SECRET 高度機密

6

7.

From а purely legal

identified in paragraphs

suitable

point of view, the problems

5 and 6 suggest a case for

provisions in our domestic legislation to provide

for:

(i)

some statutory

criteria, to come into effect as

from 1 July 1997, for allocating the 20% quota;

and

(ii)

the

validity of acts done (after 30 June 1997) by

LegCo Members who are the subject of proceedings

under section 45 of Cap. 367 or section 44 of Cap.

381.

The

is that

question is whether we should, in consultation with the

Chinese, prepare the necessary legislation for "mid-night

enactment", ΟΙ whether we should, as we have said all

along, leave the entire matter to the Chinese to deal with

come 1 July 1997. A key constraint of the first approach

any legislation before 1997 which seeks to

nationality restriction is most likely to be held

incompatible with Article 25(b) of the ICCPR which

provides that every citizen [permanent resident] shall have

the right and the opportunity, without any of the

distinction mentioned in Article 2 (i.e.

introduce

to be

national

or

race, colour,

social origin etc) to "vote and to be elected

at genuine periodic elections......".

SECRET 高度機密

Share This Page