པ
ju
CM
00035930
produced that could be produced.
That of
course was not the case I would also refer
you to the latter from Macfarlanes saying that
everything in their possession had been
produced; it is obviously not satisfactory
that this should be limited to a question of
possession.
Your description is too broad; what I want is
on from the exi ing bundles of
those documents that are really necessary.
other than any documents relating to
17 any,
diplomatic immunity. The additions, should indeed relate to what went on between
the Magistrates Court and the Home Office, and
the Home Office or other government department
and the Government of Hong Kong
that we can see exactly what was said by whom
to whom, and at what date.
I have one enquiry; presumably this relates to
documents which are concerned with the
granting of the Provisional Warrant, and
presumably again it does not apply to
documents falling after the date of the second
Authority to Proceed.
-39-
17.10.89