1991-09-07 11:20 COMMS OFFICE (GOVT HOUSE)
852 526 0995 P.05
Page
05/0
10104
☎ 00000000000000
cooldovers/ two.
#2088010.08.0
PACE 2 POR LackYER!
1. Is the former special prosecutor in this case a convicted criminal 705
2. Is there information that the evidence that he was presented with in Malaysia and brought back to KK. was selective, partial, from a suspect source, and unsafe.?( >.
3.Will any of the witnesses he saw attend for trial in HK209
4. Is all the source material from which he obtained his evidence available for triel.? •
5. Was the complainant motivated by motives 'other than those of justice' ? (
6. Is there concrete evidence that the complainant could, by bringing the complaint, conceal his role in a crime.
}
7. Was the evidence about the criminal activity of a party to the complaint in the hands of the HK authorities at the time they decided to prosecute.?()
!'
8. Has the possible criminal party in the complaint been investigated and prosecuted?()
9. Is the Crown's witness, 'upon whom' to quote the UK High Court, 'the entire case depends' credible.}( )
10. Has the Crown's witness violated his immunity.?(
>
11. Has the Crown's witness been discredited, in public, in the court in which he is to give evidence ? ( >>
12. Has the Crown's principle (only) witness lied to investigators, police, his own auditors, lawyers, about the case, after he was grated immunity? (
>
13. Has the immunity been withdrawn ( >
14. Has any senior figure for the Crown, cast doubt on the integrity of the prosecution 7;
15. Is there concrete evidence of political interference in this case, from the beginning.? (
16. Has significent evidence been 'lost' in suspect circumstances ? ( )
i.
TOTAL P.04