·
any possible criticism for having in some way concealed the existence of these documents. Our view in the FCO which I believe is shared by Treasury solicitors is that, taking into account the extreme sensitivity of the Osman case in Hong Kong, the proposed action is quite unnecessary and is likely to lead to further complications in an already difficult case. The draft letter which I have addressed to Clifford Chance is really a final attempt to persuade the Attorney General of Hong Kong to change his mind. It is intended to supplement the arguments made by Jonathan Ziegel in his letter of 2 August 1991 which has been copied to the Hong Kong Attorney General.
4.
I have had the benefit of an off the record conversation with Graham Harris in the Hong Kong Attorney General's Chambers. I understand that the Attorney General would welcome further representations by us at whatever level we deem appropriate. Any action or interest from one of our Law Officers would certainly not be viewed as interference by the Attorney General of, Hong Kong. I should be grateful to know whether the Attorney considers it appropriate to take any action in this case.
In any event, I would appreciate any comments you have on my draft letter or any other aspects of the handling of this matter.
Yours ever,
Nyel Parker
N D Parker
Assistant Legal Adviser
CC:
Mr Ziegel, Treasury Solicitors
LEGAEW
BLIND COPIES:
Mr Yaghmourian, SEAD
Mr Morris, HKD
Ms Barrett, Assistant Legal Adviser
Grateful for
comments by cap. ured, 4th
pls.