444
THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 23rd JULY, 1879.
MAGISTRACY, HONGKONG,
21st July, 1879.
Summary of cases deserving notice decided at
the Magistracy of Hongkong, from 12th to 18th
July. 1879, both days inclusive.
Larcenies from the person.
1. Chéung A-chii. a hawker. was couvieted. on the 12th instant, by two Magistrates, of steal- ing sixty cents from the person of one Lau A-yung, and sentenced to two years' imprison- ment with hard labour. The accused was identi- fied as an old offender.
2. Mák A-kiwan, a carpenter, was convicted, on the 17th instant, by two Magistrates, of stealing a pair of earrings and a pair of jade-stone drops, value $21, from the person of a female named Tang Sau-kam, and sentenced to twelve months' imprisonment with hard labour.
Larceny.
3. Chéung A-hing, a coolie, was, on the 14th instant, convicted of stealing a white blanket. the property of one Lai A-t'sat, and sentenced to four months' imprisonment, the first and last fourteen days to be in solitary confinement and the rest with hard labour, in addition to be ex- posed for six hours in the stocks on the day previous to his release from gaol.
Breach of : The Night Passes Ordinance..
4. Ch'an A-pò, Léung A-kwai, hawkers, and Ch'an A-sai, a rice-pounder, were convicted, on the 15th instant, of being at large in the public streets without lights or passes, and fined $50 each, or three months' imprisonment with hard labour. All the three defendants were identified as old offenders.
Noisy trade-carrying on a.
5. Fung A-luk, master of a silver-smith shop, situated at house No. 1c, Peel Street, was sum- noned at the instance of Mr. François Vincenot for carrying on a noisy trade during night time. The defendant admitted the charge, but on his promising not to continue the nuisance and the complainant being satisfied, the case was dis- taissed.
Breach of "The Excise Ordinance
(Opium), 1858-1879."
6. Chéung A-yan, an opiun seller, was, ou the 16th instant, convicted of having in his pos- session about 300 tacls of prepared opiuun, with- out a permit from the opium farmer, and was fined $250, in default of payment to be innprisoned for three months; the whole of the opium and half of the fine (if paid) were ordered to be given to the opium farmer.
所判案情
選錄於後
十九日止
搶去劉亞
年五月
爲 容洋銀六
三日起至
案奪搶爲
案臺容
禁
年蓋其
憲同斷監 苦工兩
積也
也義
乃屢雨
-
苦年
工前
斷監禁
府到
香港巡理
府自已卯
月販張
三于柱 五小
麥亞坤
解對耳環秀搶卄于木 案被扣 金去八五匠 對耳鄧日月也
木麥
當期作
六點鐘示衆
當衆處柳號
期滿日發往
作苦工另監
案竊偷篇
壹亞五
幽牢餘則-
月斷被白
則困拿洋
五日偷去黎
也張
張亞興挑夫
也于五月廿
衆號往監-
于尾 尾禁到 到氈黎卄夫
個完罰
抵欵
消
罰銀五十元不
案 夜犯為
前案燈上 也經查夜 故繫
乃三
上夜行未携手
月十六日在街
春小
陳梁
在于亞亞
不人舊人到手街五
訊時被告直
言不諱言
完罰欸監禁三
案 自後不復再 犯故官釋之
案吵
Milli I 做爲
嘈
陳亞保梁亞桂
街第壹號首
嘈其控士也飾街馮
嘈吵隣居堂
間于
雲
做案
直堂工謂生西主首利
例煙洋違為
資洋 前月則百官兩貯未月張
烟半
斷被洋領
三照
百擅為五
資墊補
洋烟公司以
壹半歸承-
並罰款撥出
兩被執到案
官斷罰二
百五十元否
月所執之
則監禁三個
張亞仁于五
月十七日爲