<<

Article 9

20.

Article 9(1) of the Model Agreement was deleted and. replaced by a Malaysian formulation which additionally enables the requested Party to grant an extension to the time limit for the receipt of documents and to release the fugitive offenders from custody should the documents not arrive in time.

Article 10

21.

This Article is substantially the same as Article 9(2) of the Model Agreement.

Article 11

22.

Same as Article 10(1) of the Model Agreement.

Article 12

23.

This Article is

substantially the same

as

Article 10 (2) of the Model Agreement.

Article 13

24.

as

This Àrticle is substantially the same Article 11 of the Model Agreement. At the request of the Malaysians, Article 13 (1) (c) was included to provide that where expenses were of a

substantial or extraordinary nature, consultation would be held to determine the apportionment of the costs.

Article 14

25.

This Article is substantially the same as Article 12 of the Model Agreement. Article 14(3) was reformulated SO that the period of time to take custody of the fugitive offender should be the period determined by the law of the requested Party; for Malaysia this is 90 days.

Article 15

26.

This

he

Article was included at Malaysian request to permit

fugitive's a

surrender to be expedited if consents to waive the formal surrender proceedings.

Article 16

27.

Article 16 (1) was re-written to take account of Malaysian law which only permits property found in the possession of the fugitive offender at the time of his arrest to be handed over. Article 16(2) - (3) are the same as Article 13 (2) (3) of the Model Agreement.

-

Share This Page