Q.-Have

185 (162) –

1715/6

you heard of a case much longer than that-three or four months?

A.-No.

Q-I have heard complaints of much longer periods, but still a fortnight is longer than half an hour.

A. Yes, but if there is delay, I call at the office and get the thing through quicker.

Q-Do you think there is anything gained by the Medical Officer of Health holding your plans? What does he know about plans?

A.-I think he looks for the open air spaces and so on.

The Chairman. But could an engineer not do that as well?

A.-Certainly.

Mr. Shelton Hooper.-Dont you think that an engineer would be able to grasp the plans, taking the elevations and sections, and deal with it quicker than a Medical,man?

A.-Certainly.

The Chairman. Some of these drainage plans have, I understand, to be passed by a certain sub-department.

A.-Drainage plans are usually passed very quickly. One gets plans for drainage passed more quickly than buildings.

Q.--I suppose a good deal of your contractors sublet, in the usual way ?

A. Yes.

Q-And for, so far as you are aware, no payment?

A. Yes.

Q. Have you ever heard from any of your contractors, or from the sub-contractors that, at any time, it was rather an advantage if you wanted your plans passed quickly, to pay money or make a present to anybody?

A.-Not as far as I am aware. I always get them through for the contractor.

Q.-And he sublets?

A. Yes.

Q.-And has he ever told you that he avoided delay by his paying some money?

A.-No, I think where an Architect is employed, things work smoothly, might happen where an Architect is not employed.

Such things

Q.-I understand from that, that an Architect is a check on any illegal demand that might be made on any Chinese contractor by a subordinate of the Government Service ?

A. Yes, I certainly think it would be prevented by the employment of an Architect

Share This Page