CODE 18-77
13
14
15
Reference
Agreed provided we get "comfort" on
reasonableness.
This would normally be quite unacceptable.
However, if we are minded to be flexible I suggest that the power of re-entry should be subject (a) to the provision on like terms of an
alternative site to the Grantee's
satisfaction and adequate notice within which to achieve rehousing of a major Consulate General.
Subject to that we should reserve our position on the wording of 14 (b) (i) and
(ii) for later consideration.
If they see no difficulty why not accept the re-draft we proposed? It is preferable.
16
(a)
Accepted.
20
Agreed.
4.
22
41(b)
Noted.
Noted.
As to the title of the Grantee I too assume it will be SOSFA and believe Legal Advisers have comment on this earlier.
Luck.
D Savage
Manager Area One/OED
Room 414 AP
760 8133
PJ14.DS
888-700