13 DEC

93 19:24 HM CUSTOMS & EXCISE

pa

37019.

97

P.2/4

SOLICITOR'S OFFICE

HM CUSTOMS AND EXCISE

NEW KING'S BEAM HOUSE 22 UPPER GROUND

LONDON SE1 9PJ

Dial Direct 071-865 extn Switchboard 071-620 1313 GTN 3913

5725

International Criminal Division

Mr Garrett,

Foreign and Commonwealth Office,

Downing Street, London SW1A 2AH

Fax 270-3387

Your reference

Om reference

370/9

M3-739

RECE

STRY

14 DEC 1993

19th December 1993

DESK C INDLX

LOISTRY

A

on Taken

Dear M Garrett,

Re: UK/Hong Kong Extradition Treaty

I have noted the recent correspondence in this matter,

Having liaised with my administrators, I can say that the dic point of concern to this Department is as follows:-

That there may be extradition for fiscal and customs offences where appropriate. I note that, in the proposed list, drug trafficking offences are specifically listed, as are offences of smuggling. The latter category would seem to possibly embrace offences in connection with customs prohibitions and restrictions( and Andeed possibly customs duties). The category (13) cowls he a basis for extradition in respect of other taxes such as VAT. However, this would depend on the view of the Hong Kong Courts on extradition for a non-fiscal offence where the subject matter is fiscal. Overall, by reason of the uncertainties in this area, we would prefer as already suggested, a simple conduct based dual criminality test.

However, wording such as is included in Art 2 of the 2nd Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition of 1957 regarding fiscal offences would be desirable, to avoid a refusal to extradite by reason of there being technical differences between taxes etc in the two jurisdictions (copy enclosed ). It may be preferable to change that woding a little to relect the fact that it is conduct which is being compared, not offences; i.e. we would wish to be able to extradite if our VAT offence were matched by a general theft offence in Hong Kong. I would suggest wording such as "For offences in connection with...if the conduct constituting the offence, under the law of the requested Party, corresponds to conduct which constitutes an fence under the law of the requested Party.

Share This Page