CONFIDENTIAL

٤١

Case

CHENG Pui-kit

MA Mar-ho

NG Chi-keung TSANG Hing-man

WAN Kit-ran

LEE Ping-yau

YU Chi-lun

Nature

strict liability offence of publishing an obscene article

evidential presumptions

presumptions relating to unlawful gambling and forfeiture of money presumed to be used for unlawful gambling

disqualification for holding or obtaining driving licence in addition to fines paid amounted to double punishment

"due diligence" defence to a charge of importing counterfeit goods

possession of offence weapon in public place without lawful authority or reasonable excuse

Provisions being

challenged

S.21(1) of Control of Obscene and Indecent Article Ordinance (art 11(1) of BCR)

S.18A, 35A and 34 of Import and Export Ordinance (art 11(1) of BOR)

S.19(1)(a) and (c), 19(2) and 19(4) of Gambling Ordinance (art. 11(1) of BOR)

S.8 of Road Traffic (Driving Offence Points) Ord (art. 11(6) of BCR)

S.12(2) of Trade Description Ordinance (art. 11 (1) of BOR)

S.33(1) of Public Order Ordinance (art. 11 (1) of BCR)

Decision

Court

not inconsistent Magistrates

Court with BOR

Impact/HKG's

response

Nil

not inconsistent Magistrates

Court with BOR

Nil

not inconsistent Magistrates with BOR

Court

Nil

not inconsistent Magistrates

Court with BOR

Nil

not inconsistent Magistrates with BOR

Court

not inconsistent Magistrates,

Court with BOR

Nil

Nil

JL.

CONFIDENTIMI

Share This Page