SECRET
entire DCA could be called into question unless it can be
Can be shown
monstrated to LEGCOL that the costs of the garrison are
declining steadily from year to year. (He has ruled out approaching LEGCO for additional funds and this has already led to delay in payment of the Hong Kong government's share of the costs of the garrison.) He therefore sees no alternative to a more rapid run down of the garrison to one based around a single infantry battalion, accepting that this means giving up its capability to support the police without external re-inforcement.
other
4. From the UK point of view, there is also advantage in withdrawing infantry units from Hong Kong and redeploying them to increase our flexibility in dealing with current commitments eg in Northern Ireland and the former Republic of Yugoslavia, though the financial costs to the defence budget would be significant. While an early reduction in the garrison will provide a way to mitigate the Hong Kong government's problems over defence costs, it will not alter HMG's defence obligations to Hong Kong. The proposal simply moves some of the resources that might be used back to the UK.
Military implications
need
as
5. The requirement for two battalions in Hong Kong, which has
a minimum requirement been endorsed by the Chiefs of Staff, as the minimum appropriate for current tasks, is based on the assessed threat and a consequent BFHK concept of operations that requires one battalion to guard key points, the defence estate and reinforcement
reception points (including Kai Tak airport), leaving the other
PA/S/2.033
3 SECRET