Hum
Harris
Chamberlain
Harris
cannot find support in the actual text.
Desire to work within JD and BL parameters and other understandings and agreements. If no agreement is reached, we would have to carry out our administrative responsibilities, but those parameters would continue to guide us.
Have Chinese breached any of the three documents?
Concern over backlog of technical work in JLG.
-
do you mean
Obliged by JD to co-operate the Chinese not fulfilling JD?
Chamberlain
Yes.
Harris
Stanley
Hum
Sumberq
Chamberlain
Gapes
Chamberlain
Gapes
Important conclusion.
Chinese claim they have put forward detailed counter proposals?
Negotiation confidential. Wa
202
Chinast
Ment
Still not clear what are Chinese legal objections to proposals
In view of current negotiations, unwise to speculate whether Chinese still hold that view.
etc will
Reference in JD to "Current social remain unchanged". And reference in BL to "Previous" life-style. Does it mean previous to 1984 or 1997?
Previous in BL means prior to 1997. Situation not frozen. Dynamic development.
"Current" in JD?
Chamberlain JD 1984
Gapes
BL
J
1997
No inconsistency
Changes 1990-1997 could be defined as part of previous life-style?
Chamberlain
Yes.
Gapes
Should China become party to international Covenants?
Chamberlain Read briefing on BOR and Covenants)
Gapes
BOR compatible with BL? What could UK Government do if China annuls it?