RETURN of all BANKRUPTCIES filed in the Supreme Court of Hongkong during the Year 1888.
245
Name.
Date of Adjudication.
Official
or
Petitioner.
Creditor's Assignee.
Debts in Schedule.
Assets.
Amount Total received amount
by
of Official debts Assignee. proved.
REMARKS.
$
$
$
Ma Shum.
Ng Wai Chan,
Ma Sing alias Ma Oi Shi,
9th
27
Chu Shing Cheong alias Chu Chuk
1st Feb., 1888. Creditors Official 3rd
1888. 1888. Bankrupt
356.30
3,059.99
No Schedule filed.
Creditor
277.72
11
1,395.60
No Schedule filed.
36,303,84 141,972.26
2.66
12,603.29
Pang and Leung Yee Cheung,... 22nd
Kwok Yuk Kai alias Kwok Mẫu
Fai.
Leung Yung alias Peter Young,... 15th Mar., 1888.
Lam Ching Po,.
1888.
6,615,97 3,121.10
347.35
1,503.37
Official
8,199.89 3,270.97 2,147.78
30.00
328.75
649.10 1,169.64
Not proceeded with.
Petition refused.
Chan Sam Kwai alias Chan Kwai
Hop..
John William Croker,
5th July, 1888.
Chang A Yeong,
309.00
Not proceeded with,
Official
34,991.03
29,406.44 13,202.47
22,962.67
569.69
Dhunjeebhoy Dorabjee,.
Luiz Mariano Pinto,...
Edgar Louis Heymans and Gas-
ton Louis Heymans,..
Frederick Hunerfauth.
Edith Laurence,
José Nepomuceno Larcina,.
Francisco Mamede Gonsalves,..
2,058.75
959.00
!
453.30
118.00
9th Aug., 1888.
15th Oct., 1888. | Creditors 23rd 1888. Bankrupt 22nd Dec., 1888.
Official
Official
12,097.52 3,333,55
7,882.15 2,260.77
161.15
7,234.49
2.166,37
4,685,64
Not proceeded with. Not proceeded with. Petition refused.
Not proceeded with. No Schedule filed.
}
51
1,143.18 15,086.55
180.75 2,565.65
965.81
156.25
Total,
3123,310.04 189,667.47 18,942.39
59,985.85
Registry Supreme Court, Hongkong, 1st April, 1889.
ALFRED G. WISE, Acting Registrar.
RETURN of BANKRUPT and INTESTATE ESTATES and of all JUDICIAL DEPOSITS, paid into the Treasury, by the Registrar of the Supreme Court, during the Year ended 31st December, 1888.
DATE.
ESTATE, CAUSE OR ACCOUNT.
JUDICIAL DEPOSITS.
INTESTATE BANKRUPT ESTATES. ESTATES.
TOTAL.
1888.
March
26 | Buckow, Adolph, Unclaimed balance,
15.45
Down, James
Do.,
18.45
"
Roberts, Frank
Do.,
2,25
29
"
Kwok Ting Sui,
Do.,
2.75
27
77
Smyth, James R.
Do.,
10.26
Sept.
18 Speechly v. Webster,
Suit No., 167 of 1877,...
4.22
Chan Yau v. Li Kam,
988,, 1877,.
3.48
Poon Lai San v. Revena,
22
""
236 1878,.
1.50
Lo U. S. R. Neate,
>>
17
1061 1877,...
14.21
Cheung Kwong v. Yau Cheong,
>>
""
605 1874,..
1.32
Chui Pun v. Aitken,
وور
27
547 1878,.
9.45
Cheung Kun & anr. v. Li Ling Shing, Lee Fat v. Australian S. N. Coy,
881
1878,.
4.00
71
>>
128 1879,
14.00
Dayoormell v. Bryant,
”
748 1879,
16.00
A. F. Smith v. Ho Tai,
910 1879,
4.34
"
"
Rajah Singh v. Abdool Khan,
>>
""
504 1879,
1.00
Lee Ahmoon v. Lou Man Po,
868 1879,..
16.13
""
"
Mak Sew Wan v. Hon Chong, U-kwan Cheoug v. Klampermeyer,. Kwan Mi-ho e. W. M. B. Arthur,... Fong Wing Shan v. T. I. Bowler,
Chan Leung-fu v. Wong Pung
Sheong,
}"
980 1879,
8.75
240 1880,
12.65
2
""
471 1880,
2.40
897 1880,
,25
وو
>>
95
"
1056 1880,..
8.40
Yeung Fu v. Norman,
多
475 1981,...
3.25
Lam U-Lai v. Betts,.
589
1881.
28.50
27
})
Chan Wa Hi v. Chung Wing,
750
1881,
.20
»
""
Suit Nos. 1009 to 1024, Balance of sale
1009/
1024)
1881,
10.39
Li Chi v. Ng Kam,
189
1881,
1.34
Suit No. 496, Balance of sale,
496
1882,
10.50
>>
Utter Singh 2. Mahomed,.
245
1882,..
1.10
""
Suit No. 939 Tsang Achoy v. Hol
939
1882,...
9.23
Kam Moon, Balance of sale,... f
27
>>
Chun Kwai v. Dare,
Lui Pek-tsz v. Cheung Kau,
Li Pat Hing v. Leong Yon,.
Wong Iu Chin e. Yew Luk,..
Do.,
2. Man Kow,
Do., e. Mok Yung,
Wong Yiu Chew v. Tang Wing, v. Lee A-kee,..
Do..
1882...
4.00
11
618 1882,
9.61
AARA AA
255
1883,
.99
""
649
1883,.
7.78
>>
656
1883,
3.16
17
655
>>
1883,
6.92
>>
338 1883, 653
8.00
1883,
5.40
"
Carried forward,.....
232.47
49.16