Ordinance No. 1 of 1889, in section 9 the words "either in addition to
or in substitution for such imprisonment" are repealed; in section 65, for "or to imprisonment” there shall be read and to imprisonment" and the words "or to both" are repealed:
in section 78 (1) and (2), for the words for imprisonment “ there shall be read “and im- prisonment“, aud the words
or either of such punish- ments in the discretion of the Court are repealed:
in section 83, for the words "and to a penalty" there shall be read or to a fine", and the words. For to either of such punishments in the discretion of the Court" are repealed:
and in section 87, the word- either or in addition or in substitution for such impri- sonment are repealed.
Ordinance No. 4 of 1890, in section 3 (3) (C). for the words "or to a fine, or to both imprisonment and fine" there shall be read "and to a fine not exceeding 2,000 dollars ".
Ordinance No. 2 of 1891, in section 6, for the words "be liable to a penalty,
or to imprisonment, with or without hard labour, or to both: Provided that such penalty shall in no case ex- coed the sum of 1,000 dollars, and that there shall be read *be liable to a fine not ex- ceeding 1,000 dollars and in- prisonment; provided that”.
Ordinance No. 4 of 1893, in section 27 for the words "or to imprison- 11111 ther shall be read “and to imprisonment “, and the words or to both repealed.
are
Ordinance No. 2 of 1897. in section 15. for
the words or to imprison- ment there shall be read *and to imprisonment “, and the words for to both such penalty and imprisonmentˆ ˆ are repealed.
Ordinance No. 4 of 1897, in section 12 for
the words "or to imprison- Bent there shall be read and to imprisonment" and the words "or to both are repealed:
in section 13, as amended by Ordinance No. 11 of 1904. for the words “ or to impri- somment three times there shall be read "and to impri- sonment", and the words from Provided always” to → think fit are repealed: