aefl.rw/docs/6.5.11
Option C
insert a new advantage (a): "Demonstrably fair to the UK
taxpayer"; insert а new advantage (b): insert a new
advantage (b): "Contingent costs likely to be lower than
option A (due to safeguard levels tailored to each officer instead of single trigger for all)";
promote disadvantage (d) to (a) and add: "(some existing HMOCS pensioners would have retired at below UK pension
levels).";
delete "Very" in disadvantages (a) and (c), and insert "(and costs)" after "introduction".
in advantage (a), replace "circumstances" with "exchange
rate", and add at the end: "if the HK$ were to weaken in this period, HMG's liability could be significantly
reduced."
Option D
Option E
in disadvantage (a), replace "no" with "limited"; add at the end of (c): "which is likely to be more expensive."; for (d) repeat as for Option A disadvantage (c).
delete advantage (b) and replace with: "Would reduce contingent liability to the extent that it encouraged
officers to retire early to guarantee the level of their
safeguard";
delete disadvantage (đ).
replace
headline with "HMG PROFITS FROM HMOCS WHEN HK$
IS STRONG";