During
Chinese proposals on these issues were unacceptable. these Rounds, the Chinese side also set out their position on
three other issues:
}
On the through train, they maintained that the British
side would have to ensure that the 1995 election
arrangements conformed fully with the Chinese side's
interpretation of the Basic Law before criteria for the
through train could be discussed. The British side
made clear that, given the fundamental importance of
criteria for the through train, discussion of this must proceed in parallel with that of other issues.
On the stipulation in the Basic Law that no more than
20% of the legislature in 1997 may hold foreign
nationality or right of abode, it would be for the
British side to devise a mechanism to ensure that the
Legislative Council elected in 1995 conformed to this requirement. The British side responded that it would
not be appropriate to discriminate in this way against
British and other nationals in elections held under
British administration in 1995. In any case, the
nationality status of individual legislators could
change between 1995 and 1997.
For
On the voting method in geographical constituencies,
the nine constituencies used in the 1991 elections
should remain unchanged. (In 1991, each constituency
returned two members; each voter had two votes).
1995, the Chinese side proposed the "multi-seat,
single-vote" system, whereby the 20 directly-elected
members of the Legislative Council would be returned
from the existing nine constituencies. Each voter
would have only one vote. The British side proposed
that the single seat-single vote system should be used
1
statememt.8/BRIEFS/NJH
22