28.03.90 to 30.03.90
Osman applies to magistrate in Hong Kong for issue of a subpoena under section 104 of Magistrate's Ordinance to Attorney General to produce documents. The subpoena is issued and AG applies to set aside the Court's order. Hearing adjourned sine die to await discovery proceedings in the United Kingdom
Osman appeals to Supreme Court of Malaysia in respect of the decision of 06.01.90
HK3
M6
10.04.90
Osman applies for summons for discovery in respect of his 4th application for habeas corpus
UK4
20.06.90
The Divisional Court reject the application for discovery on grounds other than public interest immunity.
UK4
26.07.90
The House of Lords reject Osman's petition for leave to appeal against the Divisional Court's decision of 20 June 1990.
UK4
14.11.90
Further application for discovery rejected by the Divisional Court.
12.12.90
The Divisional Court delivers judgment in UK4 rejecting Osman's claims and declares his application to be an abuse of process and contravention of statute.
UK4
11.01.91
The Divisional Court refuse Osman's application for leave to appeal to the House of Lords.
UK4
14.01.91
European Commission of Human Rights reject Osman's complaint against the United Kingdom under Article 3 of the Convention.
EUR2
24.01.91
Osman petitions the House of Lords for leave to appeal.
UK4
Page 150Page 151