i
1
aefl.rw/docs/6.5.11
The
work.
paragraph 2: delete the words in the first sentence up to "commute at retirement" and replace with "That all officers"
I think it best if we strive for a non-partisan paper.
justifications for the various trigger points need a bit of
The "historic rate" for 16:1 needs explanation; the
justification for 22:1 should read "would cut out average salary
differential" and for 30:1 "would cut out pensions as well as
salary differental" (GAD are advising on the accuracy of the 30:1 figure). These justifications should then be read-across to the triggers under option C (where you need to say how you arrive at a 33% trigger).
The paper needs to be a lot clearer about the actual and
contingent costs of each
drafting comments below.
Specific
Option A:
Option B
option. I address this point in the
in advantage (b), preface with "All costs contingent:";
in advantage (e) delete "principle";
in disadvantage (a), insert "immediate" before "benefit"
and delete "the majority of";
"Existing pensioners
insert a new disadvantage at (b):
who retired at a stronger HK $ rate would suffer
relatively bigger losses before their pensions were safeguarded compared to those retiring at a later date"; delete after "differentials" in disadvantage (d) and replace with "which are greater for Admin. Officers and Judges than for Police."
insert "UK" in headline before "Comparator";