if he is pensionable. But in view of Hong Kong practice and the fact that we did provide for contingent applications for the Judges, and are apparently now prepared to allow
contingent applications for the rest, so long as the latter actually transfer by 30th April,
this paragraph may stand. But what if HK do not complete the "exercise" in time ?)
Para 12: It is difficult to reconcile the
first sentence with paragraph 8. I think it should be deleted. Add at the end of line
8: "This gives them three months following
their any application for membership of HMOCS
-
see paragraph 8 above - made contingently
on their being accepted for transfer to the
pensionable establishment. Only when they
have been admitted to the pensionable establishment will they become eligible for membership of HMOCS.".
The statement
3. I have the following comments:
Para 3, after first sentence: separate provision was made for the judges etc., who, if I remeber correctly, were required to apply for membership of HMOCS by 1st October contingently on their
application for transfer to the pensionable
service being approved. An appropriate qualification needs to be made to reflect this. Para 3, penultimate line: insert "from officers in the service of Hong Kong" after "applications".
Paras 5(1), line 4 and 5(11), line 4: substitute
"as pensionable service" for "towards payments”. Para 6: add at the end "under Hong Kong Pensions
3