2
3.
At present, if it is
there is a case for
removing
Judiciary, other than a Judge,
considered f. - ... ... ...
that
a member of the
from office for
reasons of misconduct, the Chief Justice may appoint a disciplinary board headed by a Supreme
Court Judge to investigate the matter. In the
light of the findings of the board the Chief
Justice may recommend to the Governor that a
member of the Judiciary, other than a Judge,
be removed from office. The Governor may then
accept or reject that recommendation as he sees
fit. It is now proposed that these administrative
arrangements should be embodied in law but
modified to the extent that the disciplinary
board would report to the Judicial Service
Commission (of which the Chief Justice is
Chairman) rather than to the Chief Justice
personally. At the same time, it is intended
to extend these arrangements to cover cases of inefficiency.
4.
As regards members of the Judiciary,
other than Judges, on agreement terms, cases
of misconduct may follow the same
procedure as
/....
C.F. 336
CONFIDENTIAL #