HISTORY
the far greater cultural sphere of South China, itself as yet imperfectly known. In such a context, scholarly debate over definitive interpretations may be expected to continue for many years to come.
Some writers suggest that Hong Kong's most ancient inhabitants were related to the early horticultural Bacsonian peoples of South-east Asia, themselves successors of late Pleistocene hunter-gatherers known as the Hoabinhian. They urge an underlying continuity of cultural development running throughout the prehistoric periods and perhaps into the historic. More traditional views see in the archaeological remains evidence of powerful influences entering the region from northern cultures, such as the neolithic Longshan and the early northern bronze age cultures which gave rise to China's first historic dynasties, the Xia and the Shang. There are, on the other hand, a growing number of scholars who believe that the prehistoric cultures within the South China region had evolved locally, independent of any major influences from outside the area.
However, a consensus is growing that the earliest periods, from the close of the 4th millennium BC, must be seen within the framework of a changing environment which experienced sea levels rising from depths as low as 100 metres below the present inexorably submerging vast tracts of coastal plain and establishing a basically modern shoreline and ecology to which human groups present in the area had to adapt or perish.
The stone tools, pottery and other artefacts upon which we must rely for an insight into the lives of Hong Kong's ancient inhabitants are for the most part preserved in coastal deposits. This pattern of coastal settlement points to a strong maritime orientation and an economy geared to the exploitation of marine resources. However, it would be unwise to over-emphasise this point, since the discovery of archaeological remains is influenced by the many factors governing their survival. One such factor, the erosion of the hilly terrain, has been severe, and evidence of some inland settlement, though scanty, is not totally absent.
Recent excavations have revealed two main neolithic cultures lying in stratified sequence. At the lower, oldest levels there is coarse, cord-marked pottery together with a fine, soft fragile pottery decorated with incised lines, perforations and occasionally painted. Chipped and polished stone tools are also present. Current indications suggest a 4th millennium BC date for this initial phase.
Cord-marked pottery and chipped stone tools continue as long-lived traditions into the higher, later levels in which a new ceramic style decorated with a wide range of impressed geometric patterns appears. In this phase, beginning in the mid-3rd millennium BC, polish- ed stone tools show better workmanship and a proliferation of forms, some with steps and shoulders, features probably connected with improvements in hafting techniques. Ornaments such as rings, some slotted, in a range of sizes were also made, sometimes with exquisite craftsmanship, from quartz and other suitable stones.
The final phase of Hong Kong's prehistory is marked by the appearance of bronze at about the middle of the 2nd millennium BC. Bronze artefacts do not seem to have been in common use, but a few fine specimens of weapons, swords, arrowheads and halberds, and tools such as socketed axes and fish hooks have been excavated from Hong Kong sites. There is evidence, too, from the Tung Wan site at Shek Pik, Lantau Island, in the shape of pottery moulds, that the metal was actually worked here.
The pottery of the bronze age comprises a continuation of the earlier cord-impressed and geometric traditions and a new ware, fired at higher temperature leading to vitrification. This so-called hard geometric is decorated with designs many of which are reminiscent of the geometric patterns of the late neolithic, but with their own distinctive style including the well-known 'Kui-dragon' or 'double F' pattern, so characteristic of this period.
359