HKB 010/14

RECE!

2

DESK OFF INDEX

Sir John-Cotes

575 44/

STRY Dtl.

TRY

Taken

Letter to Cabind furly.

Cham/%

Foreign and Commonweath Office

King Charles St.

London SW1

Hurd (ow. Again)

To file

303 Richmond Road

Twickenham

Middlesex TW1 2NP

7 August 1993

Tr. Ham.

f.c. 10

little joint in

fither repoliation.

2. If we are grateful f

Lecar John LAST PAPER

Ihald

adult letter from me to the Cabinet shanty = rgh to he of Augment to the rus. fut 2 Like to hand this tomamos (Trendy) at labit

foln Loles &

Following our meeting yesterday I have made further amendments

to the two chapters in question. I enclose revised texts with this

letter. Amended passages are sidelined.

I think you will find that, out of 32 proposed changes, I

have accepted 25, i.e.some 78%. There remain a small number of cases

where I have not been able to make the changes you sought, or have not

been able to go the whole of the way. I set these out below, together

with explanatory comment:

Chapter 23, page 15. I have picked up your language about new men

and tactics. But I cannot omit the reference to confrontation. It is a

historical fact that confrontation with China occurred, also that

there was a striking difference in Sino-British relations pre and

post October 1992.

Chapter 24, page 6. This is a self-generated change, to meet the

criticism that the mandarins' idea of negotiation was to inquire what

the Chinese wanted and deliver, with suitable obeisances.

Chapter 24, page 7. I have corrected the suggestion that we

deliberately sought the course of confrontation. But the fact is

that, for whatever reason, we found ourselves in a situation where we

were trying new approaches and probing the limits of Chinese

tolerance.

Chapter 24, page 8. I have retained the phrase "if need be in

disregard of their understanding" because the Governor kept the

option of putting the matter to Legco for decision if a satisfactory

answer could not be obtained from the Chinese.

Chapter 24, page 11. I keep the reference to a "drawing back on

both sides", because the Governor did not go ahead with the

threatened legislation. He gazetted but did not go further. By the

Share This Page