2!
3
10
Classification
OUT TELEGRAM (CONT)
CONFIDENTIAL
Caveat
Precedence
PRIORITY
scope is there for societies (eg triads) to register as ''companies'', thereby avoiding the requirements of the
Societies Ordinance?
こ
to
3
You propose that failure to notify will be an offence, but that societies which do not comply with the notification requirement will not be regarded as unlawful automatically. It is not clear who would be guilty of the offence of non-notification, or what the maximum penalties would be. At present, every society which is neither registered nor exempt is deemed to be unlawful, and it is an offence to be an
office-bearer of an unlawful society, punishable by up to five
years imprisonment. We imagine you will introduce a lower maximum penalty for non-notification.
- It is not clear in what circumstances a non-notified society
might be treated as unlawful. First TUR para 5 proposes a power to prohibit the continued operation of a society, whether notified or not, on the specific grounds permitted by Article 18 of the BOR. Failure to notify would therefore be immaterial to
the exercise of that power. Are we right to interpret para 2 of your telno 212 as meaning that non-notification alone would not in any circumstances be a ground for treating a society as · unlawful? If that is the case, would the CP be empowered to
take any action against a society whose activities were lawful but whose leaders still refused to notify even after conviction
for non-notificiation?
23
20
30
31:
321
33
34
We assume that under the amended ordinance it would not be an
offence to be a member of an unnotified society, unless it has also been prohibited on one of the grounds specified in
Article 18.
For distribution order see Page
Printed in the UK for HMSO : 91 Dd FCC3276 M 100 CCN 56294
Catchword:
STOCK No. C037C YFB7
Page 135Page 136