We
plan
1
Ва
emphasise
Parliament
الله
Public Diviz in His
SECRET
existing worries that the Hong Kong government is no longer
"execeutive led".) As far as possible we should also take account
of the wider context of relations with China over Hong Kong,
including talks on constitutional development.
12.
an
The majority of people in Hong Kong will welcome the reduction in the costs of the garrison. Some however may question
whether an accelerated run-down reflected a lessening of HMG's
political commitment to Hong Kong. A few may express concern at
the removal of immediate capacity to support the police. Reaction in the UK will focus on the wider picture of the ability
of the UK to meet its military commitments, rather than any and perceived diminution of the UK's commitment to Hong Kong in the last three years of our sovereignty order to relieve overstretch 1- the Army.
13. The announcement and public handling of such a reduction
Will Herefore
Manage me. would also require careful handling, both in Hong Kong and in the
We
will
also
need
L
Counter anm
are
Hal'
We will need to be able to counter claims that we
abandoning Hong Kong and moreover that we are doing so to relieve
overstretch in the Army.
Cambry
UK.
Ал
advantages
I'm
terms
Finance
perception
He more rapid M-down
represents
14. The Hong Kong government will benefit financially from these
proposals as a result of having to pay 65% of the costs of a sharply reduced garrison. Initial calculations indicate that this would generate savings for them of about £100m, compared with existing plans, over the period 1993/4-1997/8, with the majority of the savings accruing in 1995/6 and 1996/7. For HMG there would be savings from reductions in military infrastructure in Hong
Kong and the release of locally employed and enlisted personnel. However, to the extent that personnel and units are redeployed rather than disbanded (primarily the UK infantry battalion), MOD would lose receipts from the Hong Kong government. The net effect
is likely to be an additional cost of up to £30m over the same five year period. This further burden on the defence budget is
SECRET