THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 14TH JANUARY, 1888.
He shall also cause a notice in the form set forth in Schedule D. to be published daily for two consecutive weeks in at least one daily newspaper published in this Colony.
3. The sums mentioned in the said Schedules or such of them as shall be unclaimed at the end of the respective periods aforesaid shall be transferred to the General Re- venues of the Colony.
4. The provisions of Sections 6 to 9 inclusive of the Unclaimed Balances Ordinance, 1885, shall apply to the refitud of any of the above mentioned sums if claimed at any time after the expiry of the periods mentioned in Section 1.
5. Whenever any sum other than the balance of an Intestate Estate, shall remain five years unclaimed in the Supreme Court, it shall be lawful for the Court on the application of the Registrar, to order that such sum be paid over to the Treasurer for transfer to the General Revenue of the Colony subject to refund as provided in the last section. Before making the said order the said Court may order such notices to be given and to such parties as the said Court shall think fit.
6. This Ordinance and the Unclaimed Balances Ordi- nance No. 7 of 1885 shall be read together as one Ordi-
nance.
Sumis not claimed to be paid to General Revenue.
Sections 6 to S of Ord.7 of 1985 to apply.
Sains un- claimed In Registry to be paid over.
This Ordinance to be read with No. 7 of 1885.
SCHEDULES.
(A.)
Notice is hereby given that if the sums bereinafter mentioned are not claimed within six months from this date, they will be trans- ferred to the General Revenue of this Colony.
this
Supreme Court, Hongkong,
day of
188
ALFRED G. WISE, Acting Registrar.
SUMMARY COURT DEPOSITS.
November 28th, 1882.
By Speechly v. Webster,
Suit No.
Chan Yau . Li Kam,
167'of 1877,...$74.22 988 of 1877..
3.48
..
::
Poon Lai Sau r. Revena,.
236 of 1878,...
1.50
Lo U v. R. S. Neate,.....
1061 of 1877,...
14.21
Cheung Kwong e. Yang Cheong,.
605 of 1874,...
1.32
Chui Pun v. Aitken,
547 of 1878....
9.45
་་
25
Cheung Kun & another v. Li Ling
Shing,
881 of 1878,...
4.00
Lee Fat . Australian's. N. Co.....
128 of 1879,...
14.00
*
"
13
15
Dayoormell v. Bryant,..
A. F. Smith v. Ho Tai,.
Rajah Singh v. Abdool Khan,
Lec Abmoon v. Low Mun-po,.
Mak Sew Wan e. Hon Chong,
U Kwan Cheong v. Klampermeyer,
Kwan Mi-ho v. W. M. B. Arthur,
748 of 1879...
16.00
910 of 1879,.
4.34
504 of 1879,.
1.00
868 of 1879..
16.13
980 of 1879....
8.75
240 of 1880....
12.65
471 of 1880....
2.40
1
Fong Wing Shau v. T. I. Bowler,
897 of 1880,...
0.25
":
Chau Leung-fu e. Wong Pun
Sheong,
Yeung-fu . Norman,
1056 of 1880....
8.40
475 of 1881...
3.25
Lam U-lai e. Betts,
589 of 1881,
28.50
>>
"}
Chau Wa Hia. Chung Wing,
";
750 of 1881,
0.20
Suits Nos. 1009 to 1024. Balance
of Sale,
1009 of 1881,... · 10.39
Li Chi 2. Ng Kam,
#
189 of 1881,
1.34
M. H. Madar v. Ho Tim,
140 of 1882,.
25.00
+
3.
Suit No. 496. Balance of Sale,.
496 of 1882,
10.50
多少
**
Utter Singh e. Mahomed,
Suit No. 939. Tsang A-choy v.
Ho Kam Moon.
Sale,
Chun Kwai v. Dare,
By Lui Pek-tsz e. Cheung Kan,
By Li Pat Hing e. Leung Yon,
245 of 1882,
1.10
Balance of
939 of 1882,...
9.23
of 1882,..
4.00
December 1st, 1882.
.Suit No. 618, March 1st, 1883.
Snit No. 255, June 9th, 1883.
9.61
0.99
By Wong In Chiu e. Yew Luk,
...Suit No. 649,
7.78
"
Same v. Mau Kow,
656,
3.16
*
June 11th, 1883.
By Wong Iu Chiu . Mok Yung, ..Suit No. 655,
6.92
June 25th, 1883.
By Wong Yiu Chew e. Lce A-kee,....Suit No. 653,
By Wong Yiu Chew v. Tang Wing,...Suit No. 338,
July 20th, 1883.
8.00
4.50
$256.57
1
35