PG.W:
CONFIDENTIAL
a
of
1
that the BCC would be accommodated there. They would have much better excuse to catastrouble if we take the route a permission under SQwhich is not legally valid. If we do it through a modification, then at least our documentation in Chinese would choose amongst other things, relations over Hong Kong the Chinese acquiescing ( BCG building without prot must be pretty sl For this
slit now we would almost certainl
5.
car
I am 801 which I appreciate da mat there are clear l
1im
can do. objection
I shoul stres to accom dating
as such; it is stoly in a safe and 1 antink: maur appear to be the only si given high risk of Chinese
6.
Please
(We
lat:
can
further. in a few days' in touch with the right
r legal order. Whether the iise difficulties depends, state of Sino-British this score the prospect of commodating the BCC in the in
in the foreseeable future reason, if we approach them Pract a rebuff.
more helpful in this area of ministerial concern. But what the Director of Lands
we are not raising any BCC in the BCG building think it best to do so A lease modification would of proceeding, especially ion.
ether you intend to proceed cuss when we see each other then put Francis Cornish
ingever,
Becre
phael C.C. Sze)
Constitutional Affairs
CONTENTIAL