accept those claims.
15. We have said repeatedly, from the outset, that we are
ready to discuss the Governor's proposals without preconditions. We engaged in intensive diplomatic exchanges in early February in an attempt to agree a satisfactory basis.
for talks. In order to create the best possible climate for
agreement, the Governor decided, with the advice of his
Executive Council in Hong Kong, to postpone four times
publication of the draft legislation. But we made it clear it to China was not possible to delay indefinitely, given the need to pass the necessary legislation, so that practical
arrangements can be made for the elections due in Hong Kong in
1994/95. Finally, in the face of Chinese insistence that Hong
Kong representatives should not be full members of the British
team, and their continuing refusal to agree a date for talks, the Governor decided to gazette the draft legislation on 12
March.
16.
The Chinese reaction has been harsh. They claim that the decision to publish is proof of British insincerity and an obstacle to talks. They say they will now step up preparations to set up a new legislature and government (a "separate kitchen") in 1997.
17. In spite of a widespread desire in Hong Kong to see cooperation between Britain and China, public support for the Governor's proposals is holding up well. There is some anxiety and criticism from business and pro-China circles, but strong support from liberal groups. As far as Britain is concerned, the door to talks remains open.
ipu.conf.PR
6
SLN
Page 90Page 91