9.
In paragraphs 33 to 37 of the Affirmation the Applicant seeks
to relitigate his involvement in BMFL affairs and the
sufficiency of the evidence against him which was determined
conclusively against him in the committal proceedings and by
this Honourable Court upon review. These matters are for the
Court of trial, going to the credibility of a prosecution
witness, and are not relevant to the issue of the bona fides
of the Second Respondent.
10. I refer to paragraph 38 of the Affirmation of the Applicant
and in this regard refer to paragraph 7 of this my Affidavit
and again say that these proceedings are concerned with
offences alleged to have been committed in Hong Kong.
I am
11. The matters referred to in paragraph 40 of the Affirmation are
not relevant to a criminal investigation in Hong Kong. advised by those instructing me and I verily believe that in
so far as there is any suggestion or implication that the
Government of Hong Kong has joined in any improper arrangement
merely to suit the convenience of the Malaysian Government and
thereby prejudice the Applicant in his trial, this is denied.
12. In paragraphs 41, 42 and 43 of the Affirmation the Applicant
is seeking to give secondary evidence of documents which the
201