現┎箇衡讽い睲贰"秈穨桂承ㄎ罿伐ぇΤ苦Τ瞯┕ㄓ翠笲块呼蹈"臟隔祇甶郸菠某兵臟隔秈ぇ篊虏浇辽禲临璶琌凹ō┕郴禲ê妓硂妓癦皌い翠ㄢら亥羉Γ锣禩㎝ユ硄笲块惠―㎡
材▆猭の菏恨诀ョ琌狝叭穨糷加璶ぃ筁筁菏恨ぃ虫ゎ穦部坝щ戈種饼τ临穦耑睹︑パカ初笲诀硂琌現┎ゲ斗み痙種翠狝叭穨ǔ硉祇甶眔藕Θ罿硂苦翠局Τ︑パ礚箇щ戈吏挂の現┎み眏祇甶籔础も箇ぱ眔キ颗翴τ璓
材翠镑Θㄈび跋﹠щ戈翴祙瞯㎝虏虫祙龟ぃ⊿ぃ筁祙よи玱Τㄇ紐納碞琌翠祙膀瞷タぃ耞Μ羱祙の祙Μ阀290货じ現┎羆Μ15%ぇㄤ紇臫琌Τヘ窣τ筁羱祙ゑ瞯パ54%︓40%琌弧и-
祙Μ蔼栋い琘顶糷ぇ竒蕾吏挂瞷ぃ春ぇ硂贺Μ祙膀暗猭盢琌兜︽繧郸┮и某現┎莱碞セ翠ぇ祙呼秈︽糵稸浪癚σ納耎溜祙顶ㄏ结祙璽踞耕キАだ舥
︓毙▅よ癩現絋眖Τ戈方讽い矗ㄇ"莱"惫琁ㄒ癸材せ腹厨ㄤいぶ场だΤ闽э到厩ネ粂ゅ某癩現挤蹿瘤礛ぃ衡眔び"瞡も"衡眔碭"еも"硂衡琌▆秨﹍ぃ筁癸材せ腹厨い矗のㄤ某ご礛礚ヴ︙癩現┯空┪綼粂ゅ膀挤蹿и碞ぃ骸狦"Τ現郸礚戈方癦ぃ琌单量フ杠"
临Τぃ骸琌膀娄毙▅糷碞到ì朝睝礚秈˙ㄒ厩ら厩毙畍厩︗て单拜肈竒琌╈╈睝礚秈甶и弧ヘ玡挤蹿璶栋いэ到借""ノ璶过┏矗ど俱砰毙▅借膀娄毙▅琌荡癸ぃ砆┛跌竖и辨現┎妓"еも"篈矪瞶材せ腹厨︓材腹材き腹厨兜ゼ龟︽某ぃ璶琵ㄇэ到毙▅借琂﹚現郸戈方τ辅
︑パ囊ㄓ璶―現┎癸尿毙▅璝祘戈㎝眏蚌癡兜ヘ硂Ω現┎羆衡眖到瑈糤砞–蔼笷12,000じ秈Ι祙兜ヘ㎝猔戈货蚌癡膀硂А琌称舧τΤ痲э到借某眔苂
纔╭▆щ戈吏挂瑈膀娄砞и瞏獺翠﹚Τだ龟籔话τ穝℡の▆┦膙玂瓣悔禩ぃ毖纔禫︗
и辨纯舅玂瞷Τ︑獺㎝秈弘ぃ縒硂璣瓣恨獀程烦る讽い翠カチ垦褐τョ镑抖筁寸Θ疭跋現┎︗癩現
谅谅瞶畊ネ
谅ッ闹某璓勉瞶畊ネ癩現箇衡いи稱疭酵酵Τ闽疭毙▅の吏玂兜ヘ
疭毙▅よさ挤蹿货窾籔ゑΤ9.3%糤╄硄等τ疭厩厩︗璓ì镑眖ㄓ璝籔ㄤ膀娄毙▅ゑ疭毙▅挤蹿絋龟琌⊿Τ或у蝶
琌灿芠иノ"秖ぃ借"きㄓ甧疭厩毙畍㎝摸徊洛励瑈ア腨蔼笷Θ︓Θ癸磕瑈厩ネや穿ぃìぱ毙▅ㄤ龟琌甀⊿ぱ贺拜肈現┎澈礛"单╯厨""╈"ㄓ莱
癸毙畍瑈ア瞯腨現┎粄ㄤい琌ボ疭毙▅瑉禟躬纘毙畍癡搭瑈ア瞯氮セ矗拜玱ボ瑈ア瞯籔瑉禟⊿Τヴ︙钡闽硈龟︑ベ陪現┎セ礚みэ到拜肈ぃ挤蹿糤絪も㎝矗蔼瑉禟拜肈穦膥尿碿て
︓徊洛励瑈アㄤ龟琌"铬佳"癩动墩洛恨Ы硂琌そ秨盞瘤礛洛恨Ы籔┮Τ戈徊洛励羱筍常籔羆羱本恥洛恨ЫぃΤ芠瞷瑉禟Τ帮褐現┎よぃ腀窥糤褐よ辨產ぃ璶"铬佳"êΤ"计"ㄆ
磕瑈厩钡毙▅よ現┎ノ跋跋2,800窾じや穿畓厩ネ磕瑈疭狝叭琌腨ぃì
ㄤ龟"磕瑈"厩い磅毙ρ畍⊿Τ钡筁疭毙▅癡絤⊿Τ硂よ醚禲毙疭厩ネ琌畓厩ネ"︑ネ︑防"ぃ礚猭痲︓琌璚
癸代刚祇备厩策筐絯厩ネ現┎﹍沧ぃ挤蹿秈︽Ω代刚挡狦厩策筐絯﹍沧тぃㄓ眔莱Τ狝叭はτ籹硑材き舱い厩ネτ-
ョΤΘ瑈毙▅碾┦珇
セ翠ぱㄠ担玂︳璸琌厩ネぇ2%︓3%現┎さや穿240把籔Θ罿禫厩ネ揭セ刚喷璸购刚拜現┎424窾挤蹿镑磃のぶぱ厩ネ┪癡絤ぶ毙畍㎡硂よ弧琌"甀⊿ぱ"
ㄤ龟ぃぶぃ耞璶―現┎э到疭毙▅現┎莱Τ"单"現┎程虑琌毙▅〆穦タ浪癚疭毙▅ぃ﹜淮羭笆琌︙現┎ぃ箇痙挤蹿琵Τ闽某眔荷Ν龟琁㎡
畊ネи稱弧弧吏玂兜ヘセ粄セ癩現箇衡癸吏挂玂▅┯踞ぃì吏玂竝ㄒセ挤蹿ゑ糤10%ゑ俱砰秨や糤碩ョ陪現┎吏挂玂▅硂よ环現郸ご礛︽砮"繷礹洛繷竲礹洛竲"︽ㄆよΑㄇ絛氓陪眔Τみ礚
パ斗矪瞶紀计秖糤吏玂竝渤乎烩讽い紀矪瞶砞琁挤蹿程蔼糤碩ョ蔼笷13%瘤礛︽現Ы竒∕﹚帮恶跋Μ禣盢穦ΜΘセパ現┎筐筐ゼ㎝紇臫笷Θ某穝Μ禣璸购ご礛ゼ龟琁現┎硂よ秨や跑Θ"Τ蒒"よパ帮恶跋戳ㄓ砆垒ノㄏノ戳罽搭現┎龟Τ惠璶碝―ㄤ秆∕よ猭┪辩腳篴舅穦氮"叫祔单е獽穦Τ臮拜厨"
チ囊粄–禣秖窥矪瞶紀琌獀夹τぃ獀セよ猭环現郸莱赣も︙搭ぶ紀┑帮恶跋关㏑堡琌現┎瘤ЧΘ材戳搭ぶ紀╯セ箇衡い玱礚箇痙戈方辅龟讽い某借好翠┎癸搭ぶ紀∕み秈︽╯琌"眔妓"チ囊粄璶Τ搭ぶセ翠紀現┎览璸购莱璹ミ絋ヘ夹糤Μ硑璸购瑈瑌跑Θ禣戈方
よ吏玂竝ボ盢穦祇甶の犁笲┮いァ礗て膌矪瞶洛励紀ㄤ龟瞷场だ洛皘АΤ︑礗て膌琌Τ惠璶いァ礗て膌狦弧硂ㄇ瞷Τ礗て膌ぃ夹非︙讽吏玂竝уウ-
笲琌搭ぶ紀╯厨い矗のセ翠莱砍┮礗て膌ノ矪瞶ら盽紀瘤礛チ囊璶―現┎ま秈γ琕礗て膌礗て膌骸ぱ龟チ囊"胐璝佩"и-
粄筁礗て膌ぃ穦禣戈方ョ盿ㄓ吏挂拜肈の匡某パǎ現┎﹚吏玂現郸俱砰σ納
ㄓ═ó紀琌γ琕鹤現┎╯ㄤ縐猳玱秈甶絯篊セЫ∕眏┦猳锣═猳璸购現┎筐筐ゼ矗某︓ㄤ縐ホ猳のぱ縐单╯琌籇加辫臫瞶畊ネチ囊觅Θㄤ吏玂縐蠢猳э到借и-
玃叫現┎荷е矗︽よеㄤ縐╯チ囊ョ辨現┎硂絛氓斌Μやキ颗芠├暗Ω莲セネ種щ戈方э到セ翠胺眃琌Τ基
チ囊紉Μ逼γ禣ミ初竒┕癚阶い酵のиぃビи-
辨現┎ぃ璶骸ì逼γ璸购ㄤ龟瞷γ矪瞶ぃì镑莱矗ど︓矪瞶よ搭ぶγ癸吏挂γ琕τ环現郸莱泊︙毙▅カチ竊ノのэ到瞏猠借单眖み瞶厩τē璶э跑琌辨ら癩現糤挤蹿и-
穦古砛疭毙▅よ龟ぃ眔嘿苂疭毙▅ぃ疭
讽礛現┎吏挂玂▅よΤ﹚э秈硂琌眔古砛ㄒ砞ミ蝴ㄈ翠材戳借恨跋辅龟磅︽┰﹊履焊楞その眏恨瞶偿そ堕ミ猭Ы矗ユ吏挂紇臫蝶︳兵ㄒの砞ミ材丁吏挂戈方いみ单
羆珹τēセ瞏獺現┎疭毙▅の吏挂玂▅よ﹟Τ惠璶э到よ辨現┎緕┯踞
程и稱弧碭Τ闽穦褐杠盢穦褐单緙瑀甡カチ琌盢穦褐竝竝瑀柄╊產カチ瑀弧琌癸翠穦伐玍癲硂贺ē阶琌菌痴繻朝珇荡癸琌贺璽毙ョ┛跌穦褐癸埃砲碔腶㎝铆﹚穦┮癬ノ
硂贺碔ぃく墩坝產癸穦砲絘㎝Τ惠璶端摧ρ畓ぃ琁穿もはτ辅かホ靡龟皑κ玡癸拎戈セ產┮蝶基硂痷琌癸瞷ゅ控
瞶畊ネセ略朝勉
THE PRESIDENT resumed the Chair.
ヴ到圭某璓勉畊ネセ玃叫現┎猔種秨や眀ヘいは琈"ぃキ颗"
"坝"淮""
讽狝叭穨セ翠竒蕾ゑ禬禫穨現┎秨﹍矗ㄑや穿琌谋τ琌"繟睰"セ某現┎"撤い癳"癸┛菠计穨猔耕や穿戈の贱纘璸购ぃ璶︑骸菌ㄓ俱砰竒蕾Θ罿τ┛跌セ翠穨м砃辅旧璓膙癐畓硑Θア穨癸蔼瞷禜セ翠ぃ﹚璶祇甶蔼м莱祇甶ぃ骋盞栋い单м籹硑穨ㄒ祸竟籹硑穨┪珇借恨秤穨現┎莱"祙叭安戳"ま瓣悔щ戈玥螟籔綟跋膙い单м紅パ﹚︓秨惠丁癸秆∕ア穨拜肈硂ごぃア祏戳▆よ
"臮"淮""
"臮"碞琌臮拜"臮"""碞琌""琌弧猔臮拜τ┛跌セΤセЫΤㄆΩ翠┎场ノ竨叫臮拜禣ノ筁筪ㄤ龟礚ゲ璶场だ烩办セ翠Τì镑竒喷盡穨τ翠┎┕┕┛菠и-
丁厩いΤぃぶ镑戈踞ヴ妓臮拜毙甭セ某翠┎眖硉ミ诀ㄏ厩毙戮莉诀穦踞ヴ贺兜ヘ臮拜τ-
场だΜ膍倒┮ヴ戮厩ョτ搭淮現┎癸厩戈胑璽踞
"碔"淮"砲"
セЫ︗ㄆセ翠砲碔腶薄鶪腨祘翠璸局Τ程花地═ó玱祇ネρㄆン硂琌ン籜槽ㄆ現┎莱ぃ璶倪┤笆ノぶ砛仓縩緇眏蕾砲毕莱約到ēσ納琁︽ㄎ祙┰砲碔畉禯
"猌"淮"ゅ"
安и-
盢磅猭场竒盽┦秨や癬ㄓ穦禬筁140货じ戳┮Τゅ眃のカ現砞琁珹カ現Ы┮Τ砞琁竒盽秨やΤ70货じオㄢゑㄒ2:1瞷てゅ穦埃量―カチぇ莱量―ネ借ゅ眃カ現秨や荡癸莱Τ┮糤玥翠獽ぃΘ痷タ瑈常カ
畊ネセ膀セ種硂Ω癩現箇衡会ㄎ箇衡ご辨把σ瓃芠翴祔秸俱谅谅
馋莱某璓勉畊ネи穦チ酵酵и-
癸現┎徖ネの吏挂ㄢよ秨や種ǎ
癩現箇衡い現┎ゴ衡挤竒盽そ秨や13.8%徖ネ舱秨やиのチ癸現┎徖ネ秨や场だ稰だア辨材徖ネ舱竒盽秨や糤瞯Τ4.4%癸ゑセ7.7%材徖ネ秨や現┎竒盽秨やゑ瞯ョパき︓せ14%禴︓13.8%硂ㄢ兜计иのチ借好現┎癸徖ネよ挤蹿琌瞶
筁┕セ翠徖ネよ秨やぃ纯禬禫セネ玻羆2%箇衡ㄓ弧徖ネ秨や碞セネ玻羆1.9%癸ゑㄤ瓣產龟びぶ箂竒蕾の祇甶舱麓夹非舱麓妮瓣產ㄤキА洛励そやАセネ玻羆5.8%セ翠薄鶪籔夹非禯环瞷現┎┮挤徖ネ秨やセ螟ì镑э到セ翠洛励狝叭┮拜肈疭琌膀糷洛励狝叭箇ň痚痜毙▅洛励もρ洛励狝叭の痜计ヘ单
膀糷洛励狝叭の箇ň痚痜毙▅よ徖ネ竝琌踞ヴ诀篶礛τ現┎癸徖ネ竝挤蹿ぃì镑ㄆ龟カチ癸膀糷洛励狝叭惠―璝徖ネ竝狝叭ゼ荷Ч到カチ癸洛皘恨瞶Ы"洛恨Ы"狝叭惠―ョ莱糤跑洛恨Ы溃徖ネ竝挤蹿いㄤいΤ闽崩笆胺眃毙▅挤蹿糤碩Τ2.4%5,600窾じ癸翠600窾τē–┮ㄏノぃìじ硂︙崩約胺眃毙▅㎡
ㄤΩ癩現箇衡い現┎癸э到臔洛ネの洛叭もぃì薄鶪唉ぃ矗硂琌セのチ┮稰獶盽ぃ骸沮洛恨Ыそガ臔も夹陪ボきセ翠盢惠璶28 560臔祏计きㄤ龟セ翠臔も籔ゑㄒ环ㄤ瓣產程翠秈︽兜秸琩ョ陪ボ砆砐洛ネ臔いΤ禬筁Θボヘ玡臔も祏τΤΘ臔ボ穦τσ納锣︽秸琩獺臔瑈ア瞯蔼薄鶪盢穦尿鶪現┎计陪ボき︓せ臔瑈ア瞯碞Τ10.3%ぇ蔼珿セ粄現┎荡ぃ莱┛菠臔も祏癸洛励狝叭借紇臫チ璶―現┎挤蹿糤臔厩︗厩肂э到臔ど綞搭ぶ臔瑈ア诀穦
洛ネよき腐厨い纯﹚洛ネ夹よ瞷セ翠洛ネゑㄒごゼ笷赣夹璶―よ讽夹瞷ㄓ弧竒辅ㄤ﹁よの秈瓣產チ辨現┎穝﹚洛臔も珹洛ネの臔夹盢夹ゑㄒ籔瞷Τ砞琁本恥ㄏ戈方ぃ璓禣翠┎ョ莱荷秖秸厩洛厩皘厩肂ㄏ洛ネ把籔洛恨Ы莱惠―
埃洛臔も瞷ぃìㄤ龟セ翠痜计ヘョぃì镑沮洛恨Ыき︓せ璸购い计陪ボ翠痜计ヘ琌28 000眎沮︳璸籔痜ゑㄒ盢ご蝴–1 000癸4.7眎痜籔ㄤ﹁よ瓣產ゑ耕龟だ还︹讽и-
洛恨Ы戳秈︽秸琩陪ボ痜计ヘろよ穝跋のㄇ盞蔼洛皘ぶ跋ぷ腨疭琌励緄皘痜箂箂箂励緄皘痜碞ろ1 600眎
и-
┮酵のΤ闽もの痜ぃì┪痜竚瞷禜龟悔琌は琈セ翠洛励狝叭"ぃì"薄鶪材Τㄇ洛皘Τ痜玱礚も旧璓痜竚瞯蔼材Τㄇ洛皘玥痜腨祏レ‵羛嚎腞单祏盞栋跋眔┮洛皘┪╬產洛皘禣ノ蔼τ痜皘匡拒現┎洛皘┮璓材琌洛皘计ヘぃì疭琌盞栋跋芠俄┪穝ㄇ跋办单跋办カチ竒盽璶碝―跋盡禘㎝そミ洛皘狝叭挪"ぃì"薄鶪セ粄現┎莱荷е浪癚跋跑て瞷禜洛臔も絪の痜计ヘが闽玒糤挤蹿э到狝叭もぃì瞷禜
ρ洛励よ癩現箇衡い徖ネ秨や癸ρ酚臮ごゼì镑疭琌ρ玂胺毙▅竒禣のρ盡狝叭砞ミΤ┮┛菠瞷ρ盡禘肂ぃì旧璓ρ┕┕璶近ㄏρ炊硄禘ョΤ讽惠璶э到よρ近炊硄禘狝叭А惠︓ユ硄丁┕┕ノぱ癸ρ胺眃龟Τ甡礚痲┮現┎硂よゲ斗荷е挤蹿э到
︓ρ玂胺狝叭よ瞷ρ玂胺狝叭祇甶ぃì莱ぃ耞ρて瞷禜ヘ玡徖ネ竝烈いァ胺眃毙▅舱ρ玂胺毙▅秨や徖ネ竝秨や场だτいァ胺眃毙▅舱セō秨やぶ羭ㄒτēさ癩現箇衡いㄤいいァ胺眃毙▅舱秨や2,200窾じ徖ネ竝货じ羆秨や0.9%璝璸衡いァ胺眃毙▅舱挤ρ玂胺毙▅竒禣碞ぶ眔鸡チ某現┎糤ρ玂胺毙▅竒禣荷秖–跋疭琌ρて跋砞ミρ玂胺いみρ矗ㄑō砰浪琩胺眃毙▅笆单狝叭
程チ癸現┎癩現箇衡い⊿Τ盢崩約痜舦痲乎烩兜瞏ぃ骸癘眔き琁現厨い羆服纯竒┯空"穦矗蔼カチ癸痜舦痲㎝砫ヴ粄醚"礛τ箇衡⊿Τē唉矗の硂ㄆ現┎瞷琌硓筁いァ胺眃毙▅舱籹ㄇΤ闽崩約痜舦痲魁盿筿杠荐絬单セ癸痜粄醚舦痲腊ぃ鶪カチ﹍沧ゼΤ猭措笵秈︽ビ禗チ粄現┎莱赣砞ミ痜舦痲猭タΑ絋ミ痜碻猭硚畖ビ禗舦
羆珹τēチ粄現┎徖ネ兜ヘ挤蹿ぃì現┎よ┯踞よ瓜场だ洛皘ま洛励硋兜Μ禣羭龟伐璶ぃ眔チ璶―翠┎氨ゎち硋兜Μ禣荷е浪癚洛臔も痜洛皘跑て闽硈の洛励Μ禣籔磕戈拜肈ㄏセ翠カチㄉΤ璽踞眔癬τ狝叭借蔼洛励狝叭
瞷琵и-
锣筁ㄓ現┎吏挂よ秨や現┎箇衡癩現吏挂玂臔竝秨や18.5货じ耕糤10%オ环ゑ筁キА40%糤碩还︹
穦吏玂秨やи-
ョ硄盽穦秨やセネ玻羆ぶさΩ現┎箇衡吏挂玂臔竝秨やセネ玻羆0.15%ㄏ現┎吏挂俱砰秨や璸衡ョ琌セネ玻羆0.56%沮ㄇ厚︹刮砰セ翠吏玂秨や硈ㄇ祇甶い瓣產︓い瓣嘲单常ゑぃ羭ㄒτēい瓣嘲吏挂よ秨やセネ玻羆0.6%セ吏挂秨やセネ玻羆ゑ瞯澈礛硈い瓣嘲ゑぃи-
谋眔硂琌杠
現┎吏玂現郸ご礛琌蹦干毕Α┛菠γ琕ň獀現郸τ現┎戈方┮栋いョ璶琌ノ干毕砆γ琕矪瞶玻ネ紀の靖单癸ㄆ玡ň獀玱Τ┮┛菠吏挂玂臔竝箇衡いи-
吏挂蝶︳の跋闽玒よ癬ㄓ挤蹿碞吏挂玂臔竝俱砰秨や3.1%ゑ吏挂玂臔竝ㄤ絛氓秨やぶ
程框狙琌現┎吏玂毙▅ョゼ瞷硂и-
跋闽玒挤蹿い淮癩現跋闽玒挤蹿1,200窾じ癸ゑ1,190窾じ秨や糤10窾じ0.8%硂碩и獺筿跌芥计約獽穦ノ荷
セ粄現┎э到ㄤチネ現郸荡ぃ┛菠癸吏挂э到のňゎ癸吏挂硑Θγ琕吏挂琌γ琕セ籔カチネ胺眃Τぃだ澄闽玒現┎莱糤吏挂よ秨や蹦ň獀Α郸菠磷吏挂γ琕干毕璶笵ぃ琌┮Τγ琕常镑ノ窥┪ノм干毕
畊ネセ略朝勉
辩模┚某璓勉畊ネ克い厨彻莱癩現箇衡臸砃盙鲁肈竩┽阑舩窥褐琌碸﹚眃琁現厨翴癩現度钩妓骸ì羆服琁現ヘ夹硂贺弧猭陪ボ翠璣現┎いよ泊い砆粄琌穌褐竡τ翠現┎︑︽﹚程癩現箇衡砆璶盢翠盿┕﹁よ穦褐笵隔拈块弘緙
弘緙礚好絋筂ガ翠–à辅弘緙ぃ琌褐竡τ琌眖㎝镣墩桔┯獅防▆み候蛤繦いよ硂琌ぃ笵紈ア︑и弘緙┏いよ"ó反"阶篕翠穌褐硂贺腁琌獶阶秸Θ翠ヘ玡眖㎝奸瑈ヌ腀緙フ舦禥膍碅ㄤ龟翠籔褐竡眖ㄓ┰ぃ闽玒êㄇ緙竒癵絢ぃ睲и辨-
镑揽睲泊氟睲贰翠ヘ玡褐龟悔薄鶪碞琌......
PRESIDENT: Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, please resume your seat. Who were you referring to, Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung? Would you please rephrase it?
辩模┚某┏いよ"ó反"阶......
PRESIDENT: Please rephrase it.
辩模┚某畊ネ叫拜弧睲贰琌
PRESIDENT: The last sentence you uttered. The phrase containing the words "癵絢" and so on.
辩模┚某êㄇ緙竒癵絢ぃ睲и叫-
......
PRESIDENT: But you are not talking about opium. You are talking about some people.
辩模┚某畊ネи弄俱琿琌弧杠
PRESIDENT: Please do.
辩模┚某┏いよ"ó反"阶篕翠穌褐硂贺腁琌獶阶秸Θ眖㎝奸瑈ヌ腀緙フ舦禥膍碅......
PRESIDENT: Who are those people?
辩模┚某иぃ琌ㄇи琌弧êㄇヌ腀緙
PRESIDENT: Are you referring to Members of this Council?
辩模┚某и⊿Τ睲贰
PRESIDENT: Are you alluding to a certain Member who spoke yesterday?
辩模┚某и⊿Τ硂妓弧
PRESIDENT: So would you like to rephrase it in such a way that it does not refer to any Member?
辩模┚某畊ネи弧琌êㄇヌ腀иぃ笵琌ヌ腀┮и礚種琌セЫ
PRESIDENT: I shall have to order you to withdraw the remark, if you are not prepared to rephrase it.
辩模┚某琌"ヌ腀緙"
PRESIDENT: That is it.
辩模┚某и沽刚舱
┏いよ"ó反"阶篕翠穌褐硂贺腁琌獶阶秸Θ眖㎝奸瑈Τㄇ硂フ舦禥膍碅ㄤ龟褐竡眖ㄓ籔翠龟悔薄鶪┰ぃ闽玒êㄇ緙竒癵絢ぃ睲и辨-
揽睲泊氟睲贰ヘ玡......
PRESIDENT: Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, who are those people? Who are you alluding to?
辩模┚某畊ネㄤ龟иぃ街穦ヌ腀緙и種琌狦ㄇ︑腀種緙и碞辨-
ぃ璶辨-
泊氟睲贰翠薄鶪......
PRESIDENT: Are you prepared to withdraw the remark?
辩模┚某琌闽и┮弧緙竒癵絢ぃ睲......
PRESIDENT: Or you would indicate to the effect that you are not referring to any Member, as you might have given Members the impression that you are referring to them.
辩模┚某и礚種弧琌セЫヴ︙︗某硂妓
PRESIDENT: Please carry on.
辩模┚某Τ闽虫ōρ狝叭よ羆服琁現厨箇穦矗蔼︘ρ侯穿肂讽闽猔ρ拜肈癸羆服睝ぃ瞶穦縒﹡ρ惠璶稰ぃ骸挡狦硂"Ч纯疆舦箇衡"琌斑羆服㏑琌眖糤︘ρ侯穿肂и-
癸讽礛舧и-
琌Чぃノ瞶穦縒﹡ρネ㎡-
璶縒┯踞︘禣ノ礚酚臮-
挂鶪琌Ч竚窖ぃ瞶㎡さ笰句穝戳丁翠碭ρ癸縒﹡ρ薄鶪и-
琌砈も芠㎡"Χ皊ψ隔Τ癌"╦泊い磀篏瞷禜临さぱ祇ネ硂薄鶪ぇ螟笵и-
琌穌褐竡盾︓癩現弧るらそガ侯穿浪癚厨盢穦糤侯穿肂挡狦琌籔產畑︘ρ侯穿夹非パ1,500じ︓1,800じ癸舦禥τē1,800じ箉逗ぃì镑癸そそ盋盋τē-
╯澈眔妮碙腨ネ㎡
ΤさΩ褐狝叭糤Θ虑篕翠舩窥и稱拜у蝶Τ稱ρ褐糤ㄆ龟Τσ納基害薄鶪矗褐糤计τ臮龟悔薄鶪и谋眔硂妓暗籔現┎计笴栏⊿Τだㄆ龟1,800じ籔ㄢ玡沉猭穝そ穿キ╯厨某2,300じ禯环τ籔闽猔ρ刮砰┮璶―2,700じ碞畉眔环и辨癩現龟绰2,700じヘ夹秈祇
︓ㄓカ笵ぃ春秖ア穨琌現┎竒蕾㎝穨現郸ア毖┮璓現┎龟螟勉ㄤ㏒и獺⊿Τ尺舧烩ア穨侯穿らêㄇ肂荡ぃ琵筁程膀セネΤ沧ら羭杜紐极︑炳︓鑟τǐ繧癩現ぃ筁癩現箇衡某沟蚌癡膀猔戈3货じㄓ秆∕拜肈硂蚌癡璸购琌現┎癸ア穨拜肈窾莱艶う刚拜筁硂蚌癡璸购纯蚌癡ぶウ琌秆∕窾ア穨碞穨ぃì拜肈癸ア穨拜肈и谋眔現┎琌莱赣┯踞砫ヴ疭ヘ玡膀糷狝叭ぃì薄鶪現┎σ納耎溜㎝眏膀糷狝叭糤碞穨诀穦ㄒ糤產叭瞶の癬﹡酚臮单戮︗硂妓よ琂糤碞穨戮︗э到膀糷狝叭弧琌絙蛮箸и辨癩現稸σ納硂龟悔祇甶㎝よ
よиㄓρ摧痚虫克產畑包单常や穿┦狝叭-
砆溃穦┏糷⊿Τ甶辨も現┎烩侯穿и粄瞶稱瞶癩よ猭籔琁現よ莱赣琌琵カチ渤ネ眔Τ碙腨︑ネ甶┮琵–常Τキ单诀穦現┎せ︓临ろ2 521癠ㄠ肂τ現┎┮璹﹚狝叭肂セぃì骸ì龟悔惠璶и眏疨璶―現┎糤そ犁癠ㄠ狝叭覸秆讽玡包挂环莱躬纘╬犁诀篶砞癠ㄠいみ沟褐и獺現┎莱盿繷現┎场糤砞癠ㄠいみ癬躬の崩笆狦
и某現┎挤掸蹿兜Θミ碞穨祇甶膀侯穿ρ摧痚虫克產畑单矗ㄑ礚禪蹿腊-
祇甶ㄇㄆ穨砞ミ癠ㄠが戈方呼蹈秨砞獸┯钡Θ︾ネ種单Τ現┎н-
︑ㄤ玱-
沧ネㄌ苦侯穿ㄏ-
莉眔碙腨籔︑獺环よㄓ弧現┎窥
ぃ筁癸êㄇ礚ρの端摧и粄現┎Τ砫ヴ-
緇ネτぃ琌琵-
︑ネ︑防瞷產叭瞶钉Τ114钉盢糤12钉–钉キА矪瞶70﹙硂妓计︙癸60窾65烦ρ㎝26窾端摧и谋眔現┎莱稸σ納硂拜肈ㄆ龟糤產叭瞶狝叭琌ㄨぃ甧絯
ヘ玡ρ皘狝叭琌ち拜肈沮現┎狝叭夹せ︓穦ろ2 700ρ盝︗и稱拜拜現┎癸ρ矗ㄑ硂妓狝叭穦礚穃み㎡瞷現┎の戈ρ皘Τ104丁︘皘计14 000╬犁ρ皘Τ482丁16 000︘繦ㄇ╬犁ρ皘ゼ才盢ネρ皘兵ㄒτ嘲尿闽超︳璸ゼㄓㄢ盢Τ200產挡穨紇臫︘计笷5 000翠現┎琌辨ρ產刁繷┪︘れずみ㎡
Τ弧и-
琌禣と繺и璶坚睲︑禣と繺и荡ぃ觅Θ倒-
禣と繺礚秨繺の緅繺и-
ぃ盾临Τㄇ琌Τ繺⊿繺┪ㄏΤ眔ぃ埂τブ独癌紾κ痜鸟ōи-
ぃ瞶穦-
盾鶪-
筁ぃ﹚ぃ纯癸穦癪膍┮-
┮ぃ﹚琌フ禣と繺
Τ拜窥眖︙ㄓ現┎瞷Τ1,500货じ纗称緗キネ纯弧筁琌璶―疭跋現┎Τぃぶ250货じ緇硂妓и-
︙ぃ笆ノㄇ纗称㎡璝現┎痷璶ぃ笆ノ纗称杠и粄現┎碞莱σ納糤眔祙и獺糤1%眔祙荡ぃ筁ㄏ糤1%眔祙翠ご礛程眔祙跋︽ぇい羭荡ぃ穦纞ǐ戈セ產玱糤Μэ到穦褐и辨癩現綠σ納硂拜肈辨セЫㄆㄏ現┎膀糷カチ暗ンㄆ
и眖ぃノ潮垦阶現┎笆诀и弧癩現㎝瞷現┎碻玂-
瞶癩厩琌盢秨や籔竒蕾糤本恥そ秨やぃ蔼セネ玻羆20%┮筁碭癩現そ秨やネ玻羆18%硂妓熬秨やセぃ皐癸穦惠―и辨現┎镑把σ籔翠竒蕾祇甶キ璝よㄒ芖穝℡ㄤそ秨やА禬讽ネ玻羆20%и辨翠現┎盢瞶癩"ド"ゴ瘆盢そ秨やノカチō
畊ネセ略朝勉
朝岸穨某璓勉и稱璶―畊ネ坚睲㎝秆睦︙辩模┚某"緙τ癵絢"ê弧杠畊ネ粄琌ぃ才穦某肚参㎝笲
PRESIDENT: I shall let Members have an explanation at the next sitting.
MR JAMES TIEN: Mr President, there is much to credit the Financial Secretary for his first Budget offerings. I agree with a lot of the praises expressed but time today allows me to voice some queries and misgivings that I have.
Our government takes considerable pleasure and pride in reducing taxes. Not all the taxes, mind you, just those which serve a political purpose of pleasing the numerous unionist members of this Council. This may not be wise but it is understandable and it is a matter of simple arithmetic. They have the majority of votes in this Council. A Budget is made or broken by whether they are in favour of it or against.
The Financial Secretary now offers to reduce income taxes through a series of concessions and raised the basic allowance by 14%. This is a popular move but not necessarily a smart one. For three years running our government has steadily eroded the already narrow tax base. Whether this is a consequence of having so many grassroots' champions in this Council, I leave it to you to decide. Between 1993 and now the percentage of our work force which pays income tax has shrunk from an already low 54% to 40%. Those who pay meaningful salary tax are far fewer. Though around 1.2 million people contribute to income tax, around 100 000 pay about 60% of the total receipt. The tax burden clearly has shifted decisively into the upper middle class and above. The singular reliance on so few to carry the load for so many is risky. If anything unfortunate should befall the few overly-depended-upon tax payers, then our revenue would go into a sudden seizure.
Since a return to more balanced taxation is not on, the only feasible alternative is to widen the tax net and to spread the load in another way Fees and Charges Financial Secretaries' favourable subject. We can see from the latest statistics that, with fingers crossed, our economy is gradually recovering. The unemployment rate has fallen from a decade worst 3.6% in November to 3.1% today. Inflation, while stubbornly high, has subsided to around 6% at today's rate. The property market seems to have bottomed out and prices are steady. A series of bank interest rate cuts has also eased the credit crunch.
If these economic indicators are accurate, I can relax a bit and let our Financial Secretary recoup more revenue through rates and fee increases. The Government today collects some 3 000 odd fees and charges. Most of these are levied at businesses. I support the Financial Secretary now to raise these charges not beyond the inflation rate for this year only and, at the same time, review all of them, adjusting what must be changed, cancelling those which are obsolete. We support the users pay principle and cost recovery concept. But what is cost, how efficient is government departments, how many years for full cost recovery? These are all the questions that have to be looked at.
Mr President, I regret that the Government has ignored a motion passed in November last year to reduce corporate profits tax. The Financial Secretary says our corporate tax is among the lowest in the region and any reduction of it amounts to free lunch. On the face of it, a 16.5% profit tax. He is right. But here the reality is a little more complex than meets the eye. Companies here sign cheques, whether for tax, levy, fees, rates and such charges, payable to the "Hong Kong Government" at a rate far more than what many of their counterparts do in this region. The difference is that there, they pay mainly through corporate tax and here, we mask a great portion of our contribution in an array of additional levies. I do not think it is an exaggeration to say, we in Hong Kong pay among the highest fees and charges in the region. We would be deluding ourselves if we figure multinationals are not aware of our hidden taxes and calculate their plans for locating in Hong Kong or elsewhere accordingly.
As an example of low corporate tax being compounded by additional charges, the case of the two public television broadcasters, TVB and ATV, is telling. Both have to pay the usual 16.5% profits tax plus 10% of their total revenue as a fee to the Government. Hence, in effect, TVB is paying 45% tax on their profit. While ATV, the weaker of the two, loses money, after having paid this steep fee.
Mr President, everyone of course endorses the Financial Secretary's promise of a "user-friendly government" committed to "helping the business community generate wealth". What exactly does this slogan entail? He cites such broad and vague concepts as "streamline existing services through new technology and process re-engineering", "eliminate any over-regulation and unnecessary bureaucracy", and "new services". The most tangible suggestion is the creation of a task force under the Efficiency Unit.
For now, I am holding back final judgement on his pledge until the Government can produce the specifics to show his is not just lip service. Putting more resources into business, it is not lip service. It is now time for the Government to spend more on economic development than on social welfare. This year's Budget increases expenditure in real terms on economics by only 2.5% while those on social welfare by 14.7%. In the last five years, expenditure in real term went up only by 12% for economic development, but 65% for social welfare. A family of four now gets $10,020 per month as Comprehensive Social Assistance. No wonder the business sector has trouble in finding workers nowadays. Who would want to work if one gets more money by staying unemployed? At this rate, we might soon become the welfare state of many western democracy where no one wants to invest and the economy turns stagnant.
Mr President, talking about neglect. Talking about positive non-intervention. There is not one area which has been as routinely dismissed or overlooked as manufacturing in Hong Kong. No wonder our factories have been disappearing faster than the tropical rain forests. To compensate, the Government has finally reaffirmed its interest in developing a science park. We can be pardoned for being a bit tired and sceptical over this. We have been hearing many refrains about such a Mecca for high technology since the early 1980s. Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan more or less chanced on this idea at roughly the same moment. Today Singapore and Taiwan are renowned as centres for hi-technology manufacturing and research and development. All we have to boast out of this, is a pool of water out there somewhere in Tolo Harbour. But I must be charitable and say, as I said before, it is always better late than never.
Happier, however, is the Financial Secretary's proposal for a second industrial technology centre and a fourth industrial estate. But realists must be scratching their heads as to what industries we hope to attract to these venues when in terms of labour costs and benefits, we have priced ourselves out of contention, and in terms of tax breaks, we have virtually none. Mr President, our real cash cow is not the big corporation but the small to medium enterprises employing fewer than 50 workers each. They are also the ones in urgent need of aid which the Financial Secretary has promised. While I applaud his sentiment in this regard, I must point out that small to medium businesses can benefit a lot, from the Government staying out of their way, and this Council refraining from slapping on them a whole battery of equal rights and labour bills. Many of them today feel stifled by the myriad regulations, politically correct but commercially nonsensical rules, the added costs of all types of payout to employees, and the confrontational attitude, that have spread from this Council to the workplace. I think it is only right for the Government to let them breathe and operate with more freedom, and less nuisance first, before offering them assistance. If our small and medium businesses are hampered and strained, the fault lies as much with the Government as with the unions and their advocates. This is a fact, whether or not some of my colleagues like to hear it.
My advice is that we should stop this class warfare. The Budget vision depicts our future as a community that goes out to make money from the world rather than some groups going for the throat of the other in Hong Kong. We must again make a hero, not a villain, in the popular mind, of the entrepreneur, the employer, the opportunity giver, so that our youths can emulate rather than envy those who are successful.
Mr President, our government now seconds the expert opinion that, while we are educating a record number of students to the degree level, our youths are not as fluent in English or, for that matter, Chinese as their predecessors were. To remedy this, the Financial Secretary is to allocate $14 million to hire a hundred English native speakers to teach our students the global language of science and commerce. Another $10 million a year is to be directed towards promoting Putonghua instructions. I would not be too harsh, if I call these efforts "remedial" and "cosmetic". We are spending tens of millions, to try to overcome billions of dollars' worth of neglect.
The Financial Secretary also commends the Trade Development Council (TDC) for doing a credible job and asks it, to add to its portfolio the promotion of our trade in services. Before the TDC embarks on another venture, it can already achieve more by, with the Government's support, turning itself into a "one-stop shopping centre" for foreign investors. Anyone interested in investing in Hong Kong should be able to walk into any one of the 20 odd TDC offices around the world and get all the services, that is, legal counsel, information, assistance with bureaucracy, advice and contacts he needs to do his business here. This would clear a lot of the red tape to which the Financial Secretary has expressed and establish a friendly environment for business in Hong Kong.
Mr President, I agree with the philosophy, applicable to life as it is to commerce, that one has to work to one's natural advantages. To help us do precisely this, the Financial Secretary is giving us a task force on services promotion which on face value looks a lot like our Central Policy Unit. The task force should be, he says, "an ad hoc group of prominent business leaders, professionals and academics" which is to shape a "framework of action" and "action agendas". This sounds ambitious but we have to wait and assess the task force, not for the impressive heavyweights in its membership, but for the result.
Whether we are prepared to gain from economic developments on the mainland, China is geared up to benefit us. The National People's Congress has just approved a ninth five-year-plan in which we figure prominently. I suggest that the proposed task force get the hint and look into how we can make the most of that five-year-plan. No serious economy operates in a vacuum or in isolation any longer. The prize often goes to the one who is first off the mark and races steps ahead of the competition. We were nimble, we were quick. We must be so again but with added stamina this time around. We must be prepared to run either the economic sprint or the marathon.
With these words, Mr President, I congratulate the Financial Secretary on his first Budget.
独岸藉某璓勉畊ネセ穦チ囊碞箇衡いユ硄场だ祇ē
セ癸セユ硄砞よや瞷璽糤稰ア辨翠ぶ竃盞癸ユ硄惠―蒥玃祇甶セ翠瞷ユ硄呼蹈ぃ秤璽颤セ翠ユ硄澜峨薄鶪ら痲腨﹚甅Ч到覸絯ユ硄澜峨惫琁㎝祇甶甅Τユ硄恨瞶現郸琌現┎讽叭ぇ堡侯芠さ箇衡いユ硄场だǎ讽Ы穦挤蹿竨ノ臮拜そ秈︽兜╯㎝浪癚璸购玱ぃǎ現┎穦さ挤蹿辅龟秈︽ヴ︙砏家ユ硄砏购㎝砞ㄓ現┎常戳辨祘パ╬癩刮┯㎝砍搭ぶ現┎癩現璽踞镑ノ╬癩刮戈方祇甶ユ硄讽礛琌ㄆ╬癩刮莱赣癬徊ノウぃ莱赣現┎à︹現┎ぃ莱Τ╬癩刮把籔玠搭ユ硄よ秨や発磷砍笲块呼蹈砫ヴ璝ユ硄秨や尿瞷璽糤踞紐セ翠ユ硄澜峨拜肈盢ら痲腨
ㄆ龟ユ硄拜肈闽チネ㎝穦竒蕾祇甶ユ硄ぃ虫ゎ籔蒥チら盽ネ闽局Τ甅Ττе倍笲块╰参Τセ翠竒蕾祇甶瓣產碞琌竒盽峨óτ硑Θ筪竒蕾穕ア讽Ы龟ぃ莱赣淮瞯セ翠ユ硄拜肈ユ硄薄鶪ら痲碿て現┎局Τì纗称莱赣挤戈方秆∕瞷ユ硄澜峨薄鶪临斗ゼ獴瑚羀碞セ翠ゼㄓユ硄惠―㎝祇甶秈︽冈灿╯砏购獽Τ肝丁砍ì镑笵隔㎝笲块呼蹈莱盢ㄓユ硄惠―
ユ硄砏购
パセ翠耎笵隔呼蹈Τ璶骸ì蒥チ癸ユ硄惠―璶搭淮笵隔呼蹈溃镑蒥チ矗ㄑ綼滴続τе倍笲块狝叭祇甶臟隔笲块呼蹈琌程ㄎ匡拒ぷㄤㄇ跋熬环τ竃盞穝祇甶跋荷Ν砍臟隔碞搭淮蒥チ硚禰疉痁厩ぇ璚ョ搭硈钡蒥跋笵隔呼蹈溃
穝﹁跋﹡チ戳埂峨óぇ璚砍﹁臟隔覸絯赣跋ユ硄澜峨薄鶪琌ㄨぃ甧絯瘤礛現┎眏秸Τ∕み箂箂ЧΘ﹁臟隔堡さ癩現箇衡いи-
ごぃǎΤヴ︙挤蹿ノ猔戈┪砍﹁臟隔現羆竝⊿Τ箇痙挤蹿秈︽胑Μ祘讽Ыご氨痙╯㎝糵某臟そ┮矗ユ︽┦╯厨顶琿いτ耕Νセ眖厨彻莉眡沮臟そ︳璸璝﹁臟隔璶箂箂Ч˙砞璸祘臮拜惠セる┷夹堡パ瞷さ現┎ごゼ籔臟そ坝Т俱兜璸购逼臮拜ごゼу﹁臟隔穦┑筐ЧΘㄆ龟セ常踞紐﹁臟隔ゼ戳Ч辨笲块琍戳莱碞瞷﹁臟隔祘秈矗ㄑ冈灿戈玃叫讽Ы暗ひ挤戈方硉秈叭ゲ﹁臟隔戳ЧΘ琵穝﹁跋﹡チΝら叉瞒峨óぇ璚挪現┎Μ穦Τ┮┑粇セ辨讽Ы糤現矪も荷е甶秨Μ祘﹁臟隔祘Μ┑粇τ┑辅Θ
︓ㄤ緇ㄢ兜臟隔祇甶郸菠┮某纔璸购臟隔盢瓁緿や絬硈钡皑綽瞅臟隔絬のр瞷Τ臟約臟隔絬┑︓‵〤妓さ箇衡ョ⊿Τウ-
箇痙挤蹿辨讽Ы镑荷ΝЧΘΤ闽砏购㎝╯そ渤そガ辅龟砍Τ闽祘ら戳
ユ硄澜峨
碝―环τΤ秆∕ユ硄澜峨惫琁笲块∕﹚穦竨ノ臮拜そ╯筿笵隔Μ禣セ翠龟琁︽┦╯禣ノ︳璸1货翠じ戳辨ㄢずЧΘΤ闽╯チ囊や現┎挤蹿秈˙╯筿笵隔Μ禣璸购︽┦
ぃ筁癸璶秆∕瞷ユ硄澜峨拜肈現┎ご礛ㄌ碻筁┕σよΑ辨硓筁癩現も琿ㄓ筀ы═ó糤计ヘㄒセ現┎獽矗糤═ó礟酚禣狥跋┏繥笵紉Μ祙兜㎝篗綪そ═ó祙叭纔磃惫琁チ囊辨現┎沽刚眖ㄤ硚畖獶癩現も琿à稱快猭秆∕ユ硄澜峨ㄒ現┎挤蹿砍糷氨ó初覸絯獃ó︗ぃì薄鶪縩伐祇甶氨獃锣"Park & ride"砞琁躬纘╬產ó斌ㄏノ╬產ó锣そユ硄ㄣㄆ龟硂ㄇㄣ砰砞妓祇揣覸絯ユ硄澜峨ヘ夹︙讽Ыㄣ砰ユ硄砞羆琌硂妓掇㎡
セ翠獃ó︗ぃì薄鶪讽腨パ獃ó︗ぃì硑Θó进ぃゲ璶臦隔┪緍緋тぃ獃ó︗τ隔ぃ耞露伴笵隔澜峨薄鶪癸臮拜そ﹡礛ノㄢ丁ЧΘ硂獃ó︗惠―╯厨厨ず计沮跑眔筁セ稰獶盽ぃ骸瞷╯厨瘤ЧΘ讽Ыボ斗竒現┎盡產糵臮拜╯ず甧穦硋˙辅龟Τ闽某惫琁ㄆ龟セ箇衡い讽Ы⊿Τ挤蹿砍氨ó初┪蹦ㄤ快猭秆∕獃ó︗ぃì拜肈現┎癸秆∕獃ó︗ぃì拜肈蹦╈┑篈琌笲块竝粄瞷獃ó︗ぃì薄鶪ごゼ腨螟г㎡
現┎莱赣щ戈方躬纘╬產ó斌ㄏノ╬產óτ锣ㄤユ硄ㄣ現┎Ν竒矗筁氨獃锣"Park and ride"瞶├矗讽Ы⊿Τ縩伐崩︽┪挤蹿砍Τ闽氨ó砞称皌硂琌パ現┎辨綼╬癩刮祇甶辅龟Τ闽璸购タ玡ゅ┮瓃ノ╬癩刮戈方祇甶讽礛琌ㄆ叫現┎讽Ыぃ璶а癘э到セ翠ユ硄薄鶪砫ヴご現┎ō現┎Τ砫ヴ挤戈方龟琁ㄇΤэ到瞷セ翠ユ硄薄鶪惫琁τぃ莱琌芠单╬癩刮祇甶琵︽璸购╈╈
э到そユ硄狝叭
璶琵蒥チ斌ㄏノ╬產óㄏノそユ硄ㄣê或碞ゲ斗ぃ耞矗蔼そユ硄ㄣ瞯㎝狝叭借笲块竝碞踞讽菏诡そユ硄ㄣ狝叭砫ヴㄓセ瞷笲块竝菏诡ぺぺのよぃì镑チ囊Ω璶―笲块竝糤挤戈方㎝も眏э到瞷Τ菏诡菏诡痷タ祇揣Τ蒥チΤ┮眔痲瘤礛笲块竝礷ボ穦眏菏诡眖さ箇衡い玱祇瞷笲块竝э到ぺぺ㎝狝叭璸购ずセ⊿Τ穝糤ヴ︙挤蹿㎝も╯澈笲块竝咎或玂靡-
菏诡そユ硄ㄣ狝叭穦Τэ到㎡
寸近現郸
セ翠吏堡現┎⊿ΤЧ祇揣寸近覸絯ユ硄よノヘ玡ゎセ翠ゼΤ甅Ч到の环寸近現郸セ纯Ω璶―笲块眖硉﹚甅环寸近現郸堡ごゼ眔讽Ыタ氮滦ㄆ龟ㄓ┕セ翠蒥跋ぱ琍近祇揣徊嘲ユ硄ㄣ砫ヴτ猳弚近穝蒥马の瞒畄┮矗ㄑ寸近狝叭ョ踞讽璶笲块覸絯笵隔溃セΩ玃叫現┎眖硉﹚甅环寸近現郸络﹚寸近セ翠笲块à︹蒥チ匡拒ユ硄ㄣ匡拒眖τ祇揣覸絯嘲ユ硄澜峨ノ
ユ硄
セ翠Τ笵隔竒盽瞷澜峨ㄤ龟常琌淮稬┪腨ユ硄種┮旧璓瘤礛讽Ы秨﹍ㄇ羉Γそ隔ㄒべそ隔杆尼魁诀㎝戈╰参いみ獽スΤ種祇ネ莱跑穦緍緋磷秈澜峨隔癸腨ユ硄種現┎龟莱赣暗ひ荷秖搭ぶユ硄種祇ネ┦セ辨讽Ы穦稸σ納糤ǖ呸筿虫ó牡羉Γそ隔ǖ呸︓Θミ舱羉Γ蔼硉そ隔ǖ呸钉盡砫ǖ呸竒盽祇ネユ硄種そ隔ゴ阑禬硉緍緋㎝ぃみ緍緋搭ぶ種祇ネτ旧璓峨ó薄鶪и-
谋眔瞷ユ硄種常琌パó进珹砯耫ó┮ま癬τ–Ω砯耫ó祇ネ種┮硑Θ澜峨┕┕笷计ぇи-
谋眔現┎龟Τ惠璶︑︽睰竚ó称ぃぇ惠
и-
竒盽钮Τ砆臟㎝óЖ㎝╈︽種ョ丁い钮籇Τ糧瓂厨笵セ辨現┎闽猔硂ㄇ種ㄆン籔臟㎝臟そ坝癚ó杆祸竟眏稰莱╯崩︽贺Τ惫琁絋玂搭ぶ種祇ネ
︓淮臟ユ蹲矪竒盽祇ネ腨種拜肈セ玃叫現┎祏戳ず荷е硂ㄇユ蹲矪杆尼魁诀纞诀侥縊环τē玥辨現┎镑挤戈方硂ㄇユ硄羉Γτ竒盽祇ネ腨種淮臟ユ蹲矪砍︽óぱ爵搭ぶó进籔淮臟ó进祇ネ疾種眖τ絋玂淮臟镑タ盽笲絋玂㎝诀
畊ネセ略朝勉
眎簙┚某璓勉畊ネ癸さ癩現箇衡チ羛羆砰蝶阶琌硂琌糵稸の叭龟箇衡眖贺计沮癩現種瓜骸ì穦顶糷惠璶竒蕾絯薄鶪癩現現┎场癩現箇衡搭搭干干镑暗ゑ耕叭龟癩現箇衡獺竒琌当荷福ツ讽礛俱癩現箇衡ぃ骸ì–惠璶ㄒ穦褐秨やチ羛粄ρ侯穿Τぃìぇ矪Τ蝶阶翠┎穌穦褐ň翠Θ﹁よΑ褐穦"緄胕"и-
瓣チネ玻羆のカチ眔褐ゑㄒ环环ㄇ秈瓣產硂翴и-
稰篎穃场だノ穦褐褐ぃ叭タ穨硂翴ヴ︙瓣產跋常穦瞷セ翠獺Τ伐ぶ计穦硂妓暗翠计︑ネ篈癸ネи-
璶σ納現┎Τ胑纗籛の緇琌さ笰句穝碒瑈脓翠戳丁澈礛Τ秖ρ眔ぃ莱Τ酚臮τ忌琅硂妓薄鶪瞷碔肝穦稰磀
畊ネさ癩現箇衡ǎ癩現竒沽刚骸ì穦顶糷惠璶讽礛癩現箇衡いтㄇぃ琌ぇ矪у蝶琌讽甧ㄆ琌俱癩現箇衡莱赣眔キ颗のい蝶基
畊ネセ盢穦栋い碞毙▅のユ硄よ祇種ǎ
癩現箇衡い俱砰毙▅挤蹿そ羆秨や17.5%龟借糤碩耕9%硂籔チ羛璶―毙▅挤蹿そ羆秨や18%钡羆砰ㄓ弧玧眏钡
現┎场秨や箇衡陪ボㄇ惠秆∕拜肈筐筐ゼ莉戈方矪瞶膀娄毙▅籔盡毙▅挤蹿糤碩秈˙┰环癸и-
稰だア辨現┎╯戈方だ皌莱だσ納兜ヘ璶┦㎝絯ㄏ戈方笲ノ莉眔程狦翠┎莱纔矪瞶膀娄毙▅癸拜肈ㄤい珹辅龟ダ粂毙厩ダ粂毙厩琌矗蔼毙厩借ゲ璶莱赣矗ㄑì镑戈方ぉ辅龟
癸箇衡盢秖戈方ノ耎膟毙畍璸购硂璸购碔某┦ㄤΘ毙▅借好
搭淮毙畍璽踞よи粄搭ぶ毙畍揭竊计ゑ搭ぶい厩–痁厩ネ计Τ毙畍穦Τ丁称揭㎝σ痁︓–い厩竒禣秨やいΤ场だノэ到砞琁チ羛辨讽Ыタ跌Τ闽拜肈糤い厩竒禣秨やㄏ厩眔э到砞琁の糤睰ㄤ毙厩ノ珇皌兜э到毙厩借璸购
セ玃叫現┎穝σ納龟琁チ羛矗钡戈厩玡毙▅璸购才﹚戈縒ミギ竂堕矗ㄑ戈ㄏㄤ眔э到厩砞琁の毙畍羱筍钡矗蔼セ翠厩玡毙▅借
程眔矗琌禣毙▅龟琁瞷琌莱赣浪癚Θ╯セ翠龟琁11禣毙▅︽┦ㄏ膀娄毙▅Ч俱
畊ネ︓箇衡ユ硄笲块よ翠┎のΤ闽诀篶セ盢穦兵纔祇甶臟隔秈︽冈灿祘╯セゲ斗眏秸カチ戳辨兵臟隔Νら辅Θ覸絯ユ硄澜峨ぇ璚そ渤踞み琌硂ㄇ臟隔Θセ硑基よの癩叭逼贺贺拜肈ㄒ﹁臟隔硑基笷κ货じ–笷60︓70货じそ渤踞み盢ㄓのセよ璽踞穦パ布基だ舥и-
辨笲块荷е矗ㄣ砰癩叭逼
ヘ玡い瓣よ矗膀某ㄒべ痌爵翠┎莱╯い瓣現┎某癸翠紇臫﹁臟隔籔い瓣─钡婚翴笲块眏秸盢砞璸矗ユいよ璝矗ユτぃ╯虫よ暗ひ籔い瓣膀ぃ皌穦硑Θ﹁臟隔笲块╰参笆峨翠┎莱荷е矗ユぉい璣羛羛蹈舱癚阶﹁臟隔ㄣ砰砞璸
セ翠竒盽Τ备隔祘秈︽埃カチ盿ㄓ伐ぃ獽俱砰盿ㄓ竒蕾穕ア螟︳璸瞷翠┎琌竨叫臮拜╯秸セ粄莱Τ瞏玡陇┦╯ㄤ龟隔現竝ラ紈瓣のらセ暗猭硂ㄢ瓣產穝カ马祇甶┪笵隔筁祘い砞ミいァそㄆ穨恨笵╰参盢そノㄆ穨┮惠砞琁栋い兵恨笵砞┏ヴ︙琁蝴浪琩А秈︽翠瞷て常カ╯ま兜╰参
畊ネ沮癩現箇衡笲块竝箇璸セ翠跋キА︽ó硉璶そńは琈翠┎ゼㄓ礚▆郸э到セ翠笵隔澜峨拜肈
耕Ν玡笲块ボセ翠ぶ糤砍笵隔Τ﹚螟螟笵璶セ翠砍琜笵隔盾ㄤ龟笲块Τ玡陇┦τ義承種琜笵隔絋龟秆∕拜肈らセ穝盝獽ォМ笲ノ舼Α琜笵隔秆∕笵隔澜峨ㄇ承種の稱钩ゼゲぃΘㄆ龟
翠┎さ甶秨Τ闽砞ミぺ盡絬の筿笵隔璸购拜肈单╯и-
戳辨硂ㄇ╯程沧ヘ琌Τカチㄉユ硄笲块狝叭疭琌筿笵隔璸购埃╯м砃┦拜肈︙そキ磅︽赣璸购琌拜肈闽龄セ稱矗眶翠┎莱赣糵稸σ納だ戳╯筿笵隔璸购︽┦磷赣璸购ぃ龟瞷τ禣秖そ┊
翠獃ó︗ぃì琌旧璓セ翠ユ硄澜峨ㄤい璶ら玡Τ闽﹛滦セㄇ拜肈翠┎ゼㄓ糤ó︗计ヘΤ400硂滦稰ア辨翠┎莱赣カ砏购い挤ㄇよ砍獃ó加
畊ネиョ稱ノㄇ丁酵酵ゅ眃約冀よ拜肈チ羛粄Τ惠璶砏恨瓣悔筿福呼蹈ず甧さる瓣瓣穦硄筁ㄒ窽ゎ瓣悔筿福呼蹈肚冀︹薄のぃ▆獺硂よ翠┎龟莱糤戈方╯璹┪璹ミΤ闽猭ㄒ窽ゎセ翠硓筁瓣悔筿福呼蹈肚冀︹薄のぃ▆獺
畊ネΤ闽せ︓癩現箇衡俱砰蝶阶パチ羛ㄆ腑瓣辆某祇
セ略朝勉谅谅畊ネ
︙玊く某璓勉畊ネ癩現矗箇衡"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"肈籔и-
チㄓ某㎝崩笆"チэ到チネ"ヘ夹がΤ硄ぇ矪產э到チネㄤ龟礚阶現︙祇甶竒蕾︙祇笷現┎程沧ゲ璶ノ"チセ"現郸磃の炊霉渤眔約獂や尿
現┎さぱ癸и-
硂チ匡羭ミ猭Ы絋琌蹦耕秈˙芠├耕キ颗よ猭矪瞶竒蕾㎝チネ拜肈埃┕跌玃秈竒蕾糤ョ腀種癸耕碩э到穦褐や發干┕ぃì羇ㄏさぱごΤ矪ぃЧ到㎝э秈よ程陪ㄒ獽琌璶糤ρそ穿キ单俱砰τē硂癩現箇衡ご眔и-
嘿砛иゲ斗眏秸琌現┎璓э到チネ琌糹︽砫ヴ獶界カチカチ璶―瞶穦玂毁琌兜膀セ舦ぃ琌璶―㎝琁彼
畊ネ翠琌羭瓣悔カカチそチ㎝舦種醚ご讽痢畓籔ㄤ竒蕾祇笷キぃ嘿┕崔チ毙▅㎝さらㄊ現┎現獀溃璶翠穌竒蕾圭铬籖禲皑ョぃ璶筁拜現獀︓いよぃの箇﹚癩現箇衡单癸翠チ祇甶蔼︑獀篶Θ腨紇臫パㄊ現┎癸舦猭獀芠├籔и-
翠Τぃよㄏи-
踞み翠チ舦猭獀祇甶ぃ穦綝腨筀穦璶ゴ阑舦猭临碿猭羘ㄏ翠盢羬穦癶
チ囊舦㎝猭ㄆ叭祇ēи祇ē璶皐癸現┎Τ瞶戈方崩約玃秈そチ㎝舦毙▅の綿㏕玂臔舦㎝猭絋玂カチㄉΤキ单碙腨キ单诀穦㎝キ单猭玂毁
舦毙--
舦毙▅よ現┎Τ砫ヴ眏カチ粄醚現獀舦のそチ舦瓣悔そ竒蕾穦のゅて舦瓣悔そ㎝ㄤ続ノ翠舦そ翠┎Τゲ璶秸挤戈方舱Θ村弧刮羛瓣のい瓣璓い瓣斗膥尿糹︽瓣悔そ竡叭膥尿翠羛瓣舦〆穦矗ユ舦厨琵瓣悔穦膥尿秆翠舦鶪
ミ猭Ы硄筁┦猍跌兵ㄒの戈╬留兵ㄒ現┎さ挤蹿せ窾じΘミキ单诀穦〆穦2,800窾じΘミ╬留盡そ竝иだやぃ筁6,650窾じ挤蹿いΤ5,000窾じ琌ノ羱筍秨やΤ800窾じノ肚㎝そ渤毙▅の╯秨や硂琌ì镑㎡現┎莱挤ì镑戈方荷е碞闹猍跌拜肈秈︽吭高╯妓ミㄒ玂毁闹猍跌
そチ毙▅〆穦よ挤蹿さ耕ぶ50窾じΤ500窾じノ舦毙▅竒禣い現┎穦ノ75窾じ籹甅ㄑ厩玡ㄠ担舦毙▅憨礶Τ30窾じ羭快甶凝穦55窾じㄑ刮舱参ビ叫戈羭快そチ毙▅笆ㄤ龟現┎莱糤戈倒诀穦獵把籔Τ闽舦癚阶量畒の籔瓣舱麓ユ瑈竒喷粄醚の克ō砰喷舦基
現┎ョ莱い厩の厩揭祘い挤戈方秈舦そチ芠├㎝毙▅さΩ挤蹿Τぃ400窾じ龟だぃì
綿㏕猭
崩約舦璶吏碞琌猭よ﹚玂毁舦猭ㄒ琌程膀セ翠┎莱荷еま╈┑埃癸包ちΑ猍跌瓣悔その﹚猭ㄒ埃ㄤΑ猍跌珹埃癸┦渡の產畑砫ヴよ猍跌и-
谋眔現┎莱挤戈方荷еЧΘ
ミ猭磅猭㎝猭︙皌琌獶盽璶玂毁и-
舦ぃ砆筋今舦猭兵ㄒ硄筁磅︽舦猭よパ翠㎝璣瓣舦猭肚参┮猭﹛癸舦猭ㄒ兵ゅ莱ノ㎝簍亩陪竒喷ぃì現┎斗粄痷σ納挤戈方倒セ翠猭﹛㎝猭︓猭把籔瓣悔┦舦猭癚穦╒竒喷潦竚硂よ膟現┎ョ莱荷е耎猭诀篶戈╰参纗籔舦禗砠Τ闽ン戈畐ㄑ猭猭の渤ㄏノ翠猭㎝猭莱荷е腊ゥ▅ミ碙舦猭猭瞶╰参㎝ゅて硂琌︓璶
ㄏノいゅ秈︽糵癟穦腊来いゅ睲贰秆︑糵筁祘硂琌兜だ璶膀セ舦莱荷е辅龟現┎斗﹚甅环㎝ㄣ砰現郸╯妓蚌癡猭镑ㄏノ蛮粂猭畑よ獽秈︽测癟莱挤秸戈方猭膟いゅ陆亩璶琌現┎莱籹硑Τ蛮粂ノ粂ē吏挂ㄏ猭蛮粂痷タ辅龟硂琌ㄨぃ甧絯
秨戈癟崩約猭醚
現竝ョ莱ラㄤ秈瓣產の翠┎ㄤ场荷е盢Τ闽ㄤ场戈疭琌セ翠猭ㄒ㎝猭畑ㄒ珹い璣ゅセ荷е硓筁瓣悔呼蹈Internet琵そ渤甧钡牟瞏翠癸猭粄醚硂Τ綿㏕猭獀讽礛ミ猭Ы莱荷е硄筁猭蛮粂セぷㄤ琌いゅセи谋眔現竝莱е硂よ
縒ミ猭穿
Τそキ猭и-
临惠璶ミ兜縒ミ㎝Τ瞯猭穿狝叭玂毁カチぃ穦竒蕾螟τ眔ぃ猭狝叭瞷猭穿竝チㄆ糵琩ビ叫惠夹龟筁發癚ユ硄種端竭纕单ンビ叫キА璶单る發╯洛励波┛砫ヴ竭纕璶单せる發癚沟竭纕璶单る盉よ惠る現┎莱糤戈方ㄏ猭穿竝罽祏糵у丁―璚单猭穿竝ョ斗荷е﹚ぃビ叫丁狝叭┯空ユㄓミ猭Ы硂琌猭穿竝莱荷е秈︽
︽現ビ禗
瞷穦現┎琜篶ぃ耞勘等の狡馒てカチ現┎ぃそキ現郸癸┕┕щ禗礚︽現ㄆ叭ビ禗盡そ竝Θミ祇揣颗の菏诡ノ浪羭現┎场︽現ア讽︽そ竝Θミㄓㄤ眔約獂獺ヴ㎝や眖计ǎ眔そ竝︓き斗矪瞶笷κ﹙耕Νきき︓せ沮盡ミ猭Ы氮滦и-
拜肈弧-
秖糤17︓18さΩ箇衡い莉糤挤蹿30%硂陪琌ぃìビ禗盡そ竝獶盽璶癸и-
舦玂毁矗ㄑ贺Τ惫琁и-
粄現┎痷璶跌そ竝㎝ノ莱癸ㄤ糤挤蹿
穨ミ猭刮拜肈
セ琌ミ猭Ыチ現ㄆ叭〆穦畊и-
〆穦獶盽跌硂拜肈и-
蔼砍ǎ現┎腀種挤蹿眏蚌癡現叭矪戮糤-
猭の穦璸醚羭快癚穦ミ猭刮Θ秆-
┦借и-
ご礛辨現┎σ納糤砞戮︗ㄏㄣ盡穨猭醚镑腊膚舱ミ猭刮疭笿Τ螟腊秈︽秸氨㎝秆荷秖磷把籔猭刮カチ炒礚猭秆∕いτ璶猭畑禗窖猭
羆挡
и稱ㄊ﹛のさぱミ猭Ыずō膚〆穦Θㄆよは癸チ觅ΘΘミ羬ミ猭穦の临碿猭よ眏疨у蝶翠┎筁寸戳舩窥糤そ秨やэ到チネ╯澈-
稱翠ǐよ稱盢翠盿或妓挂иぃ稱翠ゼㄓ跑ΘΤい瓣疭︹戈セ竡穦琂Τい瓣瞷現獀㎝盡Τ侣Α戈セ竡竒蕾玠㎝筀硂Ч琌笻は俱穦祇甶奸瑈и-
﹚璶は癸翠硂妓癶
矪筁寸闽翠璝璶Θ龟筋"瓣ㄢ翠チ獀翠"膥尿蝴и-
羉篴铆﹚㎝秈˙埃"┹甶竒蕾э到チネ"㎝и-
跌癸チ翠ゲ斗眏そチ種醚㎝癸舦┯踞硂琌翠Θ膀ホ
セ略朝勉
DR LEONG CHE-HUNG: Mr President, I move that the debate on this motion be adjourned.
PRESIDENT: Hold on a minute, please. Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, do you have a point of order?
辩模┚某畊ネи稱矗某ㄆ祘拜肈碞琌и祇ㄇē阶璶иэ......
PRESIDENT: I said I had made my ruling, but I shall give the explanation to Members at the next sitting.
辩模┚某畊ネ癸ぃ癬瞷ぃи秆睦и璶―盢иセ某ㄆ魁い︓倒и睲贰秆睦и穦篗и弧杠┪穝舱麓и
PRESIDENT: I think Members would understand that no words would be deleted from the Hansard. The words will remain there.
辩模┚某種琌玂痙и泊临琌ㄤ㎡
PRESIDENT: Yes, your original words. The words will be retained in the Hansard. But I found the words somewhat offensive, so I asked you to rephrase them or to indicate whether you were alluding to some Members. I shall give Members an explanation at the next sitting.
DR LEONG CHE-HUNG: Mr President, I move that the debate on the motion be adjourned.
Question on the adjournment proposed, put and agreed to.
MEMBER'S MOTIONS
LANDLORD AND TENANT (CONSOLIDATION) ORDINANCE
MR JAMES TO to move the following motion:
"That the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance be amended by repealing sections 53A(4)(a) and 119F(4)(a) and substituting -
"(a) The compensation ordered by the Tribunal under subsection (2) shall be -
(i) where the rateable value of the premises does not exceed $90,000, an amount equal to 5 times the rateable value of the premises;
(ii) where the rateable value of the premises exceeds $90,000, the aggregate of $450,000 and an amount equal to 1.7 times the rateable value in excess of $90,000."."
襖略ビ某璓勉畊ネи笆某硄筁某ㄆ祘┮更и某и矗某Ξ璹穨籔侯兵ㄒず┮砏﹚竭纕肂и辨產秆睦Τ闽璉春瞷穨㎝祇甶坝璶―猭畑Μ加箋ガ㏑ㄓ╊加︘セō琌⊿Τ竚τ硂ョ陪ボ顶糷カチ﹡︘拜肈よ┮笿エ螟筁碭セЫぃ耞璶―現┎浪癚Τ闽カ跋現郸珹竭纕現郸㎝竚現郸竒碭セЫ︓纯竒笆某宁砫現┎暗眔び篊莱赣荷еЧΘの龟琁竚現郸
瞷龟ㄓ弧﹡チ╊加螟т続﹡┮τ癸﹚螟螟Τ碭よ材-
ビ叫そ近"加"ご换换礚戳ㄏ現┎碞盢ㄓ﹚俱砰┬郸菠箂箂┪現┎ご礛琌┯空盢キА近丁パ︓きτ現┎ョ弧硂竒琌獶盽義㎝Τ緕暗猭よ瞷侣加睲╊ら侣加ど碩獶盽璶т続﹡┮琌獶盽螟-
ぃ琌稱тㄇ耕穝加侣加竒砆╊┮-
砆тㄇ耕禥耕穝加иぃ琌弧穝琌耕穝竒禥よи-
さΩ璹竭纕肂禯瞒Ω秸俱竒钡τ產ョ睲贰俱ンㄆ菌Ω秸俱禯瞒Ω秸俱琌畉ぃΤ讽秸俱瘤礛弧笷龟悔Τ⊿Τ秸俱禯瞒穦┮钡ㄇ逼琌獶盽ぇ环
и矗さΩ某笆诀ぃ琌璶过┏秆∕カチ挂璶过┏腊-
秆∕环﹡︘拜肈龟璶单現┎カ跋現郸环┬郸菠俱砰砏购現郸㎝┬現郸单よ皌暗иさΩ矗蔼竭纕肂琌辨腊カチ筁螟闽現┎э跑現郸現┎э跑猭ㄒ現┎糤そ㎝﹡镑矗ㄑ竚︓或и璹穦琌矗蔼き㎡瞷祇甶そ㎝玻坝秈︽ㄇ璸购常疉のカ跋ず侣加程竭纕肂琌き程蔼琌6.5┮и粄硂琌伐ㄣ把σ基ョ莱赣ぃ穦紇臫カ跋˙ワ瞷龟竭纕肂膀娄琵產σ納︓或琌90,000じ㎡ㄤ龟90,000じず琌き90,000じ琌緇肂1.7и㎝現┎癚阶筁硂拜肈τ現┎ョ弧场き杠穦癸肂めㄓ眔び築磏┮辨搭琌и獽辨璹﹚瞶祘癸痷惠璶腊め镑矗蔼
и把σ┬〆穦絪皌夹非程夹非琌7.5キよμ狦キА虫︗璸衡ㄓ獽琌88,000じ畉昏︳竒筁彼きぇ獽琌90,000じ硂ぃ筁琌计狦るㄓ弧琌7,500じ┪加ㄓ弧カ跋Τ硂妓加狦ㄇ加だめ耕┪Τ泞︗狾丁┬㎝徽单玥畉昏︳︓蔼笷90,000︓100,000じ炊筂カチ﹡︘拜肈ぃ琌虫綼竭纕秆∕-
惠璶現┎Τ緕矗ㄇよΤ某弧︙ぃ琵現┎祔┪┏矗ㄇ俱砰よ㎡и辨虏虫秆睦カ跋現郸竒浪癚иセ玡痷癸現┎Τㄇ獺みヴ舅ぃ耞辨弧狝и弧俱砰Τ糽缉Τ辨現┎穦Τ緕矗某и单琌и獽–る单Ωミ猭Ы矗拜肈秨"Panel"穦蛤秈るる沧╈иぃ窽Τ翴ア辨︓Τㄇ极┮и谋眔カチ瞷琌璚竒獷惠穿も硂よ╈眔びи-
镑单㎡┮и辨のΝ盢竭纕肂矗蔼硂ぃボ現┎埃砫ヴㄓ矗Ч俱よ秆∕﹡︘拜肈ョぃ单現┎┑筐矗ウセョ辨е浪癚穨籔︘侯璹兵ㄒよ疭璶琌現┎筁┕碭Ω穦某常ボ辨だめ畉昏︳竭纕膀娄硂琌璶翴某иョ獶盽猋洁ョ惠璶糤Τ闽籃蹿㎝菏窽㎝眏磅猭ňゎ穦糤獶猭Μ加
畊ネи辨︗ㄆ镑砰教ㄤ龟カチ琌Τ瞷龟螟и-
辨镑糤-
竭纕琵-
筁螟闽
セ略朝勉矗某
Question on the motion proposed.
PRESIDENT: The Secretary for Housing and Dr LAW Cheung-kwok have separately given notices to move amendments to this motion. As there are two amendments to the motion, I propose to have the motion and the two amendments debated together in a joint debate.
The Council shall now debate the motion and the amendments together in a joint debate. As Members were informed by circular on 22 March, I shall ask the Secretary for Housing to speak first, to be followed by Dr LAW Cheung-kwok; but no amendments are to be moved at this stage. Members may then express their views on the main motion as well as on the proposed amendments listed on the Order Paper.
┬璓勉畊ネさぱ某惠璶癸Τ兜某场常琌蠢紇臫め璹﹚蔼竭纕肂ウ-
ぇ丁╯澈Τ或龟借だ︙現┎璶矗琌程竭纕肂某и叫︗某灿み稱稱礛∕﹚妓щ布襖略ビ某矗某ヘ琌矗ㄑτ程矪だ甧ま產や玱┛菠ㄤ拜肈︗某莱赣み稱稱钡硂兜ま某穦Τ或狦场だ某粄虏虫快猭獽琌钡霉不瓣某猂癑某┮孔"い丁辅茎"竭纕猭﹚程肂拜肈ぃ琌ぃ莱赣琌"量基"拜肈玥現┎ぃ禣だゅ㎝ぃ笆ノヴ︙そ┊薄鶪淮矗耕襖某㎝霉某某基蔼竭纕∕某現┎ぃ穦蹦硂贺"Μ禦み"も猭┪ぃ璽砫ヴ∕﹚は現┎粄程璶琌璶穨㎝穦よ痲ぇ丁―瞶キ颗и辨︗某眖硂à灿╯襖某㎝霉某某╯硂ㄇ某癸穨㎝穦俱砰Τ或紇臫
и稱酵酵よ紇臫眔竭纕肂玡碩矗蔼讽竒璹猭﹚程竭纕肂跑Τ闽加莱揭畉昏1.7らㄓ現┎ョ秆и-
琌惠璶暗ㄇ腊ㄇ砲τア﹡┮疭琌êㄇ︘︗狾丁┬㎝虫ō┬丁さぱ現┎璹種琌ぃ紇臫穨㎝穦俱砰痲は襖某㎝霉某某穦旧璓耕碔肝眔エ痲τ龟悔硂ㄇ碔肝狦璶砎穝﹡┮ぃ穦Τ或螟羭ㄒτē︘る20,000じ虫︗產畑盢莉眔ぃぶ700,000じ竭纕环环禬-
龟悔┮惠计肂は瞶莱眔程竒蕾穿êㄇ﹡︘莱揭祙畉昏–ぶ30,000じ虫︗だめ襖某㎝霉某某ゼ秆∕硂拜肈ョゼゲㄏ-
莉眔続讽竭纕
材и稱酵酵穨よ硂贺臛阶い產穦┛菠穨猭舦ㄤ龟穨局Τ癸︑穨猭舦安穨稱Μ妮︑虫︗ㄓ︑ノ礚斗や竭纕璝疉の加и-
種穨惠璶腊┯踞场だ綞眕禣ノぃ筁沮襖某㎝霉某某穨惠禬禫瞶キ竭纕肂龟悔璶单穨基场だ鶪ぃ阶┪︘め﹡︘丁琌┪祏竭纕肂妓羭ㄒㄓ弧畒ㄥ侣Α加ず狦︘骸ㄢ–る琌5,000じ沮襖某某狦加硂眔300,000じ竭纕狦沮霉某某竭纕肂笷360,000じ单硂﹡︘硂加ず戳丁穨煤羆肂叫產稱稱硂癸穨τē琌そキ
钡ㄓи稱酵酵材よи-
惠璶σ納材摸痲-
獽琌カチ渤︗某睲贰笵現┎┯空╬祇甶诀篶き〓せ︓箂箂箂〓箂箂せ戳丁Θ195 000╬︘虫︗и-
︳璸硂计ヘい妮璸购虫︗程セЫΤㄇ某纯拜и硂ヘ夹龟瞷и獽氮滦弧現┎﹚穦絛瞅ず砞猭╬诀篶и-
︳璸硂ヘ夹琌笷ぃ筁狦襖某┪霉某某莉眔硄筁﹚穦矗蔼Θセ╬祇甶诀篶癸ア砍届眖τ紇臫╬︘砍计秖︗某ぃ璶糤竭纕肂┮盿ㄓ肂璽踞穦辅Τや穝糤肂砏家穨祇甶そ┪祇甶そㄤ龟狦诀篶ì窥Τ或ノ耕侣跋璸购场だㄌ苦砏家そ把籔秈︽硂ㄇそ琂礛戈方龟ぃ甧や艼糤竭纕肂и-
璶睲贰ㄢ︗某┮某猭﹚肂ぃ筁琌程竭纕肂龟悔╬祇甶诀篶程┮惠璶肂盢穦琌蔼┮現┎箇安襖某┪霉某某莉眔硄筁加硉盢穦絯︓穦旧璓璸购︓紇臫祘Τ腨獽璶痙らΩ蝶︳琌紇臫盢穦琌瞷单糵掉竝掉﹚κパ襖某㎝霉某某Τ發饭陪礛ま兜诀獽琌穨㎝╬祇甶诀篶盢穦Θセ糤τ沧ゎ瞷硂猭祘ㄢ︗某┮矗某獶ぃ砲產畑矗ㄑ惠穿τ龟悔穦旧璓摧瘆ぃ臭カず跋筐筐礚猭睲╊э到カ跋吏挂˙ワ絯紇臫╬︘秖Τ禗и硂穦р穨基矗蔼癸翠穦ぃ穦Τ矪
︓現┎さぱ┮矗は某琌酚め穨㎝穦よ痲ㄓ耞琌そキ㎝А颗現┎某秸俱よ猭皐癸耕砲絘め-
┮眔干纕肂环耕瞷ぃ穦碔肝め碩磃и-
р硂秸俱璸衡よ猭材˙匡﹚莱揭畉昏30,000じ硂キì酚臮︘︗狾丁┬㎝何┬めのだめ-
莉眔程碩碞莱揭畉昏60,000じㄥ侣Α加τē程竭纕肂盢パ瞷102,000じ糤︓255,000じキАㄓ弧め莉眔莱揭畉昏程竭纕硂计ヘ籔瞷硓筁╬酵┮笷ΘキА肂璝珿硂琌瞶現┎某ョキ颗臮穨㎝痲某琂э到砲挂鶪ョ玱穨ぃそキ笿穨ョ礚惠掸筁蔼竭纕肂︽ㄏ-
猭舦
程τ程璶翴琌現┎某続ノタネ讽ら┪矗ユ糵掉竝硂妓暗猭磷襖某┪霉某┮矗某ス硄筁癸瞷Τ祇甶璸购盿ㄓ睼睹薄鶪㎝璽紇臫ㄤ龟程よ猭琌﹚甅璹猭ㄒぃ紇臫カ跋種饼玡矗ョ玂毁︘痲ㄤ龟現┎ㄓ種獽琌р瞷俱虫︗莱揭畉昏夹非ㄓ璸衡竭纕肂эだ虫︗硂贺だ舥莱揭畉昏非玥ㄓ璸衡硂妓獽絋玂だめ莉眔莱Τ竭纕ョ眏癸玂毁-
綝獶猭笹綞㎝奶耑ぃ筁だ堡鲸恨襖某硂兜禩礛矗某琌Τ陪翴ご礛∕﹚ノ笆某よΑさぱ矗璹竭纕肂-
∕﹚セЫ某ぃ单現┎ㄓ耕よΤǎの現┎絋玂糤干纕肂场だ磃の痷タΤ惠璶め㎝荷秖搭癸カ跋胊紇臫さぱ礚ㄤ快猭Τ矗硂兜璹某現┎某琌程瞶㎝程そキよи略叫︗某眖そキà颗秖兜某程∕﹚や現┎璹
谅谅畊ネ
霉不瓣某璓勉谅谅畊ネさぱ襖略ビ某╬猭眔ミ猭Ы癚阶㎝щ布琌は琈カチ籔玻坝戳àΘ狦
襖略ビ某ㄓ闽猔侣加癸め竭纕ぃそキ拜肈現┎碞Τ闽現郸╈╈薄鶪驾礛矗某琌眔и-
硂竤チ狝叭某碙穛㎝厩策篯妓
チ癸襖略ビ某某ㄢ翴м砃璹τ硂ㄇ璹讽礛ョ琌は琈チ把現瞶稱
材и-
琌辨癸﹡︘侣加砲矗ㄑ竭纕撤い癳碞30,000じ┪莱揭畉昏加и-
璹琌竭纕肂﹚琌菠蔼襖某笆某き
材и-
琌辨磷癸碔Τめ繟睰竭纕碞90,000じ┪莱揭畉昏加и-
璹竭纕肂琌琌筁襖某1.7┬у蝶某のи-
タ琌穦旧璓搭篊╬加搭ぶ加基ど硂ㄇЧ琌⊿Τや阶沮и硂璶谅谅︗そ秨や┪┯空やチタ某ㄏи-
霍玂毁穦い畓墩竤э到砲碔腶碿てよ今"薄瞶猭"˙
碞チタ郭Θ某Τ絞冈灿だ猂ゅ彻肚倒產把στ郭Θ某ョ穦碞タ秈˙祇ē
セ略朝勉矗硂タ谅谅
MRS SELINA CHOW: Mr President, as Chairman of the Subcommittee set up to study the motion on Resolution under Sections 53A(4)(e) and 119F(4)(e) of the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7), I would like to report briefly on our deliberations to facilitate the Council's decision. The Subcommittee has met three times to study Honourable James TO's Resolution. In the course of deliberations, the Subcommittee also examined Dr the Honourable LAW Cheung-kwok's proposed amendment and the counter proposals by the Administration. To facilitate the Subcommittee's consideration of the various proposals, the Subcommittee invited various interested parties to express views on the subject. A summary of the views collected as well as a comparison of the three proposals have already been circulated to Members of this Council.
The Subcommittee has agreed on certain principles but has not come up with any recommendations as to which of the proposals put before the Subcommittee should be adopted. This I have already explained in the Subcommittee's report and do not intend to go into the details here. In gist, the Subcommittee agrees that compensation for tenants affected by redevelopment should be increased to assist dispossessed tenants in finding alternative accommodation and in overcoming financial hardship arising from relocation. We also agree that the alternative basis for calculating compensation should enable tenants who are most in need to receive enhanced compensation, but without necessarily benefiting better-off tenants. The Subcommittee further agrees that attention should also be focused on the needs of sub-tenants, such as those living in bedspaces, cubicles, cocklofts and bedrooms. These are the people who are most in need of assistance but the current legislation has not provided for the separate calculation of the rateable values of the sublet premises.
The Subcommittee, on the other hand, also noted that there are concerns among some Members and interested parties over the impact of a much enhanced compensation package on the pace of urban renewal. It has been pointed out to the Subcommittee that the raising of the minimum level of statutory compensation might make urban renewal less commercially viable, and it would prolong the process of negotiations between the developers and tenants, resulting in higher costs and longer time for redeveloping the old urban areas.
As far as the actual formula for calculating the minimum level of statutory compensation is concerned, Members of the Subcommittee have not reached any consensus views. It was therefore agreed that Mr TO's proposed resolution and Dr LAW's proposed amendment, (as well as the amendment by the Administration) should be put before this Council this evening for Members' decision.
糂ホ某璓勉谅谅畊畊ネи祇ēや襖略ビ某某㎝霉不瓣某タ癸τア﹡┮╬加︘め矗ㄑ穿拜肈筁碭セЫ秈︽Ω癚阶瞷癸め竭纕猭﹚程干纕莱揭畉昏1.7硄筁и碞纯矗璹辨盢1.7矗蔼︓ㄢ堡讽綝セЫ∕さぱ︓ぶ硈現┎矗癸程灿縩程ぶ虫︗め矗ㄑき干纕
瘤礛現┎某环环ゼ秆∕硂拜肈ョ竒筁穦程ぶ琌Τㄇ醚碞琌璶碩糤ネ程螟め干纕计肂硂礚阶︙常琌兜秈˙ぃ筁礚阶さぱ硄筁êよ╬加め拜肈﹍沧ゼ秆∕癸顶糷╬加めㄓ弧程璶ㄤ龟琌莉眔竚镑Τ稧甧ō贾痕矗蔼干纕肂弧琌"芉"めパ贺侣加穐贺侣加琿丁穦τ砆穐ǐㄏ琌Τ干纕ョ琌礚干ㄆ眔и-
闽み拜肈琌侣加ぱ﹡チㄆ龟カ跋ぃぶ侣加Τ计ぃぶぱ﹡チパ-
﹡┮砆粄琌獶猭-
Ч眔ぃヴ︙干纕-
矪挂琌璚璚и玃叫現┎ぃ璶╈ゲ斗荷е矗甅秆∕╬加め竚カ跋現郸秆∕顶糷カチ惠璶
畊ネи谅谅セ略朝勉
腑瓣辆某璓勉畊ネ蒥跋琌セЫㄆ闽猔揭肈ぇΤ︑礛碞瞷竭纕竚拜肈翠┎菌更籹Θ蒥跋吭高ゅンい硂柑ョ┯粄蒥跋ㄤい兜程雌も拜肈琌竚紇臫
翠矪侣跋タぃ耞ρて埃-
﹡︘吏挂碿ョま祇穦拜肈翠硂ぶよ璶Τì镑ㄑ莱盢ㄓぇノ蒥跋孔琌ゼㄓ祇甶璶ㄓ方┮蒥跋琌ぃ琁堡琌現┎常甅Ч俱蒥跋郸菠蒥跋硉氨孩ぃ玡
︗ㄆ常笵蒥跋璶ヘ夹ㄤ龟琌璶侣跋﹡チネ吏挂眔э到ㄆ籔腀笻ㄓ侣跋﹡チ琌Θ碾珇ネ吏挂ぃ虫ゎ⊿Τ锣は琌–鶪禫瞷瞷竭纕琌琌莱揭畉昏1.7τ琌竒⊿Τ浪癚Τ竭纕癸疭琌だめ︗︘单硂痁竒蕾程惠璶腊﹡チㄓ弧玧眏跋︘妓縩虫︗碭る钡ㄓら玥琌奸贾"︑臮︑"程Τ┬跑い┬い┬跑灿┬灿┬跑︗и钡牟翠畄﹁跋﹡チㄒヘ玡︘2801,200じ莉竭纕阀45,288じ︘妓縩よ–る璶ユ5,800じ竭纕肂ì镑-
やるぇ碞ぱ㏑
癸竭纕拜肈チ羛玥琌竭纕ゲ斗璶玂毁だめ痲τ腊竒蕾Τ螟め惠臮の把ぉ蒥跋祇甶坝種饼ぃ穦ゴ阑ㄢぇ丁キ颗さら襖某霉某㎝翠┎常だ矗︑よ硂琂稰舧尺稰磀舧尺琌侣跋﹡チ竭纕拜肈沧"眔冻秨ǎる"Τэ到ぱ磀琌現┎"ョ暗"璝ぃ琌Τ某矗∕某獺現┎ョぃ穦矗璹ゑぇ現┎竭纕よ癸﹡チㄓ弧琌程畉
眖把ぉ祇甶坝àτē讽礛琌辨禫ぶΘセ眔厨ヘ玡ㄣ肩借加闹笷20┪加,钡Θㄤ莱揭畉昏琌75,000じ襖某某穦莱揭畉昏90,000じ┪眔竭纕硑Θ碔禫碔瞷禜τョ皐癸┦硂ち糤竭纕肂よ琌よい祇甶坝惠璶程竭纕ョ琌祇甶坝程诀穦斌璸购よぃ琌程磃の程惠璶腊紇臫﹡チよ珿チ羛癸硂よΤ┮玂痙
ヘ玡祇甶そ﹡チ矗ㄑ竭纕兵ン珹瞷干纕莱揭畉昏5璝るず帽Т某肂莉眔1.5干纕Τる戳埃临矗ㄑぃōだ矗ㄑ膀セ肂干纕ㄢ耕蔼非临逼竚虫︗瞷現┎璹よ籔祇そ竭纕兵ンゑ畉禯τョ陪眔玂珿チ羛粄現┎矗糤竭纕肂よ瘤礛龟借糤竭纕玱ゼ癸Τ惠璶﹡チ矗ㄑ程腊
畊ネㄤ龟紇臫﹡チ璶―竭纕-
ぃ琌"蔼ㄓ禦"礚阶竭纕肂矗蔼︓︙贺キ拜肈﹍沧琌ゼ痷タ秆∕﹡チ碝砎耕ッ┦聪ōぇ┮程沧秆∕拜肈膒挡┮
さら矗竭纕よ常ぃセ︗︘だめ单竤程惠璶腊﹡チ矗ㄑ程玂毁よョぃ琌キ颗糤竚竭纕籔把ぉ祇甶坝щ戈種饼ぃ砆ゴ阑ぱ讽礛矗硂ㄇ筁寸よ羆耕璶﹡チ礚ゎ挂单ぃ現┎︙穦矗-
粄"程ㄎ"よ玡и-
チ羛よ讽い匡拒程磃の程惠璶腊膀糷﹡チよ
チ羛玃叫現┎璶翠俱砰痲玡矗荷е浪癚㎝蝶︳ヘ玡硉﹚Ч到竭纕現郸だ酚臮だめ︗︗单竒蕾惠璶腊﹡チ﹚腨糉猭ㄒゴ阑獶猭も琿Μ加ぃ▆だョ璶σ納盡穨刮砰種ǎ﹡︘戳祏络﹚竭纕夹非
畊ネ眖环àτē現┎莱┬〆穦㎝┬穦矗ㄑ砍そ犁┬ㄏ紇臫﹡チ常眔Ч㎝瞶竚
畊ネセ略朝勉
MR DAVID CHU: Mr President, the Honourable James TO's motion and Dr the Honourable LAW Cheung-kwok's amendment put the responsibility for social welfare and housing on the landlord. If adopted, their demands would place a questioned burden on the property owner and there will be a distribution of wealth by legislation rather than market forces. I would therefore vote against them.
To ask a landlord to give a tenant paying $8,300 a month almost half a million dollars (roughly equivalent to five years of rental) to get back his own property is ridiculous and a direct attack on private property ownership and a giant step towards socialism. I agree there is a need to help poor tenants in a mulit- occupant housing unit to settle. The Government's amendment is in the right direction. It is my understanding that the Government intends to differentiate compensation for flats with many tenants from those with single tenants and the expensive units, but this would take some time. Those paying $20,000 rent a month certainly does not need help. I support the Government's amendment today as a temporary measure while a lasting solution is being carefully considered.
The personal hardship of tenants should be taken care of by our social welfare and public housing systems and it surely is not the responsibility of the landlord.
Thank you, Mr President.
郭Θ某璓勉畊ネиチ祇ēチ矗タ琌酚臮膀糷竭纕よチ粄カ跋斗キ颗ㄢよ痲材琌紇臫﹡チ莉眔瞶竭纕の竚材琌祇甶坝眔瞶厨
瞷︽猭ㄒ礚砏﹚祇甶坝斗竚め瞷兜某常⊿Τ过┏秆∕め竚よ惠璶拜肈硂拜肈琂琌–よぃìぇ矪ョ琌セЫゼㄓら膀糷碝―秆∕よ猭τよ
チタΤ膀セ玥材琌酚臮膀糷筁祘い竒蕾兵ン耕畉め莱赣眔耕だ酚臮瞷惠璶秈︽侣Α加虫︗莱揭畉昏キА6窾じチ某硂6窾じ畉昏购兵だ絬礛3窾じ购だ絬9窾じ购だ絬硂妓獽穦盢畉昏购Θだ–3窾じ秸俱竭纕肂チ某﹡莱揭畉昏3窾じ虫︗め竭纕肂莱赣莉耕碩矗蔼竭纕肂莱赣莱揭畉昏-
莉眔ì镑竭纕肂砎︘虫︗
材玥碞琌璶磷筁だ築磏癸êㄇ⊿Τ惠璶钡竒蕾穿ㄤ莉眔竭纕莱赣続讽秸磷筁だ築磏┮チ某蹦秸俱干纕璸衡よ猭某êㄇ莱揭畉昏禬筁9窾じ虫︗9窾じ緇计硂兜逼磷糤祇甶坝ぃゲ璶肂Θセ
材碞琌竭纕肂碩放㎝τ瞶沮チよτ矗蔼竭纕肂ご礛Θセ讽κだゑチ粄羭ぃ穦祇甶坝崩︽種饼ぃ穦カ跋璸购τ氨箉
畊ネ礚阶セЫ硄筁よいヴ︙よカ跋程み竚拜肈ごゼ莉秆∕┮チ璶―現┎蛤秈ㄢ兜材琌浪癚穨籔侯兵ㄒ荷е矗ユセЫ癚阶材琌碞紇臫め竚拜肈秈︽現郸浪癚荷е矗ユセЫ癚阶
セ略朝勉
MR RONALD ARCULLI: Thank you. Mr President, I have listened attentively to the reasons advanced by Mr James TO, the Secretary for Housing and Dr Law Cheung-kwok in support of the motion and the amendments before Members tonight.
I confess I am sympathetic with the plight of those bedspace or cubicle tenants, particularly those needy ones, whose homes may be the plight and who may fall victim to urban renewal. The present structure of compensation as provided in our laws was devised many years ago and may seem inappropriate, at least in parts, for present-day Hong Kong. We have the difficulty in seeking a balance between the plight of those in need and the desperate need for urban renewal with a consequent result of production of more homes for the community.
This issue has been long debated in this Council, including the issue of relocation and rehousing of the unfortunate tenants or subtenants that are caught up in urban renewal. The increase in compensation proposed, whether by the Administration, by Mr James TO or Dr LAW, does not really achieve the dual objective of helping those in need on the one hand and ensuring urban renewal on the other. The Administration has repeatedly said that to ensure those in need are given the help they need, the proposals advanced to this Council tonight do not achieve such an objective in its entirety.
To do so the Administration tells us that there has to be a change in law. I entirely agree with that particular observation because I tried to propose an amendment that will achieve what I believe might be more equitable and the balance that we need, and sadly I confess that I do not have the wherewithal to actually produce an amendment within a very short time.
So I say this to the Administration: Do not speak with a forked tongue. If you really believe, if you really want to help, if you want to help those in need, if you want to achieve urban renewal, do something quickly. Members in this Council have been patient over the past years, and I think I would like to say, Mr President, on record, that I do not in any way attribute any blame to the Secretary of Housing or indeed his neighbour, the Secretary for Planning, Environment and Lands, because the complaint of this Council happened before the two of them took office in their respective offices today. So, it just goes to show how long we have been waiting.
That having been said, my colleagues and I in the Liberal Party want a comprehensive solution. We do not believe in patchwork solutions which may have consequences that are wholly unintended. The proposal tonight does not achieve that objective. We want a fair, reasonable and long-term solution. For these reasons, Mr President, the Liberal Party will vote against the two amendments and the motion.
朝岸穨某璓勉畊ネ碞甃ㄎ瞶某癸現┎蝶阶и︑琌κだぇκやミ猭Ы籔甃ㄎ瞶某ㄆê或иぶ觅Θē阶瘤礛у蝶襖略ビ某矗よ琌"干鱥"璣ゅ琌patch workい亩"干鱥"ゼ琌タ絋狦璶礜逗杠Τ鱥干羆耕礚鱥干ㄎ
畊ネΤ闽矗蔼竭纕程肂某ぃぶ㎝刮砰珹祇ē┬ず矗璓阶沮碞琌弧硂妓穦紇臫硉穦紇臫穝虫︗ㄑ莱秖琌и稱闽竭纕拜肈ㄤ龟竭纕肂俱兜璸购俱砰秨や场だ竭纕肂パ1.7ど︓き羆肂璓ョ琌どオ硂┮孔糤碩俱秨やτēョ琌稬ぃì笵ぃ穦紇臫硉讽礛弧Ч⊿Τ紇臫ョ獶ㄆ龟紇臫玱琌稬ㄤ稬狦現┎絋Τ種祇甶坝秈︽杠よ搭祇甶坝ㄤ秨や辣干硂よ肂秨やΤㄇ祇甶坝癸и弧芖跋い璸购い現┎糵у祘琁┑–る秨や笷100窾狦現┎痷タΤ港種侣跋よ祇甶坝杠虫虫竒辣干┮弧竭纕肂糤碩
崩︽璸购ぃ琌虫虫玻坝┪穨垦忌璶ヘ琌э到跋吏挂矗蔼﹡チネ借のだノ翠伐ぶ程璶琌㎝ぇ丁㎝坑τが皌笲ノㄆ龟筁ㄓ玻坝カ跋璶刮砰よ暗┮眔柬ョぃぶ琌ㄓ某竒矗穨疭琌ㄇ狾丁┬㎝侣虫︗穨舦痲┕┕砆┛跌┮現┎狦ぃ眖硉矗俱砰璸购и獺ゼㄓら疭琌ゼㄓ穦Τ某矗某兵ㄒ酚臮瞷紇臫τ綝簔跌竤辨-
舦痲眔玂毁
Τ闽竭纕穦紇臫璸购阶秸и稱羭ㄢ龟龟ㄒ靡狦祇甶坝粄璸购俱砰琌Τ瓜杠竭纕肂碩矗蔼ㄤいㄒ碞琌芖跋兜璸购祇甶坝璶祇甶跋τ︑︽匡﹚璸购狦︘め腀種把籔璸购杠–︘め莉40︓60窾じ竭纕硂肂竒计璸禬筁瞷兜璸购祇甶坝竭纕计10窾じ倒腀種把籔穨舦┪︘めぇ祇甶坝ョ┯空虫︗传ㄢ虫︗碞琌弧狦腀種把籔璸购祇甶坝獽穦倒ㄢ穝虫︗ぉ穨舦┮よ穦ま癬祇甶坝砍届τぃ琌虫虫竭纕肂拜肈狦現┎痷ê或闽猔竭纕肂癸紇臫ㄤ龟現┎┯踞竚砫ヴи獺甃ㄎ瞶某莱赣舧現┎硂兜∕﹚
ㄤ龟現┎よ痲ぃぶ瞷現┎Μ痲い耕陪帝场だ琌干基よΜ痲临Τ芥Μ痲よ安禬筁琘縩ゑㄒ籔セノ硚Τ┮ぃ干基Μ痲┕┕计货璸┪10货璸┮現┎癩現よΤ┮眔痲礛τ現┎玱礚斗璽ヴ︙砫ヴ玻坝㎝穨よ︑︽酵Т兵ン現┎獽砋砋キ礚斗璽ヴ︙竚砫ヴи谋眔硂妓ぃ瞶狦現┎粄竭纕肂痷穦紇臫玥現┎┯踞竚砫ヴτ玻坝玥礚斗や竚竭纕肂眖τ硉ョ穨㎝︘眔瞶竚弧琌羭计眔
現┎弧ㄤà︹琌璶キ颗よ痲┬独琍地弧硂珹穨㎝カチ玱⊿Τ矗の祇甶坝ゼ現┎跌祇甶坝à︹穨临琌穦狦痷璶キ颗痲杠碭︗某矗碞琌璶玂毁顶糷êㄇ–る计じ侣加狾丁┬㎝︗め舦痲現┎穝矗よ玂毁ぃì筁現┎㎝カ砏购〆穦熬砇璸购祇甶坝τ癸穨㎝玥玂毁某㎝チ囊妓ì单狦┬独琍地Ν玡矗よи獺某常穦猋礛钡瞷岿ぃ┬独琍地タ甃ㄎ瞶某┮弧岿玡ヴ砏购吏挂現╈┑и-
г礚г┮硂Ω弧琌岿ぃ瞷ヴ﹛ぃ筁и-
龟ぃ膥尿单
畊ネ襖略ビ某矗某ぇ┬穦羆稦ㄆ默紋㎝ネ矗狦硂よ莉硄筁獽穦紇臫┬芖刁㎝绊ェ璸购筁穝籇厨笵и极產篋ǎи极家妓拜肈カ砏购〆穦Ν硄筁パ┬穦祇甶芖刁㎝绊ェ玡竒硄筁┬玡秨﹍侣竭纕よ秈︽Μ潦さぱゎ┬穦芖刁㎝绊ェごゼ秈︽ヴ︙Μ潦瞷玱澈弧狦硄筁穝よ獽穦紇臫玡砏〆穦竒硄筁璸购и谋眔硂ㄇ弧杠ぃ璽砫ヴ┋τ┬独琍地⊿Τまノ┬硂ㄒ┬琌猭﹚刮砰τ莱琌璽砫ヴ猭﹚刮砰独琍地ネ琌┬磅︽〆穦Θ現┎ゲ斗菏诡硂摸舱麓崩笆-
硉辨┬らぃ璶襖略ビ某某莉硄筁瞶パτぃ芖刁㎝绊ェ玥盢砫ヴ崩襖略ビ某ōи谋眔硂妓ē阶琌ぃ璽砫ヴ㎝пΡㄆ龟暗猭
畊ネи程稱矗翴碞琌Τ闽せ璸购┬独琍地ョ矗筁狦硄筁硂璸购杠癸ゼㄓせ砍195 000虫︗ヘ夹穦Τ紇臫и稱癘魁碞琌秖Τ2窾オョゼ笷–32 500夹︓せ计︳璸╬计ョ琌19 000オぃì2窾ㄢ璸ョ碩現┎夹狦弧穝某よ穦紇臫璸购┮矗ㄑ╬加计秖ョ琌ぃ才ㄆ龟弧猭
畊ネи辨產镑や襖略ビ某┪霉不瓣某よ紇臫侣加﹡チ舦痲眔瞶玂毁硂琌и-
ㄓ┮粳иョΩ窗玃現┎碞俱砰璸购荷е矗ユ瞶俱砰よ拜肈莉眔瞶秆∕玥現┎穦ㄏи-
ら矗某兵ㄒ
谅谅畊ネ
バ玊某璓勉畊ネи稱弧瘤礛и眖ㄆ玻ネ種и礚斗ビ厨痲иぃ来暗硂贺Μ潦竭纕ネ種眖玻ネ種àτēи-
琌"诨朢逗"琌腀種窥禦璶硂遏さぱカ基琌ぶ礛繷璸衡寥ぶ穦∕﹚禦糽加チ㎝チ囊祇ē阶琌弧祇甶坝碞琌坝-
┮炊硄膀糷カチ玱篏籯┏
眖祇甶坝àㄓ硂ンㄆ籔и-
⊿Τ闽玒祇甶坝100窾じㄓ穨-
琌膀糷カチ90窾じ︘10窾じ-
┮弧10窾じ跑40窾じㄤ龟甧璸衡ㄓ碞琌祇甶坝倒穨60窾じ禦侣虫︗繦倒︘40窾じ祇甶坝琌100窾じτ︙ご礛琌100窾じ㎡硂100窾じ璶竭纕倒碭め縱禣獽单瞷5,000じキよ虫︗穝加芥基窥ご妓
ㄆ龟狦弧チ硂兜某琌腊膀糷ㄆ龟琌腊膀糷い︘甡膀糷い穨籔祇甶坝㎝坝弧琌⊿Τ闽玒チ眔膀糷︘やΤぃぶ膀糷カチ玱暗篏穨ゼ-
Τ︙猭㎡
谅谅畊ネ
ッ笷某璓勉畊ネΤ闽さぱ臛阶碭兜某襖略ビ某㎝朝岸穨某酵筁ゅ彻芠翴иぃ狡ㄤ囊ㄆ矗ㄇ芠翴иョ種
筁硂或ㄓΤ闽侣加竭纕㎝竚拜肈竒劣锣鸟▆Τ芠翴琌產常睲贰τ璓碞琌计顶糷︘㎝め┮璶―ぃ倒ぉ-
1窾じ┪4窾じ竭纕τ琌莉皌丁铆﹚㎝︑倒︑ìそ恏虫︗硂琌计侣跋﹡チ┮程戴―冠稱ぃ筁產ぃフ碞琌瞷翠現┎俱璸购埃パ祇甶そ㎝┬穦┮秈︽ぶ秖璸购ず砞Τ闽︘竚逼ㄤ璸购常⊿Τ硂兜逼и琌┬〆穦〆癸硂兜ヘぃ妮┬〆穦┯空兜ヘョぃ妮矗ㄑ︘惠璶絛瞅稰框狙Τи钮ㄇ現┎﹛┪┬〆穦ㄆ弧и-
┬琌惠璶だ皌Τиョ篘ぃ繷福硂ㄇ︘カ跋跋ず狾丁┬┪泞﹡チ-
︘惠璶獶盽睲贰и獺-
ぃ琌碝―霉不瓣某┪襖略ビ某┪┬独琍地┮某竭纕肂硂竭纕肂镑-
既跋侣加砎眔虫︗既︘琿祏丁
ㄆ穦拜或硂ㄇ侣跋﹡チ︘惠璶⊿Τ┬〆穦┯踞兜ヘиミ猭Ы㎝┬〆穦ョΩ臛阶硂拜肈иョ篘ぃ繷福琎ぱи碞癩現箇衡祇ēョ弧筁и-
┮弧141 000虫︗硂ョ琌┬独琍地竒盽本娩计弧琌Τ種竡ョ弧琌礚種竡硂计種竡盢êㄇ穦计そ粄Τち┬惠璶︘惠―珹ず141 000虫︗硂计⊿Τ珹泞﹡チ︘惠璶ョ⊿Τ珹狾丁┬﹡チ︘惠璶のカ跋τぃ焙禥惠璶︓琌ぱ﹡チ惠璶埃Ιぇ141 000虫︗痷┬独琍地┮弧骸ì┮礶伴ず癸︘虫︗惠―
畊ネ硂顶琿矗蔼竭纕肂礚阶蹦ノ琌êよиЧ種琌ぃ秆∕拜肈-
眔既砎穝︘虫︗ぃびǒ璚硂ョ琌и-
莱赣暗и戳辨︗ㄆ癚阶筁硂拜肈Τ臛阶㎝醚τ醚碞琌現┎┬〆穦┬穦祇甶そ癸硂ㄇカ跋竚拜肈斗┯踞ぶ砫ヴ
иさぱ钮甃ㄎ瞶某㎝バ玊某祇ē瘤礛иぃ琌Ч種祇ēず甧и谋眔Τ场だ琌弧-
み羘瘤礛иぃ尺舧硂妓弧㈱フ弧ㄢ︗ネ種眖暗ネ種à狦基窥び禥-
痷⊿砍届把籔瞷拜肈狦и-
ヴ︙ㄆぃ暗硂ㄇ螟獽穦禫ㄓ禫┮и辨礚阶ê囊ê顶糷某常璶Τ醚碞琌и-
妓現┎矗璶―辨現┎硓筁瞶诀篶琌┬〆穦祇甶そ┬穦カ跋い┯踞﹚à︹
畊ネиョ稱酵酵弧Ω阶翴碞琌現┎瞷┮暗琌礚セネ種иぃΤê瓣產カ跋穦у挤硂或ぶ祇甶そ琌硂ㄢ眔翴ㄠу挤琵-
乃ㄇ︘虫︗秆∕拜肈現┎穝砏家砍れ竚近㎝ㄤ﹡チ癸硂ㄇセЫㄆ畉ぃΤ醚︘惠璶現┎玱ご礛盢-
惠―竚惠―兜ヘぇи辨さΩ臛阶ぃ琌沧挡τ琌秨﹍и-
現┎矗睲贰璶―璶―現┎カ跋よ珹そ犁场︑秈︽カ跋㎝╬祇甶坝秈︽カ跋よ睲贰络﹚現┎︘め竚拜肈莱┯踞或à︹и辨瞷环┬郸菠浪癚ず┬独琍地ぃ璶┛菠硂惠―硂惠―狵掸獽р硂惠―ㄓ硂拜肈玱き︓и-
カ跋钩瞷思常穦カ窗妓ㄇΝ戳祇甶辅跋カ㎝瓣產ぃ腀種蹿獽穦跑Θ砲チ竇薄鶪穦跑セ糉硂ぃ虫琌竒蕾戈方拜肈ョ琌穦拜肈┮и辨环┬郸菠浪癚ず現┎场莱赣盢硂惠―穝и-
环┯踞兜ヘい
谅谅畊ネ
PRESIDENT: I now invite Mr James TO to speak on the amendments to his motion. Mr TO.
襖略ビ某璓勉畊ネи祇ē莱ㄇ某癸タ┮矗種ǎ
и稱坚睲ㄇ芠翴らΤ厨彻иよ程禥竭纕肂程蔼龟悔ぃ琌硂妓狦酶瓜graphㄓ计畉昏︳の癸竭纕肂瓜獽穦祇瞷畉昏︳9窾じ┪ぇ陪霉不瓣某┮矗よ竭纕肂程蔼τиよい丁現┎よ玥程狦畉昏︳禬筁9窾じ玥иよ竭纕肂菠蔼霉不瓣某よ現┎よご礛琌程
┪иまノㄇ龟悔睲╊侣加竭纕计產獽笵иぃ稱碔禫碔硂琌粇秆龟悔硂妓薄鶪ぶ祇ネ︑腀Μ加竭纕い┮孔畑笷Θ某いΤ计κ﹙ㄤい畉昏︳12窾じ┪Τ10%ぃ璶弧琌Μ加竭纕碞琌璸衡瞷┮Τ加虫︗畉昏︳蔼12窾ョ14%┮狦產弧9窾じ畉昏︳竭纕筁┕计陪ボ龟悔Τ10%┮碞9窾じ畉昏︳竭纕肂ㄓ弧иよ衡琌い眅よぃ筁иョ種狦镑钩霉不瓣某よê妓虫︗︘め莉竭纕ㄇ玥и種
┬ョ矗Τ届芠翴狦Τ︘碭る┪ㄢ加獽睲╊杠獽眔竭纕礚狠狠祇笷狦琌硂妓杠┪┬刚刚侣加︘︘琌︘︘獽祇笷ぃ筁拜肈龟悔ぃê糽加穦砆睲╊ぃê糽加虫︗パ祇甶坝场禦ぃ禦┮Τ虫︗獽ぃ睲╊ㄏ緇穨舦ぃ┪┮Τ虫︗︘刚刚琌︽琌ㄆ龟カチセぃ穦硂妓暗﹡︘ぃ獽綝睲╊ㄒ龟悔╱ǎ祇ネ
沮20玡猭ㄒ┕璸衡竭纕肂痷籔︘﹡︘本恥硂ㄤ龟そ笵拜肈現┎20玡矗璹ㄢぃ本恥瞣疉び磅の靡沮拜肈﹡︘17临琌19竭纕獽Τぃ竒盽╉﹡︘戳琌1719临琌15琌現┎∕﹚璸衡よ猭虏虫ㄇノ畉昏︳计璸衡硂芠翴ㄤ龟┣
Χギ棚某褐砫ヴ钩辅ō硂妓弧琌ぃ癸狦Χギ棚某粄硂琌缒杠玥ㄏや現┎よ褐砫ヴご礛琌辅ō琌ぶ拜肈祘拜肈τぃ琌玥現┎よ竭纕ぃ穦辅ō硂芠翴痷┣弧產粄祘琌癸τ
︓現┎矗–る2窾じ┪ㄒ︘穦礚狠狠祇笷竭纕肂蔼и辨產眖计狦–る2窾じ玥畉昏︳琌24窾畉昏︳24窾┪加翠Τ6%璶2窾じ┪璶琌侣加临璶е盢睲╊璶祇甶坝禦┮Τ穨舦睲╊硂薄鶪セぶぇぶ┪砛羭╱ǎㄒ︓弧る50窾じ硂妓侣加穦砆╊㎡硂妓ぃ琌璶竭纕碭窾じ盾и-
璶眖俱砰╯澈沮êよ穦程カチ磃τê祘琌瞶и-
σ納硂芠翴
チ囊や霉不瓣某よ谅谅畊ネ
PRESIDENT: Although the Secretary for Housing, as a mover of an amendment to a motion, does not have the right of reply, I am nevertheless inviting him to speak for the second time. In doing so, I have regard for the practice in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom Parliament where Ministers are usually allowed to speak again in debates.
Secretary for Housing, you are not to move the amendment yet.
┬璓勉畊ネи臛阶秨﹍竒眏秸現┎や盢紇臫め┮莉眔猭﹚程竭纕肂続秖糤糤碩ぃ莱蔼︓Й锚蒥跋ョ莱キ颗穨㎝ぇ丁痲硂玡矗и稱虏虫碞ㄇ某┮祇種ǎ莱
腑瓣辆某粄ぃ現┎現┎碞ぃ暗ㄆ硂猭ㄤ龟琌岿現┎﹍沧粄程瞶稱暗猭琌矗兜璹兵ㄒ龟琁ㄇゲ斗タㄆτゲ斗臮の穨猭舦痲ョ玂毁砲痲ㄤ龟現┎纯碞硂兜某ミ猭ЫΤ闽舱〆穦某讽〆穦畊琌㏄辩睶┥某現┎某狦┮Τㄤ某ぃ矗ユ杠現┎矗玡さいеЧΘ硂兜疭兵ㄒ览礛矗ユミ猭Ы堡現┎硂某ぃ赣〆穦┮钡
郭Θ某矗璶妒玃現┎ㄤ龟ぃ阶さぱ兜某莉眔硄筁現┎常惠璶еЧΘ浪癚穨籔侯兵ㄒ盢璹兵ㄒ矗ユミ猭Ыи稱ス襖某┪霉某某莉眔硄筁碞穦Чэ跑瞷竭纕膀娄の竭纕肂現┎ゲ斗穝蝶︳硂ㄇэ跑┮ま癬紇臫礛σ納矗ユ続讽兵ㄒ璹
朝岸穨某糤干纕肂癸蒥跋Θセ稬ぃì笵и獺硂弧猭琌⊿Τ疭沮礛τ礚粄襖某㎝霉某矗某碩糤竭纕肂﹚穦蒥跋璸购紇臫τиョ稱叫朝岸穨某痙種ぃ琌–兜璸购常琌寥窥ゼゲ兜璸购常だΤ瓜ㄆ龟癸ㄇ娩絫┦柬耕璸购狦и-
﹚筁蔼竭纕肂痷穦с炳硂摸璸购︽┦
и稱酵酵闽蒥跋現郸ㄤ龟и琌砏购吏挂現弧ㄇ杠現┎硂Τ闽吭高ゅンいㄤ龟矗兜穝種ǎ弧︙糤ㄑ莱竚虫︗и-
瞷タ╯祇甶その┬穦璽砫㎝矗ㄑ竚诀篶踞讽或à︹и產硂兜浪癚穦さいЧΘτㄤ現┎穦そガΤ闽∕﹚
畊ネさぱ現┎笆某タヘ琌耕砲絘莉眔程糤碩竭纕玱ぃ穦碩磃のêㄇ耕碔肝よи-
辨ぃ穦锚蒥跋璸购ㄤ龟現┎よêㄇΤ痷タ惠璶穿だめ莉眔碩矗蔼竭纕肂瞷竭纕肂单︘┮莱揭畉昏1.7τи-
某硂摸だめ┮矗蔼竭纕肂笷きぇキА单36る肂硂竭纕肂竒ì镑τ琌瞶и-
粄ㄤだめ竭纕肂莱赣秸俱τぃ琌碩秸俱
襖某㎝霉某┮矗竭纕キ碩龟筁蔼τ⊿Τだ瞶沮や狦琌穦╈篊蒥跋璸购穦紇臫╬︘虫︗ゼㄓ砍秖τゴ阑加ㄑ莱繷ㄓ瞷︘摧侣加砲璚パ╬诀篶斌種饼碞穦アэ到-
﹡︘吏挂诀穦硂龟琌堡珿и眏疨叫―︗某みσ納狦蹦襖某┪霉某某盢穦盿ㄓ环ぃ▆狦
и略叫︗某や現┎タ現┎某酚臮穨㎝穦よ痲笷璓キ颗τ琌程瞶㎝そキ
谅谅畊ネ
PRESIDENT: The Secretary for Housing has given notice to move an amendment to the motion. His amendment has been printed on the Order Paper and circularized to Members. I now call upon him to move his amendment.
THE SECRETARY FOR HOUSING's amendment to MR JAMES TO's motion:
"That the motion to be moved by the Hon. James TO under sections 53A(4)(e) and 119F(4)(e) of the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7) at the Legislative Council sitting of 27 March 1996 be amended by deleting everything after "and substituting -" and substituting -
"(a) in the case of section 53A(4)(a) -
"(a) The compensation ordered by the Tribunal under subsection (2) shall be -
(i) in the case where the application for the order for possession was made before 3 April 1996, an amount equal to 1.7 times the rateable value of the premises;
(ii) in every other case -
(A) upon the first $30,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 5 times that portion of the rateable value;
(B) upon the next $15,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 4 times that portion of the rateable value;
(C) upon the next $15,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 3 times that portion of the rateable value;
(D) upon the next $15,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 2 times that portion of the rateable value;
(E) upon the balance of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to that balance.";
(b) in the case of section 119F(4)(a) -
"(a) The compensation ordered by the Tribunal under subsection (2) shall be -
(i) in the case where the landlord's submission to the Tribunal of his opposition to the grant of a new tenancy was made before 3 April 1996, an amount equal to 1.7 times the rateable value of the premises;
(ii) in every other case -
(A) upon the first $30,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 5 times that portion of the rateable value;
(B) upon the next $15,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 4 times that portion of the rateable value;
(C) upon the next $15,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 3 times that portion of the rateable value;
(D) upon the next $15,000 of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to 2 times that portion of the rateable value;
(E) upon the balance of the rateable value of the premises, an amount equal to that balance."."."
┬璓勉и笆某タ襖略ビ某某タず甧某ㄆ祘ずи癘更
Question on the amendment proposed and put.
Voice vote taken.
THE PRESIDENT said he thought the "Noes" had it.
Dr Philip WONG claimed a division.
PRESIDENT: Council will now proceed to a division.
PRESIDENT: I would like to remind Members that you are now called upon to vote on the question that the amendment moved by the Secretary for Housing be made to Mr James TO's motion.
PRESIDENT: Would Members please register their presence by pressing the top button, and then proceed to vote by choosing one of the three buttons below?
PRESIDENT: Are there any queries? We are three short. Are there any queries? The result will now be displayed.
Dr LEONG Che-hung, Dr Samuel WONG, Dr Philip WONG, Miss Christine LOH, Mr Paul CHENG, Mr CHOY Kan-pui, Mr David CHU, Mr Ambrose LAU, Mr LO Suk-ching and Miss Margaret NG voted for the amendment.
Mr Allen LEE, Mrs Selina CHOW, Mr Martin LEE, Mr SZETO Wah, Mr LAU Wong-fat, Mr Ronald ARCULLI, Mrs Miriam LAU, Mr Albert CHAN, Mr CHEUNG Man-kwong, Mr Michael HO, Dr HUANG Chen-ya, Miss Emily LAU, Mr LEE Wing-tat, Mr Fred LI, Mr Henry TANG, Mr James TO, Dr YEUNG Sum, Mr Howard YOUNG, Mr WONG Wai-yin, Mr James TIEN, Mr LEE Cheuk-yan, Mr Andrew CHENG, Dr Anthony CHEUNG, Mr Albert HO, Mr LAU Chin-shek, Dr LAW Cheung-kwok, Mr LAW Chi-kwong, Mr LEE Kai-ming, Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, Mr Bruce LIU, Mr MOK Ying-fan, Mr SIN Chung-kai, Mr TSANG Kin-shing, Dr John TSE and Mr YUM Sin-ling voted against the amendment.
Mr CHAN Kam-lam, Mr CHAN Wing-chan, Miss CHAN Yuen-han, Mr CHENG Yiu-tong, Mr CHEUNG Hon-chung, Mr IP Kwok-him, Mr NGAN Kam-chuen and Mrs Elizabeth WONG abstained.
THE PRESIDENT announced that there were 10 votes in favour of the amendment and 35 votes against it. He therefore declared that the amendment was negatived.
PRESIDENT: Now that we have disposed of the Secretary for Housing's amendment, Dr LAW Cheung-kwok may formally move his amendment now so that Members may take a vote on it.
DR LAW CHEUNG-KWOK's amendment to MR JAMES TO's motion:
"That the motion to be moved by the Hon. James TO Kun-sun under sections 53A(4)(e) and 119F(4)(e) of the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 7) at the Legislative Council sitting of 27 March 1996 be amended, in the proposed paragraph (a), by deleting subparagraphs (i) and (ii) and substituting -
"(i) where the rateable value of the premises does not exceed $30,000, an amount equal to 7 times the rateable value;
(ii) where the rateable value of the premises exceeds $30,000 and does not exceed $60,000, $210,000 plus 5 times the amount by which the rateable value exceeds $30,000;
(iii) where the rateable value of the premises exceeds $60,000 and does not exceed $90,000, $360,000 plus 3 times the amount by which the rateable value exceeds $60,000;
(iv) where the rateable value of the premises exceeds $90,000, $450,000 plus the amount equivalent to that by which the rateable value exceeds $90,000."."
霉不瓣某璓勉畊ネи笆某タ襖略ビ某某タず甧某ㄆ祘ずи┮更
Question on Dr LAW Cheung-kwok's amendment proposed and put.
Voice vote taken.
THE PRESIDENT said he thought the "Ayes" had it.
Mr Howard YOUNG claimed a division.
PRESIDENT: Council will now proceed to a division.
PRESIDENT: I would like to remind Members that you are now called upon to vote on the question that the amendment moved by Dr LAW Cheung-kwok be made to Mr James TO's motion.
PRESIDENT: Would Members please register their presence by pressing the top button, and then proceed to vote by choosing one of the three buttons below?
PRESIDENT: Are there any queries? The result will now be displayed.
Mr Martin LEE, Mr SZETO Wah, Mr Albert CHAN, Mr CHEUNG Man-kwong, Mr Michael HO, Dr HUANG Chen-ya, Miss Emily LAU, Mr LEE Wing-tat, Mr Fred LI, Mr James TO, Dr YEUNG Sum, Mr WONG Wai-yin, Miss Christine LOH, Mr LEE Cheuk-yan, Mr CHAN Kam-lam, Mr CHAN Wing-chan, Miss CHAN Yuen-han, Mr Andrew CHENG, Mr CHENG Yiu-tong, Dr Anthony CHEUNG, Mr CHEUNG Hon-chung, Mr Albert HO, Mr IP Kwok-him, Mr LAU Chin-shek, Dr LAW Cheung-kwok, Mr LAW Chi-kwong, Mr LEE Kai-ming, Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, Mr Bruce LIU, Mr LO Suk-ching, Mr MOK Ying-fan, Miss Margaret NG, Mr NGAN Kam-chuen, Mr SIN Chung-kai, Mr TSANG Kin-shing, Dr John TSE, Mrs Elizabeth WONG and Mr YUM Sin-ling voted for the amendment.
Mr Allen LEE, Mrs Selina CHOW, Mr LAU Wong-fat, Mr Ronald ARCULLI, Mrs Miriam LAU, Dr LEONG Che-hung, Mr Henry TANG, Dr Samuel WONG, Dr Philip WONG, Mr Howard YOUNG, Mr James TIEN and Mr David CHU voted against the amendment.
Mr Paul CHENG, Mr CHOY Kan-pui and Mr Ambrose LAU abstained.
THE PRESIDENT announced that there were 38 votes in favour of the amendment and 12 votes against it. He therefore declared that the amendment was carried.
PRESIDENT: Mr James TO, do you wish to reply?
襖略ビ某璓勉畊ネи莱碞琌辨現┎縩伐暗ㄇㄆㄤ龟и程纯籔ㄇ玻坝ǎぷㄤ琌êㄇ耕τ璽砫璸购そ-
矗芠翴碞琌瞷糵掉矪逼戳惠-
斗蝗︽ぃ筁ㄏ糤竭纕肂讽礛-
ゼゲ蔼砍и-
硂妓暗-
ごΤ瓜狦現┎逼戳е翴-
碞礚い盢癩碔パ蝗︽锣簿倒め-
谋眔硂妓琌钡はタ-
常璶и辨現┎笵硂翴镑е糵癟逼戳よぃ璶び┑粇
程и辨現┎眖さぱ某祇ēい眔┮Τ某ㄤ龟常Τ種ǎ碞琌辨現┎镑过┏秆∕紇臫﹡チ环﹡︘拜肈硂琌顶糷カチ﹡︘拜肈闽龄┮
Question on Mr James TO's motion, as amended by Dr LAW Cheung-kwok, put and agreed to.
INTERPRETATION AND GENERAL CLAUSES ORDINANCE
MR RONALD ARCULLI to move the following motion:
"That the Hong Kong Airport (Traffic) (Amendment) Regulation 1996, published as Legal Notice No. 72 of 1996 and laid on the table of the Legislative Council on 14 February 1996, be repealed."
MR RONALD ARCULLI: Mr President, I move the motion standing in my name on the Order Paper. The motion seeks to repeal the Hong Kong Airport Traffic (Amendment) Regulation 1996. A Subcommittee chaired by me was formed to study this regulation which proposes to increase with effect from 1 April 1996 the fees payable for using car park facilities at the Hong Kong International Airport, ranging from 14% to 23%.
The Administration takes a view that, to ensure a sufficient allocation of airport car park spaces and to alleviate the congestion in the road access system, the fees for parking at the airport public car parks should be revised in line with prevailing market rates. The Administration argues that if fees are not kept in parity with the market rate, non-airport users will be attracted to use these car parks, the traffic congestion around the airport will increase, hence access to the passenger terminal will be constrained, and the operation of the airport will be adversely affected. As for the special car parks, the Administration considers the revised monthly parking fees reasonable and in line with prevailing market rates.
A majority of Members on the Subcommittee considers the reasons given by the Administration unjustified for increasing parking charges because:
(a) according to the information provided by the Administration during March 1995 to February 1996, the monthly average utilisation rate at the multi-storey car park ranged from 48% to 79%, but on 31 days for a total of 62 hours, the utilization rate exceeded 100%. As indicated by these statistics, there have not been any abuses of car parking facilities by non-airport users.
(b) the current fee structure of doubling the hourly charge after the first two hours has already achieved its intended purpose of discouraging long-stay parking. This is supported by the statistic that less than 10% of the car park users park their vehicles for three hours or more;
(c) as reviewed by the Administration for the year 1995 to 1996, the total costs and revenue of the public car parks were $36.3 million and $59 million respectively, thus resulting in a net profit of around $23 million. The airport is indeed operating at a profit margin well in excess of 15% which, as explained, is a target of return; and
(d) we have reservations on the concept of the adjustment in fees to control the use of government services.
Responding to the Honourable SIN Chung-kai's suggestion, the Administration has undertaken to introduce half-hourly system at multi-storey car parks and the cargo circuit car park for the first two hours as soon as possible after this regulation takes effect. The Administration considers that the current arrangements for the third hours onwards should remain to maintain its deterrent effect on long-stay parking.
Dr the Honourable HUANG Chen-ya, who is not a Member of the Subcommittee, attended the Subcommittee's last meeting and indicated that, in view of this undertaking by the Administration, Members of the Democratic Party will support the regulation. Nevertheless Dr HUANG will later move a motion to introduce a half-hourly parking charge at the multi-storey car park and the cargo circuit car park for the first two hours on the basis of the new rates proposed by the Administration.
Dr the Honourable LAW Cheung-kwok has, prior to receipt by the sub-committee of its information regarding the monthly average utilization rate and the occasions when the rate exceeded 100%, indicated that Members of the Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood will support the regulation.
In conclusion, Mr President, the Subcommittee decided by a majority vote that the parking fees increases as proposed in the Regulation should be repealed.
Mr President, I beg to move.
Question on the motion proposed.
PRESIDENT: Dr HUANG Chen-ya has also given notice to move a motion under the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance to amend the same Regulation, that is, the Hong Kong Airport (Traffic) (Amendment) Regulation 1996. Dr HUANG's motion has been printed on the Order Paper. As the contents of Mr ARCULLI's and Dr HUANG's motions relate to the same subject, I propose to have them debated together in a joint debate.
The Council shall now debate the two motions together in a joint debate. Members can now speak on either or both motions. At the end of the debate, we will vote on Mr Ronald ARCULLI's motion first. Whether Dr HUANG Chen-ya will be called upon to move his motion would depend on the Council's decision on Mr Ronald ARCULLI's motion. If Mr Ronald ARCULLI's motion is agreed, that will by implication mean that Dr HUANG Chen-ya's motion will be disapproved. If, on the other hand, Mr Ronald ARCULLI's motion is not carried, Dr HUANG Chen-ya will be called upon to move his motion, but the question on Dr HUANG's motion will be put forthwith without further debate.
独綺笽某璓勉诀初氨ó初琌琵钡诀┪癳诀ㄏノの矗ㄑó︗狦诀初氨ó初Μ禣筁だ氨ó初キ穦まㄤóㄏノ痷タㄓ诀初癳┪钡ó礚猭тó︗瘤礛基琌チ囊ㄓぃ尺舧ㄆ薄チ囊钡诀初氨ó初Μ禣Τ惠璶籔氨ó初蝴基и-
や現┎硂兜某
ぃ筁現┎セΜ禣逼腨峰搏碞琌瞷琌氨ó初Μ禣璸衡緍ó诀初硄盽常穦癳┪钡瞒秨ヘ玡Μ禣蒥チ氨óぃì璶禣ノㄤ龟琌窥и-
粄硂琌ぃ瞶甃ㄎ瞶某矗虫ヲ昂某穦矗璶―璹硂Μ禣讽虫ヲ昂某璣瓣┮и蠢矗硂兜タи-
粄莱赣Μ禣虫︗続ぃ筁ぃ穦躬纘ㄤㄏノ硂氨ó初┮и-
某だ琿Μ禣程ㄢ龟琁
膀瓃チ囊は癸甃ㄎ瞶某某辨︗某やи某
朝挪狶某璓勉畊ネ诀初氨ó初獃︗琌ㄑ诀初ㄏノ獃óノ硚硂翴チ羛琌Ч觅さΩ現┎ビ叫糤诀初氨ó初Μ禣Τ瞶パ瘤礛瞶パΤ﹚弧狝チ羛粄琌瞶沮ぃì┮ぃ镑や基ビ叫
沮現┎矗ユ戈и-
捣睝ぃヘ玡诀初氨ó初Τ砆垒ノ薄鶪眖きㄏノ薄鶪ㄓ程蔼ㄏノ瞯る笷79%τ程ㄏノ瞯る碞Τ48%ㄏ366ぱいョΤ31らい62ㄏノ瞯禬筁100%
よ沮瞷ó进–Ω氨獃丁だ猂筁ㄢ丁Τ90%氨獃丁琌ぃìㄢΤ5%琌氨獃︓τ氨獃碭单箂パǎ诀初氨ó初セぃヴ︙陪帝砆垒ノ薄鶪τ現┎ボ璶虑禣ゴ阑垒ノ氨ó初瞶沮セ琌ぃΘミ
︓诀初氨ó初Μ禣籔蒥Μ禣Τ畉禯拜肈ㄆ龟薄鶪ぃ腨現┎矗ㄑΤ闽綟氨ó初Μ禣絋龟Τㄇゑ诀初氨ó初禥ョΤ耕獽﹜и-
ョ钮ぃぶ蒥チ癸瞷╬氨ó初Μ禣筁蔼篕現┎龟ぃ莱籔╬氨ó初Μ禣霍
現┎┤狦诀初氨ó初Μ禣籔綟╬氨ó初Μ禣禯瞒び穦まㄓó进氨獃и-
粄硂翴現┎み┕穝籞盺跋ó荡ぃ穦рó进氨獃诀初Г禬筁20じ玡┕穝籞盺妓┕纒óョぃ穦玱ㄢじ氨ó禣τ畕˙ǐだ牧ㄓ┕诀初氨ó初鶪诀初氨ó初Μ禣パ材癬琌璸óぃ穦ヌ腀玙硂繧繷ㄓ穦眔ぃ纕アи-
璶祔来眔璸计碞穦笵诀初氨ó初惠64じゑㄤ綟氨ó初Μ禣临璶禥
狦и-
眖诀初氨ó初竒犁鶪σ納杠и-
┪砛眔挡阶現┎癸竒犁氨ó初Τ15%厨夹τヘ玡氨ó初Μ环禬筁硂夹氨ó初诀初穿狝叭琌ぃ莱赣Τ忌┦借
酚ヘ玡币紈诀初痁Ω糤碩ㄓи-
ぃゼㄓㄢず穦Τび糤镣墩⊿Τヴ︙瞶沮弧祏戳ず穦Τ秖ㄏノ┪垒ノ诀初氨ó初珿現┎ノ糤Μ禣筀ы诀初氨ó初ㄏノ瞯琌ぃゲ璶
畊ネи-
粄ヴ︙钡パ禣や禣ノА莱砆跌籔チネΤ闽Μ禣珿Τē阶弧诀初氨ó初Μ禣籔チネ礚闽陪礛琌贺粇秆
独綺笽某矗タ種現┎糤氨ó初Μ禣矗ㄢ璸衡и-
粄Μ禣癸诀初ㄏノㄓ弧腊ぃョぃ癬躬纘緍ó荷Ν瞒秨氨ó初ノ硄盽氨ó癳诀┪钡诀А穦禬筁狦禬筄杠óΜ禣τ伐ㄤ秖3.5じ璝痁诀┑粇τ禬筄ㄢ杠ó碞璶12じ独某某ぃ筁琌磃τ癸蒥チ⊿Τ龟借矪種糤Μ禣琌籔筀ы硄等挡現┎Μ禣約蒥チ眏疨璶―璉笵τ梗
チ羛糵稸σ納贺∕﹚ぃ钡現┎基ビ叫τ穦や甃ㄎ瞶某某
畊ネセ略朝勉
霉不瓣某璓勉畊ネ現┎秸蔼翠诀初氨ó初Μ禣辨硓筁籔綟诀初氨ó初笷耕璓Μ禣キ絋玂ヴ︙丁АΤì镑獃ó︗ㄑ诀初ㄏノ氨獃ó进チ粄硂兜現郸ヘ夹琌タ絋
碞現┎矗ㄑ戈きる︓せる戳丁诀初氨ó初31ぱずΤ场だ程羉Γ丁ㄏノ瞯禬筁100%程羉Γ丁膀セ緍ó诀初常琌тぃó︗セのチ種瞷诀初氨ó初Μ禣Τ秸蔼ゲ璶搭ぶ诀初氨ó初ㄇ獶ゲ璶ㄏノ薄鶪
よ独綺笽某タセ粄矗蔼ㄏノ瞯ョㄏΜ禣挡篶瞶セのチ常穦や
PRESIDENT: I now invite Dr HUANG Chen-ya to speak for the second time since after the joint debate, he will not be given the opportunity to speak when moving this motion. Dr HUANG Chen-ya, do you wish to speak?
DR HUANG CHEN-YA: I do not wish to speak any further.
竒蕾璓勉畊ネи灿み测钮︗某┮祇種ǎ疭碞硂ㄢ兜某祇ē玡и稱秆睦﹚セ璹砏ㄒ璉春の瞶パ
讽Ы﹚矗ユ某糵某璹砏ㄒヘ盢诀初氨ó初糷氨ó初砯笲笵氨ó初の秸笵氨ó初瞷︽氨óΜ禣キ秸俱︓籔讽玡蒥Μ禣霍琵и羭ㄒㄓ弧诀初糷氨ó初瞷氨ó禣–16じ︓琌籔诀初筳兵︽ぱ爵诀初皊┍氨ó初ㄤΜ禣玥–20じи-
ヘ玡某Μ禣琌19じ辨钡蒥初Μ禣
畊ネ讽Ы粄р诀初氨ó初Μ禣秸俱︓蒥Μ禣キ琌そキ㎝瞶璝現┎ぃ硂妓暗┤穦まêㄇ诀初跋快瞶ㄤㄆ叭ㄒ纒边逗盢ó进氨獃诀初氨ó初ず
诀初氨ó初の㏄瞅硄隔呼琌诀初笲场だи-
ゲ斗荷筀氨ó初ずΤ垒獃ó进の丁氨獃ó进薄鶪瞷絋玂氨ó初АΤì氨ó︗ㄑ痷タ诀初ㄏノㄏノ玥诀初笲稨玡の诀初硄隔竒盽澜峨ユ硄薄鶪獽穦跑セ糉硂癸诀初笲Τ恨瞶礚痲矪Τ某矗の氨ó初キАㄏノ瞯琌キАㄏノ瞯ぃ陪ボ拜肈┮и-
闽猔琌羉Γ丁薄鶪ㄆ龟ヘ玡ㄇ羉Γ丁疭琌笰句穝確竊の竧较安戳玡糷氨ó初竒瞷ㄏノ瞯禬筁100%薄鶪璝и-
ぃ秸俱Μ禣硂贺薄鶪ゲ礛碿て現┎暗猭琌浪癚诀初氨ó禣続讽秸俱獽Μ禣キ眔籔蒥Μ禣霍
翴琌某–兜Μ禣ぃ阶琌–┪る璸衡常ぃ疉の紇臫ネ璸碞蝗絏璸衡某糤碩龟妮放㎝癸硄等龟螟Τ龟借紇臫
瞷и稱锣酵赣ㄢ兜某甃ㄎ瞶某某Ξ紀埃俱兜璹砏ㄒ狦某щ布觅Θ诀初氨ó初氨óΜ禣獽穦蝴瞷︽キ沮иまノㄒ硂ボ瞷–畉ㄢΘじ畉禯穦蝴ぃ跑τま獶诀初ㄏノ垒ノ糷氨ó初ó︗薄鶪ョ蝴ぃ跑穦跑セ糉讽Ыぃヴ︙瞶パぃр诀初氨ó初Μ禣璹ㄏㄤ籔蒥Μ禣霍и-
ョ稱疭и-
惠璶絋玂ヴ︙常Τì镑氨ó︗ㄑ诀初ㄏノㄏノㄏ诀初笲篫抖и赖叫︗某ぃ璶や甃ㄎ瞶某某
独綺笽某矗某某現┎某璹Μ禣糷氨ó初㎝砯笲笵氨ó初龟琁ㄢ–Μ禣快猭讽Ы粄独某某籔и-
現郸ヘ夹璓и-
獺龟琁Μ禣︓躬纘氨ó初ㄏノ罽祏氨痙丁眖τ糤氨ó初瑈秖パ箇璸币紈诀初逞緇ㄏノず㎝ユ硄秖А穦Τ┮糤罽祏═ó瑈锣丁Τ骸ì诀初ㄏノ癸氨ó︗ら糤惠―Τǎの畊ネ現┎讽Ыや独某某赖叫︗某ョ妓や
畊ネ程и璶︗某玂靡讽Ыだ糵稸σ納硂拜肈иビи-
粄盢诀初氨ó初Μ禣籔蒥Μ禣霍琌瞶㎝続讽某Μ禣秸俱ぃ穦硑Θ璚┪紇臫チネ硂絋玂币紈诀初Τ笲ぃ穦ヴ︙穕甡иΩ玃叫︗某щ布∕甃ㄎ瞶某某τ硄筁独綺笽某某
PRESIDENT: Mr Ronald ARCULLI, do you wish to reply?
MR RONALD ARCULLI: Thank you, Mr President. Very briefly. Looking at the votes tonight, Mr President, it looks as if my motion is going to be defeated. So, being a realist, I always look at the good things in life. I welcome the Democratic Party's market price support of this particular increase in car parking because hereafter I can say that if government prices is marked to market, I assume that the Democratic Party will give its staunch support because we did specifically point out at the Subcommittee level that we had reservations about the concept of a fee adjustment to control the use of government services.
But, Mr President, be that as it may, the second point really is that I suspect that for a few dollars more the Government has decided that it should nonetheless insist on what I call a flawed policy. I say "for a few dollars more" because I rather assume that Dr HUANG Chen-ya's amendment to a half-hourly charge for the first two hours would attract more revenue, more revenue not less, because the Government has not taken a point on Standing Order 23. So, again I welcome the additional money flowing into the government coffers.
If Members of this Council, Mr President, wish to support those two principles, I will happily lose tonight's motion. Thank you very much.
Question on Mr Ronald ARCULLI's motion proposed and put.
Voice vote taken.
THE PRESIDENT said he thought the "Noes" had it.
PRESIDENT: Council will now proceed to a division.
PRESIDENT: I would like to remind Members that they are called upon to vote on the question that the Hong Kong Airport (Traffic) (Amendment) Regulation 1996 be repealed. This is the motion moved by Mr Ronald ARCULLI.
PRESIDENT: Members please register their presence by pressing the top button, and then proceed to vote by pressing one of the three buttons below.
PRESIDENT: Are there any queries? The result will now be displayed.
Mr Allen LEE, Mrs Selina CHOW, Mr Ronald ARCULLI, Mrs Miriam LAU, Mr Howard YOUNG, Mr James TIEN, Mr CHAN Kam-lam, Mr CHEUNG Hon-chung, Mr IP Kwok-him and Mr NGAN Kam-chuen voted for the motion.
Mr Martin LEE, Mr SZETO Wah, Mr Albert CHAN, Mr CHEUNG Man-kwong, Mr Michael HO, Dr HUANG Chen-ya, Miss Emily LAU, Mr LEE Wing-tat, Mr Fred LI, Mr James TO, Dr Samuel WONG, Dr Philip WONG, Dr YEUNG Sum, Mr WONG Wai-yin, Miss Christine LOH, Mr LEE Cheuk-yan, Mr CHAN Wing-chan, Miss CHAN Yuen-han, Mr Andrew CHENG, Mr Paul CHENG, Mr CHENG Yiu-tong, Dr Anthony CHEUNG, Mr CHOY Kan-pui, Mr David CHU, Mr Albert HO, Mr LAU Chin-shek, Mr Ambrose LAU, Dr LAW Cheung-kwok, Mr LAW Chi-kwong, Mr LEE Kai-ming, Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, Mr Bruce LIU, Mr LO Suk-ching, Mr MOK Ying-fan, Miss Margaret NG, Mr SIN Chung-kai, Mr TSANG Kin-shing, Dr John TSE, Mrs Elizabeth WONG and Mr YUM Sin-ling voted against the motion.
THE PRESIDENT announced that there were 10 votes in favour of the motion and 40 votes against it. He therefore declared that the motion was negatived.
PRESIDENT: As Mr Ronald ARCULLI's motion has been negatived, I now call upon Dr HUANG Chen-ya to move his motion.
DR HUANG CHEN-YA to move the following motion:
"That the Hong Kong Airport (Traffic) (Amendment) Regulation 1996, published as Legal Notice No. 72 of 1996 and laid on the table of the Legislative Council on 14 February 1996, be amended by repealing section 2(a) and substituting -
"(a) in item 1, by repealing "$16 per hour or part thereof" and "$32" and substituting "$9.50 per half hour or part thereof" and "$38" respectively;"."
独綺笽某璓勉畊ネи笆某硄筁某ㄆ祘┮更и某
Question on Dr HUANG Chen-ya's motion proposed and put.
Voice vote taken.
THE PRESIDENT said he thought the "Ayes" had it.
Mr James TIEN claimed a division.
PRESIDENT: Council will now proceed to a division.
PRESIDENT: Would Members please register their presence by pressing the top button, and then proceed to vote by pressing one of the three buttons below?
PRESIDENT: Are there any queries? We are still one short. The result will now be displayed.
Mr Martin LEE, Mr SZETO Wah, Mr Albert CHAN, Mr CHEUNG Man-kwong, Mr Michael HO, Dr HUANG Chen-ya, Miss Emily LAU, Mr LEE Wing-tat, Mr Fred LI, Mr James TO, Dr Samuel WONG, Dr YEUNG Sum, Mr WONG Wai-yin, Miss Christine LOH, Mr LEE Cheuk-yan, Mr CHAN Kam-lam, Mr Andrew CHENG, Dr Anthony CHEUNG, Mr CHEUNG Hon-chung, Mr Albert HO, Mr IP Kwok-him, Mr LAU Chin-shek, Dr LAW Cheung-kwok, Mr LAW Chi-kwong, Mr LEE Kai-ming, Mr LEUNG Yiu-chung, Mr Bruce LIU, Mr LO Suk-ching, Mr MOK Ying-fan, Miss Margaret NG, Mr NGAN Kam-chuen, Mr SIN Chung-kai, Mr TSANG Kin-shing, Dr John TSE, Mrs Elizabeth WONG and Mr YUM Sin-ling voted for the motion.
Mr Allen LEE, Mrs Selina CHOW, Mr Ronald ARCULLI, Mrs Miriam LAU, Dr Philip WONG, Mr Howard YOUNG, Mr James TIEN, Mr Paul CHENG, Mr CHOY Kan-pui, Mr David CHU and Mr Ambrose LAU voted against the motion.
Mr CHAN Wing-chan, Miss CHAN Yuen-han and Mr CHENG Yiu-tong abstained.
THE PRESIDENT announced that there were 36 votes in favour of the motion and 11 votes against it. He therefore declared that the motion was carried.
ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT SITTING
PRESIDENT: In accordance with Standing Orders, I now adjourn the Council until 2.30 pm on Wednesday, 3 April 1996.
Adjourned accordingly at ten minutes past Ten o'clock.
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL - 28 March 1996
138
ミ猭Ы せるら
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL - 28 March 1996
61
ミ猭Ы せるら