01-NOV-1993 17:33
BRITISH EMBASSY PEING
533 1965
P.03
RESTRICTED
contradiction with 3rd tiret) between us in the exchange of correspondence had not been spelled out in the BL ?
Consistenty of our proposals with the JD, BL and 1990 exchanges
vi) No specific comments. One general points do we need to consider an answer to the question, "If we are so certain that neither the JD, the BL, nor the 1990 exchange contains any agreement on the 1995 elections, why are the Chinese so convinced that they do ? How could such a major misunderstanding have arisen ?"
2.
Sorry many of these points are interrogatory rather than new drafting, but I am not very sure of the form the FAC session will take, eg will they only ask the questions they have already submitted or can they ask whatever they like and as many supplementaries as they like
1 November 1993
RESTRICTED
Janet Rogan
: